I have posted a few items on the
Sasquatch or Bigfoot in the past and have noted for some time that we have long
had critical mass in terms of conforming observations to work with. The creature is clearly a large primate and
plausibly more closely related to us than any other primate. The difficulty has been its nocturnal nature
when we are blind and its adaptation to forests, an ecological niche
specifically different from our own allowing easy separation.
It has been a matter of waiting
for the hard evidence to properly materialize and get into the right hands.
I also note that BFRO has done an
excellent job at providing a reporting system and has been capturing reports at
the rate of twenty plus per month for more than ten years. This plus the work of John Green on the twentieth
century has given us a report inventory that includes a thousand or so
excellent reports from good observers and many more that show weakness for one
reason or the other.
Here it is reported that an
obvious encounter took place that certainly conforms to the known data and has explicitly
left us a tuft of hair. The collector is
working to determine the nature of the hair and reports that it is confirmed as
primate.
We learn that the creature does
eat mushrooms, which is new information.
Certain plants are indicated also and we do know that they take deer in
the deep snow.
As expected the DNA work is
difficult. It must be if the animal is
unknown to science. Otherwise a simple
test will determine what it is exactly and quickly. Here they must test for primate specific
parts of the code.
The take home is that we are
close to nailing it.
With that in hand it should be
possible to organize the hundreds of thousands needed to track and capture a
specimen(s) using experts at the craft.
Kirk Stewart displays a cast he made of a large footprint found on
his
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 2011
|
triplicate - Kirk Stewart displays a cast he made of a large footprint found on his
Take a 3-mile excursion up a winding mountain road near Gasquet, go down a driveway lined with heavy brush, and there’s a meadow.
In that meadow roam horses, cows, cats, and occasionally, the landowner believes, Bigfoot.
Kirk Stewart, the owner of a residence on French Hill Road, is still waiting on detailed analysis of hair samples he collected after a night three years ago when he thinks Bigfoot broke through a wire fence, plucked about seven of his peacocks and then made off with them.
The next morning, Stewart said he found a trampled fence and a piece of his peacock pen peeled off. He also noticed feathers on the ground and on a tree limb about 7 feet high.
“I was thinking it was a bear, up until I had seen how it opened the pen,” said Stewart.
As he assessed the damage, Stewart said he happened upon a clump of about 16 hairs attached to one of the barbs on his fence. They were about 7 inches long with a fine texture and a slight curl.
“The hairs are the smoking gun,” he said.
Stewart sent them to the
A more detailed analysis is expected within six months, it said.
NABS claims to use scientific methods to investigate possible incidents involving Bigfoot, also known as Sasquatch, a purportedly ape-like creature whose existence is discounted by a majority of scientists.
NABS was created about six years ago by a group of private donors who wanted to find answers to their childhood curiosities about whether Bigfoot exists, said David Paulides, director of the organization based in Los Gatos, Calif.
It has collected dozens of hair samples from around the country to genetically analyze them. Along with Stewart’s samples, NABS has received hair samples from Hoopa, northern
“(
He’s especially interested in Stewart’s property, where the resident said several other things have happened that seem Bigfoot-related.
“I’ve been at his property several times,” said Paulides. “ What’s going on there is very strange.”
Stewart said he made a cast of a giant footprint he found on his property on a different occasion than the 2008 peacock disappearance.
It’s about 7 inches wide and about 17 inches long.
In 2007, Stewart was throwing a birthday party for his son, when he heard a loud yell coming from near his melon patch.
When Stewart later went to the patch, he said he found a line of about 50 melons that had been pried open, he said.
There were circular holes in the melons with fingernail indentations, he said, adding there was also a big indentation in one of the large tires that housed the melons.
Perhaps Bigfoot used it as a resting place while gorging on melons, Stewart speculated.
“If I ever had him over for dinner, I’d cook peacocks and cut honeydew melons,” joked Stewart as he walked around his property recently.
“I believe it’s what they call a Bigfoot,” he said. “It’s not some long-haired hippie running around.”
Stewart said he has yet to sign a contract with NABS releasing his rights to the hair samples.
He said he makes his living farming his property. He also has a lawsuit pending against Del Norte County seeking the cash value of marijuana plants confiscated from his land even though he had a valid medical marijuana caregiver license.
The drug-related charges against Stewart were dismissed, but he’s currently on probation for being a felon in possession of a firearm.
Before it started collecting hair samples, NABS set out to gather anecdotal evidence from people who claimed to have encountered Bigfoot.
Through commonalities in the evidence gathered, Paulides said he was able to profile behavioral attributes of the creature.
“We named food sources,” said Paulides. “Bigfoot eats mushrooms. That’s a food source people didn’t really think about. Also, there’s a series of green shrubs and ferns and water plants.”
NABS has also hypothesized Bigfoot is not going to be far from water.
After gathering anecdotal information, NABS had a forensicartist draw sketches of Bigfoot that people who claimed to have seen it described.
The facial features of Bigfoot are more humanlike than previously suggested and its hair color runs the color spectrum similar to human hair, said Paulides.
“We flew right into the face of old-time researchers,” he said.
Paulides included anecdotal evidence and the forensic sketches in his book, “Tribal Bigfoot.”
Stewart was featured in the book, as were several other people from Del Norte and Humboldt counties.
While the book released in 2009 was being written, NABS was in the beginning stages of hair sample analysis.
A letter about a preliminary laboratory analysis of Stewart’s sample was published in the book.
The letter states that an expert examined the hair and found it to be from an animal of primate origin.
Since then, dozens more hair samples have been submitted for evaluation, and NABS hopes to have results soon, Paulides said.
The research has taken longer than expected due to the complexity of genetically tracing the hairs, Paulides said.
“That’s probably one of the reasons no one has tried to jump through the hurdles that we’re jumping through,” said Paulides. “It’s much more complicated than anyone thought.”
Paulides anticipates having the analysis completed within the next six months.
The work will be published in a report written by a group of scientists who will scrutinize the findings, Paulides said.
“I think if you have any scientific acumen to you and you’re an educated person then it’s hard to ignore science,” said Paulides. “In reality there’s thousands of (Bigfoots). They’re much more common than anyone realizes.”
“The forrest floor is so efficient at disposing of things,” said Paulides, adding that he’s spent thousands of hours in the woods, but has never seen a fully intact skeleton of a mountain lion.
“If we can prove theres a primate out there that’s bipedal and it has been ignored by science for eternity and we can now show it exists,” said Paulides, “I don’t care what kind of evolutionary belief system you have, I believe that will alter the course of science.”
----------
The following is a report made to the BFRO in 2002 referencing a sighting in the same geographic area. As well, this link lists sightings in
YEAR: 1985
SEASON: Fall
MONTH: October
DATE: unknown
STATE:
COUNTY: Del Norte County
LOCATION DETAILS: Our camp was located just a short way up Patrick Creek road, maybe just 1000 feet up from Hwy 199. We camped near the creek in a small clearing. We arrived at dusk and left just after breakfast the next morning.
NEAREST TOWN:
NEAREST ROAD:
OBSERVED: I live in Humboldt Co. CA and have heard night screams that sounded like an incredibly loud out-of-control frat party in 1985 when a friend and I were remote camping in a heavily wooded unihabited area around Patrick Creek in Del Norte Co. just north of Humboldt. There were voices in deep male tonations as well as slightly higher and higher still [juvenile?] I've heard coyotes, bears wolves etc etc. I've also spent time with my sister who was doing her graduate project in anthropology on primates at the
At the time, my wolf-hybrid dog who traveled 300+ miles of the Pacific Crest Trail alone with me and who at the time was a veteran of wilderness encounters and very bold [never would hesitate to tree the largest bear] was trying to bite a hole in the tent to get in. Once I let the trembling dog in the tent she actually tried to climb inside of my sleeping bag. She refused to go back outside and remained whimpering in the tent with me until dawn. At one point in the night, I awoke to hear a very heavy body tramping just outside the tent. I heard breathing, very deep like in a broad-chested animal. I dared not go outside until light. Upon first light I went outside and saw what looked like a stampede had been through our campsite. The duff was heavily scuffed with signs of foot traffic, which hadn't been there the night before.
I've read a few Bigfoot stories and I've noticed that sometimes the sound of children playing has attracted sighting situations. I once had a problem with a mentally ill person who was sneaking in my horse barn at night and letting the horses out. After months of frustration and being told I was paranoid, I got a remote camera that had some infrared capabilities. As expected, I caught the man and turned in a point-blank video to authorities of him. If your researchers want a good chance at getting Bigfoot on film, why not set up a week-long or so remote campsite with tents etc. and install a infrared video camera to view the camp. Have recordings or better yet, actual children squealing in play through the hours of the night. Review the tapes each day and see what you get. It worked for me. From the sound of how intelligent the Bigfoot may be, the more 'natural' you make your camp appear as just a family outing, the more likely you'll get what you're after. That's why I think using real children would work. Good luck getting any brave enough to do it though!
ALSO NOTICED: Only that many years later I talked with a man who lives up Patrick Creek road whose name I forget, but he is a retired police officer so his credibility can be assumed. He reported that the sounds we heard then are common to his experience and that he has actually seen Bigfoot families cross the road to where his house is!
OTHER WITNESSES: Yes, my roommate was with me. We were both just recreating, cooking over a campfire, laughing at jokes and going to sleep.
OTHER STORIES: Yes, just what I've reported above.
TIME AND CONDITIONS: Sounds were heard at around 11:00PM. It was pitch black with a drizzling light rain. The sounds seemed to come from the top of a nearby ridge to our campsite
ENVIRONMENT: Mixed hardwood/coniferous forest. Madrones, douglas fir and maybe a redwood or two. The terrain is hilly, and mountainous at points. There was a creek nearby. We selected the spot to camp because of it's unused and remote look.
No comments:
Post a Comment