Only a bunch of conniving statists would attempt to hoist this upon an unsuspecting public.
Suddenly the UN is constructing a whole body of law over riding all laws of a lesser status such as our laws. This cannot stand. Except no one really knows this. This is why nationalism is massively re-surging throughout the world.
Blow back is well underway in Europe and the political idiots in Canada known as liberals will be sent to extinction in Canada in late 2019. Such a scheme can not be sold here and it will be their albatross.
We also have a serious problem in our education system. Lawyers take the liberal arts route into the legal profession and that means indoctrination with so called Political Science as least. All that has been heavily reworked as apologia for Marxism under a different name. This is the typical home fro most politicians and liberals in particular. Their destruction of the economy of Ontario. is available for all to see.
The UN was created as an unaccountable body. Bad mistake. It needs to establish an elective body based on a global application of the Rule of Twelve. Short of ever selling that it needs to allow representative elections worldwide under some formula or the other and aceptance for seating will depend on adherence to viable elections..
UN Compact on migration proposes destruction of Canada
UN Compact on migration proposes destruction of Canada
By Retired Major Russ Cooper, Spokesperson, C3RF
https://immigrationwatchcanada.org/2018/10/17/un-compact-on-migration-proposes-destruction-of-canada/
The Global Compact on migration is an inter-governmentally negotiated
agreement coordinated by the United Nations. It has been a
work-in-progress for two years with the final text agreed to this past
July, 2018. It moves forward to formal adoption by UN members states,
(save for the United States, Australia and Hungary) this December in
Morocco. It is noteworthy that the U.S. and Australia see the Compact as
incompatible with their sovereignty concerns while Hungary desires
measures that deter, rather than promote, migration. The two worldviews
for and against the Compact could not be further apart as the U.N. sees
migration as a benefit to all while opponents see it as a risk to
security and social cohesion. Here are some of the aspects of the
Compact that Canada is about to sign onto :
It affirms the pre-eminence of international law in areas that
include national migration policy and due process in dealing with both
regular and “irregular” migrants;
It requires a “whole of government” approach to eliminating
discrimination and intolerance of migrants and their families (Does
M-103 ring a bell?);
It seeks to minimize factors that drive migration through the
elimination of socioeconomic factors such as poverty and climate change
while funding sustainable development at local and national levels in
originating states;
It sees border management as an internationally coordinated and integrated affair;
It requires laws that see the provision of basic services to migrants
without discrimination on a number of grounds including “political or
other opinion”;
It requires the incorporation of national health and education plans
and policies that accommodate all migrants without discrimination in a
“lifelong” fashion;
It requires the minimization of disparities between migrant and host populations;
It requires passage of laws that penalize hate crimes directed at
migrants and the training of law enforcement and other public officials
to respond to such occurrences;
It demands the cessation of funds to media outlets that promote
intolerance against migrants and the provision of national and regional
complaint and redress mechanisms;
It requires the promotion of safer, cheaper and easier means of remittance corridors to originating states; and
It calls for the facilitation of return and readmission to
originating states including financial support and the portability of
social security benefits and earned benefits from host states.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Make no mistake : This Global Compact, with its promotion of
available and flexible “pathways” of migration, means supranational
coordination of international border controls. This will not be the
first time the world has witnessed such developments as they are
resident within the European context of the past few years. It is this
context that has seen EU migration policy open up borders to mass Muslim
migration from the Middle East and North Africa. The results in areas
of security, violent crime, individual rights and finances have been,
and continue to be, startling. Is there any reason that similar,
supranational efforts at the U.N. level would produce different outcomes
for Canada?
The Global Compact, like Motion M-103, has flown under the radar with
little public debate before its imminent instatement. As well, it
places an inordinate amount of pressure on the host nation to
accommodate migrant sensibilities and needs. There is simply no mandate
for the migrant to integrate or even consider the possibility that such a
capacity might be a part of the migration process. Rather than this,
the accepted bigotry of the host population must be “quelled” (M-103) or
eliminated (Global Compact). Not great ways to start a “lifelong”
relationship between host and migrant communities.
The stakes involved by virtue of the Global Compact are potentially
nation-changing and include the type of social dislocation we are
beginning to see in Europe. Sure, one might say that the agreement is
non-binding since it doesn’t constitute an official treaty or UN
Convention but it will establish an international norm regarding the
governance of international migration. It is norms such as these that
can become part of what international law experts call “customary
international law”. That, in turn, can inform and shape national laws.
Given the fact that the Compact calls up the need for significant
resources to be expended by both federal and provincial agencies and for
individual Canadians to sacrifice their right to criticize such
policies and expenditures, is it not time to openly debate Canada’s
participation in such a venture? At the very least and in line with the
health and education burdens the provinces must bear, should the
provinces, with Ontario at the fore, not be consulted before Canada can
even consider lending its signature to such an enterprise?
What to do? It is clear by now that the federal government is simply
chasing a U.N. pat on the head as it virtue-signals its “Canada’s back”
mantra. They will not listen to your concerns over loss of sovereignty,
security and individual rights and freedoms. Is it not better to
petition a powerful office that is prepared to listen to these concerns
and act? Given the fact that the Premier of Ontario has demonstrated his
willingness to “rock the boat” and speak truth to power and the fact
that Ontario has much to lose in the way of health and educational
capacity, it makes sense to approach him and his administration with
your concerns.
If you agree, please sign this petition and pass along your support
of the adjoining message to Premier Ford and his administration :
No comments:
Post a Comment