This
is amazing stuff and well worth doing. The truth is that it could
only have been justified in China. Our own building industry is
overbuilt and under utilized and that is not a formula to drive
innovation.
The
technology is best applied for building structures capable of housing
two hundred and providing additional work space. These could be
plunked down beside any village and used to swiftly reduce the land
used for housing. In that environment, the land cost becomes
irrelevant. In practice it will work best if the adjacent farm land
is made community property anyway.
All
this avoids the problems of accessing resources to do the same thing.
After all there is a pretty clear limit regarding how far a truck
load of cement can be hauled.
It is
clear that these modules can be put on a truck and delivered just
about anywhere. This all returns to my theme that the modern city is
now no longer necessary and little remains to justify its retention
in terms of economic advantage. The reason for this is that
information itself is now completely distributed. The same is almost
true for energy delivery and the drive is on to make it effectively
so.
Thus
everything that I need is available to a modern apartment miles from
a city center. It follows that disassembling the modern city is both
feasible and actually desirable in terms of achieving a better social
engineering result. We have not got there yet, but this makes it
easy and fashion is fickle.
Above the world in
90 days: China building world’s tallest skyscraper — 220 storeys
— in just three months
Kathryn Blaze
Carlson | Nov 22, 2012 7:56 PM ET
When Pierre Beaudet
was told about a Chinese corporation’s plans to build the world’s
tallest building in record speed — 2,749 soaring feet in just 90
days — the global studies professor marvelled Thursday: “Ah.
There’s nothing they can’t do.”
Having already
revolutionized construction by literally stacking factory-made
modules like Lego blocks, Broad Sustainable Building Corporation is
sending the world a message — not just about itself, but also about
its home country: Make no mistake, China is an epicentre of
technological progress and a nation worthy of awe.
“It’s a symbol of
their new superiority,” said Takashi Fujitani, the director of Asia
Pacific studies at the Munk School of Global Affairs’ Asian
Institute in Toronto. “Modernity today is really about speed in a
lot of ways, so being at the top of the world is about being able to
do things fast.”
Decades ago, the
United States and Russia flexed their muscles in a politically
charged race to the moon; today, China is racing for the clouds. The
phrase “the rise of China” is uttered so often it is almost
cliched, but if Broad is successful, the country will literally rise
above any other.
“It’s another
frontier — on Earth,” said Mr. Beaudet, who teaches at the
University of Ottawa’s School of International Development and
Global Studies. “It proves their capabilities … It’s symbolic.”
The 90-day challenge
starts in January, when the 220-storey tower will sprout
module-by-module from a piece of farmland in the southeastern Chinese
city of Changsha. Although Broad and its chairman Zhang Yue have
stunned the world before — first in 2010 by building a 15-storey
hotel in 48 hours and again a year later by stacking together a
30-storey tower in just 15 days — this latest creation, nicknamed
Sky City, is the most audacious and aptly named: After the modules
are stacked at a rate of roughly five storeys per day, Sky City will
boast a hospital, a school, 17 helipads, and enough apartments to
house 30,000.
“If anyone else in
the world made such a claim, it would be immediately thought of as
crazy,” Mr. Beaudet said. “But China is very strong in
engineering and organization.”
The prefabricated
tower — “prefab,” as the technique is already dubbed — will
rise 10 metres higher than the current tallest building, Dubai’s
Burj Khalifa, and according to Time.com it will rise a
whopping 24 times quicker. For all its wonder, though, Sky City is
not the culmination of Mr. Zhang’s lofty ambitions.
Traditional
construction is chaotic. We took construction and moved it into the
factory
“Pinned up on his
office wall are plans for a project even more audacious — an almost
preposterously massive building two kilometres high,” Reuters
Magazine recently reported. “When asked to estimate the odds of his
636-floor giganto-scraper ever being built, Mr. Zhang responds
without hesitation, ‘100%!’”
The visionary chairman
made a name for himself manufacturing industrial air-conditioning
units, but since becoming an environmentalist and seeing poorly
constructed buildings fall at the mercy of the 2008 earthquake, he
has redirected his company toward what he calls a “structural
revolution.”
“Traditional
construction is chaotic,” he recently told Wired magazine. “We
took construction and moved it into the factory.”
Just like the iconic
Sydney Opera House or New York’s Empire State building, his Sky
City will make a statement about the place in which it is built, Mr.
Beaudet said.
“When the Empire
State building went up [in 1931], the world knew about it,” he
said. “It showed the U.S. had capabilities technically and
financially. It wasn’t just a building. It was a symbol of real
power. And I think that’s the case [with China] now.”
No comments:
Post a Comment