Tuesday, March 5, 2019

qanon stage now set TRUST SESSIONS


We now have 82,000 sealed indictments out there.  The acquisition rate is slightly over 5100 per month.  Understand the line below in which blanket surveillance in happening.  All this is possible because we are in a state of WAR and WAR powers are been used and MIL INTEL is clearlyin charge.

WE have been watching the public house cleaning of the DOJ and the FBI.  Now we understand that all the so called letter agencies have been given the same treatment while we have been sleeping - TRUST SESSIONS.

500 new prosecutors translates into 10,000 cases now under full application of process.  Presume that the in place manpower matches that at least.  In short 10,000 to 20,000 are now actively proceeding with an ample backload to keep them all busy for several years.  No deals either.

After that or concurrently, the State justice systems will also surely be cleaned up.

Mar 3 2019

2943 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4c2e9e No.5488382
Mar 3 2019 18:17:55 (EST)


More statements made (evidence) without presenting facts.

If 'evidence' exists(ed), under 'broad' scope #1, would Mueller have the auth to pursue?


The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confinned by then-FBI Director James 8. Corney in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including:

(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and
(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and
(iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).

Because no evidence exists(ed) and/or was found by SC/Mueller, was scope #2 enacted in an attempt to go outside of the 'intended engagement'?


Why is scope #2 classified only to AG/DAG and a select few others (read at terminal only)?

If 'evidence' exists(ed), why did R+D members of the Senate conclude NO DIRECT EVIDENCE EXISTS …………..?


If 'evidence' exists(ed), as per your statement released today, again, why did the SENATE (R's + D's) JUST CONCLUDE NO EVIDENCE EXISTS?

When will Americans wake up to the [D] party con that is continually pushed without facts, without support, and supported and further pushed by the media arm of the [D] party [FAKE NEWS MEDIA]?

Reading the comments on these Tweets further demonstrates the seriousness of media brainwashing in our Country whereby statements are considered fact w/o the need to provide proof.

Control of the Narrative.

If enough people state the same thing w/o providing evidence and/or support does it become FACTUAL to those caught in the loop?


Q 2942 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 9e30da No.5488056 
Mar 3 2019 17:59:38 (EST)


Full-scale attack.
March Madness.

Q 2941 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 8edf77 No.5486620 
Mar 3 2019 16:21:19 (EST)

Read the comments.

Those still asleep buying the 'narrow' scope 'new narrative' shift.
If the scope memo was never unclassified (v2) how do D's make this statement?


Q 2940 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 8edf77 No.5486189 
Mar 3 2019 15:57:33 (EST)

Anonymous ID: 602e0c No.5486062 
Mar 3 2019 15:49:35 (EST) Feb Count.JPG 

February 2019 Update to #SealedCases

5,832 new 82,324 entered 10/30/17 thru 2/28/19
Avg: 5,145 per month


(sorry, no heat map this month - a couple of our soldiers are down with medical ailments)


Thank you, Anon.

Note: Not all are USA v. [ ]
Nothing to see here.

Q 2939 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 493988 No.5485705 
Mar 3 2019 15:31:28 (EST)


Sometimes reading between the lines provides…

"Huber says every one of the prosecutors is already handling about twenty cases."

"They range from domestic terrorism to court-authorized wiretaps of criminal organizations to child pedophiles and those who would exploit our children. Criminal aliens. Big fraud schemes." 

Q 2938 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 188b95 No.5485007 
Mar 3 2019 14:55:55 (EST)

Ask yourself a very simple, logical, question.
What is a FISA warrant/application?
Is it a highly confidential [safeguarded] product of the UNITED STATES GOV?
If a product of the US GOV _ how did UK/AUS know what was listed inside of the package?

Think call to POTUS to prevent DECLAS [sources & methods].

If the US GOV requests UK/AUS [+2] to spy [+ campaign insertion] on an AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL PRE_NOMINEE + POTUS ELECT, is there a CHAIN OF COMMAND to APPROVE such AUTH?

Paper trail of the CHAIN OF COMMAND & umbrella spy metadata?
If not tasked & targeted under FVEY - what legal authority existed to engage the targeting?
Think Nunes' statement "not through normal collection, gathering, and reporting/oversight re: (FVEY)."

Did the dossier provide the 'bulk data' anchor for the spy campaign?
What entity paid for the 'research' dossier?
Opposition candidate?

What US Ally completed the collection of false data?
Why was it important to use sources within the UK vs. US?
How do you circumvent US LAW?
What other 'anchors' were provided to FISC in order to gain the warrant? [DECLAS will show].
Was the 'other' data (collection/process) worse than the dossier?
Why didn't FISC require 'in room' presentations of the data prior to 'sign off'?
Who signed apps 1-4?

Who traveled to UK/AUS post election of POTUS?
Why were SECURITY PRIV removed from select 'formerly active' individuals?

Treason-Sedition-Corruption at the highest levels of GOV (WW). [ world wide conspiracy funded by NWO - arclein ]

How do you repair a bridge without closing it down?

Q 2937 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 188b95 No.5484459 
Mar 3 2019 14:27:22 (EST)

Why have there been no arrests?
Why have 'specific' dates been mentioned only to see no action?

Define 'game theory'.

Why must disinformation be provided?
Define 'open source'.
Define 'public purview'.

Do we let our enemies walk through the front door?
Define 'plausible deniability'.

Why was it important to FIRST clean house within the FBI & DOJ (public info)?

Why was it important to FIRST clean house within other ABC agencies (non_public info)?
What are the duties of the FBI?
What are the duties of the DOJ?

When does MIL INTEL have jurisdiction?
What vested powers does POTUS have re: MIL INTEL vs. ABC agencies re: matters of NAT SEC (HOMELAND)?

Think 'umbrella surv'.

What agency does the FBI report to?
What is the role of the AG?
Does the AG oversee the firing of FBI & DOJ senior/mid/lower staff?
How many FBI & DOJ were FIRED/FORCED?
Does 'Russia' recusal prevent/block AG from this responsibility?
What time period did this occur?
Who appointed and tasked HUBER?
Who appointed and tasked the OIG?
Who was AG?

[zero leaks - none]

Transfer from AG1 to AG2?
Why might that be important?

How do you avoid 'politically motivated/attack - obstruction - attempt to block/obstruct Mueller'?

Optics are important.

When are optics not important?
Think Whitaker. 

Define 'stage set'.
Who recently walked 'on stage' to take command?
What 'stage' experience did this person have?
Think Bill Clinton impeachment.

Has the 'stage' been cleaned & cleared for the next performance?
If the 'stage' is clean, can the performance begin?
How might 'transparency' [DECLAS] fit into the dialogue?
Define 'thesis' statement.
What benefit(s) does this provide BARR?

"This is not simply another four-year election. This is a crossroads in the history of our civilization that will determine whether or not we, the people, reclaim control over our government." - POTUS

Logical thinking.

Q 2936 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: ca665a No.5483687 
Mar 3 2019 13:52:38 (EST) At what stage in the game do you play the TRUMP card?

No comments: