My readers know that i have been rewriting history on this blog for several years and have rarely had to retreat from a position in the face of fresh evidence. The news from Gunang Padang continues to be excellent.
We have also come to understand that pyramids are natural concentrators of the Earth's natural sonic energy which happens to be a vertical wave that will pump energy into a pyramid. Initial calculations on the apparent geometry shows concentration along the axis for the great pyramid at least. Add in the granite slabs and we have a energy conversion system that is not insignificant.
Sticking to the thousand year long global Atlantean civilization we end up with sites all along the thirty degree band of the tropics accessible to sea power in particular. The natural inference was that Indonesia was a prime prospect for massive pyramid building. That it plausibly is also much earlier is also a possibility not to be rejected out of hand.
Bosnia and Gunang Padang both suggest pre Pleistocene Nonconformity use of the same technology and the deliberate transmission of this knowledge into the Bronze Age. Both are regions where this information may well have survived. Most went under water and have not been found yet, while Bronze Age construction was on new ground generally.
.
This unprecedented historical discovery will rewrite our history!
http://fabweb.org/2015/08/13/this-unprecedented-historical-discovery-will-rewrite-our-history/#
Graham Hancock) The archaeological establishment is scrambling to
find some reason to reject and pour scorn on the extraordinary
consequences of the excavations now taking place at Gunung Padang in
Indonesia.
Since its first exploration by archaeologists in 1914 the site was
thought to be a natural hill with 2500 year-old megalithic structures on
top of it. But in 2010 geologist Dr Danny Hilman Natawidjaja (who
earned his doctorate at Cal Tech) recognized this “hill” as a possible
man-made pyramid and began to explore it using ground penetrating radar,
seismic tomography, resistivity survey and other remote sensing
techniques, as well as some direct excavations and deep core drilling.
The results were immediately intriguing producing evidence of deeply
buried man-made chambers and yielding carbon dates going back as far as
26,000 years. This was the last Ice Age when our ancestors are supposed
(according to the orthodox archaeological model) to be have been nothing
more than primitive hunter gatherers incapable of large-scale
construction and engineering feats. Was it possible that geologist
Natawidjaja was unearthing the proof of a lost advanced civilization of
prehistoric antiquity? Such ideas are heresy to mainstream
archaeologists and sure enough the archaeological establishment in
Indonesia banded together against Dr Natawidjaja and his team, lobbied
the political authorities, agitated locally and succeeded in slowing
down, though not completely stopping, the further exploration of Gunung
Padang.
Dr Natawidjaja fought back, doing some high-level lobbying of his
own, taking the matter to the President of Indonesia himself. There were
further delays to do with elections in Indonesia but just a couple of
months ago, in mid-August 2014, the final obstacles were lifted and Dr
Natawidjaja and his team moved back onto the Gunung Padang site with
full approval to go ahead with their work, including permission to
excavate the concealed chambers.
Archaeologists were furious and immediately began lobbying to get the
work stopped – fortunately to no avail as preliminary excavations have
produced results that prove beyond doubt that Gunung Padang in indeed a
man-made pyramid of great antiquity as Dr Natawidjaja had long ago
proposed. Even the relatively young layer so far excavated (the second
artificial columnar rock-layer beneath the megalithic site visible on
the surface) has yielded dates of 5200 BC (nearly 3000 years older than
the orthodox dating for the Pyramids of Giza in Egypt) and there are
firm indications from the original remote sensing and core drilling work
of much older layers below. In short, it is now evident to all that the
site is vastly older than the 2500 years that archaeologists had
insisted upon for decades. Even the most hostile amongst them are
therefore now reframing their assessment of the site and referring to it
as “a gigantic terraced tomb, which was part of the biggest megalithic
culture in the archipelago.”
For a flavor of the sour grapes the archaeological establishment feel
towards Dr Natawidjaja and his team see this recent article from the
Jakarta Post:
I asked Dr Natawidjaja for his response to the Jakarta Post article and he replied as follows:
“The article has got the story all wrong. All excavations were supervised by archeologists from Agency for Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites (BPCB) and University of Indonesia. The excavation sites have also recently been inspected by the Director for Conservation of Archeological Sites (who is the boss of Miss Desril Shanti ), by the head of the BPCB, and by the Minister of Education and Culture himself. Afterward, they gave a press conference confirming that all excavations are good and proper. For information, the head of the National Archeological Center, which is the main office above local Archeological Centers including Bandung Archeological Center, is also a member of the National Team for Gunung Padang. The Jakarta Post article is also wrong about the funding. The Minister of Education and Culture did indeed announce in the press conference that he would allocate about Rp 3 billion for the research but it has not begun to be disbursed yet. So far, I and my team are still working willingly on our own funding with the help of the soldiers (TNI) who have been working alongside us. Of course the TNI have their own funding – but not from that Endowment Fund.”
As to the progress of the work at Gunung Padang, Dr Natawidjaja writes as follows:
“The research progress has been being great. We have excavated three more spots right on top of the megalithic site in the past couple weeks, which give more evidence and details about the buried structures. We have uncovered lots more stone artifacts from the excavations. The existence of the pyramid-like structure beneath the megalithic site is now loud and clear; even for non-specialists, it is not too difficult to understand if they come and see for themselves. We have found some kind of open hall buried by soil 5-7 meters thick; however we have not yet got into the main chamber. We are now drilling to the suspected location of the chamber (based on subsurface geophysic) in the middle of the megalithic site.”
Stay tuned for more news from the front line!
No comments:
Post a Comment