There was always something off about our perspective of Churchill. This takes it all well down the road to a very different understanding. It is noteworthy that we again hear the received notion of an ethnic genocide of the Jews been challenged, yet the big picture certainly supports ethnic removal and selective slaughter against populations also applied everywhere, regrettably by even the allies after the war. You simply did not need a special plan to remove populations to starvation camps. That was why it was easy enough to disappear evidence that may not have existed.
As said here, WWII was a holocaust that consumed millions and millions in a massive population contraction aimed against mostly the civilian populations. who often as not weakened for lack of food and died by the roadside or in internment camps. The top down argument is that they were excess and to let them died. At the end, all leaders accepted this from Stalin to Hitler and to the allied commanders as well after hostilities ended. Stalin got an early start in this type of behavior with the Kulaks and their enemies soon caught the virus.
Assigning guilt is both a cover up and a political project to distract from just how bad they all became.
I wonder just how many German soldiers quietly found their way into the French foreign legion to escape post war Germany? Welcome to Diem Bien Phu.
We are crawling back slowly to the two hundred year NWO conspiracy held by old stupid money. We live today as the worm itself is turning. The War remains global and it is now well engaged. Stand by the Cross.
November 19, 2019 |
“During the late 1930s, Churchill and his clique of similarly bought-and-paid-for political allies had endlessly attacked and denounced Chamberlain’s government for its peace policy, and he regularly made the wildest sort of unsubstantiated accusations, claiming the Germans were undertaking a huge military build-up aimed against Britain. These roiling charges were often widely echoed by a media heavily influenced by Jewish interests and did much to poison the state of German-British relations. Eventually, these accumulated pressures forced Chamberlain into the extremely unwise act of providing an unconditional guarantee of military backing to Poland’s irresponsible dictatorship. As a result, the Poles then rather arrogantly refused any border negotiations with Germany, thereby lighting the fuse which eventually led to the German invasion six months later and the subsequent British declaration of war. The British media had widely promoted Churchill as the leading pro-war political figure, and once Chamberlain was forced to create a wartime government of national unity, his leading critic was brought into it and given the naval affairs portfolio.
It is impossible to imagine a governmental act more vile and more depraved than contriving death and suffering for its own people — for the very citizens whom it was exhorting to “loyalty” — and I suspect that an act of such infamous and savage treason would have nauseated even Genghis Khan or Hulagu or Tamerlane, Oriental barbarians universally reprobated for their insane blood-lust. History, so far as I recall, does not record that they ever butchered their own women and children to facilitate lying propaganda….In 1944 members of British Military Intelligence took it for granted that after the war Marshal Sir Arthur Harris would be hanged or shot for high treason against the British people…