Thursday, April 30, 2020

Anti Gravity Concepts




Nice work here.  it is embedded in the mathematics of relatiivty, but is still working backwards fro mthe observations of UFOs or Tic Tacs.

I am not confident in the approach because all structures provide guides holding internal gravitiational effects which are way more significant than we anticipate and can be modified directly.


I do expect that all this will respond to much simpler mathematical modaling when we get down to it.  After all the ancients depended on the mathematics of ratios to learn a lot and gravity itself is deeply geometry dependent.  Intuiting ratio and resonance allows progress.
....  

Dr. Jack Sarfatti 

Gravity is not always attractive. Can you think of a citation to an easy-reader explanation for a layman ?

No, because it’s original research by me currently under development along with my team Professor Keith Wanser Physics Cal State Fullerton, Maurice Passman PhD theoretical physics U. London (at UK MOD for years under Professor James Moffat) and others. This is key to understanding flight of the UAVs the US Navy reports. I can try in words. Einstein’s gravity field equation has the form

Induced Warp Drive Tensor Field = Newton’s G x Source Electromagnetic Susceptibility Response Function x Source Stress-Energy Tensor

The Source Electromagnetic Susceptibility Response Function gets very large by many factors of ten. This allows the desired Induced Warp Drive to be generated with a smaller Source Stress-Energy Tensor applied electromagnetic pump field. Finally, with negative susceptibility the Source Stress Energy Tensor reverses sign causing anti-gravity.

This is for NEAR EVANESCENT Fields CONFINED INSIDE THE META-MATERIAL SKIN /FUSELAGE OF THE MACHINE – NOT FAR FIELD GRAVITY WAVES PROPAGATING FAR AWAY FROM THE CRAFT. Jack Sarfatti :


PS

In a meta-material resonance pumped by the applied source stress-energy tensor electromagnetic field (it can be a battery voltage V across the parallel conducting plates of a capacitor C filled with the meta-material dielectric. Electric Field = surface charge density on the plates divided by the dielectric function .The stress energy tensor in the Newtonian weak field limit (Poisson equation) has the form (electric field)^2/(dielectric function) = (surface charge density)^2/(dielectric function).



Metamaterial.jpg

In a metamaterial resonance this energy density can be negative (or also positive) Poisson’s near field eq is Laplacian Warp Field Potential Energy per unit mass = =G(RESPONSE FUNCTION)(surface charge)^2/(dielectric function) I found it! I found it! So let’s celebrate …




F-18s and Tic Tac UFO

David Fravor the Commanding Officer of the Black Aces FA-18F Navy fighter squadron from the carrier Nimitz had 3600 hours flying time and was a Top Gun graduate. He Chased a UFO of Tic Tac (cylinder) shape in 2004 off the coast of San Diego. He was part of the Strike Group. And cruiser USS Princeton radar that detected multiple AAV (Anomalous Aerial Vehicles).The F-18s tracked multiple targets from 80,000 ft. to 50 ft. above the water in SECONDS.

There were 4 F-18s. that observed the UFO for over 5 minutes. UFO tried to jam RADAR (different video… that’s the one with the FLIR video). The UFO jammed the RADAR as soon as they got an initial RADAR lock. (Hostile action)

Got within 1/2 mile of UFO, and were painted on IR (infrared), EO (Electro-optical). There was something under the water.UFO re-appeared at CAP (Combat Air Patrol point).



Physicist Dr. Eric Davis working for AWSAP

and BASS reports there were hundreds of tic-tac incidents like this on east and west coast.

“So, they set up a program that, initially, was AWSAP. It was separate from AATIP, the program that Lue Elizondo was involved with. The Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) was a secret investigatory effort funded by the United States Government to study unidentified flying objects (UFOs) or unexplained aerial phenomena (UAP). He wasn’t involved with actually for another year, but AATIP was the study, the occasional encounters that military personnel had with UFOs; that was an informal organization that existed within The Pentagon, different departments and different divisions of the military. And they would exchange information, videos would come in, they do analysis, and create files, and try to figure the stuff out. AWSAP was created to be something else entirely. It was to look at a broader range of paranormal activity. ” – source: http://www.openminds.tv/george-knapp-hunt-for-the-skinwalker-interview-transcript/42039

Fravor said a friend had a drone taken underwater by a USO.



From: Robert Addinall
Date: Sunday, April 5, 2020 at 2:59 PM

To: Jack Sarfatti <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Simple example Tic Tac/Gimbal Warp Drive with network of small meta-material parallel plate capacitors tiled around fuselage

Robert states Jack, One thing that I have wondered about but have not bothered to ask until someone worked out Alcubierre/Natario warp field theory in more detail:

Jack Sarfatti I am computing the Christoffel symbols and 4th rank curvature tensors for the original toy model Alcubierre drive (tic tac as “point”) not good enough – will tackle more realistic metrics later – this one is tedious enough to start and I have not been able to find them in the literature. If anyone can save me the trouble let me know.


Robert states, despite being comparatively low energy in your version, how does the metamaterial layer in the outer skin of the craft avoid being pulled apart by the extreme gravitational curvature of the spacetime field that it is generating?

Jack Sarfatti Your premise is false. The compensating curvature inside the meta-material needed for Tic Tac/Gimbal flight is very weak!




Robert states Some cosmologists talk about accelerating expansion of the universe eventually pulling atoms apart – sub-atomic particles being pulled away from each other, assuming that expansion continues to accelerate. Looking at Alcubierre’s toy drawing of a warp bubble metric that is a huge amount of negative curvature on one side of a craft and a huge amount of positive curvature on the other.

Jack Sarfatti Your intuition is false here. You cannot decide these things without doing the mathematics, which I am doing slowly too slowly.

The fact is Tic Tacs are flying around so all your idle speculations are clearly false.

One iron post of observation is worth reams of paper mache speculation (apology to John Archibald Wheeler)




Robert states Does the spacetime start to curve “just” inside the layer on the craft’s skin where its stiffness is reduced,

Jack Sarfatti Yes, of course.

Robert states and then, kinematically speaking, have that extreme curvature in a volume a few millimetres wide around the craft,

Jack Sarfatti NO EXTREME CURVATURE

Robert states and then as it propagates any further from the craft –

Jack Sarfatti: NO PROPAGATION, THE NEAR FIELD DECAYS EXPONENTIALLY OVER A SMALL DISTANCE FROM THE TIC TAC SKIN

Robert states even a few centimeters – regains its typical stiffness

Jack Sarfatti: THAT IS A DESIGN PARAMETER, THE SMALLER IT IS THE BETTER. OBVIOUSLY, IT’S SMALL IN FACT FOR TIC TAC WHICH IS QUITE STEALTHY.


Robert states and so goes back to flat (or whatever the background curvature is, such as the curvature of Earth’s gravity well a few hundred metres off the ground)? Is the EM pump field pushing the spacetime out of the metamaterial in order that the extreme curvature happens just “next” to the metamaterial instead of in it?

Jack Sarfatti: NO, YOUR PICTURE IN YOUR MIND IS TOTALLY WRONG, THAT NOT WHAT EINSTEIN MATHEMATICS PREDICTS.

In other words: Robert states Spacetime stiffness is reduced in the metamaterial\\

The metamaterial resonance for the electrical permittivity

Jack Sarfatti: THAT’S CORRECT

Robert states EM pump field is coming into the metamaterial from inside the craft

Jack Sarfatti: THAT’S CORRECT
The metamaterial resonance for the electrical permittivity




Robert states Reduced stiffness spacetime is the constantly being “pushed” out of the metamaterial while curving so that it curves extreme right “next” to the skin of the fuselage

COMPLETELY WRONG

Robert states As soon as it is any distance from the fuselage it “snaps” back to background curvature

THAT’S CORRECT

Robert states “More spacetime” meaningless

Robert states always appear within the metamaterial, but at reduced stiffness because the metamaterial prevents it from forming as dense an amount of particle- antiparticle pairs as normal?

Jack Sarfatti: NO! The density of ZPF virtual electron-positron pairs does not change significantly – the effect is entirely from real charges inside the meta-material.

Robert states or the extreme curvature happens in the metamaterial, but it still holds its shape despite the extreme spacetime curvature because the spacetime is not stiff and the EM pump field is low energy?

Jack Sarfatti: DON’T HOCK MY CHINIK WITH YOUR FAKAKTA IDEA OF “EXTREME CURVATURE”


UFO Tic Tac like Photo taken from USS Trepang (SS 412) submarine late 1960s

No comments: