Tuesday, August 28, 2018

Dinosaurs Only a Few Thousand Year old






This is really interesting  Dating is a huge problem and no position should be trusted at all.  Throw in the universal false narrative of our whole prehistory and you are soon in deep trouble.  followers know that i have reconstructed a massive prehistory that is well supported by unending evidence once you actually go looking.
The response here by peers was horrid and not slightly warranted because of my first comment on overall reliability. Follow up was certainly warranted and the attack appears to be an effort to prevent just that.
After saying that, i do not think that the Dinosaurs survived continuously for the past 65,000,000 years.  However they or some aspect of them did survive continuously in the Sahul rain forest until around the time of the Pleistocene nonconformity some 12900 years ago.  Taking that as a starting point it becomes plausible the our predecessors likely revived notable species as we ourselves will attempt soon enough.  So it is not impossible using just what we know.

Thus just using one geological event and actually the one best represented in my mountain of evidence, i can find a way to transform a bunch of currently living theropods from the Suhul into the desired animal.  Simply put, a population existed in the Sahul until 12900 years ago.  This made population restoration possible before then.   I do not need 65,000,000 year old soft tissue.


Dinosaurs Only a Few Thousand Year old


https://nationalufocenter.com/?wysija-page=1&controller=email&action=view&email_id=346&wysijap=subscriptions&user_id=2771


This stunning discovery by a published scientist of over 30 years would be the envy of most professional paleontologists and the pride of any university associated with it except for one What he found is an inconvenient truth for the evolution theory.


World Net Daily reported that a team of attorneys is jumping to the defense of a scientist who was fired after making the stunning discovery of soft tissue attached to a triceratops This undermined the belief that dinosaurs roamed earth no less than 60 million years ago and supported the Christian belief that dinosaurs were here only thousands of years ago. The Pacific Justice Institute said its case on behalf of Mark Armitage alleges that a university official where Mark Armitage worked shouted at him, “We are not going to tolerate your religion in this department!” The suit against California State University Northridge, filed recently in

Los Angeles County Superior Court against the board of trustees, alleges discrimination.


“Terminating an employee because of their religious views is completely inappropriate and illegal,” said Brad Dacus, PJI “But doing so in an attempt to silence scientific speech at a public university is even more alarming.

ABOUT THE DISCOVERY of Soft Tissue


Armitage was at a dig in the Hell Creek formation in Montana in 2012 when he came up with “the largest triceratops horn ever unearthed at the ” Later, while examining the specimen under a high-powered microscope at CSUN, he discovered the soft tissue. The discovery stunned members of the scientific community because it indicates that dinosaurs roamed the earth only thousands of years in the past rather than going extinct 60 million years ago. Armitage was then dismissed. He is in the Microscopy Society of America, the Southern California Academy of Sciences and the American Society of Parasitologists.


School officials previously had described him as “tops.” “He has patience, great expertise and practices great ” But his discovery of the soft tissue, which according to most scientific perspectives should have completely decayed millions of years ago, sent a shock wave through the department where he worked.


In the light of examples such as this, the phrase ‘Alternative Science’ seems less a contradiction in terms and more a harbinger of something that professional science is likely to see more and more of in


A short while ago I reported on a colossal cover-up which should concern all of When you also consider the fact that many other dinosaur bones (and other things that are supposed to be millions of years old) are dated as only being 22,000-41,000 years old, you have to at least conclude that there is something wrong somewhere. Either the carbon-14 dating system is not as robust as some want to believe, or the fossils are not as old as some want to believe. Dr Armitage has won $500,000 from the University for firing him and has now located more soft tissue on dinosaurs. I find it ridiculously hypocritical that evolution proponents go on to slam Mark Armitage for calling it what it obviously was while knee-jerk lawsuits shunt the court system striking down anyone, specifically any Christian, for so much as mumbling opposition to the hulking will of legalist atheists. The court’s judgement counts as a win for the God of creation.

No comments: