I missed thinking about the bird populations when I began posting of
what appear to be now called agroforests. We are going to see a lot
more of these. The land diversion can be minimal while the
underlying crop can be optimised with the use of modern equipment.
It is monoculture without the total separation form the surrounding
environment. The benefits are many and soon obvious.
We now learn that we develop an improved bird population profile also
and from that an improved insect population. I would also anticipate
superior pollination from wild wasps.
Were shading is in place, leaf fall additionally enriches the soils
and it is common to find the thickest greenest grasses there.
At the moment this is all in its infancy, but I do predict that it
will dominate the landscape everywhere.
An example that I can foresee is the growing of spaced rows of Gary
oaks throughout the USA. The acorns are a food stock in their own
right asking merely to be processed into flour and the leaves are a
natural fertilizer. The tree itself can be induced to produce a long
trunk opening up the ground beneath completely for cropping.
The shade itself will induce a slower growing crop that is naturally
much richer. Yet with the open space beneath none of the crop is
ever in permanent shade.
I cannot speak to other nut trees, but the same likely holds true for
many. Our problem is that we have focused on small trees to
facilitate orchard operations. Those trees are likely much less
suitable. This is likely to change as operators perceive the
benefits. It is all early days.
Birds do better in
'agroforests' than on farms
by Staff Writers
Salt Lake City UT (SPX) Aug 09, 2012
University of Utah
ornithologist Cagan Sekercioglu uses radio equipment to track an
orange-billed nightingale-thrush in the Costa Rican countryside. A
new study by Sekercioglu indicates that wooded "shade"
plantations where coffee and cacao (the source of chocolate) are
grown are better for bird diversity than open farmlands, although
forests still are the best habitat for tropical birds. Credit:
Mauricio Paniagua Castro.
Compared with open
farmland, wooded "shade" plantations that produce coffee
and chocolate promote greater bird diversity, although a new
University of Utah study says forests remain the best habitat for
tropical birds.
The
findings suggest that as open farmland replaces forests and
"agroforests" - where crops are grown under trees - reduced
number of bird species and shifts in the populations of various types
of birds may hurt "ecosystem services" that birds provide
to people, such as eating insect pests, spreading seeds and
pollinating crops.
"We found that
agroforests are better overall for bird biodiversity in the tropics
than open farms," says study author Cagan H. Sekercioglu
(pronounced Cha-awn Shay-care-gee-oh-loo), an assistant professor of
biology at the University of Utah.
"This
doesn't mean people should farm in intact forests,"
the ornithologist adds. "But if you have the option of
having agroforest versus open farmland, that is better for
biodiversity, with shade coffee and shade cacao [the source of cocoa
and chocolate] being the prime examples."
Sekercioglu's
new study, funded by the University of Utah, is being published this
month in the Journal of Ornithology. He will present the findings
Thursday, Aug. 9, at the Ecological Society of America's annual
meeting in Portland, Ore.
If consumers wish to
support bird diversity and agroforests, "a good way is by
choosing certified, bird-friendly, shade coffee or shade chocolate,"
he says. While such coffee or chocolate often cost more because they
are more labor-intensive to produce, the certification "is
usually better for the farmers' income as well."
He adds: "There
are trustworthy environmental organizations that certify shade
coffee," including the Smithsonian Institution, the Rainforest
Alliance and the Rainforest Action Network.
Other crops grown in
shade include cardamom, which is a spice, and yerba mate, which is
steeped in hot water to make a beverage popular in South America.
Study Focuses on Birds
of Forests, Farms or Both
An agroforest "is
a type of farm where the crops are grown under trees at a reasonable
density," Sekercioglu says. "Often, it's not like
forest-forest - it feels more like a open park," although in
Ethiopia "commercial coffee is grown under full-on forests in
its original native habitat."
Sekercioglu conducted
the study in two steps. First, "I used my world bird database
that has information on all the 10,000-plus bird species of the
world," he says. "I sorted birds based on habitat choices
and compared species that prefer forests to those that prefer
agricultural areas and others that prefer both forests and
agricultural areas."
Next, he reviewed
about 40 previously published studies that examined bird communities
in forests, agroforests and open agricultural areas.
"The global
analysis of all the birds species mostly agrees with the findings of
detailed local bird studies," Sekercioglu says.
The
study focused 6,093 tropical bird species, including migratory birds,
in which their top three habitat choices (out of 14 possible
habitats) included forests, farms or both, with the latter described
as agroforest birds. So the study found 4,574 bird species that
include forest but not farms in their top three habitats, 303 species
that include farms but not forests in their top three habitat
choices, and 1,216 agroforest species tha include both forests and
farms among their top three habitats.
The findings suggest,
but don't prove, that conversion of forest to farmland may reduce
ecosystem services, which are services birds provide to people.
"As you go to
more and more open agriculture, you lose some bird groups that
provide important ecosystem services like insect control [insect
eaters], seed dispersal [fruit eaters] and pollination [nectar
eaters], while you get higher numbers of granivores [seed and grain
eaters] that actually can be crop pests," Sekercioglu says.
Specifically:
+ Insectivores or
insect-eating birds do best in forests - especially those that live
near the ground in the understory, the layer of plants below the tree
canopy and above the ground cover. But small and medium insect-eating
birds, especially migrant and canopy species, do well in agroforests.
The number of insect-eating species declines on open farms, where
they help control pests.
+ Frugivores or
fruit-eating birds, especially larger ones, "do best in forest
because they have more habitat and more food, and the large ones
often are hunted outside forests in agricultural settings. Overall,
frugivores - especially smaller ones - do OK in agroforests, but the
number of fruit-eating species decline significantly on open farms."
Frugivores help spread the seeds of the fruits they eat.
+ Nectarivores or
nectar-eating birds help pollinate many plants. They "tend to
increase in agroforests compared with forests. A lot of nectar-eating
birds obviously like flowers, and many plants flower when there's
some light. When you have extensive forest its often pretty shady so
not many things are in flower at any given time." The nectar
eaters are less common on open farms.
+ Omnivores, which are
birds that eat many things, "tend to do better in agroforests
and especially on open farms" than in forests, because their
diet is so generalized instead of specialized in certain foods.
+ Granivores, or
grain- and seed-eating birds are "the only group that
significantly increases in open agricultural areas. A lot of the
seeds they eat are grass seeds, but also from crops. Some of these
seed-eating bird species are major agricultural pests, and that's
another reason for encouraging agroforests. In completely open
agricultural systems, you have more seed-eating birds that can cause
significant crop losses."
While the study found
fewer species on farms than in agroforests, and fewer on agroforests
than in forests, Sekercioglu says it doesn't answer a key question:
"Does the decline in the number species translate into a decline
in individuals providing a given ecosystem service?" If so,
farms and agroforests have lost birds that provide important
insect-control, pollination and seed-dispersal services.
"It is possible
you may lose a lot of species, but some of the remaining species
increase in number and compensate and for the decline in ecosystem
services by the lost species," he adds. "It's one of the
biggest questions in ecology."
The Trend toward Sun
Coffee
Noting that the study found forests have more tropical bird species than agroforests, which in turn have more bird species that open farms, Sekercioglu says: "A lot of threatened species globally are found only in forests, and most of them disappear from agroforests and open agricultural areas."
He
says many migratory birds that breed in the United States are in
decline - even though the nation has a law to protect them - and not
just because of U.S. environmental problems, "but due to
problems in their winteringgrounds in Latin America, such
as loss of habitat and intensification of agriculture."
"Coffee was
originally a mid- to high-elevation African forest understory plant,"
he adds. "For centuries in Ethiopia and parts of Central and
South America, coffee has been grown as an understory plant with
shade traditionally provided by native trees."
But fungi can be a
problem in humid shade coffee plantations, and growers have come up
with varieties that grow well in the sun with less fungus and bigger
yields, so in recent decades, there has been a trend toward
converting Central and South American shade-coffee forests to open
farms, Sekercioglu says.
"As
tropical forest is converted to increasingly open types of
agriculture, hundreds of endangered bird species are being lost,"
he says. "Tropical forest is the only refuge for thousands of
bird species and hundreds ofendangered bird species.
Although agroforest is better than open farmland, at the end of the
day intact tropical forest is the only suitable habitat for thousands
of bird species."
1 comment:
There is a downside to that, if it is a single crop agro forest, it is more destructive. Eucalyptus forest in the Philippines hastily planted to combat erosion from logging are devoid of birds. The oily tree do not harbor insects that the birds eat. Ergo, a silent forest only the wind song.
Post a Comment