I propose that Sumarian scholars were deeply informed by earlier anti diluvian sources produced from 35,000 BP through 12900BP. Published long lives suport this possibility. Sumer arose at the end of the long lived transition era between 12,900BP to 9000 BP first phase ( geological stabalization) and 9000 BP to 6000 BP ( Re settlement under long lived leadership and knowledge retention)
humanity was established and modified to exclude talents as part of the Fall from Eden. I have already noted the loss of mind to mind comms still retained by the rest of life on earth at some level. note the HIVE GIANT INSECT exerience lasting throughout the Carboniferous when athmospheric oxygen levels ran at 35%.
this ists 6 additional talents. All plausible.
The Sumerian Tablet That Lists the Seven Powers Taken From Humanity — And Who Still Holds Them
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GR2g_Kc-OBk
In the restricted storage wing of the British Museum, past the Assyrian reliefs and the Babylonian boundary stones, there is a climate-controlled room that does not appear on any public floor plan. Constant temperature, humidity locked at forty percent. On shelf 14-C of cabinet row seven, cataloged under the designation K.2100, sits a clay tablet slightly larger than an adult hand, recovered from the library of Ashurbanipal at Nineveh by Layard's expedition in 1851. The standard museum record describes it as a mythological fragment, Old Babylonian copy, partial preservation, variant of the Descent of Inanna cycle. The general structure of these texts is well known. The goddess Inanna descends through the underworld, passes through seven gates, and at each gate something is removed from her — a garment, a piece of jewelry, a symbol of divine authority. The standard interpretation treats this as allegory. Death and rebirth. Seasonal cycles. Temple ritual. That reading has held for over a century.
<iframe width="853" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/GR2g_Kc-OBk" title="The Sumerian Tablet That Lists the Seven Powers Taken From Humanity — And Who Still Holds Them" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
In the restricted storage wing of the
0:01British Museum, past the Assyrian
0:04reliefs and the Babylonian boundary
0:06stones, there is a climate controlled
0:07room that does not appear on any public
0:10floor plan. Constant temperature,
0:12humidity locked at 40%. On shelf 14C of
0:16cabinet row 7, cataloged under the
0:18designation K.201000, 20110 0 sits a
0:22clay tablet slightly larger than an
0:24adult hand recovered from the library of
0:26Asherbanopal at Nineveh by Leard's
0:29expedition in 1851.
0:31The standard museum record describes it
0:33as a mythological fragment old
0:35Babylonian copy partial preservation
0:38variant of the descent of Anana cycle.
0:41The general structure of these texts is
0:43wellknown. The goddess Anana descends
0:46through the underworld, passes through
0:48seven gates, and at each gate something
0:50is removed from her, a garment, a piece
0:52of jewelry, a symbol of divine
0:54authority. The standard interpretation
0:57treats this as allegory, death and
1:00rebirth, seasonal cycles, temple ritual.
1:06That reading has held for over a
1:08century. The problem is that K2100 does
1:11not describe garments. The word that
1:13standard translations render as ornament
1:16is written on K2100 as a compound
1:19Sumerian term that translates most
1:21accurately as a power embedded in the
1:23body, not an object removed from the
1:26outside, a capacity extracted from
1:28within. And the tablet lists seven of
1:31these capacities individually with a
1:33description of each with the name of the
1:35deity to whom each was transferred after
1:37extraction and with a direct statement
1:39that humanity once possessed all seven
1:42and now holds none. If the Sumerianss
1:44were writing poetry, they chose
1:46extraordinarily specific language. If
1:49they were recording something else, then
1:51what was taken from us? And who still
1:53has it?
1:55The Sumerian word the tablet uses is me.
1:58One of the most debated terms in the
2:00cuneaoiform lexicon. Mainstream
2:02assiology translates me as divine
2:05decree, a vague theological concept
2:07representing abstract forces that govern
2:10civilization.
2:11The standard reading treats the me as
2:13symbolic metaphors for cultural
2:16institutions like kingship and
2:17priesthood. But the cunea form on K2100
2:21does not support that reading. The
2:23tablet enumerates the sevenme as
2:25functional capacities with physiological
2:27descriptions. The first is nam kuru the
2:31power of seeing what is distant
2:33described not as wisdom but as a
2:35function of the eye and the back of the
2:36skull. A capacity to perceive beyond the
2:39range of ordinary vision. The second is
2:42namish tuku direct knowing without
2:44instruction. The ability to absorb
2:47complex information without being
2:48taught. The third is nam shub, the power
2:52of the spoken command, not rhetoric, but
2:55a capacity for speech to alter physical
2:57reality, for sound to affect material
2:59structures.
3:02The fourth is nomilla, which translates
3:05literally as the power of living without
3:07end. The text is specific, biological
3:10processes that do not degrade, cells
3:13that replicate without error, a body
3:15that does not age. The fifth is namin,
3:19the power of sovereign connection, the
3:21ability to communicate between minds
3:23without spoken language. The sixth is
3:26nam eigal, the power of seeing what is
3:29hidden, perceiving the interior of solid
3:32objects. And the seventh given the
3:34longest description is nam mam
3:37translated for decades as divine
3:39radiance but described on K2100 as a
3:42field generated by the body that repels
3:44harm, prevents disease, and makes the
3:47bearer immune to physical damage. Seven
3:50capacities described in physiological
3:52terms that read less like theology and
3:55more like a technical inventory of
3:57capabilities removed from a species and
3:59redistributed to its creators. and the
4:02tablet names every recipient.
4:06The redistribution section of K2100 is
4:08the part that no mainstream translation
4:10has fully published. Partial renderings
4:13exist in academic footnotes, accompanied
4:15by disclaimers that the passage is too
4:17damaged for reliable interpretation. The
4:20tablet is damaged, but the structure of
4:22the list is intact enough that the
4:24pattern is unmistakable. The first me
4:27farseeing was given to Enki consistent
4:30with his role across the entire Sumerian
4:32corpus as the one who sees to the edge
4:34of the universe. The second direct
4:37knowing was given to Nisaba the goddess
4:39of writing and scribal arts described in
4:42other texts as needing no teacher. The
4:45third, the spoken command went to Enlil.
4:48In every Sumerian text, Enlil's word
4:50does not merely order. It physically
4:53alters reality. When Enlil speaks, the
4:56ground opens. The texts do not describe
4:58obedience. They describe causation
5:00through vocalization.
5:02The fourth me living without end went to
5:05the Anunnaki collectively, not to one
5:07god, to the council.
5:11This detail has been ignored because it
5:13implies that immortality was not an
5:15inherent divine quality. It was a
5:17transferred capacity, something that
5:20originally belonged to the created
5:21species and was taken back. The fifth,
5:25mind-to- mind communication, has a
5:27partially legible recipient beginning
5:29with nin, suggesting a major goddess.
5:32The sixth, seeing what is hidden, shows
5:35traces consistent with Utu, the sun god,
5:38from whom nothing can be concealed. The
5:40seventh recipient, whoever received the
5:42protective field, is completely erased.
5:45The signs are gone. And in Sumerian
5:47textual tradition, names are not
5:49casually destroyed. Deliberate eraser
5:52from a clay tablet is a documented
5:54practice. You erased a name to erase a
5:56being's power to remove them from the
5:58record to ensure they could not be
6:00invoked. Someone made certain that name
6:03would not survive.
6:06The tablet does not frame the removal as
6:08punishment. Every comparative mythology
6:11framework would predict a fall
6:13narrative. Humanity sins, the gods
6:15punish, the powers are revoked. K2100
6:19does not follow that pattern. The
6:21language used is administrative, not
6:24judicial. The Sumerian terms are the
6:26same ones found in economic tablets from
6:29and legash. Terms for reallocation of
6:31resources, redistribution of assets,
6:34administrative transfer. The gods did
6:37not punish humanity. They reorganized a
6:40system. And the reason given is not
6:42transgression. The reason is that the
6:44species possessing all seven capacities
6:47became impossible to manage. The text
6:50uses a phrase translating approximately
6:52as they could not be directed. And a
6:55second partially legible reading, they
6:57had no need of the gods. A workforce
6:59that cannot be directed. A created
7:02species with no need of its creators.
7:04That is not a moral failure. That is a
7:07design flaw. The Atrahasus epic supports
7:10this reading.
7:12The gods create humanity, observe the
7:15result, and make adjustments. Multiple
7:17adjustments. They introduce mortality,
7:20disease, infertility. Each modification
7:23is a response to a specific problem.
7:26Humans are too numerous, too
7:28independent. The adjustments are
7:30iterative. They are refinements of a
7:32product not working as designed. K2100
7:35adds a layer that Atrahasis omits.
7:38Before mortality, before disease, the
7:417ME were extracted first. The
7:44capabilities were the first thing to go.
7:46The biological constraints came later as
7:48secondary containment. And this
7:51sequence, remove the advanced functions,
7:53then restrict the hardware, then reboot
7:56with reduced permissions, is not the
7:58structure of a myth about divine anger.
8:01It is a controlled shutdown protocol.
8:03The result is us.
8:07A species that cannot see beyond the
8:09visible spectrum, that must be taught
8:11everything from scratch, whose words
8:13have no material force, whose bodies
8:15degrade from birth, and who can be
8:17harmed by virtually every force in the
8:19environment. Seven capabilities removed.
8:23And if the tablet is accurate, not
8:25destroyed, transferred, held.
8:29If K2100 were the only text describing
8:32the systematic removal of human
8:34capabilities by non-human entities, it
8:37could be dismissed as a theological
8:39outlier. The problem is that K2100 is
8:42not alone. The Egyptian Book of the
8:45Dead, chapters 64 and 175, contains
8:49passages where the deceased demands the
8:51return of powers taken at the beginning
8:53of the age of humanity. The hieroglyphic
8:56term is semhem modified by
8:58determinatives indicating plurality and
9:00specificity. Multiple distinct powers
9:03each named. The pyramid texts at Sakara
9:06describe the pharaoh's journey after
9:08death as a process of reclaiming
9:10capacities distributed among the gods at
9:12creation. The pharaoh does not acquire
9:15new powers. He recovers original ones.
9:18The language is explicit. In the Vdic
9:21tradition, the rig vda describes the
9:24cosmic sacrifice of perushia, the
9:26primordial being whose body was divided
9:29to create the universe.
9:32The division is performed by the davas
9:34and the result is a cosmos where the
9:36original unified capacities are
9:38scattered across separate domains, each
9:41held by a different deity. The
9:43Mesoamerican Popal Vu contains an
9:45episode that is even more striking. The
9:47gods create the first humans and
9:49discover they can see everything across
9:51any distance through any obstacle. The
9:54gods are alarmed. They deliberately
9:56cloud human sight, reducing it to a
9:58fraction of its original range. The text
10:01uses the metaphor of breath on a mirror.
10:04This is not a story about blindness as
10:06metaphor for ignorance. It describes the
10:08surgical reduction of a specific
10:10perceptual capacity because the created
10:12species was too powerful. four
10:15civilizations, four continents, four
10:17independent traditions describing the
10:19same event. The deliberate removal of
10:21capabilities from humanity by the
10:23entities that created it. The
10:25probability of this structural
10:27correspondence arising through
10:28coincidence decreases with each
10:31additional instance.
10:34Two traditions might share a common
10:36source. Three might reflect a universal
10:38archetype. Four, with this level of
10:41specific alignment, the enumeration of
10:43distinct powers, the named recipients,
10:46the administrative framing suggests
10:48either shared historical memory or a
10:51transmission mechanism that no current
10:52model of ancient contact can account
10:54for.
10:57The responsible position is that K2100
11:00is mythology and cross-cultural
11:02parallels reflect universal narrative
11:04patterns. This is the consensus. What
11:07makes it harder to maintain with
11:08absolute confidence is the evidence from
11:10genetics and neuroscience that keeps
11:12identifying features of human biology
11:14that do not fit the expected
11:16evolutionary pattern. The human cerebral
11:19cortex contains approximately 86 billion
11:22neurons. Chimpanzees have roughly 6.2
11:25billion. The jump is an order of
11:27magnitude leap in a time frame that
11:29evolutionary biologists acknowledge is
11:32difficult to account for through
11:33standard selection pressure. The FOX P2
11:36gene, critical to human speech,
11:38underwent two specific mutations after
11:40the human lineage split from
11:42chimpanzees. These mutations
11:44fundamentally altered the protein it
11:46produces and are directly linked to the
11:48fine motor control that makes complex
11:50language possible. No other primate has
11:53them.
11:55They appeared in humans only and their
11:57functional impact is so precise that
11:59several researchers have noted the
12:01mutations look engineered rather than
12:03random. The word engineered does not
12:05appear in the published literature. The
12:07observation does. The encode project
12:10publishing major results in 2012 found
12:13that at least 80% of the human genome
12:15has biochemical function, regulating
12:18gene expression, controlling protein
12:20production, timing, orchestrating how a
12:22single cell develops into a
12:24differentiated organism. What encode
12:26could not determine is why so much
12:28regulatory architecture exists in the
12:30human genome that does not exist in
12:32other primates. The regulatory
12:35complexity is disproportionate. It
12:37exceeds what standard models predict for
12:39a species that diverged from its closest
12:41relative 6 million years ago. None of
12:44this proves the Sumerian account, but it
12:46establishes that human genetics contains
12:48features the current framework handles
12:50poorly.
12:53an order of magnitude neural leap with
12:55no identified driver, speech genes that
12:59appeared with surgical precision, and a
13:02regulatory genome of disproportionate
13:04complexity whose full function remains
13:06unmapped.
13:08The Sumerians had a word for what they
13:10claimed was removed. The geneticists
13:13have not yet found a word for what
13:14appears to be missing.
13:17K2100 has been in the British Museum
13:20since 1852. The first serious
13:23translation was conducted in 1924 by the
13:26French Assyrianologist Francois Thuro
13:29Donjan who included K2100 in a broader
13:32study of the ME concept. He noted the
13:34unusual terminology in private
13:36correspondence but published only the
13:38standard reading. His personal notes
13:41donated to the Louv after his death in
13:431944 contain a different assessment.
13:46Theo Donghan writes that the
13:47physiological language of K2100 is
13:50unlike anything in the standard corpus
13:53and that the tablet appears to describe
13:55the me as intrinsic biological functions
13:58rather than symbolic divine authorities.
14:01He did not publish this observation. In
14:031978, a graduate student at the School
14:05of Oriental and African Studies,
14:08Margaret Hail, requested access for her
14:10doctoral dissertation on variant ME
14:12texts. Her request was approved. She
14:16photographed the tablet and began a
14:17chapter arguing that K2100
14:20represented a biological reading of the
14:22ME concept.
14:253 months later, her access was revoked.
14:28The museum cited conservation
14:30reclassification. Hail's dissertation
14:33submitted in 1981 does not contain the
14:36chapter. She left academia in 1985 and
14:38never published on K2100.
14:41In 2003, the British Museum digitized a
14:44significant portion of its Cuneaform
14:47collection. K2100 was not included.
14:50Formal inquiries received a standard
14:52response. The tablet was in conservation
14:55review and would be digitized when
14:57stabilization was complete. As of this
14:59recording, stabilization remains
15:01ongoing. 23 years of conservation review
15:04for a tablet photographed without
15:06difficulty in 1978.
15:08Every instance of outside interest in
15:10K2100 has coincided with a restriction
15:13of access. Thorough Deng Xan noted the
15:16anomalies and published only the safe
15:18reading. Hail attempted analysis and
15:21lost access. The digitization excluded
15:24the tablet from a collection containing
15:25fragments in worse condition. The
15:28pattern is not proof but it is a
15:30pattern.
15:32The tablet sits in London. The
15:34conservation review continues. The 7ME
15:38described on K2100 remain untransated in
15:42full in any publicly available
15:43publication. The physiological language
15:46that thorough Donjan noted a century ago
15:49has not been subjected to modern
15:50computational analysis. The
15:53cross-cultural parallels have not been
15:55examined in a systematic comparative
15:56study. The genetic anomalies
15:59accumulating in the literature have not
16:01been mapped against the specific
16:02capacities the tablet describes. None of
16:05this has happened. The question of
16:07whether K2100 preserves a genuine record
16:10of capabilities removed from the human
16:12species or whether it is unusually
16:15detailed bronze age theology remains
16:17open. The responsible position is that
16:20it is theology. The uncomfortable
16:23position is that the theology keeps
16:24aligning with data the theologians could
16:27not have known. The Sumerianss did not
16:29have microscopes. They did not have
16:31genome sequencing.
16:34They did not understand neural
16:36architecture or regulatory DNA. Yet they
16:39described a species that was reduced,
16:42capacities that were extracted, and a
16:44redistribution to specific entities who,
16:46in every other surviving text, exhibit
16:49exactly the powers the tablet says they
16:51received. Anki sees what is distant, and
16:55Lil speaks, and reality changes. The
16:58Anunnaki do not age. The sevenme were
17:01not destroyed. The tablet is explicit.
17:04They were transferred. They are held.
17:06They exist somewhere in the framework
17:08the Sumerianss described with more
17:10precision than we have been willing to
17:11acknowledge. K2100 does not answer
17:14whether recovery is possible. The scribe
17:17at Nineveh either did not know or chose
17:19not to record the answer. What he
17:21recorded was the inventory, the list,
17:24the names.
17:27A document precise enough to function as
17:29a receipt filed in a library buried for
17:32two and a half thousand years, recovered
17:34by a Victorian archaeologist who had no
17:37idea what he was holding, cataloged as
17:39mythology, and stored on a shelf where
17:42it has waited for someone to read it the
17:43way it was written. The seven powers are
17:46listed. The recipients are named. The
17:49record exists. The conservation review
17:52is in its 23rd year. The digitization
17:55remains pending, and the tablet, as it
17:57has for 5,000 years, waits.
