The surprise is that just rewatering Australia has a
visible and measurable effect on the sea level itself. That is sensitivity well above expectations
and obviously allows us to police any climate related changes rather well.
It is also a measure of the potential for the
regreening of the whole of Australia. Kati Thanda-Lake Eyre could easily become
a massive rain forest able to water all of Australia through tree respiration
and wind.
That would allow a stable hydraulic system to grow
out and dominate the rest of the continent, originally burned off by early
humanity.
How an ocean went into
hiding in Australia
A
chunk of the oceans took a wrong turn in 2011. Instead of going from sky to
rain, into rivers, and then back into the oceans in the usual water cycle, it
got stuck in Australia, caught up in record-breaking floods and rivers that run
backwards into the continent. So much water got lost down under that global sea
levels fell and stayed low for more than a year.
John
Fasullo of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in
Boulder, Colorado, noticed something amiss while looking at trends in global
sea levels. They had been rising steadily by about 3 millimetres every year,
but in the second half of 2010, they suddenly plummeted. By early 2011, they
had dropped by 7 mm, the biggest drop since satellite measurements began in
1992.
The
reversal lasted until late 2011. Not many people noticed: at the time, the
world was preoccupied with massive floods in Australia. Fasullo wondered
whether the two events might be linked. If more water than usual was
evaporating from the oceans and falling on Australia, that might help to
explain both the floods and sea level drop.
Satellite data showed that more water was stored
on land in 2011 than in previous years, most of it in Australia, South America
and South-East Asia (Geophysical Research Letters,
doi.org/nhk). An early explanation was a strong La Niña,
which funnelled warm, moist air towards Australia. But La Niña events happen
every few years and regularly make it rain in Australia, says Fasullo.
"Why don't we see massive sea level drops after all La Niñas?"
Triple
whammy
Re-examining weather records revealed two other
factors. The Indian Ocean was much warmer in the east than in the west, pushing
yet more warm, moist air towards Australia. This had not happened for 20 years.
At the same time, a band of winds circling Antarctica shifted to the south,
boosting the effect still further (Geophysical Research Letters, doi.org/ngx).
The
rare combination of events led to unusually heavy Australian rainfall, says
Fasullo. But why did the water stay out of the oceans for so long? Extra
rainfall on land should get washed back out to sea by rivers within a few
months.
It turns out that Australia has an uncanny
ability to trap water for long periods. River channels are sparse in the west,
so rainwater tends to sit in the sandy soil. And in the east, many of the
channels run into a low-lying desert basin at the centre of the continent
rather than out to sea. With heavy rains, the basin fills up to become Kati Thanda-Lake Eyre;
fish eggs lying dormant in the soil hatch, and an ecosystem briefly comes to
life. "It's an instant inland sea," says Fasullo.
The unusual weather and geology offer a
convincing explanation for the sudden drop in sea levels, says John
Church of CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research in
Hobart, Tasmania. But his colleague Xuebin Zhangsays questions remain. He calculates that
the extra water on land accounts for about 3.75 mm of the 7 mm fall in sea
levels.
Similarly
heavy rain fell on Australia in 1973-74, but sea-level records from then are
not detailed enough to draw conclusions, and the three climate systems might
not align again for decades.
This article appeared in print
under the headline "Australia: where oceans go to hide"
Sheer weight of water
When the seas rose at the end of the last ice age, all hell broke
loose. According to a new analysis, the extra weight of liquid water deformed
the seabed, causing vast submarine landslides and tsunamis, perhaps even
releasing extra greenhouse gases. Today's rising seas could have similar effects,
but probably not for centuries.
Underwater landslides were
more common in the first 5000 years after
the last ice age than they are today. During that time, sea
levels rose by 120 metres as melting ice sheets poured their cargo into the
ocean.
Daniel Brothers of
the US Geological Survey in Woods Hole, Massachusetts, and his colleagues
estimated how much stress the extra weight would have placed on the seabed.
They found that faults were more likely to rupture along the Amazon and North
Carolina coasts, triggering landslides (Geology, doi.org/nhq).
Submarine earthquakes and landslides can cause
tsunamis, so these monster waves may have been more common as sea levels rose.
The changes might also have released
methane, which is stored beneath the seabed in icy
crystals called clathrates. Methane is a potent greenhouse gas, so would have helped to warm the
climate.
Simon Day of University College
London broadly agrees with the findings. He adds
that we are unlikely to experience similar
convulsions. It would take about 10 metres of sea level
rise to affect the number of underwater landslides. Most predictions
for this century are for a rise of about 1 metre.
No comments:
Post a Comment