What caught my eye was the
limited extent of the great lakes watershed itself and particularly as
expressed in the United
States .
The exception there is Michigan .
This actually means that the two
dominant polities are just two and that is Ontario
and Michigan .
Actually accomplishing something is
actually much easier than I thought.
Every other state has an interest but not a dominant one.
Agriculturally, the interest is
somewhat narrower but the basic pattern holds true.
The important consideration that
needs to be addressed is how to optimize this huge watershed. For the present, it has all been by reaction
as one fresh invader after another rips through the environment. This has been a source of consternation for
two centuries.
My own experience informs me that
riverine restoration and outright management and direct commercial exploitation
needs to be fully integrated with all stakeholders. I grew up there and have posted many
suggestions. The rivers need to be
forested properly and not just in some ill planned imposed system either. The edges need to be made impervious to large
herbivores. I have suggested a forest
edge composed of staggered hawthorns and a verge amply seeded with chamomile to
protect crop land.
Thereafter the woodlands
themselves need to be actively managed and the the rivers themselves will
quickly restore their working banks and be a natural host to an active spawning
environment supporting a huge Great lakes
fishery.
All that remains is to control
industrial pollution properly so that it might be possible to eat the product
of that fishery.
Great Lakes proposal envisions Canadians, Americans working together
RENATA D’ALIESIO
From Friday's Globe and Mail
Published Thursday, Oct. 06, 2011 7:53PM EDT
A U.S. architectural
firm best known for creating some of the tallest skyscrapers in the world has
turned its creative eye to the Great Lakes ,
advocating for a new economic and environmental vision that spans borders.
The bi-national blueprint from Chicago-based Skidmore, Owings and Merrill
is still in its infancy, but the concept has garnered support from several
mayors in Canada and the United States .
The proposal calls on the two nations to re-imagine the Great Lakes and St.
Lawrence River region as a shared space, where Canadians and Americans work
together to protect waterways, ease traffic congestion, promote tourism and
develop new economic ventures.
“This isn’t a collection of
lakes that divides two countries. This is a collection of lakes that should
unite two countries,” said Philip Enquist, one of the firm’s senior urban
designers.
The bi-national vision, presented this week at a global green-building
conference in Toronto ,
isn’t so far-fetched. The Brookings Institution in Washington
and Mowat Centre in Toronto
have been studying the idea, consulting 250 business, government and community
leaders. The public-policy think tanks will present their regional blueprint at
an international Great Lakes water-quality meeting in Detroit next week.
Genesis of a vision
At first blush, the pairing of the Great Lakes
and an architectural company seems odd. Skidmore, Owings and Merrill has built a
global design empire with such towering wonders as the iconic John Hancock
Center and Sears Tower in Chicago and downtown Dubai’s spiralling Burj Khalifa,
which, at 828 metres, is the tallest building on the planet.
But when the firm was asked to draft a vision to mark the centennial of
the 1909 Burnham Plan that helped shape Chicago, Mr. Enquist, who’s done
regional planning in China and Bahrain, began wondering why there wasn’t a
holistic strategy for the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River area.
And so Skidmore, Owings and Merrill began envisioning an environmental
and economic plan.
The environmental case
The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence
River region is massive, encompassing Ontario , Quebec and eight
U.S.
states. It contains about 84 per cent of North America ’s
fresh water and almost 18,000 kilometres of lake frontage. Nearly a third of
Canadians and about a tenth of Americans live here, in more than 15,000 towns
and cities.
The National Parks Conservation Association, a U.S. advocacy group, and
the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiative, which includes about 80
mayors from both sides of the border, have joined the push for a bi-national
strategy. The proposal urges greater collaboration to improve water quality and
conservation. The plan also calls for the designation of a Great Lakes
international park, which would increase the region’s cachet, said Lynn
McClure, a regional director with the U.S. parks group.
The economic argument
Unlike provinces and states in the Pacific Northwest that forged formal
economic and political alliances two decades ago, the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence region doesn’t
have an entrenched culture of co-operation, observes Josh Hjartarson, policy
director at Mowat Centre. Rather, the jurisdictions are more accustomed to
competing for tourists, manufacturers and other economic opportunities.
But with the manufacturing sector waning in many parts of the Great Lakes and glum forecasts of a deepening economic
downturn, Mr. Hjartarson says the region should forge closer ties to capitalize
on its assets. Those would include top-notch educational institutions, a wealth
of corporate head offices and a population of 105 million people. New
industries could be created through stronger co-operation. Mr. Enquist, the
urban designer, points to renewable energy and green technology as possible
opportunities for the region.
Obstacles
“Given the economic crisis that’s taken place, I think there’s a sense
of urgency that’s being developed to try and get this group to work together,”
added the Windsor mayor, whose city has grappled with the decline of auto
manufacturing.
“The region has an ability to compete. It’s either we work together or
lose together,” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment