TERRAFORMING TERRA We discuss and comment on the role agriculture will play in the containment of the CO2 problem and address protocols for terraforming the planet Earth. A model farm template is imagined as the central methodology. A broad range of timely science news and other topics of interest are commented on.
Wednesday, February 13, 2019
qanon Voter ID
This is a quick refresh on voter ID and the shape of the ongoing investigation in voter fraud that is certainly ongoing. This obvious investigation is a natural source for the sheer volume of sealed indictments.
Other sources also exist but not nearly as productive. The Pedophile meme appears to largely happening publicly while largely protected by media silence. The higher echelon is kept secret, but those numbers should be small.
After that we are talking about direct government corruption and that could well have been rounded up during this shutdown and be the source of the rumored 10,000.
As said the intent is to ensure all bad actors pay to the full extent of the law as a public lesson that prevents any further attempts..
Feb 11 2019
2696Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 72895d No.5134798
Feb 11 2019 23:22:27 (EST)
Anonymous ID: ff6f80 No.5134529
Feb 11 2019 23:11:34 (EST)
>>5134370
Here to the end, sir.
>>5134529
You will never be alone.
We are UNITED.
God speed, Patriot.
WWG1WGA!
Q 2695Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 72895d No.5134370
Feb 11 2019 23:07:05 (EST)
Anonymous ID: 2b91c6 No.5134144
Feb 11 2019 22:56:46 (EST)Screen Shot 2019-02-11 at 7.51.21 PM.png
34afaaf863584e77256baca2c48bf28c42e9a8bc3e77952cb523b6a4c6ef27e8.png
Not a T-shirt - she laid a square cloth with the Q on it when POTUS came by. PERFECT IDEA when they don't allow Q shirts in.
>>5134144
https://twitter.com/Jvineyard2011/status/1095168967457558528
POTUS "Did they get the clip?"
Yes, Mr. President.
POTUS "Did they catch all the references?"
Yes, Mr. President.
POTUS "Show me."
Thank you, Mr. John Vineyard.
Thank you, Anons.
(return publicly)
Q2694Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 306030 No.5127652
Feb 11 2019 17:53:54 (EST)
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 306030 No.5127462
Feb 11 2019 17:44:56 (EST)
https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/1095051195658522625
Let's actually use 'FACTS':
Step One: Hype an invented threat of POTUS working w/ the RUSSIANS (disinformation campaign).
Step Two: Send FBI/DOJ/CONGRESS/SENATE/C_A/NSA/INTEL/FVEY/etc… to address and investigate the IMAGINARY THREAT.
Step Three: Justify the 'SPECIAL COUNSEL' and MILLIONS OF TAXPAYER DOLLARS SPENT as necessary to protect the public and our election process against an imaginary, made-up, non-existent threat (which really is) designed to protect the illegal activities of many elected officials.
Step Four: Open 'new' Fake & False investigations as CHAIRMAN of the House Intel Comm to retain disinformation campaign designed to keep liberal/D Americans onboard to regain POWER & PREVENT prosecution - Executive Time!
Q
>>5127462
Life Lesson - [AS]
The next time you 'leak' classified information, don't have your phone (or allow phones of the 'unknown' go-between 'students') present.
FISA works both ways.
Q 2693Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 306030 No.5127462
Feb 11 2019 17:44:56 (EST)
https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/1095051195658522625
Let's actually use 'FACTS':
Step One: Hype an invented threat of POTUS working w/ the RUSSIANS (disinformation campaign).
Step Two: Send FBI/DOJ/CONGRESS/SENATE/C_A/NSA/INTEL/FVEY/etc… to address and investigate the IMAGINARY THREAT.
Step Three: Justify the 'SPECIAL COUNSEL' and MILLIONS OF TAXPAYER DOLLARS SPENT as necessary to protect the public and our election process against an imaginary, made-up, non-existent threat (which really is) designed to protect the illegal activities of many elected officials.
Step Four: Open 'new' Fake & False investigations as CHAIRMAN of the House Intel Comm to retain disinformation campaign designed to keep liberal/D Americans onboard to regain POWER & PREVENT prosecution - Executive Time!
Q 2692Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 306030 No.5127210
Feb 11 2019 17:29:04 (EST)Dd5W7hEVQAA8oJO.jpg
DjuLvI1VsAItD5H.jpg
DjsnjmeW0AAGXPH.jpg
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-fbi-general-counsel-talked-to-hillary-clintons-lawyer-about-comeys-letter-on-weiner-laptop-clinton-emails/
Baker’s heads up on the Kendall call was sent to:
Then-Director James Comey; since fired;
Then-Associate Deputy Director David Bowdich, who later replaced Andrew McCabe as deputy director;
Michael Steinbach, the F.B.I.’s former executive assistant director for national security;
Then-Assistant Director of Counterintelligence E.W. Priestap, now retired;
James Rybicki, former chief of staff to Comey;
FBI intelligence analyst Jonathan Moffa;
Former Acting Assistant Director Jason V. Herring;
Michael Kortan, FBI assistant director for public affairs, now retired;
Former principal deputy general counsel Trisha Anderson;
Strzok and Page
Does the list above look familiar?
Re_read drops re: FBI 'Midyear' OIG ……. & review graphics.
Q 2691Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 15e248 No.5126726
Feb 11 2019 17:00:54 (EST)
If [AS] has seen 'evidence' of collusion and/or POTUS/RUSSIA illegal activities, as he's stated in the past many times across all D-arm media networks, why then is there a need to open 'new' investigations?
What about the so-called 'evidence' already seen?
How is [AS] making open statements re: MUELLER not investigating POTUS/Deutsche Bank thorough enough if the MUELLER investigation itself is CLASSIFIED?
How does [AS] know what MUELLER has/hasn't investigated?
FAKE NEWS DESIGNED TO KEEP THE FAKE NARRATIVE IN PLAY [COVER].
You are witnessing the greatest 'DISINFORMATION' campaign to ever be pushed by a political party.
Ask yourself, why?
FEAR of what?
The message must be direct.
The WAR is very real.
Q 2690Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 82893e No.5123215
Feb 11 2019 12:50:46 (EST)
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 82893e No.5123210
Feb 11 2019 12:50:22 (EST)VoterFraud.jpg
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/acting-attorney-general-and-secretary-homeland-security-submit-joint-report-impact-foreign
[Only when the election harms the D party will they claim foreign interference]
Keyword: 'Foreign'
What about Domestic interference?
>Non-Cit votes by county
>Non-Cit promo by county
>Non-Cit org by county
>Targeted districts breakdown by 'Non-Cit' data acc
>Voter irregularities [internal]
>(-2) Laws enacted in battleground areas as test for 2020 (voter roll screening/review of non_votes (D) > ballot pop > track for sign > submit late for count) - vote swing figures + rule of law (new standard of no show vote SC 2019 scope case?)
Why do D's push for NO VOTER ID in U.S. elections?
Why do D's push for OPEN BORDERS?
Find the connection.
Sometimes a MAP helps.
What SC decision (6-3) ruled VOTER ID did NOT suppress votes or deter minorities?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-politics-court/supreme-court-upholds-photo-id-voting-law-idUSWAT00940020080428
What (FALSE) 'narrative' is pushed by D's re: VOTER ID LAW?
Racist?
Voter suppression of minority vote?
When is an ID required?
Should an ID not be required at all (for any reason) given the argument made by D's?
Does the argument 'A NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW would suppress the minority vote' suggest minorities are incapable of obtaining an ID?
When is an ID required?
Which minorities are they referring to?
(illegal immigrants?)
Logical thinking.
If there is a previous SC decision on the matter (pre-POTUS Justice conf), would a NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW MANDATE using the SC ruling of 2008 (+ common sense logic/arguments) as the LEGAL FOUNDATION, have merit?
Is every other country that has a VOTER ID LAW considered racist?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article92593512.html
Will the DOJ support the push instead of file legal challenges as [LL] did in the past?
If the SC ruled in 2008 that VOTER ID laws do not impact/harm or prevent 'minorities' from voting, how could the U.S. 4th Circuit Court rule opposite?
Is the 4th Circuit Court considered LEFT/Liberal?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article215247000.html
Why do D's want POWER at all costs?
One example above.
Logical thinking.
#FactsMatter
You are the news now.
Q Drr-_hrXcAEV77j.jpg
>>5123210 2689Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 82893e No.5123210
Feb 11 2019 12:50:22 (EST)VoterFraud.jpg
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/acting-attorney-general-and-secretary-homeland-security-submit-joint-report-impact-foreign
[Only when the election harms the D party will they claim foreign interference]
Keyword: 'Foreign'
What about Domestic interference?
>Non-Cit votes by county
>Non-Cit promo by county
>Non-Cit org by county
>Targeted districts breakdown by 'Non-Cit' data acc
>Voter irregularities [internal]
>(-2) Laws enacted in battleground areas as test for 2020 (voter roll screening/review of non_votes (D) > ballot pop > track for sign > submit late for count) - vote swing figures + rule of law (new standard of no show vote SC 2019 scope case?)
Why do D's push for NO VOTER ID in U.S. elections?
Why do D's push for OPEN BORDERS?
Find the connection.
Sometimes a MAP helps.
What SC decision (6-3) ruled VOTER ID did NOT suppress votes or deter minorities?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-politics-court/supreme-court-upholds-photo-id-voting-law-idUSWAT00940020080428
What (FALSE) 'narrative' is pushed by D's re: VOTER ID LAW?
Racist?
Voter suppression of minority vote?
When is an ID required?
Should an ID not be required at all (for any reason) given the argument made by D's?
Does the argument 'A NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW would suppress the minority vote' suggest minorities are incapable of obtaining an ID?
When is an ID required?
Which minorities are they referring to?
(illegal immigrants?)
Logical thinking.
If there is a previous SC decision on the matter (pre-POTUS Justice conf), would a NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW MANDATE using the SC ruling of 2008 (+ common sense logic/arguments) as the LEGAL FOUNDATION, have merit?
Is every other country that has a VOTER ID LAW considered racist?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article92593512.html
Will the DOJ support the push instead of file legal challenges as [LL] did in the past?
If the SC ruled in 2008 that VOTER ID laws do not impact/harm or prevent 'minorities' from voting, how could the U.S. 4th Circuit Court rule opposite?
Is the 4th Circuit Court considered LEFT/Liberal?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article215247000.html
Why do D's want POWER at all costs?
One example above.
Logical thinking.
#FactsMatter
You are the news now.
Q
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment