It may not be possible with mammals, but elsewhere it now appears to
be common enough to be effective when a population does miss its
breeding season through external intervention. And in spite of all
said, a rare mammalian virgin birth should not be ruled out.
It appears to be also quite common in the species studied which is
why it is seen and now better understood. Just as clearly, it is
not so common outside what has been observed. Thus determining the
biochemical pathway appears important. There may be a simple trigger
that can be applied on demand.
We will want to have those triggers when we begin cloning DNA for
replicating extinct species. A single mammoth is a tragedy while a
female mammoth able to produce is a great plan that provides
additional time to clone up additional members. We also will not be
stymied if we have only one usable sample to work from.
Virgin births
discovered in wild snakes
12 September 2012 Last
updated at 00:45
By Jeremy
ColesReporter, BBC Nature
Researchers in the
US caught pregnant females from two snake species and genetically
analysed the litters.
That proved the
North American pit vipers reproduced without a male, a phenomenon
called facultative parthenogenesis that has previously been found
only in captive species.
Scientists say the
findings could change our understanding of animal reproduction and
vertebrate evolution.
First identified in
domestic chickens, such "virgin births" have been reported
in recent years in a few snake, shark, lizard and bird species.
Crucially though,
all such virgin births have occurred in captivity, to females kept
away from males.
Virgin births in
vertebrates in general have been viewed as "evolutionary
novelties", said Warren Booth, from the University of Tulsa,
Oklahoma, US.
Professor Booth is
lead author of a paper published in the Royal Society's Biological
Letters that challenges this label.
He and his
collaborators investigated virgin births in wild populations of two
geographically separated and long-studied species of snake.
They captured pregnant copperhead and cottonmouth female
pit-vipers from the field, where males were present.
The snakes gave birth,
allowing the scientists to study the physical and genetic
characteristics of the litters.
Of the 22 copperheads,
the scientists found one female that must have had a virgin birth.
Another single virgin
birth occurred within the 37 cottonmouth litters.
"I think the
frequency is what really shocked us," said Prof Booth.
"That's between
2.5 and 5% of litters produced in these populations may be resulting
from parthenogenesis.
"That's quite
remarkable for something that has been considered an evolutionary
novelty," he said.
Sex or no sex
A virgin birth, or
parthenogenesis, is when an egg grows and develops without being
fertilised by sperm.
It results in
offspring that only have their mother's genetic material; no fatherly
contribution is required.
This is not uncommon
in invertebrates such as aphids, bees and ants.
It also happens in a
few all-female species of lizard; geckos and whiptails for example.
But here it occurs across a generation; all females reproduce
asexually via a process called obligate parthenogenesis.
But asexual
reproduction by a normally sexual vertebrate species is still rare,
having been reported in under 0.1% of species.
It was only in the
mid-1990s that virgin births began to be documented in captive
snakes, followed by a captive giant lizard in 2006 and a captive
shark in 2007.
To date this now
includes around 10 species of snakes including a couple of boas, and
a python, four species of shark, and several monitor lizards,
including the endangered Komodo dragon.
Recently the zebra
finch and Chinese painted quail were added to the list. All were kept
in isolation in unnatural conditions and away from any males.
So to find asexual
reproduction in two species of snake in the wild on their first
attempt was "astounding", according to Prof Booth and his
collaborators.
Virgin births should
no longer be viewed as "some rare curiosity outside the
mainstream of evolution," he said.
Evolutionary dead-end?
It remains unclear
whether the female snakes actively select to reproduce this way, or
whether the virgin births are triggered by some other factor, such as
a virus or bacterial infection.
"Any answer is
pure speculation at this point," says Prof Booth.
In captivity, two
sharks, and three snakes, have been shown to have had multiple virgin
births, producing more than one litter via facultative
parthenogenesis.
As yet, it also
remains unclear whether the offspring of these wild virgin births can
themselves go on to have normal, or virgin births of their own.
In captive snakes
studied so far, offspring have so far not been proved viable, that is
capable of surviving and reproducing.
However, earlier this
year Prof Booth and colleagues reported that a checkered gartersnake
that has had consecutive virgin births, appears to have produced
viable male offspring.
Parthenogenicly born
copperheads and cottonmouths are also currently being raised and "in
the next two to three years we will know if they are indeed viable,"
said Prof Booth.
"If they cannot
survive and reproduce, then this is a reproductive dead-end.
"However, if they
are healthy and can reproduce, that opens an entirely new avenue for
research," he said.
Being able to switch
from sexual to asexual reproduction could be advantageous; in the
absence of males a female could still give birth and start a new,
albeit inbred, population.
Her genes could still
be passed on via her fertile male offspring.
Scientists believe
that facultative parthenogenesis is more common in some lineages such
as reptiles and sharks.
However it is unlikely
that similar virgin births will be found among placental mammals,
which include all the mammals aside from the platypus and echidnas.
That is because
mammals require a process called genomic imprinting to reproduce,
where a set of genes from one parent dominates over the other. The
interaction between the two sets of parental genes is required for
embryos to develop normally.
1 comment:
..And then there was that Jewish girl "Mary", about 2000 years ago...Not so far-fetched any more, -is it!
Post a Comment