More critical
is that the citadel was built using five ton blocks which conform to our
expectations for an important city during the Bronze Age which was in serious
collapse post 1159 BC or just preceding the reign of King David. Thus we find David taking over a diminished
world still retaining robust infrastructure.
The remaining
remnants of that world are the living background of this pre exile polity of
the Jewish people. Our error has been to
habitually underestimate the scope and size of that remnant culture, although
the scale of the philistine presence should have tipped us off.
We can then
presume that the temple platform is contemporaneous to the building of this
citadel. It was then most likely a
ritual center as well as a factory palace.
This whole factory complex concept conforms to Mycenae, Athens and many
other centers that all were established well inland from their service ports.
That strongly
suggests that we need to look closely around Seville as well. There we have a substantial port city but no
obvious upland complex.
Israeli
Archaeologist Says He Has Found King David's Legendary Citadel
MAY 6, 2014
Eli Shukron, an archeologist formerly with
Israel's Antiquities Authority, walks in the City of David archaeological site
near Jerusalem's Old City.
JERUSALEM (AP) — An Israeli archaeologist
says he has found the legendary citadel captured by King David in his conquest
of Jerusalem, rekindling a longstanding debate about using the Bible as a field
guide to identifying ancient ruins.
The claim by Eli Shukron, like many such
claims in the field of biblical archaeology, has run into criticism. It joins a
string of announcements by Israeli archaeologists saying they have unearthed
palaces of the legendary biblical king, who is revered in Jewish religious
tradition for establishing Jerusalem as its central holy city — but who has
long eluded historians looking for clear-cut evidence of his existence and
reign.
The present-day Israeli-Palestinian conflict
is also wrapped up in the subject. The $10 million excavation, made accessible
to tourists last month, took place in an Arab neighborhood of Jerusalem and was
financed by an organization that settles Jews in guarded homes in Arab areas of
east Jerusalem in an attempt to prevent the city from being divided. The
Palestinians claim east Jerusalem, captured by Israel in 1967, as the capital
of a future independent state.
Shukron, who excavated at the City of David
archaeological site for nearly two decades, says he believes strong evidence
supports his theory.
"This is the citadel of King David,
this is the Citadel of Zion, and this is what King David took from the
Jebusites," said Shukron, who said he recently left Israel's Antiquities
Authority to work as a lecturer and tour guide. "The whole site we can
compare to the Bible perfectly."
Most archaeologists in Israel do not dispute
that King David was a historical figure, and a written reference to the
"House of David" was found in an archaeological site in northern
Israel. But archaeologists are divided on identifying Davidic sites in Jerusalem,
which he is said to have made his capital.
Shukron's dig, which began in 1995,
uncovered a massive fortification of five-ton stones stacked 21 feet (6 meters)
wide. Pottery shards helped date the fortification walls to be 3,800 years old.
They are the largest walls found in the region from before the time of King
Herod, the ambitious builder who expanded the Second Jewish Temple complex in
Jerusalem almost 2,100 [ 3100 rather – arclein ] years ago. The fortification surrounded a water spring and is thought
to have protected the ancient city's water source.
The fortification was built 800 years before
King David would have captured it from its Jebusite rulers. Shukron says the
biblical story of David's conquest of Jerusalem provides clues that point to
this particular fortification as David's entry point into the city.
In the second Book of Samuel, David orders
the capture of the walled city by entering it through the water shaft.
Shukron's excavation uncovered a narrow shaft where spring water flowed into a
carved pool, thought to be where city inhabitants would gather to draw water.
Excess water would have flowed out of the walled city through another section
of the shaft Shukron said he discovered — where he believes the city was
penetrated.
Shukron says no other structure in the area
of ancient Jerusalem matches what David would have captured to take the city.
The biblical account names it the "Citadel of David" and the
"Citadel of Zion."
Ronny Reich, who was Shukron's collaborator
at the site until 2008, disagrees with the theory. He said more broken pottery
found from the 10th century BC, presumably King David's reign, should have been
found if the fortification had been in use then.
Shukron said he only found two shards that
date close to that time. He believes the reason he didn't find more is because
the site was in continuous use and old pottery would have been cleared out by
David's successors. Much larger quantities of shards found at the site date to
about 100 years after King David's reign.
Reich said it was not possible to reach
definitive conclusions about biblical connections without more direct
archaeological evidence.
"The connection between archaeology and
the Bible has become very, very problematic in recent years," Reich said.
Critics say that some archaeologists are too
eager to hold a spade in one hand and a Bible in the other in a quest to verify
the biblical narrative — either due to religious beliefs or to prove the Jewish
people's historic ties to the land. But other respected Israeli archaeologists
say recent finds match the biblical account more than naysayers claim.
Shukron, a veteran archaeologist who has
excavated a number of significant sites in Jerusalem, said he drew his
conclusions after nearly two decades exploring the ancient city.
"I know every little thing in the
City of David. I didn't see in any other place such a huge fortification as
this," said Shukron.
The biblical connection to the site is emphasized
at the City of David archaeological park, where the "Spring Citadel"
— the excavation's official name — has been retrofitted for tourists, including
a movie projected on a screen in front of the fortification to illustrate how
it may have looked 3,800 years ago. The City of David — located in east
Jerusalem — is one of the most popular tourist sites in the holy city, with
500,000 tourists visiting last year.
"We open the Bible and we see how the
archaeology and the Bible actually come together in this place," said
Doron Spielman, vice president of the nonprofit Elad Foundation, which oversees
the archaeological park. He carried a softcover Bible in his hand as he ambled
around the excavation.
The site has come under criticism because of
the Elad Foundation's nationalistic agenda. Most of the foundation's funding
comes from private donations from Jews in the U.S. and U.K., and its activities
include purchasing Arab homes near the excavated areas and then helping Jews
move in, sometimes under heavy guard.
Critics say this political agenda should not
mix with archaeology.
___
Follow Daniel Estrin at
twitter.com/danielestrin
1 comment:
Please proceed with the utmost caution as there may still be gold and silver artifacts of amazing and dangerous power as of yet undiscovered there. Most were taken long ago, but some may still remain hidden. Watch out for Solomon's ring and do NOT handle it carelessly if found, please. I do not wish to have to deal with the demonic forces trapped within at this particular time. Really. Please do not seek me out as I am rather busy with the work given me by our Lord and do not wish to be revealed just yet. Thank you and G-D bless you. Joseph David Rucker Jr.
Post a Comment