Friday, November 1, 2019

Death Star Tic Tac Black Hole Weapon? Stealth Cloak? Force Shield? MAYBE!





Observed UFO Tech has inspired research since the 1950's.  This led directly to passive stealth technology itself which we now see.  Active Stealth Tech may not be understood yet, though it is seen on UFOs.  I do observe that stealth fails, usually at close range, when they are forced to come much too close to a potential observer.

 It is also plausible that any prospective repeat observer will be induced to mentally block these observations.  My point is that we have ample traffic and that would need to become policy.

 Overcoming all this stealth is not particularly difficult in terms of War making.  That is the first step in terms of producing an active defense for the planet.  Them a massively distributed homing drone system provides ample potential for interception of all such traffic.  so yes we do have a plausible defense if it ever came to that.
.

Death Star Tic Tac Black Hole Weapon? Stealth Cloak? Force Shield? MAYBE!
Jack Sarfatti messages & I do remember being part of a conversation where people were saying that if you can make an Alcubierre drive the warp bubble could also act as a force shield – I can’t remember who with though. Was that a discussion that you started? Yes
Tic Tac Tech Weaponry Threat Analysis V1
A. Murad writes This is an interesting comment and characterizes part of the problem concerning the conventional wisdom. Rocket propulsion is bad but we do not care about UFOs! That is humorous…
You have learned that you can learn nothing more from the conventional wisdom but only from anomalies. If the evidence from anomalies is real, then we are responsible for changing the conventional wisdom to include the existing knowledge as well as to explain the anomaly. T here is no reason to persuade you that UFOs exist. Who really cares! What does care is what these so-called vehicles are capable of exercising unusual maneuvers as an anomaly with field systems to generate propulsion? The hard part of the problem is if you are given pictures on a jet engine and then request that you have to explain how it operates. Chances are you cannot give a reasonable idea of its operation. By contrast, with huge amounts of photographic and sensors concerning UFOs, we are in the same position. Thus, without a re-engineering operation on a vehicle, we can only theorize how these systems operate.
The points of most interest, at least to me, is how do you reach a vehicle traveling at an orbital speed at ground-level considering the huge amount of high aerodynamic heating that would melt anything. We cannot do that. Add to this where a vehicle can go hundreds of miles per hour underwater far faster than our technology that drives super-cogitating torpedoes. Again, we cannot do that either especially since it seems to operate with the same craft.
Some comments from NASA indicate that as much as 30,000 civilizations can exist in the cosmos. Signals are recorded from seven locations in the Milky Way. Something is clearly going on and it would be worthwhile to consider these possibilities. Before you reach these understandings and with acceptance, only then can you provide a meaningful contribution… I think it would be wise to change your perspective to accept more realism… Other than the current paradigm, your efforts may be questionable…P. A. Murad
APA PROPULSIONS wrote:
It is important to talk and discuss about these facts on November 30, 2019.If you remember on day 6 September 2019 in this same group I wrote this mail to all you:“ I would like, first of all, to write two words about our association. Our association (www.apapropulsions.cloud) is NOT an ufology association, we are not interested in UFOs and we are not interested in small grey men, greens or lighter colors APA is made up of university students in physics, engineering and mathematics (Cortona is in fact very close to important universities such as Pisa, Florence, Perugia and Rome) the association also includes older people who have always maintained a love and an interest in these subjects also after the studies.
Our goal is to help, if possible, the scientific community of the Atlantic to think of new forms of propulsion to overcome the rocket and the principle of action and reaction that today, at least as far as we know, is the dominant space transport mode. I agree with some of you when you say that even if we consider the rocket relativistic equations time and distances are insurmountable problems.
For this reason, as Jack Sarfatti says, we need to change approach. Our workshop and the subject should be the perfect occasion for explain this need of “a change of vision” .Looking at the history of our humanity, every new technological goal has gone hand in hand or emerged from a war. We are well aware of this but such a fear cannot stop the development in space propulsion, and the research on physics, on new materials, engineering, computer science and in the study of artificial intelligence.
We can’t get stuck at the rockets: this will NEVER bring us to the stars!! Only by reaching the stars we could give a chance to survive to our planet Earth. If such extremely important technological leap, in addition to guaranteeing us the stars, will also produce new weapons and military devices, we hope that they will be used to defend our planet from those who internally and externally put it or will put it in danger. APA has a dream:
to see the best minds of the old West (Israeli, Italy, UK, USA etc.) united to achieve this goal and win this new space race that perhaps other countries (Russia and China) have already started to run.
For now it’s just a dream and maybe it will remain so but if you come to Cortona on November 30th to listen Jack talk about PHYSICS OF LOW ENERGY WARP DRIVE, CONSCIOUS AI AND METAMERIALS for a day that dream will come true.

The only alternative for the 30th of November 2019 could be to go and see yet another launch of a space rocket in Baikonur, Cape Canaveral, Jiuquan or Vandemberg but I guarantee you that Tuscan food and wine are better than those you could eating in these places and this is certainly a fact on the table.”
If Jack’s calculations are correct and if what we think of these objects is correct, none of my mails was more precognitive than the one I wrote on September 6, 2019.
Unfortunately, if we want to reach a new level of technology that allows us to make a jump to the stars this is the risk we must be willing to take.
I am assuming that I know nothing about these objects and Jack will certainly be able to inform us and start a scientific reasoning that can be carried very far on November 30th.
But one thing I want to say about these Tic Tac objects as seen in the videos released by the US Navy: these objects certainly do not produce carbon dioxide, do you understand how important this is? I repeat, these objects do not produce carbon dioxide! If we ever manage to master that type of aerial and space technology, life on earth could have a highly positive development!
All over our world all our way of transport produces carbon dioxide: motorcycles, machines, aircrafts, trains, power plants for electric power. Being able to develop this new form of terrestrial and air transport would make it possible to almost totally break down our emissions; our problems of pollution on the planet earth would be almost totally solved! Unfortunately, however, starting to face this challenge involves opening a new research front that goes beyond the study of metamaterials and how the hull of such crafts moves within the terrestrial air space or within the empty space. In fact, it means understanding the source of energy from which the hull in metamaterial tries the power necessary to develop this new form of movement. As you will have understood by now the members of the association APA are first of all dreamers our dream has been, is and remains to reach the stars but we are more and more aware that such a type of research and such type of technological advancement would have very important repercussions in many other technological sectors of humanity that would allow the humanity, as we have already said, to make a very important evolutionary jump to the future. Thank for your attention. Gaetano
Abstract
If you are not profoundly shocked and even frightened by what you read below, then you have not understood it. If I am not fundamentally mistaken, and I might be, this Tic Tac Technology is more powerful than nuclear weapons if in the hands of the wrong people.
JACK SARFATTI wrote: Franc Milburn

“Can I share this with Eric and other relevant players with my comments?”
Franc Milburn wrote
Dear Jack “For sure. Please do publish.”
Further to my last set of questions, would a Tic Tac with its surrounding field be susceptible to directed energy weapons like and air or ground-mounted directed EMP device or a nuke detonated near a Tic Tac? What about a powerful laser?
Jack states “Perhaps not if the surrounding warp field is strong enough. This is a topic for research. A white hole artificial event horizon generated by the meta-material prevents anything from entering no matter how powerful the rocket engine.
I know from own professional experience and also from numerous cases that radar and infra-red homing air to air and ground to air missiles are not guaranteed to bring down a craft exhibiting Tic Tac characteristics. For air to air missiles, the 1976 Tehran episode I described below is a prime example. Cannons like 23mm Gatling-type have also been shown to do nothing to UFOs. What about a more potent projectile weapon like a railgun”
UFOs / UAPs very often cause weapon systems on fighter aircraft to fail and even the avionics…and have effects on ground vehicles and other machinery with electrical circuits. Is this a result only of the field surrounding them, or do you think they could have some advanced electronic warfare and electronic counter-measures that beat anything terrestrial powers have?
Jack states “EMP with low power metric engineering should not be difficult. Again these are all problems for research.”
Best,
On 23/09/2019 18:25, Franc wrote:
Dr Jack,
Franc Milburn wrote, Wanted to pick your brain on something if you have time. Eric Davis below says Greys are “us” from the future. I included the book by Masters that he mentions too for your interest.
“Eric and I agree on that. I was unaware he thought that.”


I know you favor this time traveler concept and we previously discussed if the Tic Tacs could also come from our past – not sure how likely you think that might be. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-04QIW-eFo Richard Dolan did a great discussion of the Iran UFO intercept incident in 1976.
I did some extra research on it and Leslie Kean´s book https://www.amazon.com/UFOs-Generals-Pilots-Government-Officials/dp/0307717089 UFOs:
Tehran, Iran 1976 UFO Intercept
Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Record, has some interesting quotes from both of Shah of Iran and the F-4 pilot who tried to shoot down the UFO.
F-4
Leslie Kean´s book on UFOs has a short chapter written by Jafari who was carrying 8 missiles: 4 x heat-seeking and 4 x radar. No mention of Vulcan cannon. He goes back to base quickly from home as he is the Squadron CO. He is quickly in the air and his plane weapons load-out indicates that Northern Iran was a front-line air defense identification zone hotspot.
Unlike the debunkers´ theories who claim ineptness in radar operation, he orders his weapons officer back seater to break radar lock on the object and re-paint it, to insure they are not picking up ground effect or a mountain. He says he selected and tries to fire a Sidewinder when he loses weapons panel, all instruments and communications. He is freaked out but does not lose his nerve at any moment.
At base USAF Colonel Mooy tells him he “is lucky” he could not fire…They have blood tests, both aircraft checked for radiation and a battery of questions for the crews over a period by Iranian scientists writing a scientific report.
The Shah visits the base: “When the base commander told the Shah that I was the pilot who had chased the UFO, the shah asked me, “What do you think about it?” I answered, “In my opinion they cannot be from our planet, because if anyone on this planet had such power, he would bring the whole planet under his own command.” He simply said, “Yes,” and told us this was not the first report he had received.”
Above worth a look: experienced U.S. military pilots fly a simulator (in aircraft) to evaluate Jafari´s claims.
This debunker plus Klass make a number of claims: radar ineptitude, lack of experience night flying, Jupiter and U.S. contractors who they say stated that Jafari´s F4 was notorious for systems malfunctions and the maintenance shoddy. The same thing happened to two craft.
Still trying to find a bio for Jafari but a number of points: this was a high-speed frontline area; you do not get to fly top-notch interceptors with live warheads without being very competent; the IIAF received a lot of training and support from U.S. Iran´s pilots and their operational commanders in the Iran-Iraq war pulled off some daring and cunning complex ops against the Iraqis, despite the chaos of the revolution, purges and initial Iraqi successes. They did very well all things considered. Jafari is a general who went on the record and is not the only witness. I have to come down on his side against the debunkers. How would Jupiter be flying around his aircraft when he is at Mach etc??? Easy to debunk when you were not there. Plus all the official U.S. and Iranian interest in the fascinating case.
So my question is, if Jafari and apparently the Shah, do not believe the craft are terrestrial, then why have humans not been dominated by an ET species – that is – if we accept the possibility of the extraterrestrial hypothesis – whether these are space-faring humans from far away in time and / or space / intra-dimensional etc, or other species?
Lt Pirouzi also attempted to intercept the UFO and could not fire his weapons.
If one looks at the ETH, then judging by human behavior, which is the subjugation of the tech inferior by the tech superior, there are only a couple of valid theories as to why we have not been dominated / defeated yet.
ETs or “others” do not have hostile intent – but tell that to the hundreds of Western and probably Russian and Chinese and other pilots who have lost their lives in UFO encounters, plus the highly suspicious link between UFOs and nukes.
ETs or “others” are steadily infiltrating human societies as per Prof David Jacob´s “They Walk Among Us” theories, because while they have the tech to defeat earth militaries, they want the planet, resources and population for their use; not killed or destroyed.
ETs or “others” know or believe that terrestrial earth militaries have an effective means of defense.
There is some ET balance of power, i.e., more than one ET race in play, who balance each other out and/or have alliances with terrestrial powers to prevent one side having an absolute advantage as to be able to physically take over the earth. We are already living in an ET-dominated scenario – we just do not know it – like the humans in The Matrix. What do you think? Best, Franc
Editor’s Note: I briefed the general staff that morning at 21st Air Force about the confidential UFO incident. Allegedly the incident was imaged on our satellites and the generals were very interested in the inability of the Sidewinders to fire. Later the F-4 system was checked out I was told it was functioning properly. I also flew with Iranian pilots and they seemed as competent as ours at the time before the Islamic Revolution of 1979 placed Shi’a clergy in positions of power.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)