What is now becoming abundantly clear is that by 2020, the whole immigration system will be doing the job intended and that the illegals will be well on the way to been thrown out. The DEMs desperately need to abandon this whole MEME just as quickly as they can in the hopes they can get the voters to forget it all.
In fact, i have long since failed to understand just how the DEMs can be so incoherent in dealing with Trump initiatives. You pick your fights, not set yourself up to lose. It is as if all the strategic thinkers have been thrown out of the party.
Remember folks, the reward for a hostile opposition that loses is ongoing hostility for years after.
Trump Fools Democrats Again, Is Still Winning Immigration Fight
July 16, 2019
Updated: July 17, 2019
President Donald Trump and Attorney General William Barr walk out of the Oval Office to announce an executive action to tally American citizenship, in the White House Rose Garden in Washington, on July 11, 2019. (Charlotte Cuthbertson/The Epoch Times)
President Donald Trump and Attorney General William Barr walk out of the Oval Office to announce an executive action to tally American citizenship, in the White House Rose Garden in Washington, on July 11, 2019. (Charlotte Cuthbertson/The Epoch Times)
https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-fools-democrats-again-is-still-winning-immigration-fight_3004440.html?
For the past week, I’ve watched in amazement as a huge victory for President Donald Trump has been spun by many as a massive defeat.
On July 11, the president appeared at a White House press conference with Attorney General William Barr to deliver some very important news on immigration.
The two men jointly announced that since there’s no longer enough time
to place the controversial citizenship question on the 2020 Census—given
the time it would take to navigate the legal challenges—Trump will
instead use an executive order to require all federal agencies to share
their data on citizens and non-citizens with the Commerce Department.
Immediately following the president’s statements, the
usual doom-criers in conservative media filled the airwaves with cries
of “cave” and “sell-out” and “failure.” Meanwhile, social
media accounts that purport to be Trump-friendly spent days
“explaining” how Trump has yet again betrayed or failed his base.
They must have watched a different press conference than the one I did.
I’m not the only one to figure out how Trump has expertly played the Democrats in the past week. Andrew Malcolm wrote an excellent op-ed at McClatchy spelling
out how Trump’s strategy has left him in a stronger position, while
leaving the Democrats totally exposed on the immigration issue. Malcolm
wrote the article after advance leaks had Democrats and the media
celebrating, because Trump supposedly had given up the fight:
“Trump, in fact, took the citizenship issue to a whole new front — one that only he controls through the federal bureaucracy.“He signed one of his favored executive orders erasing data-sharing obstacles between departments, including Defense and Homeland Security, and compelling all to cooperate with the Census Bureau on estimating citizenship.“Trump called this data vital to design sound public policies in health care, civil rights, education, and immigration. ‘We must have a reliable count of how many citizens, non-citizens, and illegal aliens are in our country,’ the president declared.“Recent polls indicate 60 percent of Americans actually agree with Trump.“Of course, he also slipped in a political shot: ‘As shocking as it may be, far-left Democrats in our country are determined to conceal the number of illegal aliens in our midst. They probably know the number is far greater, much higher than anyone would have believed before.’”
Those who think Trump is losing the immigration fight
completely ignore what Trump and Barr actually said at that press
conference.
Barr patiently explained there was no time left to put a citizenship question into the 2020 census form. Here’s how he quite succinctly explained it:
“Because as the Supreme Court recognized, the defect in Secretary Ross’s decision was curable with a better record, the President asked me to work with Secretary Ross to determine whether there remained any viable path for including a citizenship question on the 2020 Census. I did so. In my view, the government has ample justification to inquire about citizenship status on the census and could plainly provide rationales for doing so that would satisfy the Supreme Court. There is thus no question that a new decision to add the question would ultimately survive legal review.
“The problem is that any new decision would be subject to immediate challenge as a new claim in the three ongoing district court cases. In addition, there are injunctions currently in place that forbid adding the question. There is simply no way to litigate these issues and obtain relief from the current injunctions in time to implement any new decision, without jeopardizing our ability to carry out the census itself, which we are not going to do. So, as a practical matter, the Supreme Court’s decision closed all paths to adding the question to the 2020 decennial census. Put simply, the impediment was logistical, not legal. We simply cannot complete the litigation in time to carry out the census, including appeals.”
As Barr carefully elucidated, the choice the
administration faced was either to give up on having the 2020 Census or
to find another way to count the number of illegal immigrants in the
country. So he and Trump
found another way, one that will be far more accurate in the long run
and that Democrats will be powerless to stop, because how could the
federal government be prevented from consulting its own internal records
at the direction of its chief executive?
In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised at all to discover that
this is what Trump really planned to do all along. He simply waited
until the Democrats had won at the Supreme Court on obstructing the
addition of the citizenship question to the Census before showing his
hand.
Barr went on in his statement to also push back against
the absurd speculation in the media that Trump would defiantly place the
citizenship question on the census form by executive fiat:
“One other point on this. Some in the media have been suggesting—in the hysterical mode of the day—that the Administration has been planning to add the citizenship question to the census by executive fiat without regard for contrary court orders or what the Supreme Court might say. This has been based on rank speculation and nothing more. As should be obvious, that was never under consideration. We have always accepted that a new decision to add a citizenship question to the census would be subject to judicial review.”
Dems Weaker Than Ever on Immigration Issue
Over the past several months, Trump has maneuvered the
Democrats into starkly revealing that they will do whatever it takes to
prevent an accurate count of how many illegal immigrants are currently
residing in the United States.
This is an incredibly bad look for the Democratic Party.
Their stated reasons for wanting to hide and obscure this factual
information aren’t holding up, and Trump keeps goading them into making
their affinity for illegals over U.S. citizens crystal-clear.
Two other key developments occurred after Trump announced his executive action on gathering citizenship data:
- A new asylum rule, which requires asylum-seekers to file for asylum in the first safe country they reach. Only after they are rejected can they apply for asylum in the United States.
- Barr invoked §1158(a)(2)(a), a multilateral treaty that declares Mexico a safe third country, to implement this new rule, so now all asylum-seekers will be sent legally to Mexico to await their hearing.
To combat these new rules on asylum, open borders
advocates will have to come up with an argument as to why these
asylum-seekers need to be admitted for their asylum only into the United
States. Why would only the United States do for
their asylum claims, rather than any of the other various countries
they passed through on their way to the southern U.S. border?
I wish them lots of luck trying to make that explanation.
No comments:
Post a Comment