Now that we have entered the midterms full press, all this declassification has passed from the news cycle.
This item makes it clear that there are no remaining secrets anyway except actionable evidence against Rosenstein in particular and others as well. Certainly the informed public knows this.
What we have is valuable leverage or the appearance thereof. This way Rosenstein is kept in play until the midterms are over and even then he may well stay on because he flipped a long time ago as possibly Mueller as well.
I do suspect that Trey Gowdy will become the new head of the FBI. We have clearly entered the end game. 55,000 + sealed indictments means a mass roundup likely starting in the new year with the new electors installed. This sword has been hanging a long time now and it is no secret if you are on the list.
Read the last Q drop ( Oct 9 )to see the whole picture of this unprecedented operation.
By the way, after his private trip on air force one, Rosenstein looks happy.
Trump, Declassification, and Leverage
There's
a reason why President Trump has not unilaterally declassified the
documents exposing perfidy against him: leverage. As the whole Russia
hoax is beginning to come into some sort of global perspective – quite
literally, as we'll see – the extent of the advantage he now maintains
by holding back declassification as a threat outweighs the benefits of
transparency. Recent posts by observers who write from widely varying
perspectives give us the ability to discern the current state of play.
Let's start with the domestic front of the Russia hoax. Sundance at Conservative Tree House has an excellent post up: "President Trump and DAG Rod Rosenstein – "No Collusion", No Immediate Worries..." The
overall theme is one that's dear to Sundance's heart: leverage. The
state of play is this: the congressional investigation has progressed to
the point that it's clear beyond cavil that the entire Russia narrative
is, in fact, a hoax and fraud – both on the American people in general
and on our legal system. This is to say real criminal liability exists
for the key players who developed the plot against Trump. John Solomon summarizes what Congress has discovered in succinct fashion:
There is now a concrete storyline backed by irrefutable evidence: The FBI allowed itself to take political opposition research created by one party to defeat another in an election, treated it like actionable intelligence, presented it to the court as substantiated, and then used it to justify spying on an adviser for the campaign of that party's duly chosen nominee for president in the final days of a presidential election.
And when, nine months later, the FBI could not prove the allegation of collusion between Trump and Russia, unverified evidence was leaked to the media to try to sustain public support for a continued investigation.
But Sundance spells out very specifically where the greatest risk – and therefore the greatest leverage – lies:
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein created the special counsel under fraudulent pretense. That origination material (Ohr 302's, FISA pages, origination EC, and Page/Strzok messages) is now a risk to the Deputy AG.
There
are many other players, in addition to Rosenstein, who are at serious
risk. But from the perspective of leverage, Rosenstein is the key
because he created the special counsel part of the hoax and because – as
a result of A.G. Sessions's recusal – he remains in charge of the
special counsel operation. Rosenstein can exercise as much or as little
control over Mueller as he wants. Trump's threat of declassification
of the "origination material" gives Trump complete leverage over
Rosenstein and therefore over Mueller.
Trump's leverage ensures that Rosenstein will very much want to restrain Mueller. If Rosenstein wants to restrain Mueller, Mueller will be restrained. This
may explain why we are now seeing key members of Mueller's team leaving
and returning to their old jobs. The importance of this is that
Mueller has posed the greatest threat to the Trump administration, the
greatest annoyance. That threat is now defanged for the immediate
future. If Mueller steps out of line, boom! Declassification. By
putting declassification on hold, Trump maintains his leverage. And
Congress continues to investigate and slowly reveal the truth.
The
benefits of this leverage via threat-of-declassification extend well
beyond the Russia hoax to other practical political matters. I believe
we saw that at play in the Kavanaugh nomination battle. Rod Rosenstein,
as DAG, directly supervises the FBI director, Christopher Wray. To say
the FBI acted with alacrity and efficiency in exposing the machinations
behind the accusations leveled at Kavanaugh would be an
understatement. But consider: Sundance himself was distinctly alarmist
during the Kavanaugh hearings, alleging a plot of Deep State FBI-DOJ insiders to torpedo the nomination. As
we've seen, however, exactly the opposite occurred. The FBI leaped to
Kavanaugh's defense, and I attribute that to Trump's leverage over the
DOJ-FBI through Rosenstein.
How
will this play out for the midterm elections? Will Trump at some point
declassify that crucial "origination material"? While Trump stressed
that his hold on declassification doesn't change his commitment for
transparency sooner rather than later, I believe that the Kavanaugh
nomination has given Trump and his newly committed GOP allies the issue
they need for the midterms. Polling has repeatedly shown that Supreme
Court nominations are a hot-button issue for Republican voters, and it
has the advantage of being readily comprehensible. Trump used his
leverage to get his nominee confirmed while energizing "normals"
for the midterms. After the election, declassification could play a
significant role in the run-up to the 2020 presidential election.
Let's turn to that global perspective now.
Justin Raimondo at Anti-War.com has a blog post up that complements Sundance's "leverage" perspective quite nicely: "The Final Truth of Russia-gate: As the hoax unravels, the real story of 'foreign collusion' comes out." Raimondo
focuses on the role of foreign "allies" in the plot against Trump. As
on the domestic front, there were multiple players: Australia, Ukraine,
Estonia, Israel. The key player was undoubtedly the U.K. Without
massive intelligence involvement by the U.K., the entire Russia hoax
would likely never have gotten off the ground. Here, Raimondo
encapsulates that involvement sufficiently for our purposes (much more could be said):
This entire episode has Her Majesty's Secret Service's fingerprints all over it. Steele's key role is plain enough: here was a British spook who was not only hired by the Clinton campaign to dig up dirt on Trump but was unusually passionate about his work – almost as if he'd have done it for free. And then there was the earliest approach to the Trump campaign, made by Cambridge professor and longtime spook Stefan Halper to Carter Page. And then there's the mysterious alleged "link" to Russian intelligence, Professor Joseph Mifsud, whose murky British-based thinktank managed to operate openly despite later claims it was a Russian covert operation.
It was Mifsud who orchestrated the Russia-gate hoax, first suggesting that the Russians had Hillary Clinton's emails, and then disappearing into thin air as soon as the story he had planted percolated into plain view. Some "Russian agent"!
Leverage,
anyone? Declassification would expose all these foreign players, but
the heaviest hit by far would be against the U.K. and its Australian
poodle. And so we learn that "key allies" "begged" Trump not to
declassify that "origination material." Raimondo notes:
Trump's decision to walk back his announcement that the key Russia-gate intelligence would be declassified tells us almost as much as if he'd tweeted it out, unredacted. For what it tells us is that public knowledge of the contents would constitute a major break in relations with at least one key ally.
Yes,
Trump smoked them out and got them begging for mercy, as reported by
the major media in all too transparent detail. Trump ends up with all
the leverage he needs over "Her Majesty's Government" for as long as
that leverage is useful.
Well played, Mr. President!
No comments:
Post a Comment