David Duke goes to great lengths to
create attention for his favorite thesis of Jewish tribalism as if it might be
unique. It is not. What Judaism does accomplish is to formally
educate its young men and yes indoctrinate them as well to sustain the community. This is a standard that truly needs to be
emulated with perhaps superior wisdom and modern insight.
Much more important however, is the
genetic information. This conforms to
substantial intermarriage taking place and subsequent conversion. This is quite reasonable and even natural for
broadly distributed families not living in communities together. Thus a one third European ancestry is just
about right.
Yet recall the source of strength. It is in the training and indoctrination of
the boys which ensures conversion and sons been raised as observant Jews. Thus all intermarriage was followed naturally
by the hybrid child then marrying back into the community most often.
In the meantime the Khazar legend is a
fairy tale and can be discarded. Even a
foundation population of Jewish bachelors relying mostly on European brides for
the first couple of generations will back breed to naturally maintain and
increase their DNA and produce these ratios.
Rethinking the Khazar
Theory by Dr. David Duke
APRIL 23, 2014 AT 12:05 AM
By Dr. David Duke.
When I was first began to
understand the ultra-racist, supremacist ideology of Judaism and Zionism, I
came into contact with the theory that present-day Jews are genetically
unrelated to the historical Jewish community.
The allegation, known as
the “”Khazar theory”, claims that the Ashkenazim Jews of today are actually the
descendants of the Khazar people, a Central Asiatic tribe who allegedly
converted to Judaism in the 9th Century AD. It is claimed that these
newly-minted Jews then migrated into what is now Russia, Eastern Europe and
later Western and Northern Europe.
Interestingly enough, the
Khazar theory was launched, and is still to this day, driven primarily by
Communist Jews. It is ironic that the three most prominent exponents of
the theory that “the Jews are not a race” all have almost exaggerated
caricatures of features people ascribe as Jewish. Above, left to right:
Zionist extremist and Communist Party member Arthur Koestler (author of
the “The Thirteenth Tribe”); Jewish geneticist Eran Elhaik; and Shlomo Sand, an
Israeli academic and former member of the Union of Israeli Communist Youth
(Banki). All three maintain that large numbers of present-day Jews are
completely genetically unrelated to the Middle Eastern-origin Jews who wrote
the Babylonian Talmud.
For years I accepted the
Khazar theory as true. After it, all it was repeated by some writers who also
recognized the leading Jewish role in Communism and their leadership in many
other subversive movements.
It was only later, when I
considered the question logically and scientifically, were my doubts about the
Khazar theory aroused.
There are three fundamental
issues which need to addressed: the scientific evidence; the historical-logical
evidence; and the reasons why the Khazar theory came about.
Part I: The Scientific
Evidence—Twelve DNA Studies Which Disprove the “Khazar Theory”
1. A 1999 study titled
“Jewish and Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations share a common pool of
Y-chromosome biallelic haplotypes” (M.F. Hammer et.al,
Proceedings of the US National Academy of Sciences 6769–6774, doi:
10.1073/pnas.100115997) found that:
“[D]espite their long-term
residence in different countries and isolation from one another,
most Jewish populations were not significantly different from one
another at the genetic level.
“Admixture estimates
suggested low levels of European Y-chromosome gene flow into Ashkenazi and
Roman Jewish communities . . . Jewish and Middle Eastern
non-Jewish populations were not statistically different. The results
support the hypothesis that the paternal gene pools
of Jewish communities from Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East
descended from a common Middle Eastern ancestral population, and suggest that
most Jewish communities have remained relatively isolated from neighboring
non-Jewish communities during and after the Diaspora.”
2. A November 2001 study
titled “The Y Chromosome Pool of Jews as Part of the Genetic Landscape of the
Middle East” (Almut Nebel et.
al., American Journal of Human Genetics, Nov 2001; 69(5): 1095–1112)
found that in most Jewish populations, male line ancestors appear to have been
mainly Middle Eastern.
The study found that
Ashkenazi Jews in particular “share more common paternal lineages with
other Jewish and Middle Eastern groups than with non-Jewish populations in
areas where Jews lived in Eastern Europe, Germany and the French Rhine
Valley. This is consistent with Jewish traditions in placing most Jewish
paternal origins in the region of the Middle East.”
3. A September 2006 study
titled “European Population Substructure: Clustering of Northern and Southern
Populations” (Michael F
Seldin et.al., PLOS Genetics, DOI: 0.1371/journal.pgen.0020143) found that both Ashkenazi Jews as well as Sephardic Jews showed
more than 85% membership in the ‘southern’ European group which made their
results “consistent with a later Mediterranean origin of these ethnic
groups.”
4. An April 2008 study titled
“Counting the Founders: The Matrilineal Genetic Ancestry of the Jewish
Diaspora” (Doron M. Behar et.al., PLoS ONE. 2008; 3(4): e2062. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0002062) found that about 40% of
Ashkenazi Jews originate maternally from just four female founders, who were of
Middle Eastern origin.
5. A January 2009 study
titled “A genome-wide genetic signature of Jewish ancestry perfectly separates
individuals with and without full Jewish ancestry in a large random sample of
European Americans” (Anna C Need et.al.,
Genome Biology, 2009; 10(1): R7. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-1-r7) found that “individuals with full Jewish ancestry formed
a clearly distinct cluster from those individuals with no Jewish ancestry.”
This study showed that in
DNA terms, Jews, both Sephardic and Ashkenazim, cluster as a distinct
group—something that, if the Khazar theory was true, would be impossible.
6. A December 2009 study
titled “Genomic microsatellites identify shared Jewish ancestry intermediate
between Middle Eastern and European populations” (Naama M Kopelman et.al., BMC Genetics. 2009; 10: 80. doi:
10.1186/1471-2156-10-80) found that :
“Jewish populations show a
high level of genetic similarity to each other, clustering together in several
types of analysis of population structure. These results support the view that
the Jewish populations largely share a common Middle Eastern ancestry and that
over their history they have undergone varying degrees of admixture with
non-Jewish populations of European descent.”
7. A December 2009 study
titled “The genome-wide structure of the Jewish people” (Doron M. Behar, et. al., Nature 466, 238–242 (08 July 2010)
doi:10.1038/nature09103) analyzed individuals from 14 Jewish
Diaspora communities and compare these patterns of genome-wide diversity with
those from 69 Old World non-Jewish populations in order to “provide
comprehensive comparisons between Jewish and non-Jewish populations in the
Diaspora, as well as with non-Jewish populations from the Middle East and north
Africa.”
The results identified a “previously
unrecognized genetic substructure within the Middle East” and that “Most Jewish
samples form a remarkably tight subcluster,” and that “trace[s] the origins of
most Jewish Diaspora communities to the Levant.”
8. A June 2010 study titled
“Abraham’s children in the genome era: major Jewish diaspora populations
comprise distinct genetic clusters with shared Middle Eastern ancestry” (Atzmon et al., American Journal of Human
Genetics, 2010;86:850-859) refuted the idea of large-scale
genetic contributions of Central and Eastern European and Slavic populations to
the formation of Ashkenazi Jewry.
This study found used
genome-wide analysis of seven Jewish groups (Iranian, Iraqi, Syrian, Italian,
Turkish, Greek, and Ashkenazi) and “demonstrated distinctive Jewish
population clusters, each with shared Middle Eastern ancestry, proximity to
contemporary Middle Eastern populations, and variable degrees of European and
North African admixture.”
This paper specifically
excluded the “Khazar theory” as an origin for present-day Jews, saying “the
genetic proximity . . . is incompatible with theories that Ashkenazi Jews are
for the most part the direct lineal descendants of converted Khazars or Slavs.”
9. A March 2012 study by
Steven M. Bray et. al., titled “Signatures of founder effects, admixture,
and selection in the Ashkenazi Jewish population” (Proceedings of the US
National Academy of Sciences, 16222–16227, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004381107) found that the “Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) population .
. . has a common Middle Eastern origin with other Jewish Diaspora
populations” while concluding that the Ashkenazi Jewish population has
had the most European admixture.
10. A March 2012 study by
Christopher L. Campbell et. al., titled “North African Jewish and non-Jewish
populations form distinctive, orthogonal clusters” (Proceedings of the US
National Academy of Sciences, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204840109) found that genome-wide analysis of five North African Jewish
groups (Moroccan, Algerian, Tunisian, Djerban, and Libyan) “demonstrated
distinctive North African Jewish population clusters with proximity to other
Jewish populations.”
Furthermore, the study
showed, the Sephardic Jewish genome is “compatible with the history of
North African Jews—founding during Classical Antiquity with proselytism of
local populations, followed by genetic isolation with the rise of Christianity
and then Islam, and admixture following the emigration of Sephardic Jews during
the Inquisition.”
Finally, this study
added “These populations showed a high degree of endogamy and were part
of a larger Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jewish group.”
(*Endogamy: the practice
of marrying within a specific ethnic group, rejecting
others on such a basis as being unsuitable for marriage or for other close
personal relationships.)
11. In his book, “Legacy: A
Genetic History of the Jewish People” (Oxford University Press, USA; May
2012), Harry Ostrer, a professor of Pathology and Genetics at Albert Einstein
College of Medicine of Yeshiva University and Director of Genetic and Genomic
Testing at Montefiore Medical Center, Medicine, concluded that “Jews
exhibit a distinctive genetic signature.” (Jews Are a ‘Race,’
Genes Reveal–Author Uncovers DNA Links Between Members of Tribe, The
Jewish Daily Forward, May 04, 2012).
Ostrer, who is also
director of genetic and genomic testing at Montefiore Medical Center, said in
his conclusion that “Jews are a homogeneous group with all the
scientific trappings of what we used to call a race.”
Ostrer also deals
specifically with the Khazar theory. He pointed out that the findings from the
Jewish HapMap Project (see below) completely refute “the theories that
Ashkenazi Jews are the descendants of converted Khazars or Slavs.” (Jews: A religious
group, people or race?, Jerusalem Post, 8/26/2012)
12. The Jewish HapMap Project, a joint project of Albert Einstein College of Medicine and
New York University School of Medicine, was created to “understand the
structure of the genomes in Jewish populations” and is an outgrowth of the
Human HapMap Project.
According to this
project, “Jewish populations are remarkable for maintaining continuous
genetic, cultural, and religious traditions over 4000 years, despite residence
all over the world.”
Its findings, based on
first hand DNA studies amongst Jewish populations around the globe, found no
evidence to support a Central Asian DNA origin for Jewry.
According to
the Jerusalem Post, the “Jewish HapMap Project in New York
City has so far shown “in exquisite detail what had been conjectured for a
century. Jewish populations from the major Jewish Diaspora groups – Ashkenazi,
Sephardic and Mizrahi – form a distinctive population cluster that is closely
related to Semitic and European populations. Within this larger Jewish cluster,
each of the Jewish populations formed its own subcluster.
“A high degree of mixing of
Ashkenazi, Sephardi, Italian and Syrian Jews caused them to become more closely
related to each other than they were to Middle Eastern, Iraqi and Iranian Jews.
This genetic split seemed to have occurred about 2,500 years ago.” (Jews: A religious
group, people or race?, Jerusalem Post, 8/26/2012)
DNA Studies Find that
Ashkenazim Jews have 30% European Admixture
Both the Behar study
(section 7 above) and the Atzmon study (section 8 above) were commented upon by
the British former deputy editor of the journal Nature, and currently the
scientific correspondent for the New York Times, Nicholas Wade, in an article
in that newspaper as follows:
“Jewish communities in
Europe and the Middle East share many genes inherited from the ancestral Jewish
population that lived in the Middle East some 3,000 years ago, even though each
community also carries genes from other sources — usually the country in which
it lives,” adding that a “major surprise from both surveys is the genetic
closeness of the two Jewish communities of Europe, the Ashkenazim and the
Sephardim.”
Wade pointed out that the
two studies “refute the suggestion made by the historian Shlomo Sand in
his book ‘The Invention of the Jewish People’ that Jews have no
common origin but are a miscellany of people in Europe and Central Asia who
converted to Judaism at various times.
“Jewish communities from Europe,
the Middle East and the Caucasus all have substantial genetic ancestry that
traces back to the Levant; Ethiopian Jews and two Judaic communities in India
are genetically much closer to their host populations,” Wade wrote.
“The shared genetic elements
suggest that members of any Jewish community are related to one another as
closely as are fourth or fifth cousins in a large population, which is about 10
times higher than the relationship between two people chosen at random off the
streets of New York City.
“Ashkenazic and Sephardic
Jews have roughly 30 percent European ancestry, with most of the rest from the
Middle East, the two surveys find. The two communities seem very similar to
each other genetically, which is unexpected because they have been separated
for so long.” (Studies Show Jews’
Genetic Similarity, Nicholas Wade, New York Times, June 9, 2010).
Eran Elhaik’s Single Study
Attempts to Refute the Mass of Earlier DNA Evidence
The mass of DNA and genetic
evidence is, therefore, overwhelmingly indicative that, despite a certain
amount of European admixture among Ashkenazim Jewry, there is still a clearly
definable Middle Eastern genetic component to both Ashkenazim and Sephardic
Jewry.
Despite all of these
studies—and many more, too numerous to list individually here—in December 2012,
a single individual by the name of Eran Elhaik, from the Johns Hopkins University
School of Medicine, attempted to refute all of the above mentioned evidence.
His paper, titled “The
Missing Link of Jewish European Ancestry: Contrasting the Rhineland and the
Khazarian Hypotheses” was published in the journal Genome Biological Evolution ((2013) 5 (1):61-74.doi: 10.1093/gbe/evs119).
In a nutshell, Elhaik—whose
rather obviously Jewish physical appearance should by itself indicate that
there is indeed a common Jewish “type” (how else can many Jews be physically
“recognized” as Jews?)—argues that his method of doing comparative studies
between present-day Central Asian populations, Ashkenazim Jews and non-Jewish
test groups, “proves” that Ashkenazim Jews are a hotchpotch of genetic origins,
with a strong link to what he identifies as the “Khazar” tribe.
Even though Elhaik’s work
is the only single paper (as opposed to literally dozens of opposing DNA
studies), written by a single Jewish individual (as opposed to the other papers
which were written by dozens and dozens of scientists from around the globe,
Jewish and non-Jewish alike), it has quickly become the most-quoted “proof” of
the “Khazar Theory.”
Critical Errors in Elhaik’s
Paper
Elhaik’s paper has a number
of errors, some small and a number of major ones. But they are all serious,
because even the “small” errors cast doubt on his academic ability and
motivation.
For example, his paper
discusses in detail what he sees as the geographic origin of the Khazars—yet he
completely misidentifies the geographic location of one of his test sample
groups, the Mbuti and Biaka Pygmies.
These two groups, Elhaik
asserts at least twice, are to be found in “South Africa.”
Actually, the Mbuti and
Biaka Pygmies are nowhere near South Africa, and are only to be found literally
half a continent away, in the Congo.
While this may seem a
“small” error, it does indicate sloppiness in research which certainly does not
bode well for the rest of the paper.
This sloppiness is again
repeated when Elhaik asserts that “Eastern and Central European Jews account
for approximately 90% of over 13 million worldwide Jews.”
In reality, the figure is
far less. Of the estimated 13 million Jews worldwide, 8 million are Ashkenazim
and 5 million are Sephardic, a division of 61% “European Jews” to 39% “non-European
Jews.” And it should be pointed out that the Zionist State of Israel actually
has a Sephardic and Mizrahi (non-Ashkenazi) Jewish majority among Jews.
These actual facts on
Jewish ethnicity are readily available, and Elhaik’s motivation for making this
clearly false claim could only be ascribed to a desire to underscore his
general assertion, namely that most Jews are not Middle Eastern in origin and
that Jews are not race, or a genetically similar people.
The most important error in
Elhaik’s paper, however, is actually openly admitted: namely that there is
actually no “Khazar DNA” in existence, against which any sort of measurement
can be taken.
Elhaik himself admits this
in his paper: the “Khazars have been vanquished and their remains have
yet to be sequenced. . .”—in other words there is no record of what exactly
Khazar DNA might have been.
As there is no record of
what Khazar DNA is—it is, ipso facto, physically impossible to determine who is
descended from it and who is not.
Elhaik attempts to
circumvent this major problem by selecting what he calls “surrogate
populations”—in this case, “contemporary Middle Eastern and Caucasus
populations.”
Anyone with a basic
understanding of historical events in the Caucasus in particular will immediately
see that Elhaik’s assertion that current populations in that region can be
taken to reflect those of 1,500 years ago, is highly problematic and quite
simply, unsustainable.
The Caucasus, a region at
the border of Europe and Asia, situated between
the Black and the Caspian seas, has been crisscrossed by
numerous peoples and races over the last 2000 years, ranging from
Indo-Europeans, Semites, Mongols and others—and is today highly genetically
diverse. A claim that DNA samples from this region can be taken as any sort of
DNA yardstick, is dubious to say the very least.
Finally, Elhaik’s
methodology in comparing the DNA samples is, to make an understatement, unique
to him. As Marcus Feldman, director of Stanford University’s Morrison Institute
for Population and Resource Studies, said, “He [Elhaik] appears to be applying
the statistics in a way that gives him different results from what everybody
else has obtained from essentially similar data.” (‘Jews a Race’ Genetic
Theory Comes Under Fierce Attack by DNA Expert. The Jewish Daily
Forward, May 07, 2013)
Interestingly, the study
which was cited in the New York Times of the “Jews as a race” is exactly the
same conclusion that was reached by German National Socialist anthropologists
and other experts who studied race science in the United States and elsewhere.
Also, many of the present-day extensive studies have been carried out by
both Gentile and Jewish geneticists alike, obviating any claims of racial bias.
Elhaik’s theory is
completely refuted by the new, most massive and most complete study ever
done of the Jewish Genome
One of Elhaik’s arguments
was that the previous studies (referenced above) “were done in the
pregenome-wide era using uniparental markers and including different reference
populations”—implying that their results are not in line with the most modern
DNA sequencing methodology.
In fact, at least one study—which
appeared after Elhaik’s work was first published—has confirmed
the accuracy of the original studies, and also completely refuted Elhaik’s
hypothesis.
Titled “No Evidence from
Genome-Wide Data of a Khazar Origin for the Ashkenazi Jews,” this study was
published by the journal Human Biology in August 2013 (Behar, Doron M.
et.al.; Human Biology, Access Pre-Prints. Paper 41), this paper emphasized the serious error with Elhaik’s
work:
“Because the Khazar
population has left no obvious modern descendants that could enable a clear
test for a contribution to Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry, the Khazar hypothesis has
been difficult to examine using genetics.
“Furthermore, because only
limited genetic data have been available from the Caucasus region, and because
these data have been concentrated in populations that are genetically close to
populations from the Middle East, the attribution of any signal of
Ashkenazi-Caucasus genetic similarity to Khazar ancestry rather than shared
ancestral Middle Eastern ancestry has been problematic.”
This latest, most massive
study of the Jewish genome was a worldwide effort of geneticists, both Gentile
and Jewish, to analyze Jewish genetics. Researchers from laboratories around
the globe, including Estonia, Russia, Italy, Greece, Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Croatia, Armenia, the US, and Israel, gathered together the largest Jewish DNA
data set ever yet assembled. The paper explained as follows:
“Here, through integration
of genotypes on newly collected samples with data from several of our past
studies, we have assembled the largest data set available to date for
assessment of Ashkenazi Jewish genetic origins.”
“Employing a variety of
standard techniques for the analysis of population genetic structure, we find
that Ashkenazi Jews share the greatest genetic ancestry with other Jewish
populations, and among non-Jewish populations, with groups from Europe and the
Middle East.
“No particular similarity
of Ashkenazi Jews with populations from the Caucasus is evident, particularly
with the populations that most closely represent the Khazar region. Thus,
analysis of Ashkenazi Jews together with a large sample from the region of the
Khazar Khaganate corroborates the earlier results that Ashkenazi Jews derive
their ancestry primarily from populations of the Middle East and Europe, that
they possess considerable shared ancestry with other Jewish populations, and
that there is no indication of a significant genetic contribution either from
within or from north of the Caucasus region.”
The latest, most up-to-date
and modern DNA analysis has, therefore, completely refuted the “Khazar Theory.”
It is important to
understand that this refutation has come from non-Jewish and Jewish scientists
from dozens of different universities and geneticists all over the world, and
cannot be ascribed to a “conspiracy.”
Part II: The Historical-Logical
Evidence
The Historical Record Shows
Jewish Physical Consistency
One of the most obvious
indicators of genetic commonality is physical appearance. European people
broadly resemble each other; African people broadly resemble each other;
Chinese people broadly resemble each other; Australian Aborigines broadly
resemble each other and so on.
It is a characteristic of
genetically similar people to physically resemble each other.
Jews are no different in
this regard to any other people. They too show a resemblance to each other—this
is why it is possible to often “recognize” a Jewish person by his physical
appearance.
A good example in point is
the already mentioned Jewish geneticist Eran Elhaik, who, despite physically
embodying a Jewish sterrotype recognized around the world, tries to claim that
there is no genetic commonality amongst Jews.
The “Khazar theory” holds
that most Ashkenazim Jews are not Semitic, but are “Central Asian” converts to
Judaism.
Proponents of the “Khazar
theory” fail to understand the logical consequence of their belief—namely that
a supposed Central Asian origin of “most” Ashkenazim Jews means that they will
not physically resemble other Jews.
As anyone can see, this is
not the case. Sephardic Jews are, on average, slightly darker than Ashkenazim
Jews, but there is no doubt that there is a physical similarity which allows
them still to be recognized as such.
###
Above: These two
illustrations make the point even more dramatically. On the left, the
Ashkenazim Jewess, Barbara Streisand, New York, 1966. On the right, a Jewish
leader of Israelite trade delegation as portrayed on a mural on the wall of the
18th Dynasty (1400 BC) Tomb of Sobekhotep, Thutmose IV; Egypt.
Streisand’s paternal
grandparents came from Galicia (Poland–Ukraine) and her maternal
grandparents came from Russia—if anyone would be “Khazar,” according to
that theory, it would be her. Nonetheless, she closely resembles the only
designated Jew as portrayed on an Egyptian tomb from 3.400 years ago, the
leader of a Jewish trade delegation to Egypt.
The genetic continuity is
clear—and if the Khazar theory was true, there would be no physical similarity,
because there would have been a racial sea change in Jewish appearance.
###
Left: The famous banker of
Pompeii, Jucundus, who lived circa 20–62 AD. Identified as a Jew by the German
anthropologist, Hans F.K. Günther, in his book “Racial Elements of European History” (Fig, 240a and b,
chapter VIII). Alongside, the
Ashkenazi Jew, Abe Foxman of the ADL. The similarity between Jucundus and
Foxman is clear, and serves a further indication of the physical continuity of
the Jewish type over centuries—something that would be impossible if the
“Khazar theory” was true.
In addition to genetic
studies, there have been extensive physiological comparison of Jewish remains
from burial sites from ancient Israel and present-day Ashkenazi and
Sephardic physiology, all of which conclusively shows their similarity across
both the Sephardic and Ashkenazi spectrum—and their difference from European
populations.
Jewish Supremacist Behavior
Through the Millennia Disprove the “Khazar Theory”
Another piece of the jigsaw
which disproves the Khazar theory, is that Jewish Supremacist behavior has
remained constant throughout the millennia—from biblical times right through to
the present day.
Most Christians are aware
of the behavior of the Old Testament Jews—who burn, rampage, kill rape and
enslave their way through Palestine supposedly on order of their tribal God.
They are aware of the fact that the gospels of the New Testament show that
elite of the Jews, the Pharisees, were the biggest enemies of Christ and
arranged for his crucifixion, and the New Testament is clear that they led the
persecution of Christians which has continued through both Jewish Bolshevism
and the cultural assault in the Zio global media.
It must also be clear that
the Talmud, the books of Jewish law promoting Jewish extremist supremacism and
hatred against all non-Jews, was written hundreds of years before any alleged
Khazar conversion.
While it another debate
altogether as to the historical accuracy of those events, there is no question
about Jewish interaction with Gentiles—and Romans in particular—during the
first century AD.
The world’s first
anti-Jewish riots broke out in the city of Alexandria in 38 AD, and re-occurred
in 66 AD, 115 AD, 118 AD, and 411 AD. In that year, the archbishop of
Alexandria, Cyril, ordered the expulsion of all Jews from the city.
The Roman historian
Socrates of Constantinople (not be confused with the Socrates of Classical
Greece), in his Ecclesiastical History, recorded the reasons for this first
great expulsion of Jews from a non-Jewish city in detail, and reveals behavior
by Jewish Supremacists exactly as the world experiences it today, over 1,500
years later:
“. . .[T]he Jews were
continually factious; and there was added to their ordinary hatred of the
Christians . . . Cyril, on being informed of this, sent for the principal Jews,
and threatened them with the utmost severities unless they desisted from their
molestation of the Christians. These menaces, instead of suppressing their
violence, only rendered the Jewish populace more furious, and led them to form
conspiracies for the destruction of the Christians, one of which was of so
desperate a character as to cause their entire expulsion from Alexandria” (Socrates, Hist. Eccl., VII, 13; PC, LXXXII, 759
ff).
The very first Jewish
community outside of the Middle East was established in Rome in 139 BC—and it
was not long before their activities roused Roman public opinion against them.
The famous orator Cicero,
among others, frequently spoke against the presence of Jews during sittings of
the Roman senate. In his famous Pro Flacco oration (which dealt with
the case of a Roman aristocrat, Lucius Valerius Flaccus, accused of unlawfully
confiscating Jewish money), Cicero said:
“Now let us take a look at
the Jews and their mania for gold. You chose this site, [chief prosecutor]
Laelius, and the crowd which frequents it, with an eye to this particular
accusation, knowing very well that Jews with their large numbers and tendency to
act as a clique are valuable supporters to have at any kind of public meeting.”
Many other prominent and
famous Romans, such as Seneca, Juneval, and Tacitus all went on record as
complaining about the activities of Jews within the Roman Empire.
The Roman historian
Tacitus, in his most famous work, Histories, described the activities of
the Jews as follows:
“In order to secure the
allegiance of his people in the future, Moses prescribed for them a novel
religion quite different from those of the rest of mankind. Among the Jews all
things are profane that we hold sacred; on the other hand they regard as
permissible what seems to us immoral . . . The other practices of the Jews are
sinister and revolting, and have entrenched themselves by their very wickedness.
Wretches of the most abandoned kind who had no use for the religion of their
fathers took to contributing dues and free-will offerings to swell the Jewish
exchequer; and other reasons for their increasing wealth may be found in their
stubborn loyalty and ready benevolence towards brother Jews.
“But the rest of the world
they confront with the hatred reserved for enemies. They will not feed or
intermarry with gentiles. Though a most lascivious people, the Jews avoid
sexual intercourse with women of alien race. Among themselves nothing is
barred. They have introduced the practice of circumcision to show that they are
different from others.” (Tacitus, Histories, 5.2–5).
The famous British
historian Edward Gibbon, in his monumental work, The Decline and Fall of
the Roman Empire, (Lippincourt, Philadelphia, 1878, vol. 2, page 4),
discussed Jewish Supremacist behavior in Roman times this way:
“From the reign of Nero to
that of Antoninus Pius, the Jews discovered a fierce impatience of the dominion
of Rome, which repeatedly broke out in the most furious massacres and
insurrections. Humanity is shocked at the recital of horrid cruelties which
they committed in the cities of Egypt, of Cyria, and of Cyrene, where they
dwelt in treacherous friendship with the unsuspecting natives; and we are
tempted to applaud the severe retaliation which was exercised by the arms of
the Legions against a race of fanatics whose dire and credulous superstition
seemed to render them the implacable enemies not only of the Roman government,
but of all human kind.”
Anti-Jewish literature
during Roman times was very widespread. One work by the Greek, Apion, was so
well-known that the Romanized Jewish historian Josephus (who wrote the famous
account of the Jewish uprising of 70 AD, called The Jewish Wars) wrote an
entire book trying to refute Apion’s arguments.
The Roman Emperor Tiberius
formally expelled the Jews from Rome in 19 AD. They returned shortly
thereafter, only to be expelled once again in 49 AD.
In 116 AD, Emperor Trajan
ordered that all Jews in Mesopotamia should be killed, saying that they were
the cause of continual uprisings in that region.
One of the most famous
emperors of the Eastern Roman Empire, Justinian (527–565 AD), adopted a
comprehensive anti-Jewish policy which barred Jews from the civil service,
military posts, and any other positions of influence in his government.
All of these events
pre-date the supposed “Khazar conversion” by centuries—yet it can be seen that
the identical behavioral patterns are on display before and after the supposed
“Khazar” infusion.
Logic dictates that if the
racial make-up of Jews changed substantially after the year 700 AD, then their
behavioral traits would also have changed.
The fact that they did not,
is yet more proof that there was no racial sea-change amongst Jews as is
claimed by the supporters of the “Khazar theory.”
The historical-logical
evidence therefore clearly shows that there has been no change in Jewish
Supremacist behavior from the time of the ancient Romans to the present-day. If
there had been large-scale conversions, as the “Khazar theory” claims, the
genetic continuity of the Jewish people would have been disrupted, which would
likely have caused a change in behavior.
As this behavior as
remained constant, the historical account indicates that the “Khazar theory” is
untrue.
Part III: The Reasons Why
the “Khazar Theory” Has Come About
1. The “Khazar Theory” Deflects Attention from the Most Racist Jews
of all, the Sephardic Jewish Extremists, suggests that there is not “Jewish
problem” but a Khazar or Ashkenazi problem.
The “Khazar theory”
falls down when it is understood that it only attempts to explain the origin of
the “European” or Ashkenazim Jews—and completely ignores the Sephardic element
of Jewry, which compromises nearly 40% of all Jews today and about 50 percent
of Jews in Zionist State of Israel.
The ludicrousness of the
situation is underlined when it is appreciated that the Sephardic element of
Jewry tends to be the most religious and the most orthodox. They most closely
follow the dictates of the Talmud and the Torah laws—and are therefore most
immersed in the racist supremacy and anti-Gentile hatred which guides all
Jewish behavior.
It was, after all, the
former chief rabbi of the Sephardic Jews in Israel who announced that
Gentiles are donkeys, created by God only to serve Jews, among many other
overtly racist comments. This ultra racist Jew, Rabbi Yosef, recently died and
had the largest funeral in the history of Israel.
By focusing on the bogus
“Khazar” theory, its proponents deflect attention away from the proven
historical record that Jewish Supremacist behavior is common to both Ashkenazim
and Sephardic Jewish extremists.
This is proven by the fact
that Israel uses DNA tests to check if potential immigrants to that
country are Jewish or not.
If there was a wide
divergence between Ashkenazim and Sephardic Jewry, as the “Khazar theory” would
maintain, then it would not be possible for Israel to genetically distinguish
who is a Jew and who is not.
2. The “Khazar Theory” is Popular Among Anti-Zionists (For the Wrong
Reasons)
In the wake of the Second
World War and establishment of the Zionist State of Israel, the Khazar theory
gained traction in the anti-Zionist movement.
It seemed to be powerful
argument against Zionism. If the leaders of the Zionist movement had no
relation to the historical people called Jews in the Mideast, then the
theoretical rationale of the Zionists to claim Palestine as a historical
homeland, was demolished.
This logic is, of course,
fundamentally flawed, because it matters not if modern Jews were related or
partly related to Jews who lived in the region 2,000 years earlier.
No matter what the case,
there is no moral justification for the Jewish terrorist creation of
Israel. It is a crime against humanity to drive hundreds of thousands of
men, women and children from their land and homes, terrorize them and murder
thousands, just because of a claim that one’s distant ancestors supposedly
lived there millennia ago.
It this “logic” is carried
through to its conclusion, then it would be “justified” to drive from their
homes 99.9 percent of the people alive on planet Earth—because there is hardly
a region on earth that has not been subjected to invasions or migrations
throughout history.
To explain this
inconsistency another way: by using the “Khazar theory” as “proof” that the
Zionists cannot claim Israel because they are not the real Jews, the
anti-Zionists are in fact saying that IF it can be shown that the Zionists ARE
the real Jews, then they would have the right to claim Palestine as a homeland.
Remember that a majority of Jews in Israel are Sephardic or Mizrahi Jews who
are non-Ashkenazi.
This “logic”, as detailed
above, is false.
3. The “Khazar Theory” is a Tactic to Disguise Jewish Supremacist
Racism
The “Khazar argument” is
intrinsically related to the question of whether the present-day Jews are a
religion or a race.
Prominent Jews have long
referred to Jews as a “race,” even in modern times.
If there was any leader of
world Jewry in the days before The Second World War it was Nahum Goldman, the
President of the World Zionist organization. He said:
“The Jews are divided into
two categories, those who admit they belong to a race distinguished by a
history thousands of years old, and those who don’t. The latter are open to the
charge of dishonesty.”
Even the current prime
minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, speaking before a gathering of Jews
from all over the world, candidly referred to the “Jewish race”: “If Israel had
not come into existence after World War II than [sic] I am certain the Jewish
race wouldn’t have survived.” (Daily Pilot, Newport Beach/Costa Mesa, Feb.
28, 2000, front page.)
Leading Jews have always
defined themselves as much more than a religion but as people of special
genealogy, and expressed the ultimate supremacism that God has chosen them
above all others.
Israel is a Jewish
religious state, in which the religious dictates hold supreme. The rabbis
determine all the important issues: immigration, education, housing, and
marriage. It matters not if a person believes in God or not—the only thing that
counts is if one is of Jewish lineage, or Jewish descent.
It matters not if one’s
Jewish mother was an atheist or a Haredim, or if her great grandmother was
religious or not—what ultimately counts is one’s blood, not one’s belief in
God.
Ironically, this is not
only true in Israel. It is true in the very synagogues of the Jewish religion
across the globe. Atheist? No problem as long as if you are of the tribe.
The tactic of claiming that
Judaism is simply a religion is an effective defensive strategy.
Whenever anyone complains
about Jewish domination of any institution (achieved by favoring their own and
disfavoring their non-Jewish competitors), Jewish Supremacists simply say that
they are a “religion” like any other, rather than an ethnic group.
People in America, Europe,
and the Western world, all overwhelmingly endorse the concept of religious
freedom—and thus they equate criticism of Jewish actions as “religious bigotry”
and oppression. “After all,” the claim is made, “it is just a religion.”
This is a Jewish
Supremacist tactic: They disguise Jewish racism through religious dogma, rather
than admitting ethnic nationalism.
I have come to believe that
the Khazar theory is one more piece of controlled opposition as illustrated in
Orwell’s 1984 where Emmanuel Goldstein is supposedly Big Brother’s opposition,
but in fact he is part of the Big Brother apparatus.
How convenient it is to
suggest that Jews are not a race, not a related people that gives them a unity
and strength in conflict with other peoples.
One cannot explain the
power of Zionism unless one understands Jewish tribalism.
Jewish tribalism (racism)
and favoritism and preference for fellow Jews combined with discrimination
against non-Jews ultimately enables them to take over almost any institution.
Without Jewish racism,
Zionism could not flourish, for that is what gives the Jewish extremists its
enormous economic, media and political influence.
Christians who propagate
the “Khazar theory” should not forget that the Talmud is perhaps the most
anti-Christ tome ever written. The Talmud portrays Jesus being boiled in human
excrement—“forever”!
The Talmud as well the
gospel recounting of the Jewish persecution behind the crucifixion of Christ
all took place hundreds of years before any supposed Khazar conversion!
How convenient it is for
the anti-Zionist, anti-Jewish supremacist efforts be divided on the foundation
of the Jewish problem.
Bear in mind, the problem
we face is not a “Khazar” problem, it is a Jewish problem, it is a problem of
extremist Jewish racism and supremacism which continually plunges our world
into war, hatred, tyranny and degradation.
It is for these reasons,
that I no longer believe the Khazar theory.
Anyone who opposes Jewish
extremism, supremacism and Zionism I consider an ally and brother in the cause
for the liberation of Europeans and every people on the Planet from the
Zio-Globalist threat.
I accept whole heartedly
those who still believe the Khazar theory, but at the same time I must express
what I think to be the truth: that, overall, the theory does more harm than
good in our efforts to oppose Jewish tribalism.
I will no longer endorse a
false theory fostered upon us by Jewish communists who seek to lessen our
understanding of the core threat of Jewish racism.
No comments:
Post a Comment