This item by Paul Schroeder tackles the broad rethink that is taking
place in the theory of evolution. As ever we keep looking for an
externalization rather than explanation.
A logic reality check is in order. An external reality must also
self evolve. We are merely demanding that life as we know it be self
evolving here on Earth and that is not impossible at all, although it
is completely plausible that we got a jump start along the way, but
it must not be foundational unless life arose first inside the Sun.
What is the problem is that we have mistaken the library for the
reader operant itself. Setting aside the DNA, we must have a self
assembling decision maker that creates code it can use. We can
almost imagine how it could work. But we do need to look to that
model only knowing that it can create DNA in order to preserve
instructions.
Quite simply the primordial soup is way more important that the DNA.
We can stuff it into a proto bubble, we can place it in proximity to
solid crystalline acids to be the hammer and anvil. We can protect
it all in ice for however long it may take.
It still has to be sophisticated enough to use replication to
construct its home and to duplicate. This is difficult but I will
never say it is impossible.
What should be clear by now though is that visible evolution is
driven by responses to the environmental opportunity and not the
other way around.
DNA as Nanotech
Design: Darwin Never Met Aliens
By Paul Schroeder
http://www.ufodigest.com/article/human-dna-reveals-we-are-someone-elses-property
God is responsible for
the spiritual entities within our bodies, and more likely, aliens are
the most likely candidates for the geniuses behind the amazing
nanotech DNA which designs our life form physical bodies; there is no
argument required.
There are many
predominant planets whose entire intelligent life forms are spiritual
entities who have no physical DNA required to house such a spirit
being.
Our
physical world is an anomaly, by virtue of the sheer numbers of
many such noncorporeal worlds, bycomparison.
Does human DNA reflect
a computer code, an alien nanotech, and thus the not so hidden hidden
fingerprint of a "Creator"?
Scientists have found
that our genetic code has all of these key elements.
"The coding
regions of DNA," expostulates Dr. Stephen Meyer, "have
exactly the same relevant properties as a computer code or language"
(quoted by Strobel, p. 237, The Case for a Creator, 2004)
Whose mind or what entity could shrink and miniaturize such
information and place our DNA's enormous number of 'letters' in their
correct sequence as a genetic building block instruction manual?
Could evolution in
itself have progressively come up with a nanotech system like this?
It is difficult to
fathom, but the quantum of information in our human DNA is roughly
comparably equal to 12 sets of The Encyclopedia Britannica-an amazing
384 volumes worth of detailed data that would fill 48 feet long of
required library shelves .
Yet in their precise
size-only two millionths of a millimeter thick-a teaspoon of DNA,
according to molecular biologist Michael Denton, has "all the
information needed to build the proteins for all the species of
organisms that have ever lived on the earth, and there would still be
enough room left for all the information in every book ever written"
(Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, 1996, p.
“God is responsible
for spiritual entities within, aliens are the geniuses behind
nanotech DNA which is our physical bodies. Most planetary intelligent
spiritual entities need no physical DNA to house a being.” p.
334).
Intelligent Design of
our Human DNA
As scientists began to
unravel and decode the human DNA molecule, they found something
amazingly unexpected-a computer programmer's exquisite 'language'
composed of some 3 billion genetic letters.
"One
of the most extraordinary discoveries of the twentieth century,"
says Dr. Stephen Meyer, director of the Center for Science and
Culture at the Discovery Institute in Seattle, Wash., "was that
DNA actually stores information-the detailed instructions for
assembling proteins-in the form of a four-character digital code"
(quoted by Lee Strobel, The Case for a Creator, 2004, p. 224).
As
George Williams explains it: "The gene is a package of
information, not an object. The pattern of base pairs in a
DNA molecule specifies the gene. But the DNA molecule is the medium,
it's not the message" (quoted by Johnson, p. 70).
Design from an
intelligent source
To any discerning
mind, this type of nanotech high-level information has been deduced
to originate only from a seemingly intelligent source.
As Lee Strobel
explains: "The data at the core of life is not disorganized,
it's not simply orderly like salt crystals, but it's complex and
specific information that can accomplish a bewildering task-the
building of biological machines that far outstrip human technological
capabilities" (p. 244).
For example, the
precise nature of this genetic language is such that the average
error that is not caught turns out to be one error per 10
billion letters.
If
an error occurs in one of the most important parts of the code,
in the genes, it causes diseases such as sickle-cell anemia. Yet even
the best and most apt typist in the world couldn't come close to
making only one mistake per 10 billion letters-far from it.
Michael
Behe, a biochemist and professor at Pennsylvania's Lehigh University,
explains that DNA genetic data is primarily an instruction
manual.
He
reasons: "Consider a step-by-step list of
[genetic] instructions. A mutation is a change in one of the
lines of instructions. So instead of saying, "Take a
1/4-inch nut," a mutation might say, "Take a 3/8-inch nut."
Or instead of "Place the round peg in the round hole," we
might get "Place the round peg in the square hole" . . .
What a mutation cannot do is change all the instructions in
one step-say, [providinginstructions] to build a fax
machine instead of a radio" (Darwin's Black Box, 1996, p.
41).
We therefore have in
our human genetic code an huge complex instruction manual that
appears to have been eloquently designed by a more highly intelligent
source than mere human beings.
The God agnostic and
recently deceased Francis Crick, one of the discoverers of DNA, after
decades of work deciphering it, admitted that "an honest man,
armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state
that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be
almost a miracle, so many are the conditions which would have had to
have been satisfied to get it going" (Life Itself, 1981, p. 88,
emphasis added).
Dean Kenyon, a biology
professor who repudiated his earlier book on Darwinian
evolution-because of discoveries of information found in DNA-states:
"This new realm of molecular genetics (is) where we see the most
compelling evidence of design on the Earth" (ibid., p. 221).
As well, one of the
world's most famous atheists, Professor Antony Flew, admitted that he
couldn't explain how DNA was created and developed through evolution.
He now sees the demanding need for an intelligent source to have been
involved in the making of our human DNA code.
"What I think the
DNA material has done is show that intelligence must have been
involved in getting these extraordinary diverse elements together,"
he said (quoted by Richard Ostling, "Leading Atheist Now
Believes in God," Associated Press report, Dec. 9, 2004).
" I will
praise You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made . ."
Written some thousands
of years ago, King David's words about our constructed human bodies
seems most true. He wrote: "For You formed my inward parts, You
covered me in my mother's womb. I will praise You, for I am fearfully
and wonderfully made . . . My frame was not hidden from You, when I
was made in secret, and skillfully wrought. . ."
Where does all this
deposit the theory of evolution? Michael Denton, an agnostic
scientist, concludes: "Ultimately the Darwinian theory of
evolution is no more nor less than the great cosmogenic myth of the
twentieth century" (Denton, p. 358).
Thus we are left like
a precipitate out of a solution with the astounding Creator notion
that every life-form on Earth carries a genetic code for his
extraterrestrial cousin and that evolution is hardly what we deduce
that it is it .
This discovery shall
shake our roots of humanity and confirm or deny our beliefs, both in
our concept of a Creator as well as in our own concept of our
destiny.
Within this very
paradigm, all forms of life farmed throughout the Universe may well
be seen as an enormous molecular nanotech creation by a intelligent
Creator using amino acid thoughts expressed mathematically.
Crick, DNA's
discoverer, perhaps, said it best:
"Life did not
evolve first on Earth, a highly advanced civilization became
threatened so they devised a way to pass on their existence.
They
genetically-modified their DNA and sent it out from their planet on
bacteria or meteorites with the hope that it would collide with
another planet.
It did, and that's why
we're here.
The DNA molecule is
the most efficient information storage system in the entire universe.
The immensity of
complex, coded and precisely sequenced information is absolutely
staggering. The DNA evidence speaks of intelligent,
information-bearing design.
Complex DNA coding
would have been necessary for even the hypothetical first ‘so-called'
simple cell(s).
Our DNA was encoded
with messages from that other civilization.
They programmed the
molecules so that when we reached a certain level of intelligence, we
would be able to access their information, and they could therefore
"teach" us about ourselves, and how to progress.
For life to form by
chance is mathematically virtually impossible."
No comments:
Post a Comment