to start with, this observation in time and pace is impossible to impeach and certainly may have been a natural comet and something which scholars really paid attention to then. you als0 do not make this up. so locating a related reference in chinese records fully conforms and 5 BC is truly close enough to the necessary time line which then makes Yesua around 36 years of age. It also intercepts the last two years of Herod the Greats rule as well.
even if the nativity itself is a write in which by the way is highly plausible. these were the known external dates and facts to which such a story could be attached. understand that the central recorded fact regarding Yesua was his ministry.
Now let us recall #I/ATLAS and Cloud cosmology. Understand a socalled comet shifting it mass and rolling in from deep space at a significant percentage of light speed and then setting up to put on a visible display from the corect direction. imagine 3I/ATLAS doing just this.
My take home is that this can be intentional
Nasa's wise scientist finally 'finds the Star of Bethlehem'
Published: 20:36 EST, 8 December 2025 | Updated: 20:36 EST, 8 December 2025
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15365769/Nasa-scientist-finds-star-Bethlehem-Christmas.html
A Nasa astronomer has claimed there is scientific evidence explaining the strange movement of the Star of Bethlehem that led the three wise men to the infant Jesus.
Mark Matney, a planetary scientist, pointed to an object recorded by the Chinese from 5BC - a bright comet that was visible for more than 70 days.
His analysis in the Journal of the British Astronomical Association comes as the spectacle - also known as the Christmas Star - has proved a subject of debate amongst astronomers for centuries.
In the Gospel of Matthew the star shows the way to the baby Jesus - first appearing 'in the east' before it 'goes before' them on a short journey from Jerusalem to Bethlehem.
According to the Biblical narrative, it then 'stands over' the place where Jesus was born.
While many have chosen to see the star as a miracle or a myth, Mr Matney has now suggested it did in fact exist - as a comet that nearly struck the earth some 2,000 years ago.
With historians typically placing Jesus's birth somewhere between 6BC and 5BC, Mr Matney analysed an object from Ancient Chinese records, identifying a range of possible orbits consistent with the observations.
One reconstruction of the object's movement suggested it would have become visible on a June morning in 5BC.
Mark Matney (pictured), a planetary scientist, pointed to an object recorded by the Chinese from 5BC - a bright comet that was visible for more than 70 days
In the Gospel of Matthew the star shows the way to the baby Jesus - first appearing 'in the east' before it 'goes before' them on a short journey from Jerusalem to Bethlehem
Mr Matney analysed an object from Ancient Chinese records (pictured), identifying a range of possible orbits consistent with the observations
'This is the first astronomical candidate for the Star ever identified that could have had apparent motion corresponding to the description in Matthew, where the Star "went before" the Magi on their journey to Bethlehem until it "stood over" where the child Jesus was,' Mr Matney wrote in his study.
He said a comet that had passed so close by might 'easily have been visible in the daytime' and would have been 'extraordinarily bright'.
At least 400 scholarly attempts have been made to explain the truth of the Star of Bethlehem, among them, claims of a supernova or an exploding star that would have appeared suddenly.
Others have simply brushed off its existence as either a miracle or a myth.
No comments:
Post a Comment