Monday, February 5, 2018

Paul Hill’s Interstellar Travel in “Unconventional Flying Objects”

Gravity control was achieved before 1955 by American Science.  It then went black.  Our present day large triangular 'UFO's are the outcome of that line of work.  They are already operational for thirty years at least.  They rely on jet engines to build velocity but inertial lag is massively reduced.
As i have posted, i now understand the underlying science here and what they have from 1955 is good enough today.  An actual inertial drive is possible but demands serious engineering design before it is operational.  That is why it is not yet in evidence.
So called wormhole travel is certainly confirmed from conforming reports in our possession and will be achieved soon in the physical present...

Paul Hill’s Interstellar Travel in “Unconventional Flying Objects”

Paul Hill’s book, Unconventional Flying Objects, based on solid NASA/US Military data, is solid physics and engineering showing that UFOs have some kind of propellantless inertial drive based on a micro-miniaturized, probably nano-engineered, smart high temperature superconducting outer shell. The Modanese theory fits this scenario quite well and is mathematically simple. So far I cannot see any error in it, but I need to look harder. So bear this in mind while reading Crowell’s report. A recent WIRED also made it appear that experiments to test Modanese’s theory have been flaky. It may all be true. On the other hand it may be disinformation, a smoke screen, to get others off the track of something that may actually work.

Astronaut Edgar Mitchell thinks that this technology is real, Jan Lamprecht writes, There is an excellent book called: Unconventional Flying Objects, by a former NASA scientist Paul Hill who did a fully-blown study of UFOs, propulsion, etc from a scientists viewpoint.

This book unquestionably shows the PHYSICAL nature of many UFOs – that these things are big and heavy – when landed at least. He discusses “UFO nests” where they swirl when they land on grass, etc. He also says that when UFOs land on marshy ground they do a “belly flop” and distribute their weight over a larger area. By measuring the compression of the mud they can ascertain certain things. He says that “when landed” these things have a tremendous weight.

He also describes a most interesting experiment (if any of you see a UFO face to face, remember this one!!!). He said you should throw a rock or a brick UNDERNEATH it and observe the trajectory of the object. By doing such simple experiments as throwing a brick at various parts of the craft you can ascertain if there is some kind of field around it, and information from this will be of interest to scientists. He describes how one farmer chucked a brick at a UFO and then he goes on to infer various things from this. It is a most interesting book written by a scientist. This guy used to build flying platforms for fun. He has been involved in designing aircraft since WWII, and then worked for NASA. He died in 1990.

Some of the examples he cites in his book are from actual encounters and he then analyses them. Amazing stuff. Anyone who does not believe UFOs are real should read this. This is the kind of stuff I like. It also mentions something I’ve never come across before. Do you know that the Germans did a study of UFO’s in 1954 and had their best rocket scientists study them? The Germans had a conference saying these were unquestionably space ships. they then also said that these spaceships were probably powered by gravity by turning gravity into energy! This NASA scientist has all of this in his book!! If the Germans knew in 1954 that these were spaceships then the USA must have known by then too. Some of what these Germans concluded is almost similar to what Dr Tom Van Flandern speaks of these days with his gravity ideas. Governments knew from Day 1 these things were space ships pure and simple.

Many Scientists claim their biggest stumbling block to ET visiting Earth is the tremendous distances between our Earth and other solar systems!” I attempted to explain NASA engineer Paul Hill’s findings regarding the time requirements for interstellar travel. Einstein pointed time and distance in space is shortened by speed

Paul Hill wrote, “Most writers and physicists too, in estimating the time for interstellar travel, neglect the effect of the accelerating portions of the trip on the trip time, making the simplifying assumption that the vehicle makes the entire trip at constant velocity. This is probably done because the requisite equations are scarce items in the literature… snip.

It is possible for an interstellar trip to be very short. The trip from our nearest neighbor, Alpha Centuri, a triple star system 4.3 light years away made by acceleration at 140 g to a v/c of 0.9999 is accomplished from a standing start to a standing finish in 6 weeks. Snip

At the highest speeds considered, the travel time is not at all proportional to the distance. For example at 20 g and v/c=0.9999 we read a distance of 25 light years takes 0.6 years on board, while a distance of 100 light years is covered in almost a year. The reason is easy to visualize. Once the vehicle is up to speed, vast amounts of additional distance may be covered during the coast period with but little increase in time and, obviously, with no increase in additional light year covered while coasting.

CONCLUSION: I hope I have made it clear that there is an important distinction to be made between the time experienced by the space traveler and the time which passes meanwhile on the home planet and on the planetary destination. The tremendous acceleration, speed, and energy capability displayed by UFOs make them well suited to capitalize on this distinction by the attainment of greatly reduced on board times realizable by approaching the speed of light. Even an approach to 90 percent of light gets the job done for the nearer stars. Higher fractions of light speed give attractive time reductions for longer trips. Don’t be misled by the countless statements in the literature that interstellar distances and the speed of light constitute some kind of barrier to space travel. There are only two paths to this conclusion: Nobody in the universe has the technology to approach light speed. Observer time is significant, and on board time is to be ignored. Both paths are false ones. The confused second view is the more common. Its proponents are using the observed time for light to travel as the shortest possible time for passage;“Totally false.” Thanks to Paul Hill, “Unconventional Flying Objects”, Pages 268-279.

Note: Aliens frequently talk about high speed travel between planets with wormholes portals, time travel, etc that may or may not exist.

No comments: