What this really means is that a
mark up materializes in a given sector around clear leaders. These rapidly reach their realistic
target. Yet this leaves a lot of
stranded money that was not in with the leaders, yet the rationale has not been
disproven.
This leads the rationale been
applied to others in the sector to absorb the pool of willing money. Once that pool is exhausted the situation is
created whereby a fair number of issues are naturally over priced and internal variability
has declined. Thus we gain the mimicking
effect.
Recall the old market adage that
even a turkey can fly in a high wind.
This means that while the leaders
have earned their prices a lot of turkeys are now been seriously over priced. Crashes now become more probable and in the
end inevitable as the turkeys have drawn of support.
Mimicry among stocks can predict stock market crashes
February 15, 2011 by Lisa Zyga
The co-movement of stocks during six recent years shows the fraction of
trading days during the year (f) in which a certain percentage of stocks (k/N)
go up. The chart on the right combines all of the years. Image credit: Dion
Harmon, et al.
(PhysOrg.com) -- Since early October 2008, when the Dow Jones
Industrial Average began its drop that reached a low point the following March,
many questions have been raised - particularly about what caused the crash and
if it could have been predicted and somehow prevented. Some possible answers
involve market volatility, changes in regulations, bank failures, easy credit,
or any combination of external influences and internal market dynamics. In a
new study, research analysts have found another clue to stock market crashes:
high levels of collective stock movements - or market mimicry - tend to precede
crashes, which suggests that measuring the mimicry level of the market could
provide significant advance warning of an impending stock market crash.
The researchers, Professor Yaneer Bar-Yam and others from the New
England Complex Systems Institute (NECSI) have posted their study, “Predicting
economic market crises using measures of collective panic,” atarXiv.org. Their
results indicate that it is the internal structure of the market, rather than
external news, that is primarily responsible for crashes.
As previous research has shown, investors can often benefit from using
a trend-following strategy - that is, buying or selling a stock based on the recent
performance of other stocks (which is not necessarily based on any fundamental
value). Mimicry is
high when many stocks move up or down together, which provides a potential
point of origin of self-induced market-wide panic.
The researchers constructed a model of this mimicry to obtain
co-movement data, which is the percentage of stocks that move in the same
direction. When 50% of stocks move in the same direction (and 50% in the
opposite direction), then there is no co-movement. But when substantially more
than half of the stocks move in the same direction, this co-movement indicates
higher levels of mimicry.
Using data from the past several years, the researchers plotted the
number of days in a year that a certain percentage of the market moves up. For
the year 2000, the curve showed that about 50% of stocks were moving together
on any given day. But as the decade went on, the curve became flatter and
peaked lower, indicating an increase in co-movement. By 2008, the curve was
nearly flat, with its distribution reaching the critical value of 1. During
this time, the likelihood of any percentage of stocks moving up was almost the
same. As the researchers explained, when mimicry gets this high, external
influences become very weak compared to the influences among stocks as a whole.
In addition, the researchers found that the Dow Jones’ eight largest
drops (percentage-wise) during the past 26 years occurred during periods in
which mimicry reached a level that was twice the standard deviation from the
previous year. This signature increase in mimicry occurred before the drops by
less than a year, indicating that crashes are preceded by nervousness that
causes investors to demonstrate increasingly collective behavior. For this
reason, the simple signature pattern could provide advance warning of an
impending crash.
“Our results suggest that self-induced panic is a critical component of
both the current financial crisis and large single day drops over recent
years,” the researchers wrote in their study. “The signature we found, the
existence of a large probability of co-movement of stocks on any given day, is
a measure of systemic risk and vulnerability to self-induced panic. Finally, we
note that the ability to distinguish between self-induced panic and the result
of external effects may be widely applicable to collective behaviors.”
In the future, the researchers plan to investigate whether volatility
might be a better predictor of crashes than mimicry. They note that, while
volatility often increases at the beginning of a crisis, it is generally
considered to be unreliable for predicting crashes.
Researchers at the NECSI also played a role in changing the market
regulations during the 2008 crash. The institute advised the US Securities and Exchange
commission to reinstate
the uptick rule, which prohibits short selling during periods of price
decreases; otherwise, short selling can further drive prices down. The uptick
rule was reinstated on the morning of March 10, 2009, the day that the market
began to rise.
More information: Dion Harmon, et al. “Predicting economic market
crises using measures of collective panic." arXiv:1102.2620v1 [q-fin.ST]
No comments:
Post a Comment