Unfortunately, it is politically incorrect to address the issue of
expanding wild population of traditional prey species. As we cannot
rightly tolerate a return of the predator prey cycle as we ourselves
would soon become prey and the cycle itself is horribly inefficient
with huge swings of boom and bust, it will become necessary to apply
real husbandry.
In the case of the wild horse, that means an annual drive to corral a
portion of the herds while applying selection and disease treatment
protocols. This provides an annual source of horse protein that may
be handled in a number of ways. Once fattened a portion could even
enter the long established human food chain. The rest can be used as
a protein source for managed stocks of carnivores.
World wide there are huge potential prey species populations that
simply need to be successfully managed without the encouragement of
an excessive carnivore population. A lot of that meat protein will
quite rightly flow into the human food chain but plenty will not.
Populations of carnivores provide the natural scavengers of this
surplus.
Technology may soon allow us to interact more successfully with all
creatures and thus alleviate the management issue. With appropriate
technology, the lion can lay down with the lamb. In that case, they
have both a role in scavenging and a role in herd management as in
outright protection and shepherding.
Wild Horses Are
Running Out of Room, On and Off Range
Carol Walker, who
lives outside Longmont, Colo., adopted three wild horses, from the
Bureau of Land Management for $125 each.
By DAN FROSCH
Published: December
14, 2012
CAÑON CITY, Colo. —
The herd of wild horses clopped cautiously toward the strangers in
their pen. A chestnut mustang leaned in for a closer look, sniffing
and snorting curiously. Another inched backward, her black eyes
flashing with fear.
For many, this would
be their first human contact, beyond the workers who feed them at
this 80-acre holding center, 100 miles southwest of Denver.
“They have all their
needs met here. Except their freedom,” said Fran Ackley, who
oversees the Bureau of Land Management’s Wild Horse and Burro
Program in Colorado. “I can’t say if they want it or not.”
Long a totem of the
American frontier, the tens of thousands of wild horses who roam
across forgotten stretches of the rural West are at the heart of an
increasingly tense dispute over their fate. The bureau says their
numbers continue to grow at an unmanageable rate, despite years of
removing wild horses from the range to enclosed pastures so that
wildlife and livestock can share the land.
Horse advocates
contend that the government’s approach has not only failed, but is
also needlessly cruel. And they say the horses should be able live
out their lives freely.
Despite deep
differences on how the animals should be managed, both sides agree on
one thing: The situation has reached a tipping point.
These days, the
temporary holding pens and long-term pastures where many wild horses
end up are nearing capacity or full. And the cost of caring for them
has ballooned over the past decade.
“We’re looking at
critical mass,” said Tom Gorey, a spokesman for the bureau. “The
fact is we can’t be in a position of gathering horses that we can’t
take care of. The capacity issue is staring us in the face.”
The question of what
to do with the animals — descendants of United States Cavalry
horses, workhorses and horses brought here by Spanish settlers —
has confounded the federal government for decades.
In an effort to
maintain a stable population, while also preserving public land,
Congress passed the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971,
allowing the bureau to remove “excess” wild horses from the
range.
But with virtually no
natural predators, herds typically double every four years.
Currently, about 37,300 wild horses and burros roam across federal
rangeland in 10 Western states, about 11,000 more than what the
bureau deems manageable.
Each year, the bureau
conducts roundups to thin the population. Low-flying helicopters
drive the animals into traps before they are taken to holding pens
and permanent pastures.
The roundups have long
been criticized as inhumane and dangerous.
“Their entire
approach is wrong. The B.L.M. puts all its emphasis on removing and
stockpiling horses as opposed to managing them on the range,” said
Suzanne Roy, director of the American Wild Horse Preservation
Campaign. “There needs to be a more humane way, a more
cost-effective way of managing these animals.”
Photos taken by
advocates of a recent roundup in northern Nevada appear to show
several confused horses stumbling into a barbed wire fence. Another
shows a wrangler with a foal slung across his saddle. Advocates said
the animal collapsed after being stampeded for miles.
While acknowledging
that a small number of horses get hurt or die during the roundups,
the bureau defends the approach as the only option given the
circumstances. Mr. Gorey said that the agency does everything it can
to minimize injuries.
But the bureau
concedes that gathering more horses is not a panacea. Nearly 50,000
wild horses and burros are already housed at temporary holding pens
or pastures, more than triple the number from a decade ago.
“People need to
realize that we’ve done more than what was envisioned under the
Wild Horses Act, which is why we’re in the situation we are today,”
said Mr. Ackley, the head of the bureau’s Colorado program.
He noted that horses
at the Cañon City facility are well cared for, whereas drought and
wintry conditions can make life on the range especially harsh. A
prison inmate training program at the center will also ready some of
the mustangs for adoption.
But advocates say that
the trauma of being separated from their families and the range
leaves the horses dispirited and stressed.
This month, a strange
illness sickened horses at Cañon City, and 19 died or were
euthanized. Mr. Ackley said he had never seen anything like it.
Arguments about
whether the holding pens or long-term pastures are acceptable homes
may be moot. With a steep decline in adoptions, and waning interest
from buyers — because of the soaring price of hay — there is
little room to care for any more.
Driven largely by what
it costs to hold the animals, the program’s budget has risen to $75
million this year from about $20.4 million in 2000.
“This is one of the
most difficult and vexing problems that we face in managing public
lands,” Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said. “It is one that does
not have an easy answer.”
Mr. Salazar said some
progress had been made in finding a solution, noting that the bureau
was using fertility-control drugs on mares, which advocacy groups
favor, and looking into developing sanctuaries where more horses can
live.
In recent months,
though, horse advocates have ratcheted up criticism of Mr. Salazar
and the bureau, after the news organization ProPublica reported that
the bureau had sold 1,777 wild horses to a Colorado livestock
hauler, Tom Davis, a proponent of horse slaughtering.
The Interior
Department’s inspector general is investigating whether Mr. Davis
sold the horses over the Mexican border for slaughter. The United
States’ last horse slaughterhouse closed in 2007, and buyers must
agree not to sell wild horses to be killed.
Mr. Salazar said
several safeguards were recently put in place to ensure wild horses
are kept safe after sale.
In the meantime, horse
advocates like Carol Walker view the bureau’s long-term strategy as
untenable. On a recent morning, Ms. Walker watched as three mustangs
meandered around her rolling property near Denver.
Ms. Walker adopted the
wild horses from the bureau for $125 each, the going rate, and had
them trained. Her youngest horse, Mica, comes from a Wyoming herd
that is the focus of a legal battle between a local grazing
association, which wants the herd removed to protect livestock
forage, and horse advocates.
Ms. Walker ruffled
Mica’s mane as he nuzzled his nose against her neck.
“Seeing these horses
out in the wild and then seeing them in a holding pen, it will break
your heart,” she said. “I’d rather they be free than live with
me.”
2 comments:
The same problem exists with elephants in South Africa, and using contraception on the females has lead to unnatural behavour in the bulls. This broke the family structure up and was judged not to be a solution.
After trialling that for over a decade they have returned to culling the herds, mimicking the system that would exist in a balance of predator and prey..
Nature is cruel but also what everything has adapted to. Thus imitation both works and is stable. It does beg the question of our own experiments in recent human history.
I am loath to go there but imitation of the human natural cycle needs to be thought out and even experimented with.
That needs to also coincide with child birth imitation and artificial final gestation i suspect. We are not there.
Post a Comment