The fix here is that the pylon is
assembled surely in panels using space frame ideas. There is plenty of engineering options with
such an approach including letting the outer panels carry a lot of the stress. In the meantime, its crane stays intact and
remains in place to allow repairs as an ongoing option.
I am sure the wind tunnels tests
were interesting. A rectangular cross
section for the pylon suggests asymmetric stress loads and plenty of stress
variations which are difficult to safely model.
We will have to wait until a few weather gale force winds.
Otherwise this approach should
easily slash the cost of the pylon and its install, all of which makes
financing much easier.
GE has the horsepower to finance
and manufacture this technology into the dominant system and they certainly will.
GE Joins Effort to Revolutionize Wind Towers
With Acquisition
The white pylon is so 1992, says Wind Tower
Systems.
General Electric today announced it will buy Wind Tower
Systems, a move that could change the look, height and economics of wind
turbines.
The turbine gets mounted on the pole by that crane at the top, called
the Hi-Jack System.
The structure, though, is really about economics. The Space Frame can
be disassembled into smaller components that are far easier to transport than
the dino-sized sections of steel pipe used on traditional wind turbines.
Mobilization and de-mobilization can gobble up to ten percent of the cost of a
turbine. Instead of 36 trucks being needed to transport all the necessary parts
to a site, it only takes six. The Hi-Jack also lets wind farm owners repair a
turbine right away, instead of waiting around for a crane to become available.
Pylons are complex structures. Turbines weigh several tons and the
spinning blades create tremendous, and irregular, forces.
Commercial availability is slated for 2012.
A few other companies are looking at ways of cutting the cost out of
wind by changing the pylon. In Scotland , SeaEnergy
Renewables has figured out a a way to mount turbines on top of the
platforms used for oil derricks. (The company was started by execs who spent
decades building the structures that drill for oil in the North
Sea .) The platforms cost less because they require less steel and
construction time is greatly reduced.
If this movement takes off, wind could go down in price. The only
losers will be the investment banks: they will have to change all of those ads
that feature traditional wind turbines.
2 comments:
Bad observation on "the only losers". This design, vs vertical turbines, is deadly to birds, sends out incredible subsonics and is much more expensive to erect, repair and maintain. Who wins? Not us.
Really?? Where are your facts or studies?? The infra-noise is a pathetic ruse to make money via lawsuits. As far as killing birds cars and power lines kill far more and the facts bear that out!The cost per Kilowatt is comparable and often less than coal.
Post a Comment