Friday, July 10, 2020

Creating Paradise on Earth




It is simply about intent.  If we all learn to perfect our intent, then paradise is inevitable. 

Yet we are all spirit.  Suppose we advance through our eight lives by beginning in the first life with 32 aspects.  We integrate our 32 life experiences into one in preparation for our second life by becoming one.  Again we access the second stage by splitting out 32 aspects as well.  We repeat this for eight lives, typically over a hundred years.


What holds it all together is intent and expressing that intent means working toward paradise itself and that is Terra Forming Terra.
.



Creating Paradise on Earth 


 Brent Johnson





Operation Disclosure | By Brent Johnson , Contributor July 3, 2020 Creating Paradise on Earth In Plato’s Republic , the author-philo...



Operation Disclosure | By Brent Johnson, Contributor

July 3, 2020


Creating Paradise on Earth


In Plato’s Republic, the author-philosopher put forth the proposition that the character demonstrated by the rulers of a society would trickle down and become inherent in the general population of a society. In other words, a social system based on good principles and values would generate serenity and happiness among the people.


Unfortunately for us all, the entire world has lost sight of this simple concept: that your society is defined by those things you value most.


In most if not all societies around the world, people value money, position and power over values like truth, justice, honor and freedom. That is why there is so much injustice and greed around the world. Most people are more concerned about what they can get for themselves than what they can do to support others. In any given interaction, people are more prone to ask, “What do I get out of it?” than to consider, “How can I support you?”


We have cultivated among us cultures that promote the concept of “winning” over everything else. “What do I have to do to get that promotion?” “How can I come out on top in this upcoming deal?” “How do I come out of this situation with more than I had entering it?” In other words, “What’s in it for me?” This attitude permeates and worse, motivates people in their daily actions; and it is a highly destructive value system in which to live.


The reason this attitude is so destructive is because winning is made more important than doing what’s right, seeking justice, speaking truth, etc. In other words, people are encouraged to do anything to get what they want; lie, cheat, steal, murder, and so forth.


Perhaps this is because (HERD MENTALITY causes) most of you tend to value yourself based on how much property you own, what kind of job you have, how high up on the totem pole you are, and all other kinds of temporal things, instead of valuing yourself based on the kind of person you are.


This attitude of winning at all costs attracts and encourages greed, manipulation, horrible injustices, and overall depravity; and it may be found at the highest levels of governments wherever it exists. Remember, the general population takes its cues from the rulers or leaders of its society. If a government is staffed with thugs and unprincipled sadists, then the population will be filled with thugs and unprincipled sadists.


Conversely, if a government is filled with people who value truth, justice, liberty, and consideration for your neighbors, then the general public in that society will reflect those values.


Don’t get me wrong. There is nothing wrong with winning. There is nothing wrong with having a good job, making a lot of money, having nice things, living comfortably, and enjoying the best that life has to offer. The question is how did you come by those things? What price did you pay for them?


If you acquire your money, position or power by violating the fundamental principles of truth, honor and integrity, then I believe you have paid far too high a price for them. If you taint your very soul in order to acquire the things that you have then you have paid far too much.


So how do we change our world from one that pursues winning at any cost to one that respects the rights of everyone and opposes those who would seek to make themselves bigger by making other people smaller?


The answer is actually pretty simple. We need to change our value systems to reflect the kind of world in which people can be happy and feel secure. We need to disallow actions taken out of greed, power-hunger, and a desire to achieve things by diminishing others.


This starts on the local level. It begins in your own house. You - like Plato’s philosopher king - need to set the example by acting out of altruistic motives. You need to consider others in your family in your daily life. When one of your children acts improperly you need to correct him or her, and explain that it is best to respect others even if you disagree with them. You need to punish those who steal, cheat or lie. Meanwhile, you need to set the example by not stealing, cheating or lying.


Once you get your own house in order you need to take your message to your local community. Speak up when a neighbor or fellow citizen says or does something wrong. Don’t be afraid to express disapproval with harmful acts. Don’t worry about whether you are popular for taking a stand; just take a stand for good values. Believe me, when you do this the message will spread rapidly throughout your local community. Others will pick up on your behavior and start to reflect it. The effects will be exponential and amazing.


However, do not diminish what others have to offer. Do not speak at people; speak to them. Listen and understand others’ positions even when you think those positions are harmful or destructive. Respect their individual situations even if you don’t agree with their conclusions. It is from that standpoint that you become powerful and effective in manifesting the kind of changes that are needed in this world.


You might even run for local public office so that you can inject your core values into your local community. Whether you win or lose, you run your campaign by communicating your character beliefs to the local population. Use media to accomplish this. Regardless of whether or not you win, you will have made your mark on society.


As you proceed in changing your small part of the world, growing numbers of people will join you, thereby creating a gestalt that will serve to effect change on a larger level.


When the time is right, expand your efforts to a larger social group. Infect others with your views, first throughout the city, then the state, then the nation, and then the world.


Do not be discouraged by telling yourself, “I am only one person. What can I do?” That thinking is false thinking. One person who refuses to accept the status quo has always changed the world. Consider Joan of Arc, Martin Luther King, Jr., Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, Yashua Christos (Jesus Christ). It is always the individual who will not accept that the way things are is how they must be who manifests changes in society.


Of course, those changes could be for the worse and not for the better. Adolf Hitler and Mao Tse Tung are prime examples of individuals who by their charisma changed the world to their ends; but their objectives were destructive and harmful. You need to exercise the same charisma they did, but toward the goals of truth, justice, liberty, enlightenment, and peace.


If you set as your personal goal to bring about a world in which honor, integrity and justice abound, then you are perfectly capable of making it happen. Don’t accept the messages of those who say you are insignificant and cannot change things. Don’t listen to those who say, “You can’t fight City Hall!” Do what you know to be right, regardless of how many people stand against you. I promise you that if you stay true to your vision, others will join you, your ranks will grow, and inevitably, you will succeed in bringing about a world in which we can all live in peace, prosperity and honor.


Brent Johnson is Director of Freedom Bound International, a common law service center dedicated to the preservation of personal freedom, privacy rights and the Declaration of Independence. He may be reached at 1-888-385-FREE or on-line at www.freedomradio.us.


“No One Has Died from the Coronavirus”



It only gets worse.  right now, there should be no dispute and it turns out that no deaths can be attributed to COV 19 which is suddenly turning out to be a mere cold varient.

All the numbers were juiced through real bribes.  $15,000 for each rteporterd death.  Now six months have passed and check analysis of known deaths have long since been carried out without pressue to do anythoing other than the science.

This means that the zero is real.


“No One Has Died from the Coronavirus”


Important revelations shared by Dr Stoian Alexov, President of the Bulgarian Pathology Association

By Rosemary Frei and Patrick Corbett

Global Research, July 03, 2020

OffGuardian 2 July 2020

Theme: Intelligence, Science and Medicine



4566


A high-profile European pathologist is reporting that he and his colleagues across Europe have not found any evidence of any deaths from the novel coronavirus on that continent.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/no-one-has-died-coronavirus/5717668

Dr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization (WHO) a “criminal medical organization” for creating worldwide fear and chaos without providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic.

Another stunning revelation from Bulgarian Pathology Association (BPA) president Dr. Alexov is that he believes it’s currently “impossible” to create a vaccine against the virus.

He also revealed that European pathologists haven’t identified any antibodies that are specific for SARS-CoV-2.

These stunning statements raise major questions, including about officials’ and scientists’ claims regarding the many vaccines they’re rushing into clinical trials around the world.

They also raise doubt about the veracity of claims of discovery of anti-novel-coronavirus antibodies (which are beginning to be used to treat patients).

Novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies are supposedly the basis for the expensive serology test kits being used in many countries (some of which have been found to be unacceptably inaccurate).

And they’re purportedly key to the immunity certificates coveted by Bill Gates that are about to go into widespread use — in the form of theCOVI-PASS — in 15 countries including the UK, US, and Canada.

Dr. Alexov made his jaw-dropping observations in a video interview summarizing the consensus of participants in a May 8, 2020, European Society of Pathology (ESP) webinar on COVID-19.

The May 13 video interview of Dr. Alexov was conducted by Dr. Stoycho Katsarov, chair of the Center for Protection of Citizens’ Rights in Sofia and a former Bulgarian deputy minister of health. The video is on the BPA’s website, which also highlights some of Dr. Alexov’s main points.

We asked a native Bulgarian speaker with a science background to orally translate the video interview into English. We then transcribed her translation. The video is here and our English transcript is here.

Among the major bombshells Dr. Alexov dropped is that the leaders of the May 8 ESP webinar said no novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies have been found.

The body forms antibodies specific to pathogens it encounters. These specific antibodies are known as monoclonal antibodies and are a key tool in pathology. This is done via immunohistochemistry, which involves tagging antibodies with colours and then coating the biopsy- or autopsy-tissue slides with them. After giving the antibodies time to bind to the pathogens they’re specific for, the pathologists can look at the slides under a microscope and see the specific places where the coloured antibodies — and therefore the pathogens they’re bound to – are located.

Therefore, in the absence of monoclonal antibodies to the novel coronavirus, pathologists cannot verify whether SARS-CoV-2 is present in the body, or whether the diseases and deaths attributed to it indeed were caused by the virus rather than by something else.

It would be easy to dismiss Dr. Alexov as just another crank ‘conspiracy theorist.’ After all many people believe they’re everywhere these days, spreading dangerous misinformation about COVID-19 and other issues.

In addition, little of what Dr. Alexov alleges was the consensus from the May 8 webinar is in the publicly viewable parts of the proceedings.

But keep in mind that whistleblowers often stand alone because the vast majority of people are afraid to speak out publicly.

Also, Dr. Alexov has an unimpugnable record and reputation. He’s been a physician for 30 years. He’s president of the BPA, a member of the ESP’s Advisory Board and head of the histopathology department at the Oncology Hospital in the Bulgarian capital of Sofia.

On top of that, there’s other support for what Dr. Alexov is saying.

For example, the director of the Institute of Forensic Medicine at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in Germany said in media interviews that there’s a striking dearth of solid evidence for COVID-19’s lethality.

“COVID-19 is a fatal disease only in exceptional cases, but in most cases it is a predominantly harmless viral infection,” Dr. Klaus Püschel told a German paper in April. Adding in another interview:

In quite a few cases, we have also found that the current corona infection has nothing whatsoever to do with the fatal outcome because other causes of death are present, for example, a brain hemorrhage or a heart attack […] [COVID-19 is] not particularly dangerous viral disease […] All speculation about individual deaths that have not been expertly examined only fuel anxiety.”

Also, one of us (Rosemary) and another journalist, Amory Devereux, documented in a June 9 Off-Guardian article that the novel coronavirus has not fulfilled Koch’s postulates.

These postulates are scientific steps used to prove whether a virus exists and has a one-to-one relationship with a specific disease. We showed that to date no one has proven SARS-CoV-2 causes a discrete illness matching the characteristics of all the people who ostensibly died from COVID-19. Nor has the virus has been isolated, reproduced and then shown to cause this discrete illness.

In addition, in a June 27 Off-Guardian article two more journalists, Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter, added to the evidence that “the existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith, not fact.”

The pair also confirmed “there is no scientific proof that those RNA sequences [deemed to match that of the novel coronavirus] are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19.”

Dr. Alexov stated in the May 13 interview that:
the main conclusion [of those of us who participated in the May 8 webinar] was that the autopsies that were conducted in Germany, Italy, Spain, France and Sweden do not show that the virus is deadly.”

He added that:
What all of the pathologists said is that there’s no one who has died from the coronavirus. I will repeat that: no one has died from the coronavirus.”

Dr. Alexov also observed there is no proof from autopsies that anyone deemed to have been infected with the novel coronavirus died only from an inflammatory reaction sparked by the virus (presenting as interstitial pneumonia) rather than from other potentially fatal diseases.

Another revelation of his is that:
“We need to see exactly how the law will deal with immunization and that vaccine that we’re all talking about, because I’m certain it’s [currently] not possible to create a vaccine against COVID. I’m not sure what exactly Bill Gates is doing with his laboratories – is it really a vaccine he’s producing, or something else?”

As pointed to above, the inability to identify monoclonal antibodies for the virus suggests there is no basis for the vaccines, serological testing and immunity certificates being rolled out around the globe at unprecedented speed and cost. In fact, there is no solid evidence the virus exists.

Dr. Alexov made still more important points. For example, he noted that, in contrast to the seasonal influenza, SARS-CoV-2 hasn’t been proven to kill youth:

[With the flu] we can find one virus which can cause a young person to die with no other illness present […] In other words, the coronavirus infection is an infection that does not lead to death. And the flu can lead to death.”

(There have been reports of severe maladies such as Kawasaki-like disease and stroke in young people who were deemed to have a novel-coronavirus infection. However, the majority of published papers on these cases are very short and include only one or only a small handful of patients. Moreover, commenters on the papers note it’s impossible to determine the role of the virus because the papers’ authors did not control sufficiently, if at all, for confounding factors. It’s most likely that children’s deaths attributed to COVID-19 in fact are from multiple organ failure resulting from the combination of the drug cocktail and ventilation that these children are subjected to.)
Dr. Alexov therefore asserted that:

the WHO is creating worldwide chaos, with no real facts behind what they’re saying.”

Among the myriad ways the WHO is creating that chaos is by prohibiting almost all autopsies of people deemed to have died from COVID-19. As a result, reported Dr. Alexov, by May 13 only three such autopsies had been conducted in Bulgaria.


Also, the WHO is dictating that everyone said to be infected with the novel coronavirus who subsequently dies must have their deaths attributed to COVID-19.

“That’s quite stressful for us, and for me in particular, because we have protocols and procedures which we need to use,” he told Dr. Katsarov. “…And another pathologist 100 years from now is going to say, ‘Hey, those pathologists didn’t know what they were doing [when they said the cause of death was COVID-19]!’ So we need to be really strict with our diagnoses, because they could be proven [or disproven], and they could be checked again later.”

He disclosed that pathologists in several countries in Europe, as well as in China, Australia and Canada are strongly resisting the pressure on them to attribute deaths to COVID-19 alone:

I’m really sad that we need to follow the [WHO’s] instructions without even thinking about them. But in Germany, France, Italy and England they’re starting to think that we shouldn’t follow the WHO so strictly, and [instead] when we’re writing the cause of death we should have some pathology [results to back that up] and we should follow the protocol. [That’s because] when we say something we need to be able to prove it.”

(He added that autopsies could have helped confirm or disprove the theory that many of the people deemed to have died of COVID-19 in Italy had previously received the H1N1 flu vaccine. Because, as he noted, the vaccine suppresses adults’ immune systems and therefore may have been a significant contributor to their deaths by making them much more susceptible to infection.)

Drs. Alexov and Katsarov agreed that yet another aspect of the WHO-caused chaos and its fatal consequences is many people are likely to die soon from diseases such as cancer because the lockdowns, combined with the emptying of hospitals (ostensibly to make room for COVID-19 patients), halted all but the most pressing procedures and treatments.

They also observed these diseases are being exacerbated by the fear and chaos surrounding COVID-19.
We know that stress significantly suppresses the immune system, so I can really claim 200% that all the chronic diseases will be more severe and more acute per se. Specifically in situ carcinoma – over 50% of these are going to become more invasive […] So I will say that this epidemic isn’t so much an epidemic of the virus, it’s an epidemic of giving people a lot of fear and stress.”
In addition, posited Dr. Alexov, as another direct and dire result of the pandemic panic many people are losing faith in physicians.
Because in my opinion the coronavirus isn’t that dangerous, and how are people going to have trust in me doing cancer pathology, much of which is related to viruses as well? But nobody is talking about that.”
We emailed Dr. Alexov several questions, including asking why he believes it’s impossible to create a vaccine against COVID-19.

He didn’t answer the questions directly. Dr. Alexov instead responded:

We also emailed five of Dr. Alexov’s colleagues in the European Pathology Society asking them to confirm Dr. Alexov’s revelations. We followed up by telephone with two of them. None responded.

Why didn’t Dr. Alexov or his five colleagues answer our questions?
We doubt it’s due to lack of English proficiency.

It’s more likely because of the pressure on pathologists to follow the WHO’s directives and not speak out publicly. (And, on top of that, pathology departments depend on governments for their funding.)
Nonetheless, pathologists like Drs. Alexov and Püschel appear to be willing to step out and say that no one has died from a novel-coronavirus infection.

Perhaps that’s because pathologists’ records and reputations are based on hard physical evidence rather than on subjective interpretation of tests, signs and symptoms. And there is no hard physical evidence that COVID-19 is deadly.

*
Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Rosemary Frei has an MSc in molecular biology from the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Calgary, was a freelance medical writer and journalist for 22 years and now is an independent investigative journalist. You can watch her June 15 interview on The Corbett Report, read her otherOff-Guardian articles and follow her on Twitter.
Patrick Corbett is a retired writer, producer, director and editor who’s worked for every major network in Canada and the US except for Fox. His journalistic credits include Dateline NBC, CTV’s W-5 and the CTV documentary unit where he wrote and directed ‘Children’s Hospital’, the first Canadian production to be nominated for an International Emmy. You can follow Patrick on Twitter.
Featured image is from OffGuardian

The Battle of Talas





The military victory was not that important per  se simply because a Chinese future was unrealistic at best.  That the whole enterprise soon collapsed proved that.  The real center of mass for this region was to the West around Samarkand.

The real pay off came  from the acquisition of a cadre of professional paper makers and that was certainly incredibly important.   We had a solid paprus tradition which by the way had never gone away but remained unsatisfactory for book making.   This was suitable for scrolls but not for book making of any kind that involved mass production.  It was likely just too fragile.

Paper making allowed for the manufacture of large robust books without using parchment.  It also allowed use in daily commerce as well.  Good paper made all the difdertence and we still are not giving it up any time soon.



What is one major Chinese historical event that had a huge impact on the world, but is hardly covered or known about today?

The Battle of Talas between the armies of Arabs and Chinese in 751 AD could be considered an event that eventually had a huge impact on the rest of the world. The battle itself was barely noticed or remembered today but it did help change the course of history.


The Battle of Talas (picture)

In 751 AD, the Arabs was in its ascendancy. At the time, the Arab caliphate was ruled by the powerful Abbasid dynasty. In the East, the Chinese empire was ruled by the great Tang dynasty. At their point of contact in today's Kyrgyzstan in Central Asia, an event would spark a conflict between these two great empires. Historian and Georgetown University professor, James Millward, wrote in his book, "Eurasian Crossroads: A History of Xinjiang", calling the conflict the "first and last meeting of Arab and Chinese armies".


By the mid-740s, the Tang controlled trade routes both north and south of the Tianshan mountains in modern Kyrgyzstan. Tang's general, Gao Xianzhi, had been engaged in a series of campaigns to drive the Tibetans out of the Pamir mountains at the time. A quarrel between the rulers of the principality of Chach and the Kingdom of Ferghana in Central Asia would eventually spark the conflict between the Arabs and Chinese. In those days, the Kingdom of Ferghana, ruled by the Ikhshids, was a vassal of Tang.


In 750 AD, the king of Ferghana had a border dispute with the ruler of neighboring Chach. He appealed to the Chinese, who sent General Gao to assist Ferghana's troops. Gao besieged Chach, offered the Chachan king safe passage out of his capital. But Gao reneged and beheaded the king. The son of Chachan king's escaped and sought help from Abbasid Arab governor at Khorasan. The Arabs decided to teach Gao a lesson. It gathered its troops and marched East. The Arabs were, of course, also keen to take the opportunity to assert Abbasid power in the region.


The Battle

In 751 AD, the two armies finally met along the Talas river in today's Kyrgyzstan. The Tang army was reinforced by the Karluks, a Turkic Central Asian tribal confederacy. The Karluks would later prove unexpectedly decisive in the forthcoming battle.


Both sides fielded tens of thousands of troops. For five days, the two mighty armies clashed. Then the Karluks came in on the Arab side on the fifth day and attacked the Chinese troops. Tang army's doom was sealed. Chinese sources imply that the Karluks had been fighting for them, but treacherously switched sides midway through the battle, causing their defeat. Gao managed to escape but with only a fraction of his army.


The defeat marked the end of Tang westward expansion and resulted in Muslim control of Central Asia area for the next 400 years. Control of this region was economically beneficial for the Abbasids because it was where the Silk Road passed through.


Consequences

At the time of the battle, its significance was not clear. The historical records of the battle are few but it was recorded in both Chinese and Arabian accounts. Not long after the Battle of Talas, China would be swept up by an even bigger event.


Tang at first wanted revenge and planned to chase the Arabs out of the Central Asia region. However, a catastrophic civil war, the An Shi Rebellion, later consumed the whole of China from 755-763. The rebellion resulted in a huge number of deaths and that the Tang empire's population was greatly reduced. The devastation of the population was not only a direct result of the heavy combat casualties and collateral civilian deaths, but, due to the widespread dislocations of the peasants, especially in the north and middle areas of China, mass starvation and disease also resulted in the deaths of millions. The rebellion spanned the reign of three Tang emperors and the death toll is estimated to be up to 36 million according to some sources.


The An Shi Rebellion and its aftermath greatly weakened the centralized bureaucracy of the Tang dynasty, especially in regards to its perimeters. Virtually, autonomous provinces and ad hoc financial organizations arose, giving rise to warlordism and reducing the influence of the central government. Furthermore, the Tang government also lost most of its control over the Western regions, due to troop withdrawal to central China to help crush the rebellion and deal with subsequent disturbances. Hence, continued military and economic weakness resulted in further subsequent erosion of Tang territorial control during the ensuing years, particularly in the Western region. By 790 Chinese had completely lost control over the Tarim Basin area. The Arabs took opportunity to further expand into Central Asia as Tang’s influence in the region retreated.


Nevertheless, the Battle of Talas had important consequences. The weakened Chinese Empire was no longer in any position to interfere in Central Asia, so the influence of the Abbassid Arabs continued to grow. Many of the communities and tribes in Central Asia were converted to Islam. Within the next 250 years, most of the formerly Buddhist, Hindu, Zoroastrian, and Nestorian Christian tribes of Central Asia had become Muslim. With the decline of Central Asian Buddhism due to Islam influence, Chinese Buddhism was cut off from Indian Buddhism and developed into an independent religion with distinct spiritual elements.


Paper technology goes West


Most significant of all, the art of making paper was said to spread to the Arabs, then to the West as a result of the Battle of Talas.


According to the 11th century historian, Thaalibi, Chinese prisoners captured at the battle helped introduce paper manufacturing to Samarkand, a city in southeastern Uzbekistan and one of the oldest continuously inhabited cities in Central Asia.


Some of the Chinese soldiers were said to have worked at paper mills in China before. They were the ones who later helped build paper mills outside of China. One of the captives was the Tang Dynasty craftsman Tou-Houan. It was reported that he and others were brought to Baghdad where they stayed and worked for their Islamic captors for some years. When he returned to China, Tou wrote to the emperor that he and his colleagues taught the Abbasid craftsmen the important techniques of paper-making, textile manufacture, and gold-working.


Soon, paper mills sprang up in Samarkand, Baghdad, Damascus, Cairo, Delhi and in 1120 the first European paper mill was established in Xativa, Spain (now called Valencia). Note that at the height of Arab domination, they controlled Spain and Portugal, as well as North Africa, the Middle East, and large swaths of Central Asia. This facilitated the transfer of paper-making technology to the West. From Xativa, this Chinese invention later passed to Italy, Germany, and across Europe.


Paper, being less expensive than parchment, helped spread knowledge, much of which was gleaned from the great Asian culture centers along the Silk Road, that benefitted Europe during the Middle Ages. It revolutionized the Islamic world, and later the European West. The advent of paper technology, along with woodcut printing and later movable-type printing, certainly fueled the advances in science, theology, and history in the West.


Ref:

Battle of Talas - Wikipedia
The Battle That Kept the Chinese Out of Central Asia
Arabs Fought the Chinese Back in 751 at the Battle of Talas River
An Lushan Rebellion - Wikipedia
An Shi Rebellion

https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/ayers_bryan_s_200408_ma.pdf

The Invention of Paper

Edit:

Someone commented that the Karluk Turks did not treacherously switch sides midway through the battle but were allied to the Abbasid Caliphate right from the beginning. It was suggested that the Chinese had lied about the supposed betrayal by the Turks in order to make excuses for its loss at the Battle of Talas so as to cover their shame.

The truth of the matter is, nobody really knows for sure. There were not many historical accounts of the battle and primarily, they came from either the Chinese or Arab sources. That means, there would be certain biasness involved in recording the accounts of the battle. So, principally, there are 2 versions of the battle.


According to the Chinese accounts, the battle lasted for five days. The fighting was hard and bloody. During the first few days, the battle was a contest between the archers and infantrymen of both Tang and Abbasid armies in the center and the cavalry units vying for control of the flanks. The Chinese army had a larger number of infantrymen and archers, while the Abbasid forces were comprised of half infantry and half cavalry. In the Chinese accounts, their forces were attacked by their Karluk allies in the rear on the last day of the battle while the Abbasids launched an all-out frontal attack. The Chinese army collapsed and was routed with heavy losses. Many of the Chinese soldiers were captured.

The second version came from Arab sources. In this version, the two armies faced off against one another for four days. Neither side was willing to fully commit to battle. Then on the fifth day, a third army, the Karluk Turks, attacked the Chinese in the rear, and at the same time the Abbasid forces launched a direct assault against the Tang army from the front, resulting in its utter destruction. In this second account, the Karluks had been Abbasid’ allies from the start and the Abbasid commander, Ziyad ibn Salih, had planned the simultaneous assault with the Karluks on the fifth day. There was never any treachery involved.

In either versions, the battle was a decisive Arab victory in any case. In both versions, the Chinese army was completely destroyed with the Chinese commander, General Gao, escaping. Multitudes of Chinese POWs were taken, which aided in the transfer of paper making technology to the West, as explained earlier. And the Chinese influence would never extend beyond the Tarim Basin again. The Arabs would come to dominate the region for the next few hundred years, resulting in its inhabitants of Central Asia gradually being Islamicized.

Today, a large majority of the people in countries of Western Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan) are Muslims. Even Xinjiang of Eastern Central Asia was originally dominated by Uyghur Muslims. After the People's Republic of China was founded by Mao Zedong in 1949, he transferred large number of Han Chinese into Xinjiang (“支边新疆” policy), resulting in today's mix of about half Han, half Uyghur populations in Xinjiang. The Eastern Central Asian region (Dzungarian Basin and Tarim Basin) was reconquered by China and incorporated into a province during the late Qing dynasty. The name Xinjiang was actually proposed by General Zuo Zongtang (General Tso) to Qing Emperor, after he successfully led the reconquest. And today, there is a constant tension between Uyghur and Han populations in Xinjiang. Beijing has established many "re-education camps" in Xinjiang to house the Uygher Muslims.

Which version of the battle to believe?

You will have to decide for yourself which version of the battle to believe in. Understandably, such decision may be affected by one's outlook and culture. Even the academics themselves aren’t able to come to an agreement.

For example, Dr Kallie Szczepanski, a history expert specializing in Asian history and culture, believes in the Arab accounts more. That is to say, there was no treachery to begin with and the Karluk Turks were originally allied with the Arabs at the beginning of the battle. In her write-up for ThoughtCo on the battle, she said, "The Arab account seems more likely since the Qarluqs (Karluks) suddenly mounted a surprise attack on the Tang formation from the rear." She has a Ph.D. in history from Boston University.

Not surprisingly, Prof Jin Canrong, Professor and Associate Dean at the School of International Studies in Renmin University (one of the top universities in China), thought otherwise. In a 2018 article on China-US trade war and its impact to the surrounding countries, he mentioned the Battle of Talas in his article:

“跟咱们接壤的西北地区是五个中亚的斯坦,我们古代叫西域,以前是佛家地区,然后深受中华文化影响,但是很不幸,在唐朝的时候有个怛罗斯战役,高仙芝将军领导的那支军队失败了,被阿拉伯联军打败了,军事上其实他打得很好,他就带了4万人和15万阿拉伯联军作战,初期是成功的,打得非常好,可是当地葛逻禄部雇佣兵叛变了,那么就失败了。很可惜,历史就变了,这就变成一个伊斯兰化的地区。”

Translation:

"The northwestern region bordering us are the five “Stans” of Central Asia. We called the region the Western Territory in ancient times. It used to be a Buddhist region, and was deeply influenced by Chinese culture. Unfortunately, during the Tang dynasty there was this Battle of Talas. The army led by General Gao Xianzhi failed and was defeated by the Arab allied forces. He was actually a good military leader. He took 40,000 troops to fight with Arab allied forces of 150,000. Initially, he was successful and fought well. However, the Karluk mercenaries rebelled, and the Tang army lost. It’s a pity cause history was changed and the region became Islamicised.”

Prof Jin is also a member of the Policy Planning Office of the National People's Congress, the highest legislative body in the People's Republic of China, and an agenda contributor to the World Economic Forum (WEF).

So, which pill would you want to take, the red or the blue? You decide.

"Khazarian Mafia Desperately Struggles"


This refers to the very real families who have positioned themselves on top of the global banking system from almost its invention over two centuries ago.  Trtump has removed their influence on the US Fed and is now restructuring the USA monetary system in concert with other countires as well.

Now that part is real and the loss of power and influence is also real for  the  families.

After saying all that the hard question is just how much of the current narritives are real.  Are we really having a serious conflict with the CCP?  The real changes are underway right  now and will apparently include some form of debt jubilee.


While this is taking place, the propaganda in particular will be intense...  .




"Khazarian Mafia Desperately Struggles" 

Chaos Increasing in U.S. and Worldwide as Khazarian Mafia Desperately Struggles to Survive

Thursday, July 2, 2020

June 29, 2020




This week we would like to inform readers that our newsletter is under unprecedented attack and that your support is needed now more than ever. One of our main intelligence sources in South Asia is being held indefinitely in prison under life-threatening conditions based on planted evidence and trumped-up charges. Another has vanished. Yet another was poisoned with ricin. Your correspondent has also been targeted over the past two months by no less than three poisoning attempts and survived with assistance from both NSA and Asian secret society sources. This work carries risks that we all understand, but there is no alternative except to fight on as the fate of humanity is at stake.


Also, this writer was physically stopped from attending a press conference at the Foreign Correspondents Club of Japan to prevent me from asking Japanese Defense Minister Kono Taro about the Fukushima mass murder event. Of course, similar harassment is being reported by multiple truth reporting media outlets.


This is all part of an incredibly hysterical propaganda war based around the so-called COVID-19 coronavirus. We are seeing fake news portals like the New York Times, Reddit, and the Drudge report filling over half their output with fake stories. If you see the words COVID, Russia, Trump, or Hong Kong in any of these, or related outlets, you are almost certainly reading fiction. As far as COVID is concerned, any reader can visit local hospitals and see what’s happening with their own eyes.


It is true that old people are dying from pneumonia and other causes, as always. But now, hospitals are being ordered to bypass typical treatment protocols and put patients with any sort of breathing difficulty on ventilators that result in fatalities with insurance bribes as incentives to label unrelated deaths as COVID. The whole thing is a well-organized, coordinated fraud. And yet it is resulting in incredible economic damage and personal harm to millions of people.



The source of the COVID fake news infection has been forensically traced to the Knights of Malta and the P3 Freemason lodge.



(thanks to Jim Stone for spotting this)


Where have we seen this number before?


The original skull and bones can be found in St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome, a church built by the mother of Emperor Constantine, founder of Roman Christianity.


To quote from Wikipedia:



“The number “322” appears in Skull and Bones’ insignia and is widely reported to be significant as the year of Greek orator Demosthenes‘ death.[19][26][5] A letter between early society members in Yale’s archives[27] suggests that 322 is a reference to the year 322 BC and that members measure dates from this year instead of from the common era. In 322 BC, the Lamian War ended with the death of Demosthenes and Athenians were made to dissolve their government and establish a plutocratic system in its stead, whereby only those possessing 2,000 drachmas or more could remain citizens.”



The fact that this number celebrates the triumph of plutocracy over democracy tells us exactly who we are dealing with in this COVID conspiracy: the families who own the fortune 500 companies.



They are pulling out all the stops because their control grid is threatened by secret negotiations now taking place concerning the Bretton Woods financial architecture set up after World War II, according to members of the Rothschild family. This includes the World Bank, the Global Debt Facility, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the BIS and the IMF, according to these as well as MI6 sources.


The talks between high-level Asian and Western secret society representatives intend to replace the current financial architecture, which is based on Babylonian debt slavery, with a system that will be kick-started with a jubilee and offer great prosperity to all, and not just the top 0.1%.



There is a lot we cannot discuss here because of the sensitivity of these talks and the very real physical danger the participants face. However, the Pentagon, the Asian Secret Societies, the British Commonwealth and many other powerful groups are backing the changes being discussed.



The main battleground remains the United States after President Donald Trump effectively nationalized the Federal Reserve Board’s U.S. operations and the Chairman now reports to him. This, and not the fake COVID virus pandemic, is the real reason why Americans are being prohibited from traveling to Europe and so many other countries, NSA sources say.



The nationalization of the FRB in the U.S. is destroying many economic paradigms. According to the Atlanta Fed, U.S. GDP had fallen by as much as 55% as of June 5th.




If this was true then U.S. GDP, on a purchasing power parity basis, would be below that of India, making it the world’s third-largest economy and not its superpower.



However, the data misses the fact that thanks to money sent directly to the people from the Nationalized Fed, most Americans are not seeing a 55% drop in income and many – especially near the bottom of the pyramid – are actually experiencing better living standards. Now NSA sources are reporting that 8 out of 10 Americans are will get relief from rent or mortgage payments. In other words, some sort of de facto jubilee has begun. No wonder the Babylonian slave masters are hysterically attacking Trump and his regime.


The main problem with the U.S., of course, is that most of the domestic industry has been moved overseas (mainly to China) and it will take years to rebuild. This is leading to shortages of many goods, especially trinkets from China. That’s why Walmart has begun selling used items.


The Europeans, still under Babylonian control, are now circling the wagons around Roman bloodline leader Angela Merkel. In an interview with 5 newspapers that was widely pushed by the corporate media Merkel said:


“We grew up in the certain knowledge that the United States wanted to be a world power. Should the U.S. now wish to withdraw from that role of is own free will, we would have to reflect on that very deeply… In a crisis of this magnitude…what needs to be done in this case is something extraordinary.”




In the interview, Merkel made a veiled threat that the EU would move closer to China. Also, the fact Europe is banning visitors from the U.S. really means they fear ideological infection, because, as I know personally from visiting hospitals, the COVID excuse is fake.


Of course, the battle inside the United States is far from over as can be seen from violent paid protests, governors imposing restrictions on people, and severe, almost paralyzing infighting in Washington DC. This battle will intensify over the summer. But, at the end of the day, it will be the U.S. armed forces and police agencies who will prevail. For now, they are mostly rallying around Trump.


However, the thing the Q fighters rallying around Trump need to realize is that the U.S. is not an island. The rest of the world needs the U.S. military’s help to protect the planet. The people of the world are also willing to pay generously for services such as peacekeeping, environmental protection, and exploration of the universe. We are facing a planetary crisis of extinction and environmental destruction and U.S. military has a key role to play.


Here is one example of the sort of thing that will happen if the U.S. armed forces do not protect the people of the Earth. Two of our South East Asian news sources were attacked and has a brush with death in hospital, most likely to prevent them from reporting a new genocide that has begun in Cambodia. The following report came from a third source, who, for reasons of personal safety, wants to remain anonymous:


Report from Cambodia

Since the 2012 election, Hun S’en and his party have been losing power, which was confirmed by the latest municipal election.

In reaction, Hun Sen decapitated the winning opposition party HSD. Then, Hun S’en declared the HSD party illegal. Now anyone who criticizes the government in any way is put in jail. Freedom of expression and of the press no longer exists. All television stations and newspapers belong to Hun Sen and his relatives [(sounds like they are learning from the U.S.)].

He benefited from a period of relative calm, after 5 years of Red Khmer (Khmer Rough) and 5 years of Vietnamese occupation the people had started enjoying the new consumer society.


However, Hun Sen kept in power most of the former Red Khmers (Pol Pot) clique who did not evolve. He also lost the contact and support of the youth (60%) who see no future in the country.


The 6% official growth is due to factories (mainly Chinese) that wanted to benefit from preferential access to European Markets (EBA) and real estate, mainly for the Chinese. The real estate deals allow them to launder money, but do not create a viable economy.


This growth has enriched the Communist ruling class, leaving the people on the sidelines. Moreover, the country is being subjected to the systematic plunder of its resources (wood, Mekong sand, etc..).



The Corona crisis Scamdemic is making things even worse. Tourism is dead, most of the hotels are closed letting the employees go without any wages. They are then unable to feed their families in the countryside. The only food Cambodia grows is rice for export as most food is imported from Vietnam and Thailand but since all borders have been closed there has been no imported food for 3 months.


The Chinese have now left the country, construction is on hold and the factories are closed leaving the entire precarious economy for dead. Aggravating the circumstances, the government has promoted the use of microcredit, and now with the loss of income, most of the borrowers will not be able to repay their loans and will lose their money, house, or land to racketeers.


The schools are closed until 2021, which will cause the bankruptcy of most of the private schools.

The country is almost totally closed due to the new restrictions imposed to enter, a $3,000 deposit upon entry!


The government stays in power only by terror and coercion, the situation will become tense within a month when the people will have no reserves anymore. The Premier is ready to pass emergency legislation, which gives HS and his communist cadre total power without any controls. In other words, Cambodia is facing Khmer Rouge 2.0


These are the sort of events that will take place around the world unless the White Hats stay engaged.


The deal presently being negotiated will allow for the U.S. military to get even greater funding than they do now. Only this time, they will be defending the people and living creatures of the planet, not stealing resources for oligarchs. Of the three great Western power centers, London has responded positively. We now await answers from Washington and Rome.