Rather obviously the Chinese consumer wants the future now
and that means buying the trusted international brand. It will take a long time to overcome that and
I am sorry to say, it must be by first successfully selling a premium car to
establish brand.
The days of introducing a bargain into a pricy global market
are long gone. The buyers are using
global income to buy locally. Those
outside the local version of that global market are just too far outside yet
and the instant they gain a global income, they enter the global market.
The establishment of a single global market has taken a
longtime but it is here and truly arrived with the global distribution of the
cell phone. The speed and depth of that
was shocking and is now a decade in.
China’s
Embrace of Foreign Cars
APRIL 8, 2014
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/09/business/international/chinas-embrace-of-foreign-cars.html
CHONGQING,
China — For more than a decade, Chinese automakers have been talking about
starting large-scale exports to North America and Europe, prompting periodic
worries in the West that companies like General Motors, Ford and Volkswagen
might be crippled by Chinese competition the way they were by Japanese imports
a generation ago.
Now
there are calls for protectionism, but from an unexpected direction: the
biggest, most politically influential Chinese automakers.
Multinational
corporations are steadily clawing market share from Chinese brands in their
home market, as a succession of global brands have pushed their way into China.
The latest insurgent is Ford Motor, which has a joint venture based here in
Chongqing and has nearly doubled its market share to 4.5 percent in the last
two years by introducing new models and expanding output, selling more than
100,000 cars and light truck in March for the first time in a single month.
Ford plans to double production again in the coming year by opening two more
assembly plants and one of the world’s largest automatic transmission
factories.
Chinese
consumers increasingly favor American brands, which have a reputation for
safety, youth and international flair. The domestic brands have tended to lag
in surveys of initial quality and engineering, although they are starting to
close the gap. In long-term reliability, they are far behind and falling even
further.
Rising
affluence has left consumers reluctant to accept cheaper, spartan models from
domestic manufacturers. The domestic brands have been further hurt by poor
crash test results for some Chinese-designed models and a series of food safety
scandals that have dented public confidence in Chinese regulations.
“Now that I have a child, I’m considering
shifting to a safer car like a Ford,” said He Hai, a 29-year-old real estate
salesman, as he browsed at a dealership
He
was preparing to pay 254,800 renminbi ($41,500), including hefty Chinese taxes,
for a light green Ford Kuga.
China’s
mostly state-owned automakers have responded with an unusually public campaign
of news conferences and statements by the industry trade association. They want
to persuade China’s Commerce Ministry to retain a requirement seldom found in
other top manufacturing nations: Foreign automakers may assemble cars in China
only through 50-50 joint ventures with domestic partners.
The
multinationals have not asked to be set free. Instead, the Commerce Ministry
raised the idea of dropping the requirement last autumn, fearing that
industrialized nations would use the restrictive rules as justification for
protectionism someday if China starts exporting large numbers of cars. But the
big state-owned companies are less interested in exports than in having the
multinationals tied to their partners indefinitely — and collecting the sizable
profits that come with those relationships.
“If
there is a loosening of the restrictions on foreign ownership in automotive
shares, it will instigate massive changes in the configuration of our country’s
automotive industry,” Dong Yang, the executive vice chairman and secretary
general of the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, warned in a
statement at a recent news conference.
The
industry is not entirely in agreement. Slightly smaller automakers started by
entrepreneurs do not have the same incentives to maintain the status quo since
they generally don’t have joint venture partners. They are also much more eager
to move into foreign markets, through exports and overseas acquisitions.
Li
Shufu, the chairman and founder of the privately held Geely Holdings Group,
wrote in an email interview last month that he thought the 50 percent cap
should be abolished.
“The
cap has hindered fair, open and transparent competition, which undermines the
interests of consumers and the overall competitiveness of the Chinese auto
industry,” he wrote.
Mr.
Li’s personal holding company bought Volvo Cars from Ford for $1.5 billion in
2010, a bargain price during the financial crisis.
State-owned
automakers have been more cautious, with one of the largest, Dongfeng Motor,
agreeing on Feb. 26 to pay $1.1 billion for a 14 percent stake in Peugeot — a
holding that cements the two companies’ venture in China but gives Dongfeng
little say in Peugeot’s management.
Wary
of offending their state-owned partners, multinationals have defended the joint
ventures. “It is our common goal to further develop these and to be successful
together in the Chinese automotive market,” Volkswagen said in a statement.
China
has been trying for more than two decades to build the country’s auto industry
into an export powerhouse. The original goal of the joint venture requirement
was to force multinationals to work with big, state-owned automakers with ample
access to credit from state-owned banks. The ministry’s hope has been that the
state-owned automakers would learn from their partners to build world-class
cars that they could then export.
But
instead of creating the next Toyota, the Commerce Ministry has created
companies more like Foxconn, the Taiwanese contract electronics manufacturer
that makes tablets and smartphones for Apple and other consumer electronics
companies.
State-controlled
giants largely provide the labor and government connections for the joint
ventures: Shanghai Automotive is a partner for General Motors and Volkswagen;
Guangzhou Automobile is the partner for Toyota; Changan Automobile is a partner
for Ford; and Dongfeng Motor juggles partnerships with Nissan, Honda, Peugeot
and Kia.
The
multinationals have continued to provide most of the designs, engineering and
marketing. They build essentially the same cars that they sell in the rest of
the world. In Chongqing, for example, Ford makes the Kuga and Mondeo, which are
sold as the Ford Escape and Ford Fusion in the United States.
The
Chinese automakers’ association, dominated by state-owned enterprises, insists
that the industry is too important to the country’s economic future to be
exposed to head-to-head competition with foreign companies.
Automobile
manufacturing is not a standard manufacturing sector. It is a strategic asset
that supports the transformation and upgrading of the national economy,” said
Mr. Dong of the association.
Chinese
brands’ share of their home market for cars and light trucks has fallen at much
the same pace that American automakers lost share over most of the last three
decades, about a percentage point or two each year, down to 45.1 percent last
year. Exclude the bare-bones pickup trucks and minivans that make up the
separately regulated light commercial vehicle market, and domestic brands had
only 29.5 percent of the car market last year, according to LMC Automotive, a
global consultancy.
Most
of the state-owned giants have experimented with their own brands, but with
limited success. Their offerings frequently look a lot like the cars from their
partners.
Marin
A. Burela, the president of Ford’s joint venture here, the Changan Ford
Automobile Company, said Mazda and Changan had decided to end their
collaboration for business reasons that had nothing to do with Changan’s car
designs. He denied that Changan’s own brand cars looked like Fords or Mazdas.
“I’ve
heard that said, but I also go back and look at the vehicles and I don’t see
it,” he said.
Ford’s
rapid expansion in China over the last two years, with more to come, offers a
case study of how China’s own automakers have gone from feared to hapless.
Ford’s
joint venture here in western China has 15,000 employees who assembled more
than 600,000 vehicles last year, making it Ford’s largest operation outside
southeastern Michigan. Ford is about to open an enormous factory here to
manufacture 400,000 automatic transmissions annually, with room to expand to
one million, followed by a third large car assembly plant at the end of the
year. A fourth assembly plant is set to open in Hangzhou, in east-central
China, in February.
Changan
Ford opened its first assembly plant in Chongqing in 2003 and its second in
2012. The second factory is among the most modern anywhere in the world: Steel
coils go in one end and finished cars come out the other just eight hours
later.
Rows
of 15-foot-tall orange robots resembling huge, long-necked vultures lift,
assemble and weld large body panels — basic tasks that have been automated at
many factories around the world. But the newer Ford factory also has robots do
delicate, precise tasks like installing and gluing the rear windows of compact
cars, which are seldom automated except in high-wage countries. The second
factory has 160 robots, compared with about three dozen in the older factory.
Domestic
Chinese automakers have also bought robots for their operations from
international suppliers. But they have tended to rely much more on using huge
teams of workers for manufacturing, and they have struggled to figure out how
to integrate robots efficiently into assembly lines — a task that took decades
for multinationals to master, even as they were working on customer research
that Chinese manufacturers are still learning.
“We’ve
ticked all of those boxes” on Chinese automotive preferences, Mr. Burela said,
“and the Chinese consumer has absolutely bought into that, which has fueled our
growth.”
No comments:
Post a Comment