The rig we see is a practical prototype providing proof of concept Way more important is that it clearly lends itself to robotization. Nozzle design art should also solve the problem of collateral damage. Thus we finally can see the future of robotic weeding and it is excellent. It shreds the weed and adds organics and even fertilizer while doing this.
The sensing technology is surely now up to the needed levels as well.
I have considered this to be the most important unsolved problem in agriculture and this will easily handle everything except field crops.like grains and canola which is simply too tightly packed..
A system like this can also handle mature weeds as well by simply cutting the weed down and perhaps chewing up the root head. Yes they will still re sprout but additional passes will be cheap and sufficient..
Time-saving green tech kills those "blasted weeds" without chemicals
Ben Coxworth
January 21, 2016
http://www.gizmag.com/abrasive-weeding/41443/
The abrasive weeding rig used in the experiments
(Credit: University of Illinois)
Although there are various other types of eco-friendly weed control,
organic farm workers often end up doing what most of us do in our
backyard gardens – bending down and yanking weeds out by hand. Thanks to
the relatively new process of "abrasive weeding," however, that may not
always be necessary. As an added benefit, crops could be fertilized and
weeded in one step.
First introduced a few years ago, abrasive weeding involves blasting weed seedlings with organic grit, shot out of an air compressor at supersonic speeds. In field tests recently conducted by a team led by University of Illinois agroecologist Samuel Wortman, it was discovered just how effective the practice can be.
The process works best on transplanted crops – in which the "good" plants are bigger and more mature than the weeds sprouting around them – and in conjunction with sheets of plastic mulch. As long as they're of a species in which the growing points are located above-ground, the weed seedlings are killed when blasted apart by the grit.
That grit can be made from almost any organic material, including nut shells, corn cobs or other agricultural waste. As noted by the Illinois team, however, fertilizers such as soybean meal could also be used. This would allow farmers to combine weeding and fertilizing in one pass, although "it is still unknown whether the fertilizer would be available for plant uptake within critical windows."
In the Illinois trials, tomato and pepper plants did sustain some superficial collateral damage, but it didn't affect their marketable fruit yield. That yield was along the same lines as is achieved when weeding by hand, and was 33 to 44 percent higher than that of non-weeded control crops.
The grit was applied using a sand blaster connected to an air compressor, pulled down rows of plants by a walk-behind tractor – it can be seen in use below. Wortman and his team, however, have since developed a dedicated device which is now undergoing testing.
A paper on the research was recently published in the journal Crop Protection.
Source: University of Illinois
First introduced a few years ago, abrasive weeding involves blasting weed seedlings with organic grit, shot out of an air compressor at supersonic speeds. In field tests recently conducted by a team led by University of Illinois agroecologist Samuel Wortman, it was discovered just how effective the practice can be.
The process works best on transplanted crops – in which the "good" plants are bigger and more mature than the weeds sprouting around them – and in conjunction with sheets of plastic mulch. As long as they're of a species in which the growing points are located above-ground, the weed seedlings are killed when blasted apart by the grit.
That grit can be made from almost any organic material, including nut shells, corn cobs or other agricultural waste. As noted by the Illinois team, however, fertilizers such as soybean meal could also be used. This would allow farmers to combine weeding and fertilizing in one pass, although "it is still unknown whether the fertilizer would be available for plant uptake within critical windows."
In the Illinois trials, tomato and pepper plants did sustain some superficial collateral damage, but it didn't affect their marketable fruit yield. That yield was along the same lines as is achieved when weeding by hand, and was 33 to 44 percent higher than that of non-weeded control crops.
The grit was applied using a sand blaster connected to an air compressor, pulled down rows of plants by a walk-behind tractor – it can be seen in use below. Wortman and his team, however, have since developed a dedicated device which is now undergoing testing.
A paper on the research was recently published in the journal Crop Protection.
Source: University of Illinois
No comments:
Post a Comment