The problem is not so much that this process can work or not, it is in developing useful questions able to give unambiguous signals. I personally have experienced a signal from my subconscious when i was engaged in market activities that detected two black swan events. In eother case i went on the defensive in the preceding week(s) to protect myself. Those two events were the 1987 market crash and 9/11 itself. Other less ambiguous signals were also experienced over the years.
To exploit something like this, it is necessary to understand the target market and to establish preset orders to take clear advantage of the information. Then you must completely disengage from the market itself and most certainly avoid reselling yourself during the selling window. This is very difficult. A large problem is that actual precision is often lacking as to timing and price points will follow a natural pattern as well.
Thus what is so far reported looks more like luck although 35 tests in the earlier study is promising. Otherwise, have fun creating effective experiments, and do not mistake a high wind as a normal condition for the flight worthiness of a turkey.
Researchers Use ESP to Make Thousands of Dollars on the Stock Market
Posted by Greg at 04:11, 25 Jun 2014
http://dailygrail.com/Mind-Mysteries/2014/6/Researchers-Use-ESP-Make-Thousands-Dollars-the-Stock-Market
If telepathy and precognition are real abilities, why is it that
nobody has cashed in on them by using their 'psi' talents to predict or
mind-read sporting results, casino games, or changes in stock markets?
It's a common criticism leveled by skeptics, but there is actually
research out there showing that people *have* done exactly that - and
made some serious money!
The most recent example is an experiment into the validity of using 'remote viewing'
- that is, the practice of attempting to use extrasensory perception
(ESP) to 'see' targets at a distance (geographically, and/or in time) -
to predict the stock market. Published in the most recent issue of the Journal of Scientific Exploration (Vol. 28, No. 1) under the title of "Stock Market Prediction Using Associative Remote Viewing by Inexperienced Remote Viewers"
(PDF), the study was carried out as part of a class project (in a
course entitled “Edges of Science”) at the University of Colorado in
Boulder. The ten 'remote viewers' were neophytes, nine of them being
students and one a professor.
The experiment went like this: Firstly, two visually distinct
'target' images were selected and printed out from a pool of pictures
depicting objects and scenes. A coin toss was used to decide which
target was going to symbolise the market going up, and which would be
down. The two target images were then sealed in dated envelopes by an
independent party (to keep participants and judges blind to the targets
as much as possible).
Then, every few days the study participants were tasked to remotely
view one of the pre-selected targets during class, the identity of which
would be revealed to them at the beginning of the next remote viewing
period a few days later. The remote viewers were given five minutes to
quickly describe on paper and sketch the image they would be shown in
the future. Afterwards, judges compared each remote viewing session to
the two targets, selecting the one they thought matched the session
best. See the image below showing the two targets, and the remote
viewing session notes by one RVer.
If the majority of the ten viewers’ sessions were judged to most
accurately describe the Up target, that was taken as a prediction that
the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) would close up at the end of the
next market day. If the majority were judged to describe the Down
image, that would be a prediction that the DJIA would close down. At the
beginning of the next market day, the experimenter purchased DJIA
options according to the prediction, then just before the close of the
market, he would sell the options and actualize any loss or gains.
The experimenters - Christopher Carson Smith, Darrell Laham and
Garret Moddel of the Department of Electrical, Computer, & Energy
Engineering at the University of Colorado - repeated the procedure for
seven trials using the same 10 remote viewers. The result? Of the seven
trials performed, all seven resulted in correct predictions, showing
statistical significance at p < .01. More tangibly, however:
Regarding the financial results, on an initial investment of $10,000 we gained approximately $16,000 with a total of $26,000 at the end of trial 5. The first five trials were conducted on days of large market swings, therefore the potential gains were very large. Trials 6 and 7 happened on days of small market changes and, despite resulting in correct predictions, produced small losses because of the mechanics of the options trading vehicle. A timing issue in the trade of trial 7 resulted in an additional monetary loss of approximately $12,000. However, it is important to stress that this was in spite of the prediction itself being correct. (Without this timing error, total cash at the end of the project would have amounted to $38,000, or a return of almost 400% on the investment in a span of about two weeks.)
The study concluded that remote viewing "appears to be a reasonably
accurate way to predict the future of binary outcomes... RV has dramatic
implications for how we view time and our ability to perceive the
future".
This is not, however, the first time someone has made money through
remote viewing research. The paper discusses some previous history,
including a study conducted by pioneering remote viewing researcher Hal
Puthoff in 1982, in which a series of 30 RV trials attempted to predict
the outcome of the silver futures market. Financially, the trials netted
a profit of approximately $250,000 for their investor, "of which
Puthoff’s share was ten percent, or more than $25,000, which he used to
help fund a new Waldorf School". And in that same year, researchers
Russell Targ and Keith Harary also used remote viewing to predict silver
futures in an attempt to raise funds for their research, with their
first experiment yielding $120,000.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to practice some remote viewing for a while...
Paper: "Stock Market Prediction Using Associative Remote Viewing by Inexperienced Remote Viewers" (PDF)
(via Carlos Alvarado)
No comments:
Post a Comment