This is a timely debate to have. It is forgotten that a real debate took place during and after WWII that structured and guided the development of the next sixty years until the collapse of the whole communist enterprise itself.
We have a wide range of global problems best not resolved with a global war. Yet those problems are triggering increasing conflict. We have commented on many individual aspects, but i need only look at another spot on the map to drum up a concern. The world needs a global dispensation and ultimately that is described through the conceptualization of the Communion of XANADU and the Rule of Twelve established globally.
And yes, Hitler's war ended the old European Order while sacrificing the German Idea. It was replaced in Europe by a benign non ethnic German hegemony as had to happen sooner or later. The war made it sooner. It will naturally expand to include Russia and Constantinople which will become the natural capital of Europe.
It is disconcerting that Goebbels understood so much so well.
This may seem outrageous but that will be the natural outcome of conflicts now arising and pending economic changes.
What
did Joseph Goebbels mean when he wrote, “The war may be lost, but at
least we have the comfort of knowing we exterminated the stupidity of
the European bourgeois world” in his diary in 1945?
Because if you really think about it, in an extremely disturbing and distressing sense, the Nazis won the war.
Goebbels
admits that militarily, Nazi Germany had lost the war. It was utterly
crushed by the might of the world’s three strongest powers, the United
States, Soviet Union and British Empire. By 1945, the Soviets were
rushing across Western Poland/Eastern Germany while the Anglo-American
armies crossed the German-French border and invaded the Ruhr.
So in what sense did the Nazis win their war? In that the Nazis
overturned the entire European social and political order. The Nazis
were bent on establishing a new world order and succeeded in doing so,
just not the specific one they intended.
Goebbels disturbingly acknowledged how the Nazis in a sense succeeded in one of their goals, the destruction of the old order.
World
War Two finished off the work that World War One started. The European
Empires were significantly weakened, with Britain losing her crown
jewel, India, within 2 years after the conclusion of the war.
The Nazis absolutely destroyed the European order. European bourgeoise no longer ruled the world. London was the seat of the world’s greatest power. Now, Washington D.C. and Moscow were competing to rule the world. Paris used to be the cultural capital of the world, where artists, writers and thinkers met to discuss, debate and unleash their passions and thoughts. Due to the war, a lot of them immigrated to the United States, safe from war, settling down in New York City.
London during the blitz, 1941
American ships carrying refugees to New York City during the war, in 1941
Don’t
believe me? Look at all the political maps you’ll see of the world from
the 1890s to 1945 and then the ones you see from 1945–1991. If you look
at the late nineteenth century maps and early/mid twentieth century
maps, you’ll see them focusing on European colonialism and the extent of
European imperial rule in continents such as Africa or Asia. Almost all
major maps focus more on European empires than just about any other
topic.
Then look at the political world maps
(and even specific) from 1945–1991. Most of them focus not on European
empires (other than their disintegration). Instead, most focus on the
Cold War. The conflict between the United States’ Capitalist led
coalition and the Soviet Union’s Communist Internationale.
Map of the world at the end of hostilities, 1945. Anyone can see that Africa and Southeast Asia are still ruled by the European powers.
Map of the world during the Cold War. The “bourgeois” European empires have collapsed, giving way to the Capitalist United States and the Communist Soviet Unions.
Hitler and his Nazi regime
did not intend for the world order to be one between the Communists and
the Capitalists. Instead of the German flag raised over all of Eastern
Europe, the Red Banner of Communism flew in ten European capitals.
Instead of the destruction of the capitalist Western allies, it was
merely weakened but left strong enough to fight the might of its new
foe, the Soviet Union. The Germans did not become a strong people as
Hitler envisioned, instead, the Germans lost vast territories and were
divided into two states for nearly fifty years. The Jewish populations
were intended to be utterly exterminated, with him nearly succeeding in
killing over two-thirds of the European Jewish population. Ironically,
70 years later, the Jews have probably never been stronger in history
since the fall of the first Jewish states thousands of years ago.
Regardless,
he did succeed in his initial goal of tearing down European
imperialism, which had been ruling the world for roughly two or three
centuries, and setting forth the stage for a new world order. The very
one we still live in today.
Edit: Actually,
really thinking about it, I think Goebbels isn’t merely acknowledging
the effect the Nazi Regime on the world. He’s mocking us. He’s mocking
us, claiming that “despite what we’ve done, despite the triumph of good
over evil, it was in a sense futile”. The British and French fought to
save not only their nations and Western civilization but also their
empires. In a sense they lost more than they won in the war.
PS:
Yes I know the Allied Powers weren’t exactly “good” and did some very
morally ambiguous or even outright wrong things, but do you really want
to live in a world where the Nazis and Imperial Japanese won?
No comments:
Post a Comment