Wednesday, September 30, 2020

Durham Goes Apocalyptic As “Blood Feud” Against “Sissies” Collapses Leftist Media

Here it is reported that when Durham went for the wrap up interview, he found himself running into the bigger picture of Clinton corruption.  This was there anyway and it sounds like a normal expansion of his mandate once the Obamagate treason was settled.

This is not good news for the criminals.  Understand that two former presidents are now under investigation for treason at least by Durham.

I am expecting heavy disclosure ahead of the election.  However, the criminal investigations and all that will be mostly post election.  The back door of the Supreme court has been slammed shut.  The judicuary is also massively on side as well now. .

Durham Goes Apocalyptic as "Blood Feud" Collapses Leftist Media

Source: What Does It Mean | By Sorcha Faal

September 28, 2020

Durham Goes Apocalyptic As “Blood Feud” Against “Sissies” Collapses Leftist Media

An extraordinary new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today discussing war hostilities presently existingbetween the Republic of Armenia and Republic of Azerbaijan that were instigated by deranged socialist Democrat Party leader Joe Biden, says as both sides to this conflict crank up their war propaganda, President Putin has bluntly told Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan “that all efforts should be undertaken to stop the further escalation of fighting”—a call quickly joined by the United States Department of State urging both sides to “cease hostilities immediately”—though both Russia and America are watching with growing concern this conflict’s potential to erupt into a greater global crisis, specifically after Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan announced that he fully backs Azerbaijan, while branding Armenia as the biggest threat to regional peace—and should Turkey interfere in this conflict, would see Russian military forces moving to protect its ally Armenia—that in turn would cause Communist China to use its military forces along with Turkey to protect their ally Azerbaijan—thus creating a dilemma for the United States, as if it moves to protect its ally Armenia, it puts itself in direct conflict with its own NATO ally Turkey and Communist China, and sides itself with Russia—the predictable end result of which would be World War III.

But as this “New Great Game” over the massive energy wealth of this volatile region threatens to ignite a global war among the world’s great powers, the United States sees itself embroiled in an epic struggle for its own survival—an epic struggle for survival now turned apocalyptic after it was revealed a few hours ago that feared United States Attorney John Durham will not soon be issuing a report or indictments against the coup plotters who targeted President Trump—and when heard about by top Republican Party leader US Senator Ron Johnson, saw him erupting in anger and demanding the immediate release of secret documents related to this coup plot before the election—anger misplaced, however, as US Attorney Durham isn’t trying to hide anything, rather his entire criminal investigation was upended 10-days ago—which was when Durham conducted what he thought would be a wrap-up interview to close out his investigation with long time senior FBI Agent William Barnett—but when FBI agent Barnett walked with his attorney into Durham’s office, the entire course of this criminal investigation changed—and has now become an expanded investigation not only against these coup plotters, but also against the entire team of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s corrupt prosecutors, as well against Hillary Clinton.

All of which is playing itself out against the hidden backdrop of the greatest internal war for power ever witnessed in modern American history—which began on Saturday when President Donald Trump nominated US Federal Judge Amy Coney Barrettto fill a vacant seat on the United States Supreme Court—the critical and monumental importance of which most certainly isn’t lost on Professor Richard Pildesat the New York University School of Law, who in talking about this near-40-year “blood feud” unseen by the American people, correctly assessed: “To talk about what Amy Coney Barrett would mean for this issue or that issue is to miss the true historical significance of this appointment”—whose true and actual historic significance of is evidenced in the warning issued by Judge Barrett’s mentor, the late United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia—who during a speech he gave on 24 January 1989, marshaled his forces preparing for the most consequential conflict in modern American history by warning them: “Administrative law is not for sissies – so you should lean back, clutch the sides of your chairs, and steel yourselves”.

An historic conflict well known about by the socialist Democrat Party and their leftist media lapdog allies—who instead of telling the American people the truth of what’s occurring, are expending all of their energy trying to destroy President Donald Trump—but whose collapsing efforts at this destruction have become so absurd and pathetic, it now sees the socialist Democrat Party prosecutor in New York illegally having given to the leftist New York Times thousands of pages of Trump’s secret tax records—tax records that offer a distorted picture of Trump’s financial state, since they simply report revenue, not profit (In 2018, for example, Trump announced in his disclosure that he had made at least $434.9 million. The tax records deliver a very different portrait of his bottom line: $47.4 million in losses)—but most hilariously to notice about these Trump tax records breathlessly and illegally revealed by these maniacal forces, they prove as true President Trump’s claim that he hasn’t been able to release his tax records because they’ve been under IRS audit—and even more comically, the leftist New York Times in trying to harm Trump, instead proved conclusively that CNN was bold face lying when they claimed Trump’s tax records would show his links with Russia. [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]

Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict (above two videos) threatens to ignite global war as President Donald Trump continues to walk on a path where his sissy socialist enemies fear to tread.

According to this report, virtually unknown to the American people is that their nation is not being ruled over by the Constitution of the United States or federal laws, rather its been a captive for over 80-years to the vile and godless socialist creation known as “The Administrative State”—that changed America from a nation whose citizens elect representatives to make laws to govern them, into one where socialist forces passed bills then turned them over to an unelected federal bureaucracy that created the actual laws, most commonly known as federal regulations—thus meaning that the historic war President Trump is waging is over whether or not non-elected agencies of the federal government have the power to legislate as well as enforce.

Vehemently opposing this socialist Administrative State, this report details, are Constitutional Originalists—whose philosophy is that only the exact words written in the Constitution and federal laws are legal—and if anyone wants these exact words to be changed, they are free to do so as long as this is done only by the representatives elected by citizens, and most certainly not by unelected socialist bureaucrats—and for those issues affecting all the American people (homosexual marriage, abortion, etc.), they should only be accomplished via Amendments to the Constitution approved by the representatives voted into office by citizens, and never the courts.

In preparing for this historic war against the socialist Administrative State, this report notes, these Constitutional Originalists have been marshalling their forces for decades under the banners of hundreds of entities such as The Federalist Society and the Center For The Study Of The Administrative State, that’s part of the Antonin Scalia Law School—whose leader is President Trump, and since he came to power in 2017, has appointed 218 of these Constitutional Originalists as US Federal Judges—that include Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh—and who joined on the Supreme Court their fellow Constitutional Originalists, who are Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito—all of whom are about to be joined by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who is not only a strict Constitutional Originalist, she’s an exact carbon copy of this philosophy’s founding member, the late Justice Antonin Scalia—all of which if known by the American people, would see them being able to understand why socialist heads are exploding.

In a rearguard action to protect their vile Administrative State, this report concludes, socialist Democrats are doing everything in their power to keep President Trump from being elected—with them specifically attempting to throw the entire 3 November election into chaos and turmoil with mail-in ballots so it will ignite their hoped for mass revolution—best exampled today by the socialist Democrat Party stronghold State of Colorado having mailed out voting cards to dead people and non-citizens, and the numerous radical socialist US Federal Judges that keep illegally making up new voter laws to deliberately throw this election into chaos—all of whom, though, are meeting the impenetrable wall erected by the Constitutional Originalists on the Supreme Court to protect this election, that’s otherwise known as the 6 April ruling in the Republican National Committee v. Democratic National Committeecase that says no election laws can be changed by any court this close to its date of occurring—an impenetrable wall just run into a few hours ago by socialist Obama appointed US District Judge William Conley, whom the Seventh Appellate Federal Court slapped across the face and told: “No! You Are Not Going To Extend The Date Wisconsin Voters Have To Cast Their Mail-In Ballots”—a socialist judge one assumes is now consoling himself with leftist pollster Nate Silver’s new prediction giving Biden a 77% chance of winning this election—though to be noticed about, is the same Nate Silver that in 2016 cheerfully predicted that Hillary Clinton was favored in States and congressional districts totaling 323 electoral votes, including all the States President Obama won in 2012—which means that instead of this socialist federal judge consoling his smacked face with fairy tales, he’d be better advised to start understanding true and factual news headlines like “MOMENTUM TRUMP – THIS IS NOT EVEN A RACE – Trump with Over 240,000 Attendees at His Rallies to Biden’s 84(!) Since Labor Day!”—though for the best use of this socialist federal judge’s time, one would think he should be brushing up on criminal court procedures so he can deal with consequences that will soon emanate from the just published headline “BOMBSHELL: Federal Intelligence Officials Cloned Phones To Surveil And Map Entire Structure Of Antifa / BLM Terrorist Operations In Preparation For Mass Arrests”—and one of whose first federal criminal cases might even be his overseeing the prosecution of Holly Zoller of the Bail Project—who’s now under arrest after being filmed dropping off a U-Haul truck full of riot supplies to Biden terrorists in Louisville-Kentucky last week—whose white multi-billionaire Bail Project boss Michael Novogratz, is scheduled to appear later tonight on the Tucker Carlson Showat Fox News—where one hopes he can explain to the American people why exactly is it that white socialist billionaires like him are funding terrorists to burn down their nation’s cities.

John Durham looking into prior FBI ‘investigation’ of questionable millions that flowed into the Clinton Foundation

This an expansion of the scope of his investigation as the work on the Obamagate is essentially done.  That it leads back to hilary is no surprise.

There is some speculation that some arrests will be postponed but this is all planned and scheduled as well and that is wishful thinking.  

It is clear though that the heavy lifting in terms of public disclosure is independent of what Durham is doing.  He gets the high profile arrests.  We have not heard from 200,000 sealed indictments and thgat is surely a poli0tical earthquake.

Meanwhile voter fraud arrests are taking place.  We have a steady trick;e of unpleseant news in the background almost out of sight.

REVEALED: John Durham looking into prior FBI ‘investigation’ of questionable millions that flowed into the Clinton Foundation

Sunday, September 27, 2020 by: JD Heyes

(Natural News) After Hillary Clinton left the Obama regime in 2013 as secretary of state, rumors began flying almost immediately that she was lining up second bid for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Time, of course, would prove those rumors to be accurate.

In the interim period between the time she left the Obama administration and Election Day 2016, the foundation she began with her president husband and serial philanderer Bill Clinton brought in money — a lot of it — and from some very questionable (as in foreign) sources.

Because not everyone at the FBI and Justice Department are criminals and deep state sycophants hungry for power, a number of these transactions were examined by the bureau. 

Nothing, of course, ever came out of those investigations — and now we know why: Hillary Superfan James Comey was the FBI director and Loretta Lynch was the attorney general. No way was ‘Obama’s successor’ and ‘the first woman president’ going to be ensnared in anything as sordid as allowing foreign governments to buy access to the ‘new administration’ couched as ‘donations’ to a ‘charity.’

But there’s a new sheriff in town — AG Bill Barr — and he’s in command of a team of law-and-order career prosecutors and FBI officials who really don’t have a political dog in the fight and who want to do the jobs they swore an oath to do, regardless of who sits in the Oval Office.

As such, one of those careerists, U.S. Attorney John Durham, who has been looking into the origins of the very bogus, very illegal ‘Russian collusion’ and ‘Spygate’ scandals, is also investigating the ‘investigation’ into the Clinton Foundation.

From the beginning, John H. Durham’s inquiry into the Russia investigation has been politically charged. President Trump promoted it as certain to uncover a “deep state” plot against him, Attorney General William P. Barr rebuked the investigators under scrutiny, and he and Mr. Durham publicly second-guessed an independent inspector general and traveled the globe to chase down conspiracy theories.

It turns out that Mr. Durham also focused attention on certain political enemies of Mr. Trump: the Clintons.

Mr. Durham, the U.S. attorney in Connecticut assigned by Mr. Barr to review the Russia inquiry, has sought documents and interviews about how federal law enforcement officials handled an investigation around the same time into allegations of political corruption at the Clinton Foundation, according to people familiar with the matter.

Naturally, the Times — whose reporters and editors hate Trump and are about as objective with their reporting as Josef Stalin would have been writing for a magazine about capitalism — is framing this probe as a politicized investigation ‘at the direction’ of President Trump (without ever framing the Southern District of New York’s pursuit of charges against the president over alleged tax improprieties in a similar manner).

But the facts are thus: The Clinton Foundation served as a cash conduit for influence peddlers for years before Hillary officially threw her hat in the ring. 

Natural News founder and editor Mike Adams reported in August 2016, just months before she lost to Trump:

What every international business person running any sort of profiteering scheme knows today is that to get a meeting with the Secretary of State, you first have to donate huge dollars to the Clinton Foundation. It’s classic “pay for play,” and it’s illegal.

Flatly stated, Bill and Hillary Clinton are career criminals who have been running a grand scale criminal racketeering scheme to defraud America and peddle political influence to the highest bidder. Sometimes, the bribery money was given directly to Bill Clinton as “payment” for his “speeches.” Soon after, Hillary would initiate some State Dept. action in favor of the organization that paid Bill $250,000 or more for his speech. Voila! It’s political magic!

How do we know this? Because after she lost the election, donations to her garbage foundation dried up.

As for Durham, his investigation into the investigation seeks to find out whether any laws or rules were broken to ‘look the other way’ — because that’s what everyone has always done when it came to the Clintons.

Sources include:

Trump's Justice Department Is Making Life Hell for Legal Weed

Interesting develoment.  Trump points out that chronic use lowers an individuals smartness and i do tend to agree wiuth this.  It actually needs serious investigation and measurement.

At the same time plenty of folks do become dependent if not chemically addicted as we experience with alcohol and tobacco and more sertious opiods.

An actual federal program is certainly been kept of the table before this election.  I do think that criminalization needs to end.  Yet that is a mere beginning.  Medical intervention needs to be fornmalized for it to work properly..  That will be a huge effort.

Trump's Justice Department Is Making Life Hell for Legal Weed

A wave of investigations unleashed by Attorney General Bill Barr last year cost companies millions, torpedoed deals, and scared off investors.

By Greg Walters
June 30, 2020, 8:40am

WASHINGTON — Ever notice there’s no Starbucks for weed? No dominant, national retailer with outlets in all states where cannabis is legal?

The Trump administration went out of its way to make sure that couldn’t happen.

A wave of antitrust investigations unleashed by President Trump’s Department of Justice last year wreaked havoc among mid-sized regional cannabis companies, undermining their attempts to expand. The probes cost companies millions in legal fees, bogged employees down for thousands of hours with mind-numbing paperwork, and scared off investors, a half-dozen industry insiders told VICE News.

A DOJ whistleblower denounced these probes in sworn testimony to Congress last week, saying they served little practical purpose except to target companies selling a product that Trump’s Attorney General Bill Barr personally dislikes.

“As a whole, these investigations had an incredibly chilling effect on the industry,” said Joe Caltabiano, a co-founder and former president of Cresco Labs, whose acquisition of Origin House was among those scrutinized by DOJ. “They didn’t stop the cannabis industry. But they definitely slowed growth.”

READ: Trump says weed makes you dumb, leaked audio reveals

The probes froze billion-dollar deals in place for months. And while companies waited, the fast-moving industry shifted to the point where deals had to be renegotiated or abandoned, even after they received approval. At least three large acquisitions failed after receiving DOJ requests for vast amounts of extra information that required months to prepare and deliver.

“It was a pain in the ass,” one industry insider at a company that went through the review and asked not to be named due to the sensitivity of the issue, told VICE News.

There are other good reasons why the American legal weed industry remains regional and fractured. Cannabis is still illegal at the federal level, even though 33 states allow medical use and 11 allow recreational consumption. Any company hoping to expand from one state to another has to cut through a thicket of complex state laws and licensing procedures.

Aggressive probes

Still, the DOJ’s probes stunted the industry’s growth at a key moment in its early development, experts on the U.S. cannabis sector said.

“If not for these DOJ actions, would we have more major players in the industry than we have today? Absolutely,” said Zachary Kobrin, special counsel of government affairs and cannabis industry expert at the Florida-based law firm Akerman LLP. “This was the icing on the cake.”

A DOJ spokesperson insisted the probes were well-founded. An internal DOJ review led by the Office of Professional Responsibility found that the antitrust division had acted “reasonably and appropriately,” she said.

The internal investigation “found that the cannabis industry provided a unique challenge to federal and state regulators alike, and it was reasonable for [the antitrust division] to seek additional information from the industry,” DOJ spokesperson Brianna Herlihy wrote in an email to VICE News.

At first, industry insiders thought the wave of extra scrutiny that began pouring over them in 2019 might actually be a good thing: They hoped it meant the government was taking their fledgling business seriously and trying to learn more about it.

After all, these weren’t criminal investigations. Antitrust probes are about making sure a company won’t be able to dominate the market and jack up prices by buying a competitor.

But DOJ officials weren’t even reading many of the millions of pages they demanded that companies painstakingly produce, a whistleblower named John Elias, who was chief of staff for the DOJ’s antitrust division from 2017 through 2018, told Congress last week.

The department threw enormous resources into clobbering the industry, Elias said, pretty much just because Barr doesn’t like pot.

Normally, these requests for tons of extra info are rare: Only about 3% of deals trigger one. But the DOJ launched at least 10 major probes in the cannabis sector starting in March 2019, according to Elias.

Cannabis accounted for five out of eight active merger probes in one office, he said, even though there was no real threat of a major weed player conquering the American market and boosting prices.

“They were not bona fide antitrust investigations,” Elias testified. “These mergers involve companies with low market shares in a fragmented industry; they do not meet established criteria for antitrust investigations.”

Deals crushed

Soon, the casualties began mounting.

A DOJ probe helped blow up a $680 million mega-deal planned by a firm vying to become the Apple of legal pot: MedMen.

The LA-based dispensary and delivery service announced a record-setting deal to buy cannabis vendor PharmaCann in October 2018, which would have let it expand into Virginia, Illinois, Ohio and Pennsylvania. The tie-up would have created the country’s largest cannabis company by market reach, with 66 retail stores and 13 cultivation facilities across 12 states.

But in March 2019, the Department of Justice stepped in — and didn’t clear the acquisition until September. A month later, MedMen announced the agreement had fallen apart, saying “regulatory hurdles” had “significantly impacted” the plan.

A similar fate befell Arizona-based Harvest Health & Recreation, which announced a blockbuster $850 million accord to buy Chicago-based Verano Holdings in March 2019.

The deal was trumpeted with great fanfare as the most expensive transaction the industry had yet seen.

But a year later, it was dead. Harvest blamed the failure, in part, on the “significant delays” caused by the DOJ antitrust review.

The extra scrutiny sent ripples of anxiety radiating through the industry, well beyond the companies that were directly targeted by the DOJ, said John Kagia of New Frontier Data, which tracks sales and consumer trends in the cannabis industry.

“The DOJ interventions threw a huge dose of cold water on the companies that were even thinking about M&A activity,” Kagia said. “No one knew what the rules were going to be.”

If these probes hadn’t taken place, would we now have a big national legal weed player with outlets on every corner? Given all the other restrictions facing the industry, the answer is probably still no — or at least, not yet. But it’s hard to say how different the industry might look today if these expansion plans had sailed through.

“It had a chilling effect on the money in the cannabis industry,” said Caltabiano. Startups in other industries that have since grown to become household names might have wilted under that kind of scrutiny if it had been applied when they were small, growing fast, and needed the cash, he said.

“If this had happened to Amazon in its sixth year,” Catabiano said, “Amazon probably wouldn’t be here now.”

1971: The Year That Changed Everything


Yes it was, but what really happened is that the first superwave of Baby Boomer Computer Scientists graduated to deliver year one of the necessary brain power to hte digital revolution.  Slo Mo came to an end and change took place against the backdrop of MOOREs Law.

Other technologies not so lucky as you may imagine.  They mostly waited for the information revolutuon to catch up and lift them.  There is little about the hardware of all of Space X that was not fully imagined in the sixties.  What we now have is accelerated design and fabrication allowing us to safely build these things.

So yes it was really 1971 that the manpower necessary started flooding the system.

1971: The Year That Changed Everything

Sun, 09/27/2020 - 10:30

The year 1971 saw the trajectories of nearly every major trend relative to our way of life shift massively.

That year is such a noticeable inflection point in so many data sets, that an intriguing website has been created to drive the point home.

The website is a parade of data series visually showing how the world changed that year.

Be it income…

…the cost of living…

….political polarization…

… the divorce rate…

…and a kitchen sink’s worth of other statistics — from the national debt to deficit spending, childhood obesity, the incarceration rate, energy use per capita — pretty much all aspects of life as we know it changed materially and permanently in the early 1970s.

This week’s guest experts, Ben Prentice and Collin, founders of, explain how virtually all of these changes are a direct or indirect result of the monetary system “breaking” that year with the Nixon Shock and the end of the Bretton Woods System.

On a personal note, interviewing Ben and Collin was an unexpected pleasure, as I found it encouraging to discover that members of the Millennial generation are engaging with the shortcomings of our modern debt-based fiat currency system with the same passion and critical thinking as we older cohorts. Perhaps the future might just turn out OK in their hands after all…

That said, Ben and Collin echo similar concerns and advice as our previous experts. The system is unfair, unsustainable, and in desperate need of reform. The prudent investor shouldn’t expect any real positive change until a painful enough shock forces an abandonment of the status quo — so it’s best to use the time now to position prudently in advance for that inevitability:

Tuesday, September 29, 2020

New Hangar Facility That Points To A Drone Swarm Future

When it comes to technology, certain developments are as natural as night following day.  The DRONE took years to develop and perfect and fully integrate with advanced computer power.

Just as inevitably the next generation of war plane(s) will not have a resident pilot.  Sorry boys.  The next generation of electric vehicles will also lack a driver.   Thus land and air war will now optimize this technology to win conflicts.  

The starting point for aerial dtrones will be supersonic weapon platforms able to do ten and twenty g turns and send a hyper sonic missle into an opponent while operated by a pilot a long way away.  In fact we can put a thousand such birds into the conflict zone all mamaged by a thousand separate pilots elsewhere.

All this depends of having the edge on processor tech and little else.

Area 51 Has A Huge New Hangar Facility That Points To A Drone Swarm Future

The Air Force is accelerating its advanced combat drone development efforts and the facility's unique attributes seem perfect for supporting them.

SEPTEMBER 25, 2020

The Air Force's clandestine flight test center deep inside the Nevada Test and Training Range, known as Area 51 or Groom Lake, among more colorful nicknames, continues to grow as it approaches its seventh decade of operations. Constant construction has grown the remote facility dramatically since the turn of the millennium, including the addition of a massive and still mysterious hangar built at the base's remote southern end. Now, an even larger extension to an existing hangar facility that is quite peculiar in nature points to the very real possibility that the age of large swarms of unmanned combat air vehicles (UCAVs) has finally arrived.

For around a year, construction has been underway in a prominent section of the southern ramp area at the base, near where the original A-12 Oxcart hangars still stand. A quartet of more modern hangars that are divided into two separate buildings, with each bay measuring roughly 90 feet wide, and are understood to be known as hangars 20-23, has been the recipient of a highly curious series of modifications. 

The hangars have stood for decades and are thought to largely serve Air Combat Command tactical aircraft programs, including supporting F-117 testing for many years. At first, it looked like they were about to be torn down. This didn't end up being the case. Instead, massive enclosures were built over the aprons that flank the east and west sides of the original drive-through hangars. 


From left to right: February 2020, July 2020, September 2020. 

In addition, the soft structure located just to the southwest of hangars 20-23 that has been badly torn for years and was eventually patched, has now been totally demolished. Interestingly, it appears that the soft structure actually concealed a unique-looking building inside of it, before it was torn down.

The same area circa 2016. 

The near-finished product seen in September 2020.

The unique additions to hangars 20-23 create a combined hangar facility that is the largest of any on base by a substantial margin, measuring roughly 400 by 500 feet, overall. The additions have more in common with the 'scoot and hide' shelter extensions built onto the arm-de-arm hangar located between the ramp and the runway in the mid-2000s than they do with a traditional hangar. They appear to be more of a covered area portico-like addition than anything else, with the existing central hangars still acting as they always did. 

The 'scoot and hit' extensions built over the arm-de-arm shelter that sits between the apron and the runway at Groom Lake.

More views of this new add-on facility and its shed-like nature came from Gabriel Zeifman's photos that he took while circumnavigating the Nevada Test and Training Range (NTTR) with air traffic control's approval on a number of occasions:


A shot by private pilot Gabriel Zeifman of Area 51 included early stages of construction of the extensions to Hangar 20-23

Another shot months later shows the relatively massive covered area taking shape. 

So, what is this somewhat peculiar addition all about? For hangars that easily fit one F-117 each with plenty of room to spare, having a huge covered structure built onto them doesn't make a lot of sense, at least not for their original purpose, and especially on both sides of what are already drive-through hangars. As such, it seems that this revamped facility is not meant for a small number of large tactical aircraft, but instead, it seems to have been remodeled to support a fleet of smaller tactical aircraft, ones that are designed to fly together in a collective swarm on missions.

What's the justification behind this conjecture? Well, it solves a number of problems with scaling up testing of large swarms of unmanned combat air vehicles. First off, servicing and then staging the aircraft for a mission requires a lot of space and would benefit more by a production line-like arrangement than a traditional hangar and apron layout. The modifications are fairly ingenious as the arrangement would allow for a large group on drones to park outside of the view of satellites and out of the weather on one side, with the hangars in the center working as pass-through servicing bays for preparing them for another flight, and then moving them to the other side to await a launch en-masse on their next mission. Upon return, they would be parked on the other side once again and await servicing and staging for reuse. Just learning how to best stage, launch, and recover a large number of semi-autonomous jet-powered unmanned systems together will surely be a focus of any such program.


The notional concept behind this odd construction.

We believe, and sincerely hope, that advanced unmanned combat air vehicle (UCAV) testing has occurred for years under deep classification after the Air Force suddenly acted like the entire concept doesn't even exist towards the end of the 2000s, a bizarre reality with huge implications you can read all about in this must-read feature of ours. In fact, it is even possible that a small pocket force of advanced UCAVs exists today in a semi-operational state. Regardless, the type of testing this revamped facility would support would likely be on a different scale. 


It is highly likely that higher-end UCAVs that are the size of manned fighters or larger and possess extreme range and low-observability have been in testing for years or even a small pocket operational force exists, but this is less likely the case for large swarms of attritable unmanned systems. 

Testing of advanced networked UCAVs in groups of three or even six is one thing, what we are seeing here could potentially support much larger groups of lower-end, smaller UCAVs or drone surrogates, the likes of which have taken on a high profile recently. As such, the aircraft that would occupy this facility could be more about testing the concepts of networking, command and control, and experimental tactics and operating procedures related to large swarms than it would be about just the vehicles themselves. That being said, it is totally possible that those airframes could still represent a potential future production vehicle.

Boeing, Kratos, and certainly Lockheed are all working on so-called attritable UCAVs that cost millions each, not tens of millions, are highly modular, and are optionally expendable. Beyond Kratos' XQ-58A Valkyrie, the company is known to have a number of classified programs underway that are of a similar in nature, but have to do with more advanced concepts and testing. You can read all about the future of attritable swarming drones here.

Kratos XQ-58A Valkyrie.

Boeing's loyal wingman drone that is currently being developed for the Royal Australian Air Force. A similar system is also being offered to the USAF, depending on their requirements. 

These jet-powered stealthy drones are smaller than their fighter-sized, high-end UCAV counterparts, and would be better suited for the airspace restrictions within 'the box' around Area 51 and within the greater NTTR. Many of the lessons learned from attritable UCAVs could be extrapolated over large swarms of those higher-end unmanned systems, as well. These types of drones are also the types that are being designed for the so-called loyal wingman role, in which a number of them are electronically 'tethered' via a semi-autonomous command-link interface to another manned aircraft. So, this concept of operations, which you can read all about here, could also be part of this advanced testing. 

All this comes as the news that a demonstrator for the Air Force's Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program has flown. As we discussed in detail, NGAD is not a new fighter, but a family of systems that will leverage common networking and command and control architecture, as well as sensor concepts, to work as a team to dominate air battles of the future. Swarming UCAVs are absolutely going to be part of that, so a facility that can support that aspect of NGAD makes a lot of sense. In fact, the 'demonstrator' itself could be the Air Force's first large UCAV swarm, not just one airplane, and the manufacturer of those drones would have leveraged the flying force's new 'e-Plane' concept of rapid digital design and prototyping to migrate the concept from idea to iron on the ramp in record time. 

Thanks to our colleagues Steve Trimble and Marcus Weisgerber, The War Zone's long-standing assertion that the Air Force's new B-21 Raider stealth bomber would work as a central C3 node for tactical aircraft, including networked swarms of UCAVs, was all but outright confirmed by the Air Force's Chief of Staff. Once again, we are talking about an interconnected family of systems here. 

Chief of Staff Brown also underlined that the NGAD demonstrator is more about how it was designed and built under the 'e-Plane' doctrine than it being an exquisite airframe (or airframes) itself. Regardless, with any UCAV type initiative, especially on the lower end, rapid evolutionary iterations of a design produced in small batches that use the same foundational networking and command and control architecture will be central to the effort. Once again, this fits perfectly with what we think this new facility at Area 51 will be used to support. 

Considering how fast the rest of the world is moving forward on UCAVs and attritable unmanned air combat systems, not to mention the glaring limitations of traditional manned tactical aircraft when it comes to emerging peer-state threats in Asia, one would imagine that the USAF has finally put these programs into high gear. Once again, while advanced UCAVs have likely been tested for some time clandestinely, larger swarms of smaller and far more modular and affordable systems that are emerging today as a key future air superiority concept are less likely to have been. 

Our assessment is that there is a strong possibility this major construction project indicates that this is about to change. 

Contact the author:

The SN1 build has begun


Watch this podcast.  The build rate keeps ramping up.  what is wonderful has been the switch to stainless steel.  suddenly we escaped design tolerances that massively slowed the build time.  Now it is just stainless steel.

Again this is all possible because of increasing size.  Better yet, we can rumble through prototype to production fast through 3d printing and the full computerization of all aspects of the build.  The whole contraption can fly virtually long before anyone cuts metal.

We are now beginning to see the march of the space elephants.  This launcher will lift a full 100 tons or one rail car equivalernt.  Now understand that a ten percent increase in size will result in a massive increase in lifting capacity.  You can imagine a ten percent increase.  The lift will be a lot more than one rail car.

This allows us to buid a hub like space frame for a massive space station in near earth orbit.   This can be rotated up to use suspension cables to to create one g living and work space.

The SN1 build has begun

SpaceX's brand new Super Heavy monster is coming. Yep, the SN1 build has begun. Overall, another action-packed week of news at Boca Chica with starship development. The SN7.1 prototype test to destruction, super heavy components finally being spotted, and more exciting news about the first prototype that should fly over 18 kilometers or 60,000 feet in altitude. Yep, Starship SN8 is getting closer. Along with that, some interesting news with Firefly Alpha, Relativity Space, and NASA.

<iframe width="896" height="504" src="" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Based on latest CDC data, the Wuhan coronavirus poses virtually no death risk whatsoever for people under the age of 50

This is the real science folks.  The pandemic is over and reports to the contrarly turn out to be lies and propaganda.

It was bad enough when the CDC cut known cases in italy by over ninety percent last winter and then in the USA a few weeks back.  That alone is absurd.

We now know htat we have zero case for lockdowns or masks forv that matter.  Get over it, it is over and make a full transition to a new normal.


Based on latest CDC data, the Wuhan coronavirus poses virtually no death risk whatsoever for people under the age of 50

Monday, September 28, 2020 by: Mike Adams

(Natural News) New CDC data confirm that the Wuhan coronavirus poses almost zero death risk in people below the age of 50 (see details below). At the same time, these data also confirm the virus remains extremely dangerous to people over the age of 70, and the CDC estimates that 1 in 18 elderly people who contract the virus (i.e. are “infected”) end up being killed by it.

Meanwhile, the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) for people 50 – 69 years is 1 in 200, making it far deadlier than the seasonal flu for individuals in that group.

But for people aged 20 – 49 years, the IFR drops to just 1 in 5000. This means that for every 5,000 people who are infected within this age group, one fatality is expected.

Those below the age of 20 have an even lower fatality rate: About 1 in 33,000.

In summary, the risk of death from the coronavirus in people under the age of 50 is extremely small, and approaching zero.

These numbers are based on the CDC’s new data released at the following link, using “Scenario 5” which is labeled, “Current Best Estimate.”

CDC data confirm the danger to elderly people while simultaneously showing how little risk there is to younger Americans

What’s especially notable in these CDC data is how they simultaneously confirm three very important things:

1) Yes, the coronavirus was killing a very high percentage of infected people as it was sweeping through nursing homes where mostly elderly people were present. During its peak in early-to-mid April of this year, we calculated the virus was killing 1 in 10 people who showed symptoms. This is very similar to the CDC’s current data for the 70+ age group, where the virus is currently killing 1 in 18 people who are infected, while 40% of infections are asymptomatic. This means 10.8 people out of the 18 are symptomatic, which is nearly identical to our calculated number of 1 in 10. Notably, the early deaths in America were happening almost exclusively among the elderly, which is one reason why the death rate was initially so high.

2) Now that we have more detailed demographic data, we know that the Wuhan coronavirus is nearly harmless to college-aged young adults, which means that running strict covid-19 lockdowns and social distancing mandates on college campuses is non-scientific and a complete waste of time and energy. All college lockdowns should be immediately ended.

3) We also know that among typical working-aged Americans in the 20 – 49 group, there is such a low risk of death that locking down workplaces and sending everyone home is another useless endeavor. It means the corporate lockdowns are rooted in junk science, not real risks.

Based on these data, it’s also safe for most people to vote in person

These data show that it’s also perfectly safe for most people to vote in person. Only those who are 60+ would likely face any significant risk of death from contracting a covid-19 infection. Yet the Democrats claim the existence of coronavirus “cases” (i.e. infections) demands that everybody vote by mail, opening up all sorts of opportunities for Democrats to cheat and rig elections nationwide through ballot stuffing, selective ballot destruction, ballot harvesting and other nefarious methods.

Most importantly, these data show that coronavirus “cases” are meaningless if detected in someone who isn’t sick. The left-wing media continues to try to terrorize the nation by claiming tens of thousands of new “cases” each day, but these cases are almost universally non-significant in that the patients demonstrate no symptoms and no sickness. Furthermore, the tests being used to diagnose such “cases” are extremely unreliable and likely rooted in predominantly false positives.

In fact, in a truly shocking development that has not been reported by the fake news media, the former Chief Science Officer of Pfizer is now claiming the entire “second wave” of the pandemic is being faked through the use of unreliable mass testing that’s producing mostly false positives.

You can watch him say these things in this extraordinary interview:

The bottom line? Unless you’re over the age of 60 or so, the coronavirus poses very little risk to you. The lockdown reactions toward the virus are wildly exaggerated and medically unnecessary. While precautions should be taken for those who are elderly and therefore more vulnerable to risks of death, younger Americans don’t need vaccines, masks, social distancing or lockdowns. What they need is to get their lives back.

Open the schools, the cities, the churches, the restaurants and the movie theaters. End the mask mandates and recommend vitamin D, zinc, quercetin and licorice root herbs. Legalize hydroxychloroquine nationwide and we can end this entire pandemic for the vast majority of the population.

U.S. cellphone data uncovers “hotspots” where COVID-19 social distancing levels are low

U.S. cellphone data uncovers “hotspots” where COVID-19 social distancing levels are low

Analysis reveals intertwined influence of demographics and governmental restrictions on social distancing

21-Sep-2020 5:55 PM EDT, by PLOS

How interesting.  what a wonderful tool for the nosy all powerful STATE. That is part of ythe fallout arising from the abuse of meta data.  At some point we are goint to havge to call a halt.

In the future we will individually be mostly engaged in optimizing a small patch of hte biome in conjunction with our mobile robotic tools.  Our imagination will advance our entire purview.

The true decission tree must be local.  Recall what is happenong in the Sahel.  Thanks to cell phones 100,000,000 subsistence farmers learned how to plant trees to improve hte viability of the land. hte whole land is now transitioning up with or without government input..

Newswise — U.S. cellphone data analysis finds “hotspots” where COVID-19 social distancing levels are low, as well as revealing how demographics and governmental restrictions interact. Rajesh Narayanan and colleagues at Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, present these findings in the open-access journal PLOS ONE on September 22. 

Maintaining physical distance from others can reduce the spread of COVID-19. People may engage in social distancing voluntarily or because of governmental restrictions, or some combination of the two. Understanding the interplay of these two factors could help inform strategies to reduce disease spread. 

To better understand social distancing across geographic areas, Narayanan and colleagues developed a computational model of social distancing behavior across the U.S. The model uses cell phone tracking data to indicate the amount of time spent at home—a proxy for social distancing—in counties throughout the country. 

The researchers used this model to explore how stay-at-home behaviors evolved over the first 21 weeks of the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S., from late January to June, 2020. They examined how these behaviors changed in relation to governmental restrictions and demographic factors that could influence social distancing, such as population density, the presence of children in households, education, racial/ethnic composition, and income. 

The analysis suggests that stay-at-home behavior increased by over nine times from late January through late March, and then decreased by about half through mid-June. Demographic factors appear to have driven these changes to a substantially greater degree, suggesting the importance of(either due to voluntary distancing or to differential compliance with mandated distancing). Importantly, there was also a tendency for behaviors to cluster, creating hotspots of counties with low social distancing. 

The authors suggest that encouraging voluntary distancing could potentially be an effective and lower-cost alternative to governmental restrictions. Such encouragement could boost acceptance of restrictions and thus increased compliance with distancing rules, resulting in an even greater degree of distancing. 

Professor Naryanan adds: “Cell phone location and mobility data reveal that social distancing in the U.S. during the Covid-19 pandemic was initially voluntary rather than a response to governmental jurisdictional restrictions. As the pandemic progressed, both effects reinforced each other, increasing social distancing far more than what could be explained by the sum of the individual effects.”

Monday, September 28, 2020

Busting the Antibody-Protection Paradigm: Antibodies Don’t Equal Immunity

Understand that our fine detail knowledge of biology remains tentative at best.  Yet we support theoretical MEMES that are themselves decades old and can not possibly be trusted.  Her some of that past detail is spelled out and found wanting. 

So just what have we really been doing for the past century?  Are we triggering faux pandemics in order to sell vaccines to cure them?  Sadly, that is a viable proposition when you can also misdiagnose deaths as well.

Can the historic global vaccination programs stand up to meta stat studies at all?  What is the rteal truth.  Was the spanish flue a vaccination blunder that was nicely covered up?


Busting the Antibody-Protection Paradigm: Antibodies Don’t Equal Immunity

Source: Golden Age of Gaia | By Steve Beckow September 25, 2020 

Big Pharma wants you to believe in the antibody-protection paradigm, so you...

September 25, 2020

Big Pharma wants you to believe in the antibody-protection paradigm, so you buy into their COVID serological/antibody tests & coming COVID vaccine. However the truth is clear: antibodies don’t equal immunity.

Antibodies Don’t Equal Immunity: Busting the Antibody-Protection Paradigm

Makia Freeman, Freedom Papers, August 13, 2020



Are antibodies the same thing as immunity? Can immunity simply be measured by antibody titers?


What do Big Pharma and the Medical Establishment have to gain when you believe in the antibody-protection model?

Big Pharma wants you to believe in the antibody-protection paradigm, so you buy into their COVID serological/antibody tests & coming COVID vaccine. However the truth is clear: antibodies don’t equal immunity.

again due to the manufactured COVID crisis. It is important that you grasp the nature and function of antibodies, as well as their limitations, since the New World Order (NWO) manipulators orchestrating Operation Coronavirus are counting on your ignorance as they continue to roll out their tyrannical agenda. Specifically, they are counting on most of the public buying into the antibody-protection paradigm.

What does this mean? By that term, I mean that they want you to believe that if you have certain antibodies, or a certain amount of antibodies (measured by titer), that you will be safe and protected from a certain disease. This plays out in 2 ways: firstly, they want you to trust the accuracy and authority of COVID antibody tests (even though there are many flaws, at least 5 as I touched upon in this article), but secondly and more importantly, they want you to trust the pending COVID vaccine (and all vaccines), since the efficacy of every single vaccine is predicated on the idea that it induces antibodies and therefore immunity.

This is the key assumption – and it is patently false. Antibodies do not equal immunity; they are merely one part of a complex system that we don’t fully understand. Immunity is far more broad, deep, holistic and mysterious than simply the presence of antibodies. If you buy into the idea that antibodies make you immune, for instance that if you have COVID antibodies you will be immune to COVID, you will be playing right into the hands of those running this despicable “live exercise.”

First Things First: The 3 Layers of the Human Immune System

Before we get into what an antibody is and what it can do, let’s revisit the human immune system. Did you know that, anatomically speaking, there is no separate and distinct ‘immune system’ as such (unlike other systems such as the circulatory system or the respiratory system)? Instead, there are several systems that possess immune function, the most important of which is the digestive system, as it is home to our microbiome or 2nd brain.

Cell by cell, we have 10 times more bacterial than human cells in our body, and these bacteria live in symbiosis with us, helping to keep us healthy and prevent disease. The immune system has 2 parts (innate or non-specific immunity and acquired or specific immunity), and at least 3 layers that operate in a very specific order. I will quote from Peter Tocci’s wonderful article OK, Let’s Talk Immunity:

“The [immune] ‘system’ exists only in the wondrous cross-communication and coordination among immunity components of the various anatomical systems … There are two major phases of immune function: 1) “Innate,” and 2) “Humoral.” Innate immune function consists of two “layers” considered to be the first and second ‘lines of defense’. The first layer is physical and chemical barriers.

The second layer of defense is called cell-mediated or non-specific resistance. Cells in the intestinal wall (protected by bacteria) thwart germs by signaling to innate cells, leading to the activation of white blood cells and release of protective chemicals. Humoral immunity (antibody-mediated), also called specific resistance and “acquired immunity,” is the third line of defense. Vaccine doctrine says it’s first, which is a ploy on behalf of artificial ‘immunity.’

Specific proteins called antigens exist on the membranes of germs. Once the antigen/organism is identified as foreign, plasma cells make antigen-specific proteins called antibodies that attach to and deactivate them. Vaccines target humoral/antibody function. As physiology texts say, however, the first time immune function sees an antigen/pathogen, antibody response is comparatively mild, as innate immunity takes the lead.”

Innate Immunity Leads While the Acquired Specific Immunity of Antibodies Only Comes Later

So when the body recognizes something foreign inside itself, it will activate its innate immunity (including white blood cells) first. If that doesn’t work sufficiently, then the body will activate the 3rd layer of defense, specific immunity. Here’s where antibodies come into the picture. What is an antibody? The textbook definition is a protein (also known as an immunoglobulin) made by the body and produced mainly by plasma cells to combine chemically with (and neutralize) possible pathogens such as foreign substances and bacteria. The antibody recognizes a unique molecule of the pathogen, called an antigen, to which it binds.

Here’s the problem: the Medical Industry, driven by the dangerous half truth of Pasteur’s germ theory and driven by the extremely reductionist mindset of materialistic science (‘everything must be measured’), has propagated the false notion that antibodies can be stimulated and measured, and therefore can be equated to immunity.

Perhaps this is because antibodies were the only part of the mysterious immune system that could be quantified, but whatever the reason, this false idea ignores the fact that many healthy people do not contract a disease even if they have low antibody titers, and conversely, there are people with high antibody titers who still get sick. In other words, a low antibody or titer count does not indicate susceptibility to a disease just as a high antibody or titer count does not confer immunity to a particular disease.

Antibodies Not Required for Immunity

This point was rammed home in a 2012 study entitled Antibodies are not required for immunity against some viruses. The study analyzed mice infected with vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and found that survival after VSV exposure did not require antibodies. They found the mice used their “adaptive immunity” (specific or acquired immunity), including antibody-producing B cells, but they didn’t actually need to produce any antibodies as such:

“A new study turns the well established theory that antibodies are required for antiviral immunity upside down and reveals that an unexpected partnership between the specific and non-specific divisions of the immune system is critical for fighting some types of viral infections … The research team studied VSV infection in mice that had B cells but did not produce antibodies.

Unexpectedly, although the B cells themselves were essential, survival after VSV exposure did not require antibodies or other aspects of traditional adaptive immunity. “We determined that the B cells produced a chemical needed to maintain innate immune cells called macrophages.” … Taken together, the results show that the essential role of B cells against VSV does not require adaptive mechanisms, but is instead directly linked with the innate immune system. “Our findings contradict the current view that antibodies are absolutely required to survive infection with viruses like VSV …”

Total Body Health is the Only True Immunity

We have to understand that true health is an all encompassing-matter. They are few shortcuts. We need to patiently build our microbiome, inner terrain and blood alkalinity levels by eating a healthy diet and living a healthy lifestyle. Cultivating this will sharpen our innate and specific immune systems, while simultaneously making us less susceptible to disease, because pathogens won’t be able to effectively invade or gain a foothold when our inner ecology is strong.

The article “Antibody titers and immunity: Are they related?” posted on Vaccine Liberation ( emphasizes the importance of memory cells rather than antibodies, but even memory cells are not the true measure of immunity. Total body health is. Here is a quote:

“The most important factor in a fully-effective immune response is general good health characterized by a clean bloodstream coupled with a nutrient-rich diet. Immunity to pathogens is dependent upon a complex response of the body’s cells which may—or may not —include the production of antibodies. A titer test typically measures only one aspect of the immune system’s response. Considered essential for viral disease immunity are memory cells for specific viruses. There is no test for qualitative measuring of these memory cells. Memory cells are what prompt the immune system to create antibodies that are dispatched to an infection associated with the pathogen it “remembers.” Memory cells don’t need reminders in the form of re-vaccination to keep producing antibodies … It is clear that immunity does not come from antibodies or even ‘memory cells’, although memory cells may play a small part in the much larger processes of protecting health. If a person is healthy, first time natural exposure to a virus does not necessarily result in disease. In fact, the majority of first time exposures result in no symptoms but do result in ‘antibodies’ which ‘prove the exposure’ but also prove that immunity was present before the exposure.”

Vaccines Are Solely Based on Artificially Stimulating Antibody Production

It would be a disaster for Big Pharma if more people knew the truth that antibody counts had nothing to do with true immunity. After all, Big Pharma vaccines are solely based on artificially stimulating an immune response (particularly with toxic adjuvants like aluminum) by inducing the body to make antibodies.

Then they turn around and say, “Look, we made you produce the antibodies to this disease, so now you are protected.” But if antibodies are no real measure of immunity, the artificial production of antibodies is irrelevant. Here are some more quotes from the VacLib article above:

“Dr. John March, a developer of animal vaccines, wrote, “Particularly for viral diseases, the ‘cellular’immune response is all important, and antibody levels and protection are totally unconnected.”

Dr. Glenn Dettman stated the following in an interview with Jay Patrick: “Just because you give somebody a vaccine, and perhaps get an antibody reaction, doesn’t mean a thing. The only true antibodies, of course, are those you get naturally. What we’re doing [when we inject vaccines] is interfering with a very delicate mechanism that does its own thing. If nutrition is correct, it does it in the right way. Now if you insult a person in this way and try to trigger off something that nature looks after, you’re asking for all sorts of trouble, and we don’t believe it works.” [“The Great American Deception,” Let’s Live, December 1976, p. 57]

Raymond Obomsawin, PHD wrote the following in his book, Universal Immunization: Medical Miracle or Masterful Mirage?:

“[W]e find that upon investigating unexpected and unexplainable outbreaks of acute infection among ‘immunized’ persons, mainstream scientists have begun to seriously question whether their understanding of what constitutes reliable immunity is in fact valid. For example, a team of scientists writing in the New England Journal of Medicine provide evidence for the position that immunity to disease is a broader bio-ecological question than the factors of artificial immunization or serology. They summarily concluded: ‘It is important to stress that immunity (or its absence) cannot be determined reliable on the basis of history of the disease, history of immunization, or even history of prior serologic determination.’

“Despite these significant shifts in scientific thinking, there has unfortunately been little actual progress made in terms of undertaking systematically broad research on the multiple factors which undergird human immunity to disease, and in turn building a system of prevention that is squarely based upon such findings. It seems ironic that ….[we] must still raise the following basic questions: Why doesn’t medical research focus on what factors in our environment and in our lives weaken the immune system? Is this too simple? too ordinary? too undramatic? Or does it threaten too many vested interests?”

Brandon Turbeville writes:

“With all of the evidence such as that compiled in this article, the underlying foundation of claims by the medical and pharmaceutical industries regarding vaccine effectiveness is clearly a shaky one. The evidence that vaccines work – without even taking into account the many studies which have demonstrated that they do not – is thus wholly unreliable even when demonstrating the “proof” claimed by the researchers. In short, neither vaccination nor antibody response equals immunity.”


This topic ties together many fascinating threads: germ theory, materialistic reductionist science, Big Pharma, vaccines, COVID, antibody tests and a lack of appreciation for the holistic and energetic nature of the human body and its immune system. There are clearly many many more factors at play in determining an individual’s immunity than just counting that person’s antibodies.

We need to fully comprehend this, because in the months to come, you can be sure there there will be some governments that will bait their citizens with a ‘return to normalcy’ if they just take the COVID serological or antibody test, despite the fact that a result of COVID-antibody positive can be interpreted any which way, and is scientifically meaningless when it comes to determining actual immunity. Next, of course, the authorities will pitch the COVID vaccine™ that produces COVID antibodies™ as the only way to participate fully in society again, a la Mark of the Beast. This article has pierced that line of reasoning. Spread this far and wide.