So far Roman Gold coins stand up nicely.. These were far to handy as a value store to ever actually ever be in circulation. We had bronze or brass for all that or even copper.
Worse, gold was easily and cheaply melted down and made into coins by mints. The gold content could then be easily proved. Thus we have a coining culture of gold smiths who readily proved their gold.
The games wiould actually focus of high circulation copper based coins. That you can readily spend and mixing is hard to detect as the alloys were close in terms of density.
All That Glistened Was Gold: Roman Coin Study Reveals Thriving Empires
https://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.com/2021/11/all-that-glistened-was-gold-roman-coin.html
Cutting-edge scientific study of gold coins from different moments of the Roman Empire has revealed a thriving economy in the periods when the coins were minted.
Credit: University of Oxford
Researchers from the University of Oxford and the University of Warwick brought three Roman coins for analysis by the Science and Technology Facilities Council’s ISIS Neutron and Muon Source. Each coin was from the reign of a different Roman emperor: one from Hadrian (2nd century AD), one from Tiberius (early 1st century AD) and one from Julian II (4th century AD).
When high-value artefacts need to be analysed, researchers are generally required to employ non-destructive techniques. The aim in this case was to see if the coins had been surface enriched – or secretly mixed with other metals. By doing this, the team could deduce a number of things, including the levels of economic stability.
Lead author, Dr George Green, Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellow and Lavery-Shuffrey Early Career Fellow in Roman Art and Archaeology at the University of Oxford, says, ‘The results from the surface level analyses of these coins suggested that they were very high purity gold. However, these measurements were from the first few fractions of millimetres of the coins. There was a very reasonable ‘what if’ of ‘what if they’re actually made of something different beneath the surface?’ We know that the Romans deliberately surfaced enriched their silver coins to ‘hide’ the fact there was a lot of copper in them, so it is plausible something similar happened to the gold.
‘Our work at ISIS enabled us to sample the very centre of these coins totally non-destructively and conclusively show that the high purity seen on the surface was representative of the composition of the ‘core’ of the coin. At a basic level, it is further testament to the economic health of the Roman Empire, but these conclusions are also useful for researchers who need to employ non- or negligibly-destructive techniques on the surfaces of Roman gold coins. Now they can be confident the surface is representative of the bulk of these objects.’
To measure the purity of the gold coins they used muonic X-ray emission spectroscopy, a totally non-destructive analytical process that involves firing negative muons at the artefact. The muons are then captured by the atoms within the coins, which then emit a ‘fingerprint’ of muonic X-rays that are unique to the chemical element they came from.
Using this technique allows scientists to probe deeper into the elemental make-up of the historical artefacts than possible with other methods, while being entirely non-destructive.
Muonic X-ray emission spectroscopy also does not require the object to be cleaned before analysis, reducing the workload placed on cultural heritage institutions. Cleaning some artefacts can actually lead them to become damaged, so this technique is particularly useful for analysing objects still covered in a layer of mud or soil – such as those salvaged from shipwrecks.
Dr Adrian Hillier, lead instrument scientist at ISIS and the muon group leader, says, ‘These results highlight the potential of this technique within the field of cultural heritage. It is a non-destructive technique that can sample deep beneath the surface of archaeological objects. It requires no sample preparation and does not leave the artefact radioactive, making it a perfect tool for those working on museum collections.
‘Beyond working out the sub-surface purity of an object it could: determine the depth of any corrosion on an object; identify chemical changes within the artefact caused by unique manufacturing processes; or reveal that an object we thought was made of one thing is actually a forgery made of another – all without causing any damage.’
The RIKEN-RAL muon beamlines at the ISIS Neutron and Muon source was used as they could produce muons with a high enough momentum to penetrate deep beneath the surface of the artefact being studied. The muons are created by bombarding a carbon target with high energy protons, this causes the creation of pions which are extracted and then decay into muons. These muons have a range of different momenta; the muons with lower momentum are used to analyse the surface of the artefact and the high momentum muons pass deeper into the artefact obtaining data from its core.
No comments:
Post a Comment