The established idea of rolling a
block along using log rollers was never a convincing idea, but served to fill
textbooks while we all waited for a sounder idea. The log idea dies the moment anyone tries it and
narrowly avoids been killed as logs spit out all over the place.
Certainly wicker was the common
building material in Stone Age England
down through the recent past. Wicker
work was used to support mud walls in housing and other structures. Specific trees were trained to the purpose of
providing wicker and we ended up with field boundaries of hedges throughout the
northern Celtic world. Thus it served
much the same purpose as bamboo in the Orient.
One presumes that the stones of Stonehenge needed quite stout wicker boughs to have the
necessary strength to hold the weight, but it seems quite practical. Winding on a hundred feet of stout rope at
either end would allow a controlled movement that would advance the roll a
respectable hundred feet each pull. Re-rigging
for a further pull would become routine and quick.
Down hill stretches may even be
quite survivable because the wicker wheel would have a natural suspension. It would also not be balanced perfectly
causing a natural damping and slowing of a downhill movement.
That it also floats nicely allows
it to be moved to a deep enough river and to be then transported by water
thereafter as is suggested here.
This is a practical solution well
within the local milieu. It also solves
a lot of other difficult ancient stone movement situations, particularly those
involving irregular shaped stones. It
is both easy and obvious.
New theory on Stonehenge transport from Wales
BBC - Island-based designer and engineer Garry Lavin has set out to revolutionize ideas on how the ancient
The current accepted theory is that each three-quarter tonne stone was rolled for more than 200 miles on logs, but Mr Lavin disagrees.
He thinks the historic monument could have been built using wicker basket constructions to roll the boulders all the way from
"I constructed a 0.5-metre diameter structure in hazel and willow into which I placed a sharply rectangular 40kg stone from a collapsed dry stone wall," he said.
"I packed the gaps inside with reeds and rolled it down a hillside. The stone fell out at the bottom but my construction was still intact.
"The project was then taken to the edge of the local canal and pushed in and it floated with about an eighth of the mass protruding above the water, but easily towable along the canal."
So could this really have been the way our ancient ancestors chose to achieve such an incredible feat of engineering as
Mr Lavin says woven structures were used widely at the time so it makes sense to assume they could also have been used in this way.
In past experiments Mr Lavin succeeded in moving a large one-ton stone in a wicker cage that he had made himself.
This year he will try to move a five-ton stone during the Summer Solstice at a time when the eyes of the world are firmly fixed on the
"I have no doubt a four-fifths of a tonne stone could be moved great distances by surprisingly few people. The method of pulling rope like a giant bobbin creates leverage that puts the process streets ahead of other theories."
"I look forward to getting an opportunity to float our bluestone replica down a river and maybe across the
Mr Lavin hopes the project will expand people's understanding of those who lived in
This intriguing story has now been reported on many websites around the world and has been translated into numerous languages- so it is possible Mr Lavin will have an international audience as he attempts to revolutionise established thought on the building of one of
No comments:
Post a Comment