At least the knee jerk conclusion
regarding these ancient structure is been properly challenged. Large structures have several plausible rationales
and are just not automatically temples which simply may not have been part of
anyone’s culture at the time. The
Northwest plank houses are a glowing admonition against such thinking. They are recent systems that organized communal
living.
In fact, I suspect that was the
cause of early large buildings simply because early societies lack the theology
and the idea of separation. Our own
thinking is influenced by the remnants of a global Bronze Age theology that
promoted sacrificial pyramids of one form or the other. In other posts I also argue that this global
culture was Atlantean and lasted from around 3000 BC through 1159 BC. This culture was certainly built around
palaces and temple complexes and a sustaining bronze trade and manufactory.
Yet to presume anything like this
applied to the preceding stone culture is surely wrong.
Another aspect of communal
housing needs to be recalled. It requires
a ready supply of storable food. The Northwest
had smoked and dried salmon. Likely the then
forested country provided large annual game migrations that supplied the
surplus protein. Retracing those routes
should allow for the discovery of additional complexes if they exist.
This is at least a good working
conjecture for future research.
Archaeologist argues world's oldest temples were not temples at all
Ancient structures uncovered in Turkey and thought to be the world's
oldest temples may not have been strictly religious buildings after all,
according to an article in the October issue of Current Anthropology.
Archaeologist Ted Banning of the University
of Toronto argues that
the buildings found at Göbekli Tepe may have been houses for people, not the
gods.
The buildings at Göbekli, a hilltop just outside of the Turkish city of
Urfa , were found in 1995 by Klaus Schmidt of the
German Archaeological Institute and colleagues from the Şanlıurfa
Museum in Turkey . The oldest of the
structures at the site are immense buildings with large stone pillars, many of
which feature carvings of snakes, scorpions, foxes, and other animals.
The presence of art in the buildings, the substantial effort that must
have been involved in making and erecting them, and a lack of evidence for any
permanent settlement in the area, led Schmidt and others to conclude that
Göbekli must have been a sacred place where pilgrims traveled to worship, much
like the Greek ruins of Delphi or Olympia. If that interpretation is true it
would make the buildings, which date back more than 10,000 years to the early
Neolithic, the oldest temples
ever found.
However, Banning offers an alternative interpretation that challenges
some of Schmidt's claims.
He outlines growing archaeological evidence for daily activities at the
site, such as flintknapping and food preparation. "The presence of this
evidence suggests that the site was not, after all, devoid of residential
occupation, but likely had quite a large population," Banning said.
Banning goes on to argue that the population may have been housed in
the purported temples themselves. He disagrees with the idea that the presence
of decorative pillars or massive construction efforts means the buildings could
not have been residential space.
"The presupposition that 'art,' or even 'monumental' art, should
be exclusively associated with specialized shrines or other non-domestic spaces
also fails to withstand scrutiny," Banning writes. "There is abundant
ethnographic evidence for considerable investment in the decoration of domestic
structures and spaces, whether to commemorate the feats of ancestors, advertise
a lineage's history or a chief's generosity; or record initiations and other
house-based rituals."
Archaeological evidence for domestic art from the Neolithic period
exists as well, Banning says, such as the wall paintings at Çatalhöyük, another
archaeological site in Turkey .
Banning suggests that the purported temples may instead have been large
communal houses, "similar in some ways to the large plank houses of the Northwest Coast
of North America with their impressive house
posts and totem poles."
"If so, they would likely have housed quite large households that
might provide an extremely early example of what the French anthropologist,
Claude Lévi-Strauss, called 'house societies,'" Banning said. "Such
societies often use house structures for competitive display, locations for
rituals, and explicit symbols of social units."
Banning hopes that more excavation at the site will ultimately shed
more light on how these buildings were used. In the meantime, he hopes that
researchers will not automatically assume that the presence of art or
decoration in structures at Göbekli and elsewhere denotes an exclusively
religious building.
"It is … likely that some of these buildings were the locus for a
variety of rituals, probably including feasts, mortuary rites, magic, and
initiations," he writes. "Yet there is generally no reason to presume
a priori, even when these are as impressive as the buildings at Göbekli Tepe,
that they were not also people's houses."
No comments:
Post a Comment