Let us make it simple. GMO pesticide protocols are failing however
it is jigged and in jig time. We have seen this play out now with
pesticide strategies for close on seventy years and it is not getting
better. The only real escape is into the organic protocol and that
is coming anyway.
The Monsanto model is facing steadily increasing resistance from both
its financial model but also the attempts to create GMO protocols.
These protocols do have merit, but demand a far more costly
scientific workup than ever imagined and a slow introduction. Yet
even that may not be good enough.
On top of that, the broad introduction of additional genetic material
opens the door to alternative genetic modification and rogue proteins
we do not even detect. That global experiment is awaiting its
thalidomide moment.
GMO multi-toxin
crops continue to backfire as more insects become resistant to crop
chemicals
Monday, April 29, 2013
by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer
(NaturalNews) Promises
made by the biotechnology industry about the alleged robustness of
its genetically modified (GM) crops are proving to be false, as
research out of the University of Arizona (UA) uncovers a growing
resistance by pests to even the most advanced crop chemical
technologies in use today. Published in the journal Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences, the new study explains how
multi-toxin GM crops are quickly losing their ability to fend off
pests, which could lead to a complete GMO failure in the very near
future if alternate interventions are not enacted.
The study evaluated specific GM crops like corn and cotton that have been infused with a genetic mutation involving the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), as well as several other toxins that grow inside the plant to target pests. This so-called "pyramid" strategy, which involves using multiple GM toxins to target the same pests, is said to have been designed for the purpose of thwarting pesticide and insecticide resistance by targeting pests with two or three different toxins all at once rather than just one at time.
The study evaluated specific GM crops like corn and cotton that have been infused with a genetic mutation involving the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), as well as several other toxins that grow inside the plant to target pests. This so-called "pyramid" strategy, which involves using multiple GM toxins to target the same pests, is said to have been designed for the purpose of thwarting pesticide and insecticide resistance by targeting pests with two or three different toxins all at once rather than just one at time.
But according to the UA report, insects and other pests are outsmarting this approach. After evaluating a series of laboratory experiments they conducted, as well as various computer simulations and other published data on the subject, the team learned that multi-toxin GM crops do not necessarily kill pests redundantly -- that is, if a pest is resistant to one toxic GM trait, it does not necessarily respond automatically to the other toxic GM traits. In fact, the pest response to multi-toxin GMOs is so complex and unpredictable that it is already shaping up to be a complete failure.
"[T]he team's analysis of published data from eight species of pests reveals that some degree of cross-resistance between Cry1 and Cry2 toxins occurred in nineteen of twenty-one experiments," explains Homeland Security News Wire about the study's findings. Cry1 and Cry2 are two types of GM toxins used in conjunction with each other in some multi-toxin GM crops. "Contradicting the concept of redundant killing, cross-resistance resistance means that selection with one toxin increases resistance to the other toxin."
GMO technology will
never overcome pests and weeds, and will only make the problem worse
over time
What this means, of
course, is that the practice of combining multiple toxins into a
single GM crop has actually made pest resistance worse rather than
better. This is particularly true in light of the fact that the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), taking its cues from the
biotechnology industry, has been lax in requiring that pest "refuges"
be established in crop fields to mitigate the spread of pest
resistance.
"Our simulations tell us that with 10 percent of acreage set aside for refuges, resistance evolves quite fast, but if you put 30 or 40 percent aside, you can substantially delay it," says Yves Carriere, a professor of entomology at the UA College of Agriculture and Life Sciences and lead author of the study. "Our main message is to be more cautious, especially with a pest like the cotton bollworm," he adds, referring to a common crop pest that has already developed resistance to both Cry1 and Cry2.
"Our simulations tell us that with 10 percent of acreage set aside for refuges, resistance evolves quite fast, but if you put 30 or 40 percent aside, you can substantially delay it," says Yves Carriere, a professor of entomology at the UA College of Agriculture and Life Sciences and lead author of the study. "Our main message is to be more cautious, especially with a pest like the cotton bollworm," he adds, referring to a common crop pest that has already developed resistance to both Cry1 and Cry2.
Earlier research out of UA that was published in the Journal of Economic Ecology warned that western corn rootworm beetles are also growing resistance to multi-toxin GMOs. Like the new paper, this previous study urged that larger acreages of pest refuges be installed to help slow the problem, although this intervention admittedly will not solve the problem forever.
No comments:
Post a Comment