The great achievement of Columbus was to discover how to return to Europe after taking the winds out. Many others had disappeared in the same
direction and never returned, quite rightly discouraging adventurers. His observation of the returning winds in the
northern latitudes clinched the deal.
Unfortunately, far too many are
also quick to hang him with results of the European onslaught of the Americas which
is grossly unfair and completely wrong. Simultaneous
onslaughts into Africa were readily contained and repulsed by societies far
less organized or advanced as the societies found in the Americas .
All he did was open the door to European
adventurers to cut themselves free from the crown and then run amok among
societies unable to outright defeat them and who were also unable to counter
the onslaught with nasty native diseases.
In fact simple European diseases felled millions completely out of European
sight. All this made Cortes and Pissarro
possible and amazingly sustainable after the fact. It was still a lucky barbarian invasion that
ran away outside any man’s control and long after Columbus .
Without the intervention of the disease
card, the Americas would
never have been truly conquered and would more resemble the settlement patterns
in Africa in which colonizers are today few.
Top 5 Misconceptions About Columbus
Christopher Wanjek, LiveScience Bad Medicine Columnist
Date: 09 October 2011 Time: 10:44 PM ET
Monday is Columbus Day, time to buy appliances on sale and contemplate
other things that have nothing to do with Christopher Columbus. So much of what
we say about Columbus
is either wholly untrue or greatly exaggerated. Here are a few of the top
offenders.
1. Columbus
set out to prove the world was round.
If he did, he was about 2,000 years too late. Ancient
Greek mathematicians had already proven that the Earth was round, not
flat. Pythagoras in the sixth century B.C.E. was one of the originators of the
idea. Aristotle in the fourth century B.C.E. provided the physical evidence,
such as the shadow of the Earth on the moon and the curvature of the Earth
known by all sailors approaching land. And by the third century B.C.E.,
Eratosthenes determined the Earth's shape and circumference using basic
geometry. In the second century C.E., Claudius Ptolemy wrote the
"Almagest," the mathematical and astronomical treatise on planetary
shapes and motions, describing the spherical Earth. This text was well known
throughout educated Europe in Columbus '
time. [Related: Earth Is
Flat in Many People's Minds]
Columbus, a self-taught man, greatly underestimated the
Earth's circumference. He also thought Europe was wider than it actually
was and that Japan was
farther from the coast of China
than it really was. For these reasons, he figured he could reach Asia by going
west, a concept that most of educated Europe at the time thought was daft — not
because the Earth was flat, but because Columbus' math was so wrong. Columbus,
in effect, got lucky by bumping into land that, of course, wasn't Asia .
The Columbus flat-earth myth perhaps
originated with Washington Irving 's
1828 biography of Columbus ;
there's no mention of this before that. His crew wasn't nervous about falling
off the Earth.
2. Columbus discovered America .
Yes, let's ignore the fact that millions of humans already inhabited
this land later to be called the Americas , having discovered it
millennia before. And let's ignore that whole Leif Ericson voyage to Greenland
and modern-day Canada
around 1000 C.M.E. If Columbus discovered America , he
himself didn't know. Until his death he claimed to have landed in Asia , even though most navigators knew he didn't. [Top 10
Intrepid Explorers]
What Columbus "discovered" was
the Bahamas archipelago and
then the island later named Hispaniola, now split into Haiti and the Dominican Republic . On his
subsequent voyages he went farther south, to Central and South
America . He never got close to what is now called the United States.
So why does the United States celebrate the guy who thought he found a
nifty new route to Asia and the lands described by Marco Polo? This is because the
early United Stateswas fighting with England , not Spain . John Cabot (a.k.a. Giovanni
Cabot, another Italian) "discovered" Newfoundland
in England 's name around
1497 and paved the way for England 's
colonization of most of North America . So the
American colonialists instead turned to Columbus
as their hero, not England 's
Cabot. Hence we have the capital, Washington , D.C. — that's District
of Columbia , not District of Cabot.
3. Columbus introduced syphilis to Europe .
This is hotly debated. Syphilis was presented in pre-Columbus America . Yet
syphilis likely existed for millennia in Europe ,
as well, but simply wasn't well understood. The ancient Greeks describe lesions
rather similar to that from syphilis. Perhaps by coincidence, an
outbreak of syphilis occurred in Naples
in 1494 during a French invasion, just two years after Columbus ' return. This sealed the connection.
But aside from descriptions of syphilis-like lesions by Hippocrates,
many researchers believe that there was a syphilis outbreak in, of all places,
a 13th-century Augustinian friary in the English port
of Kingston upon Hull . This coastal city saw a continual
influx of sailors from distant lands, and you know what sailors can do. Carbon
dating and DNA analysis of bones from the friary support the theory of syphilis
being a worldwide disease before Columbus '
voyages.
4. Columbus
died unknown in poverty.
After his death, though, his family sued the royal crown, a famous
lawsuit known as the Pleitos colombinos, or Columbian lawsuits, lasting nearly
20 years. Columbus '
heirs ultimately secured significant amounts of property and other riches from
the crown. Also, most European navigators understood by the end of the 15th
century, before his death, that Columbus
had discovered islands and a large landmass unknown to them.
5. Columbus
did nothing significant.
With all this talk of a hapless Columbus
accidentally discovering the New World, as well as the subsequent genocide of
native cultures, it is easy to understand the current backlash against Columbus and the national holiday called Columbus Day,
celebrated throughout North and South America .
This isn't entirely fair.
While Columbus was wrong about most
things, he did help establish knowledge about trade winds, namely the
lower-latitude easterlies that blow toward the Caribbean and the higher-latitude
westerlies that can blow a ship back to Western Europe .
Also, while Columbus wasn't the first European
to reach the Western Hemisphere , he was the
first European to stay. His voyages directly initiated a permanent presence of
Europeans in both North and South America .
News of the success of his first voyage spread like wildfire through Europe , setting the stage for an era of European
conquest. One can argue whether the conquest was good or bad for humanity: that
is, the spread
of Christianity, rise of modernism, exploitation and annihilation of native
cultures, and so on. But it is difficult to deny Columbus ' direct role in quickly and
radically changing the world.
Christopher Wanjek is the author of the books "Bad Medicine"
and "Food
At Work." His column,Bad Medicine, appears
regularly on LiveScience.
No comments:
Post a Comment