It had not occurred to me that the general decline in song bird populations over the past couple of decades could be related to the steady increase of systemic application of alien pesticides and herbacides been chemicals lacking a natural biological pathway for their swift elimination. Ad in the reality that bird populations should actuallly be increasing as the farm human population declines and food productivity soars.
We have been running a serious experiment on the long term effects of
all these pesticides and herbacides. They have become pervasive in
the environment. That is obviously not good news.
The only way we have of actually measuring the effect is to observe
biological disturbances that are coincidental. Thus we have this
growing list.
Herbicides: Roundup 1 Global
amphibian decline. - bio pathway now clear.
2 Male decline in sperm count. - same pathways
Pesticides: Neonicotinoids 1 Bee
colony collapse
2 Wild pollinator collapse.
3 Bird population collapse
4 Other apex preditor collapse needs checking.
This is awful and must have a common denominator and that is
environmental modification that needs to be clearly determined. We
have already noted the obvious culprits but that does not rule out
excess use of fertilizer as well and other aspects of modern
husbandry must also be checked.
Not Just the Bees –
Pesticides Wiping Out Birds Too
Heather Callaghan,
Contributor
Netherlands
researchers fear the second coming ofSilent Spring.
“Neonicotinoids were
always regarded as selective toxins. But our results suggest that
they may affect the entire ecosystem,” says Hans de Kroon of
Radboud University and co-author of a study recently published
in Nature journal.
It’s not just the
bees. There are at least two ways that neonicotinoid pesticides
dramatically affect the bird population.
Neonicotinoids are
growing in the world market to become the most widely used pesticides
and are often used to treat seeds – which makes the entire plant
contain the chemical. (Yes, that means it doesn’t wash off) This
might be useful to the farmer who wishes to target multiple pests
such as those that eat roots and others that devour leaves, but that
also means pollinators like bees get exposed to contaminated pollen,
butterflies to nectar and birds can become immobilized or die after
consuming treated seeds. Furthermore, they get into surface water in
a variety of ways and build up and persist in the soil for years.
This study focused on
multiple bird species that only consumed insects. So, we are talking
about wildlife birds, which makes the findings even more perturbing
to the researchers. It found that neonicotinoids affected their
population in two ways: directly in large doses found in their
waterways, and by killing off the insects that make up their food
supply. They reminisce “the effects of persistent insecticides in
the past” and highlight the “potential cascading effects of
neonicotinoids on ecosystems.”
CBC News reports:
The researchers
discovered the trend by looking at bird count data along with data
about imidacloprid [a popular neonicotinoid] concentrations in
waterways collected by the local water boards. While many bird
species started declining before farmers started using imidacloprid
in 1995, local differences in their decline didn’t appear
until after that time.
The authors state:
At
imidacloprid concentrations of more than 20 nanograms per litre, bird
populations tended to decline by 3.5 per cent on average annually.
Additional analyses revealed that this spatial pattern of decline
appeared only after the introduction of imidacloprid to the
Netherlands, in the mid-1990s.
Furthermore:
Recent studies have
shown that neonicotinoid insecticides have adverse effects on
non-target invertebrate species1,2,3,4,5,6. Invertebrates constitute
a substantial part of the diet of many bird species during the
breeding season and are indispensable for raising offspring7
While their findings
on bird decline linked to neonicotinoids in water and through the
unintended eradication of their food source are compelling – they
stopped short of claiming direct cause. They do however, show that
the correlation wasn’t a coincidence. They are building a line of
evidence and joining up with other scientists who have reported
similar findings with other animals. Common explanations
such as population changes, crop changes and urbanization did not
hold water under their battery of tests.
Kroon said:
Our analysis shows
that based on our data imidacloprid was by far the best explanatory
variable for differences in trends between areas.
He told BBC:
In 10 years, it’s
a 35% reduction in the local population. It’s really
huge. It means the alarm bells are on straight away.
Bayer CropScience,
leading maker of imidacloprid adamantly denied the study findings,
emphasizing lack of direct cause and “substantiated evidence.” In
a response, they wrote: ”Neonicotinoids have gone through an
extensive risk assessment which has shown that they are safe to the
environment when used responsibly according to the label
instructions.” This is an all-too-common retort that seems to
attempt placing the smoking gun in farmers’ hands.
Lo and behold, Bayer
is a part of the consortium funding an upcoming Canada-wide study to
discover what’s harming the bees. Hint: not their product.
After the response
from Bayer, they explained that for a direct cause to be
determined, they would have to do landscape-scale experiments
that would be difficult and probably very unethical.
But it is not only
environmental chemicals to consider for the bird populations –
birds are literally losing their way – due to overpowering EMF
signals. Interestingly, the symptoms of birds caught in EMF waves and
the ingestion of neonicotinoid seeds are similar – difficulty
flying, immobilization. That is what the EPA discovered in 1992 while
studying the pesticides’ effects on birds. This, however, did not
lead to any thoughtful halt on the chemical approval before it
entered the market.
The European Union
recently enacted a temporary moritorium on neonicotinoids - but not
without fierce fighting from the world’s biggest chemical producers
– including Bayer.
1 comment:
Honey and Honeybee populations dropping because of colony collapse disorder is frightening to me.
Is this from the transportation of the bees or monocultures or is it being caused by pathogens and parasites or even electromagnetic radiation and a proliferation of genetically-modified crops?
I am betting that it is mostly from Neonicotinoids which are a popular insecticide used and that is being tracked as being closely related in area to collapsing bee colonies
Post a Comment