It appears that the debate on the
origins of life is heating up. Here we
are seeing ample evidence emerging from space material of microbial life and
also ample evidence that such can be blasted all over the place. We do now know that microbial life operates
deep into the earth and in extreme conditions.
All the barriers opposing such have evaporated.
So before we even think in terms
of meeting intelligent aliens, we certainly know today that the universe is
fully infected with microbial life and any newly formed planet will have an
ample basis to commence evolutionary processes.
I also have here another short
item showing us critical images from mars of apparent structures that can only
be engineered and possibly still in general use. The obvious attitude been that when we get
there will be soon enough to talk to us pukes.
The evidence for a heavy presence
in space and on earth is actually overwhelming and becoming less and less fussy
about been seen. They do use stealth
mode a lot, but actual discipline is obviously weak as most operators are
worker bees conducting a variety of missions.
As I have also posted, the argument
for a huge presence on Earth itself is now pretty compelling, because that is
the natural explanation for the heavy observed traffic.
We have unending reports of scientific
sampling taking place from the subjects themselves and that is an obvious
mission. We have plenty of reports of
obvious joy riding coming to us also and occasional reports of real
contact. What is important that the body
of evidence is now massively beyond one man’s illusions and it is both
conforming and consistent.
The kicker is that I suspect that
huge alien populations do live on Earth today in underground structures built
out for that purpose. It is no trick at
all to build within stable rock strata a couple of thousand feet down a huge
complex quite able to hold tens of millions of individuals. External access could be anywhere underwater
to keep us out of the way. We may even
decide to do just that ourselves someday.
It is all a matter of free energy, now upon us, and effective recycling.
Active harvesting of seafood
could even be conducted and we would never know.
Nasa Scientist Claims Evidence of Extraterrestrial Life
Is this proof of colony Earth and we're all aliens?
Fossils of algae-like beings in meteorites are reported by
astrobiologist Dr. Richard Hoover in the Journal of Cosmology. Reportedly the
White House has reacted angrily to the announcement and is pressuring Hoover to recant since
the evidence changes much in science and biology such as the theory that life
evolved in the primordial soup on Earth. In the beginning, of course, the
explanation was God. Then, in the age of science, Charles Darwin came along and
speculated that it all began in a warm little pond.
The origin of life on Earth — known as biogenesis' — remains one of the
great unsolved mysteries of science. Although Darwin gave us a theory of how the first
primitive microbes evolved into the wonderful diversity of plants and animals
that comprise the living world today, but we don't know how life got
started.
The human race will have to realize we are not the biological center of
the universe that a designer spread life to numerous planets. Dr. Hoover has
stirred up fresh debate over life elsewhere in the cosmos after claiming to have
found tiny fossils of alien bugs inside meteorites that landed on Earth. About
2% are bacteria within the meteorites.
Richard Hoover, an astrobiologist at the US Space Agency's Marshall
Space Flight Centre in Alabama, said "Filaments and other structures in
rare meteorites appear to be microscopic fossils of extraterrestrial beings
that resemble algae known as cyanobacteria. S ome of the
extra-terrestrial fossils' look very much like a living earthly bug called
Titanospirillum velox, which is found in muds in the Ebro Delta in Spain . The
three meteorite samples Dr. Hoover has studied predate any fossils found on
Earth and older than the crust of our planet, dating from the time when the
planets of our solar system were still coming together from a cloud of dust and
rocks.
If is findings are confirmed we will be forced to conclude that life
on Earth really did start elsewhere, and furthermore that life is probably
everywhere in the Universe. A meteorite, named ALH84001, generated headline
news in 1996 when Nasa announced it contained biomorphic' structures,
tubule-like objects that looked like bacteria.
Laboratory tests on the rocky filaments found no evidence to suggest
they were remnants of Earth-based organisms that contaminated the meteorites
after they landed, Hoover
said. "He discovered the features after inspecting the freshly cleaved
surfaces of three meteorites that are believed to be among the oldest in the
solar system.. Writing in the Journal of Cosmology, Hoover claims that the lack of nitrogen in
the samples, which is essential for life on Earth, indicates they are "the
remains of extraterrestrial life forms that grew on the parent bodies of
the meteorites when liquid water was present, long before the meteorites
entered the Earth's atmosphere."
B,C: red blood cell remnants found inside meteorite Ivuna
Cyanobacteria play the key role in nitrogen fixation on Earth and many
genera and species of are capable of diazotrophic growth and nitrogen
metabolism. Nitrogen fixation occurs via the nitrogenase enzyme with some other
proteins involved in this complex biological process. Rudy Schild, a scientist
at the Harvard-Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics and editor of the journal,
said: "The implications are that life is everywhere, and that life on
Earth may have come from other planets." Proof that alien microbes
hitched across the cosmos inside meteors, or by clinging to their surfaces,
would bolster a theory known as panspermia, in which life is spread from planet
to planet by hurtling space rocks.
Sir Fred Hoyle (British astrophysicist): "A common sense
interpretation of the facts suggests that a super intellect has monkeyed with
physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind
forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the
facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond
question." Hoyle, F. 1982. The Universe: Past and Present
Reflections.
Sir Francis Crick, joint discoverer of DNA, remarked that "the
origin of life seemed "almost a miracle, so many are the conditions which
would have had to have been satisfied to get it going. The problem is that even
the simplest living thing is already so stupendously complex that if such an
entity were to be thrown together by chance, it would be a fluke of such
magnitude as to be unlikely to happen twice in the observable universe, vast
though that may be.
Certainly, many scientists support the idea of an extra-terrestrial
origin for earthly life. Professor Paul Davies, a British cosmologist at Arizona State University ,
has suggested life on Earth may have its origins on Mars. He reasons that four
billion years ago Mars was a far more hospitable place for life to evolve than
Earth. Being smaller, Mars cooled more quickly and was hit less often by the
massive meteor strikes that made the infant solar system such a hazardous
environment for life of any kind. He says, "We could all be the
descendants of ancient Martian microbes blasted off the Red Planet's surface by
later meteorite bombardments. There is even the fascinating possibility a
dying civilization loaded up an ark like space ship and flew to Colony Earth
with all types of animals. We have now discovered life on Mars similar to
life on Earth that strongly suggests life exists throughout the universe on
billions of planets.
Mars Structures
Dr. Richard Buchli writes, "Here is a series of partially covered
openings or structures on mars. These shapes are too perfect to be works
of nature. There is a line of objects two and half miles long with seven objects
running north to south. The distance between the opposing two structures
is about 1500 feet, and 1300 feet. White domed st ructures are located at
both ends of line. The location is at 37 57 26 85 N 82 16 43 13 W. Thanks to
Richard Buchli D.V.M. PhD. Dorothy Buchli W.B.W
Kepler Telescope Discovers 1,235 planets
This illustration created by Jason Rowe of NASA's Kepler Science Team
shows all of Kepler's planet candidates in transit with their parent stars
ordered by size from top left to bottom right. / Illustration Courtesy NASA
Kepler Mission .
On March 6, 2009, the Kepler telescope was launched into space by the NASA Ames
Institute to search for potentially habitable planets. NASA announced that
1,235 planets have now been detected. It also announced that the Kepler 11
star-system is believed to have six orbiting planets.
Every 30 minutes the Kepler telescope is scanning 150,000 stars to
detect fluctuations in the brightness of each star that would indicate that a
planet was revolving around it. Each time a planet crosses the star, the
brightness of the star appears to dim.
To learn more about the Kepler Mission
visit
Thanks to Charles Ratliff
No comments:
Post a Comment