Monday, February 2, 2026

Saskatchewan Alumina deposit/





Bauxite is grading at fifty percent alumina while this deposit is running around 15%.  Yet it is large and assume easily mined as are most bauxite deposits as well.  this smells like a tough nut to crack, but we shal see.

At worst it is a strategic reserve when easier stuff gets interdicted.

Yet it exists and produced concentrate can be processed at our smelters.



A major,, world-class alumina deposit, the Thor Project by Canadian Energy Metals (CEM), has been identified near Tisdale, Saskatchewan, containing roughly 6.8 billion tonnes of alumina within 49.5 billion tonnes of ore. This resource, potentially representing over 30% of the known world supply, focuses on extracting aluminum through a high-value process to produce Chemical Grade Alumina (CGA), High Purity Alumina (HPA), and Smelter Grade Alumina (SGA), with additional potential for scandium and vanadium.


Key Aspects of Saskatchewan Alumina (Thor Project): Mineralization & Processing: The project aims to extract aluminum, initially in the form of aluminum chloride hexahydrate (ACH), through crystallization, followed by calcination and pyrohydrolysis to produce Alumina (
Al2O3cap A l sub 2 cap O sub 3𝐴𝑙2𝑂3).

Significance: The discovery is positioned as a potential "game changer" for the North American supply chain, providing a domestic, secure, and sustainable source of aluminum.

Location: The deposit is located in a 600-square-kilometer area near Tisdale, with access to rail infrastructure, which is crucial for transporting materials.

Projected Output: The Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) suggests a 25-year project life, with an average annual production of 1.8 million tonnes of alumina from 16.5 million tonnes of ore.

Outlook: 2026 will focus on evaluating the resource and engineering a demonstration plant.

The Remarkable Anti-Tail Jet of 3I/ATLAS in New Hubble Images from January 7th, 2026



So let us be uncomplicated.  no explanation exists for the anti tail.  I also want to say that dust explantions for a draging tail run thin as well.  

I do think that what we are experiencing though is the interaction of the object with the surrounding plasme field belonging to our star.  I also think this holds true for all comets as wrll

This interaction can act upon the contained Dark MATTER. perhaps squeezing and twisting it to procuce an forward and backward DARK MATTER zone able to sustain duct such as carbon in particular.

Induced EM forces are also likely to produce lobes naturally.  in short ,cloud cosmology gives us a potential natural explanation.

The Remarkable Anti-Tail Jet of 3I/ATLAS in New Hubble Images from January 7th, 2026



·Jan 8, 2026


Press enter or click to view image in full size

Image of 3I/ATLAS, taken on January 7th, 2026 by the Hubble Space Telescope (top panel), and processed through the Larson-Sekanina rotational gradient filter (bottom panel). The bottom panel shows a triple jet structure with a prominent anti-tail jet in the direction of the Sun, towards the lower left corner of the image. The anti-tail extends to a scale of order the Earth-Moon separation. (Image credit: Toni Scarmato, based on data released by NASA/ESA/STScI here)

When the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS was first imaged by the Hubble Space Telescope on July 21st, 2025, it became evident that the glowing halo of light around it extends by an extra factor of ~2 towards the Sun. Given that the observing line-of-sight was only 10 degrees away from the sunward direction at that time, this implied that the actual extended structure is of a jet that is 1/sin(10 degrees)=5.8 times more elongated than observed in the projected image, namely ~11.6 times longer than it is wide.

But the most surprising fact about this jet is that it is oriented in the sunward direction. Usually, the elongated feature around comets is oriented away from the Sun. The physical reason is simple: the solar-wind push on gas and the solar radiation push on dust create the appearance of a cometary tail extending away from the Sun relative to the nucleus. But 3I/ATLAS exhibits a physical anti-tail that is definitely not a visual illusion due to a projection effect created by a special viewing angle.

Intrigued by this unusual phenomenon, I wrote three papers (posted here, here and here), attempting to explain the physics behind it. When the first paper in this series, co-authored with my colleague Dr. Eric Keto, was submitted for publication in “The Astrophysical Journal Letters,” we were informed by the editor that the paper will not be sent for review because: “I believe that your results would be of rather limited interest to the astrophysics research community as a whole.” Disappointed by this response, we submitted the paper to the competing journal “Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society”, where it was accepted for publication after a very favorable referee report. This experience shows how subjective the editorial and peer-review process is in academia.

By now, it is clear that the anti-tail jet of 3I/ATLAS is one of its major anomalies, because it is clearly observed in post-perihelion images taken from different perspectives during the past couple of months. These images show (as I described most recently here, here and here) a prominent anti-tail jet that extends out to 400,000 kilometers from the nucleus of 3I/ATLAS towards the Sun.

The anti-tail is evident in the latest Hubble image, taken on January 7th, 2026. The application of a Larson-Sekanina rotational gradient filter that removes the circularly symmetric glow around the nucleus of 3I/ATLAS reveals a triple jet structure with a major tightly-collimated anti-tail jet towards the Sun. The two minor jets are equally separated in angle from each other and the anti-tail, and are not oriented away from the Sun — as expected from a familiar cometary tail.

As inferred from the first Hubble image on July 21, 2025, the anti-tail jet is tightly collimated and an order of magnitude longer than it is wide. The tight collimation and the prominence of the anti-tail relative to any tail feature, are surprising given that the anti-tail jet goes through the countering pressure of the solar wind and the solar radiation. Given that, I beg to differ with the above-mentioned editorial opinion. The physics responsible for this remarkable anti-tail jet is not “of rather limited interest to the astrophysics research community”.

From the wobble of the anti-tail jet around the rotation axis when 3I/ATLAS was approaching the Sun (as reported here), it became clear that its rotation axis is pointed at the Sun to within 7 degrees at large distances. This constitutes another unexplained anomaly on top of the alignment of the trajectory of 3I/ATLAS with the ecliptic plane, each with sub-percent probability — making their combined geometry unlikely at a level below 0.0001. NASA officials did not mention these geometric anomalies at their press conference about 3I/ATLAS on November 19, 2025, when they concluded that 3I/ATLAS behaves like a regular comet. Obviously, if one ignores the unexplained anomalies of 3I/ATLAS, one would conclude that there is nothing surprising about it. The easiest way to argue that we fully understand something is by ignoring what we do not understand about it.

However, the foundation of science is the humility to learn, not the arrogance of expertise. What is the point of pursuing science if practitioners claim that they understand nature based on past knowledge even when data shows that they might be missing something. Our ability to learn something new is limited by our willingness to admit what we are missing. Anomalous data should not be “of rather limited interest to the astrophysics research community”, but instead of great interest for the astrophysics research community.

Science is fun as long as we treat it as a learning experience. Curiosity is a genuine trait of a beginner’s mind. My hope is that the next generation of scientists will do better than my generation in revolutionizing our perception of our cosmic neighborhood. The Universe will not appear a lonely place if we find residents in our cosmic street. Finding these residents would update the priorities of humanity beyond Earth.

In a WORLD.MINDS forum led by the brilliant Rolf Dobelli yesterday, I asked the historian Sir Niall Ferguson: “Could science bring humanity to pursue a vastly better future than its past?” Niall responded that science is not separate from power politics. He argued that throughout history, humans evolved as fighters and killers. The 20th century saw extraordinary scientific breakthroughs and unprecedented mass killings. Niall suggested that these facts are not unrelated.

Niall is right about our past. But I am hopeful that an encounter with a more accomplished extraterrestrial civilization will make our future better, once we will receive our inspiration from the stars. As Oscar Wilde noted: “We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.” For that reason, when we observe interstellar objects in our backyard, we should not treat their anomalies as being “of rather limited interest.” Instead, let us focus on understanding the anomalies of 3I/ATLAS (as listed here), starting from its anti-tail jet. This visitor to our backyard is not a regular street cat since a tail appears to be emerging from its forehead.

Newtons papers and time.




interesting.  so much intellectual water has passed under the bridge since his era.  not least the layersw of intellectual arrogance laid out every decade ince.

I understand the basis of the science pursued by alchemy and it was both scientific and profoundly empiriacle and replication difficult.

The implied assumption of biblical revelation leads quickly to intense textual interpretation and a vast potential for error.  Yet recall Swedenborg was contemporaneous.  His revelation presages cloud cosmology none of which is understood today and may never be understood.



Isaac Newton's Lost Papers - And His Search For God's Divine Plan

by Tyler Durden
Thursday, Jan 29, 2026 - 07:35 PM



Few have had as profound an effect on modern scientific understanding as Sir Isaac Newton.A


Many people are familiar with the story of how a falling apple first inspired Newton to investigate the force that would come to be known as gravity, and as he later concluded in his seminal scientific treatise, “Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy,” it is this same force that pulls a fruit to ground that keeps the planets in orbit.


While Newton undoubtedly possessed a keen sense of observation and an insatiable curiosity that enabled him to make some of the most influential mathematical and scientific discoveries in recorded history, his prolific notes and writings—especially the vast amount of manuscripts that went unpublished until hundreds of years after his death—reveal a more profound motivation.

Newton wrote more, arguably significantly more, on theology than on scientific phenomena. According to those most familiar with the totality of his writings, he viewed the two not as distinctive pursuits, but as one unified quest to map out the divine order of the universe.

Although Newton is justifiably renowned for his numerous astounding scientific contributions, what is less known about him is that he was also a devout Christian, a dedicated scriptural scholar, and one of the most preeminent theologians of his time. While his public scientific works blossomed in full view of the world, it was his private religious studies that served as the unseen roots providing sustenance to those blooms.
A Devout Christian

Because of his demonstrated mathematical prowess, in 1669, at the age of 26, Newton was appointed as the Lucasian Chair of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge. At the time, all Cambridge professors were required to take the holy orders of the Church of England, but Newton at first delayed and ultimately refused to take the oath.

However, this refusal did not stem from his lack of faith or a rejection of the Bible, but in fact just the opposite—he believed that the church had embraced certain misinterpretations of the Bible that he could not in good conscience profess to believe. Newton was fluent in both Latin and Greek, and it was his extensive studies of original scriptures that led him to reject certain tenets of the church, specifically those concerning the Trinity.

Though he did not speak or write publicly about his disagreement with church doctrine, fearing that controversial theological arguments could inhibit or undermine his scientific research, his refusal to take the holy orders posed a serious threat to his early career.

Fortunately, some of his fellow teachers petitioned the king on his behalf, and he was ultimately granted a special dispensation that exempted him from the oath requirement and allowed him to remain in his position at Cambridge. It was around this time that Newton began to record his theological research in notebooks. And this was no passing fancy for the great scientist, as throughout the remainder of his life, he continued to write and revise his extensive theological notes and Biblical interpretations.


Many of his contemporaries were aware of his private work and considered him an authority on Biblical theology. Newton corresponded extensively on matters of Biblical interpretation with luminary thinkers and scholars, including the philosopher John Locke and the influential theologian John Mill. At one point, even the Archbishop of Canterbury, the senior bishop of the Church of England, stated that Newton knew more about the Bible than any members of the clergy.
A Divine Order

Despite the fact that Newton never published the vast majority of his theological writings, what he did publish during his life left little doubt as to his belief in the intelligent design of the universe by a divine creator. Although Newton almost completely avoided the topic of theology in his most famous scientific work, the “Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy,” when he published the second edition of the work in 1713, he included an addendum known as the “General Scholium,” around half of which is devoted to his theological conception of the universe.

“The Supreme God is a Being eternal, infinite, absolutely perfect,” he wrote. “And from his true dominion it follows that the true God is a living, intelligent, and powerful Being. ... He is not eternity and infinity, but eternal and infinite; he is not duration or space, but he endures and is present ... by existing always and every where, he constitutes duration and space.”

So even during his lifetime, Newton’s belief in a divine order and a supreme creator was well known. What was not well known, though, was the vast extent of his scriptural scholarship and writing. His unpublished papers consisted of more than 6 million words, approximately one-third of which were devoted to scriptural study and theology.

After Newton’s death in 1727, thousands of pages of notes and unpublished writings were acquired by his closest living relatives, but out of concern that the papers would offend the church and damage his scientific reputation, the relatives kept them private. As a result, the majority of his papers remained hidden from public view for nearly 150 years.

In 1872, most of Newton’s scientific and mathematical papers were donated to the University of Cambridge, where they were catalogued and made available to scholars. But the remainder of the papers, including those concerned with theology and biblical scholarship, remained private until they were put up for auction by Sotheby’s in 1936.

The auction was not widely publicized and was generally overshadowed by other auctions occurring around the same time, and as a result, the papers were scattered to various collectors and dealers around the world. However, shortly after the auction, two men set out to acquire different portions of Newton’s lost papers


.

Saving the Lost Papers

One of these men was the prominent economist and mathematician John Maynard Keynes, who focused primarily on acquiring Newton’s notes on the subject of alchemy, of which there were many. The term alchemy connotes different things to different people, and while it is sometimes associated with occult magic, it is also considered to be influential in the development of modern chemistry. Even among Keynes and others who have studies Newton’s lost writings on alchemy, there seems to be no clear consensus on what he was studying or why.

The other man who aggressively set out to acquire Newton’s lost papers was the Jewish scholar and linguist Abraham Yahuda, who focused primarily on the acquisition of Newton’s theological writings.

Yahuda was a rabbinical philologist who taught and lectured at numerous prominent universities in Europe and around the world throughout the early decades of the 1900s, and he was also a collector of rare manuscripts. Although he was an accomplished linguist who studied the early writings of many cultures, his primary field of study was the philology of the Torah, and he recognized Newton as someone who was also deeply interested in accurately interpreting the symbolic language of the Old Testament.

By the late 1930s, Yahuda had acquired thousands of pages of Newton’s manuscripts, with which he fled to London at the outbreak of World War II.

In early 1940, his acquaintance and fellow scholar Albert Einstein helped arrange for Yahuda and his wife to travel to New York, and later that summer the two men met at Einstein’s summer retreat in the Adirondacks. Apparently, they discussed Newton’s lost papers that Yahuda acquired because Einstein wrote to him later that year concerning the topic.

“Newton’s writings on biblical subjects seem to me especially interesting,” Einstein wrote, “because they provide deep insight into the characteristic intellectual features and working methods of this important man. The divine origin of the Bible is for Newton absolutely certain, a conviction that stands in curious contrast to the critical skepticism that characterizes his attitude toward the churches.”

In his letter, Einstein also lamented the fact that most of the preparatory works of Newton’s physics writings had been lost or destroyed, but he was convinced that the theological works could provide valuable insight into Newton’s thinking and methods. At least, he concluded, “we do have this domain of his works on the Bible drafts and their repeated modification; these mostly unpublished writings therefore allow a highly interesting insight into the mental workshop of this unique thinker.”

Although Yahuda never published or sold his collection of Newton’s papers, he did write about them, and he was one of the first scholars to understand and note the importance of Newton’s theology on his broader work. After his death in 1952, his wife donated the papers to the Jewish National and University Library at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, where for the first time they were made available to the public.



In the ensuing decades, many scholars and writers began to study and publish papers on Newton’s theological writings, ultimately providing an expanded perspective into the thinking of one of the world’s most influential scientists. At the turn of the century and in the years since, several organizations, including The Newton Project, have set out to catalogue and publish the lost theological writings of Isaac Newton, many of which are now available to the general public and easily accessible online.

Newton’s Search for God’s Divine Plan

“Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy,” published in Latin in 1687, in which Newton formulated the laws of motion and universal gravitation, is perhaps the most influential scientific treatise ever composed, not only for its insights into classical mechanics and the functioning of the physical world but also for its advancements of scientific methods of inquiry.

Newton made significant contributions to many fields of scientific study, including mathematics, optics, and physics. His studies of prisms and the light spectrum led him to design and build the first reflecting telescope, and he also made the first attempts to calculate the speed of sound. As a mathematician, he was the first person to employ the principles of modern calculus, and he was a pioneer in numerous areas of mathematical theories and calculations.

While his influence on the history of science is well known and undeniable, his prominence as a theologian has only come to full light more recently with the publication of his lost papers.

There is no doubt that Newton was a man of devout faith, and that faith inspired and informed his scientific inquiry. As he wrote in the General Scholium, “This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful being.”

As scholars continue to study his lost papers, perhaps more insights into Newton’s conception of the universe will be revealed.

Most Important Reveals from Elon Musk Interview





Th8s sounds like a plan forwqrd for ricket based cargo handling rapidly eceeding air transport in gemeral.  This not ten years  We see them flying now.

it n is already good enough and can now be fine tuned to meet operational demand.

This means one hundred tons from China to Europe or America. and back.


Most Important Reveals from Elon Musk Interview

by Brian Wang


True AGI expected in 2026 (possibly 2027), with superintelligence by ~2030 surpassing all human intelligence combined.




100X Intelligence density increase will reduce the HBM memory bottleneck.

10X AI gains every year going forward.

Reusable rockets will be 30 times faster than planes, move more cargo and there will ten times more giant rockets than large planes.