Group
Mind Conjecture
This item will
be difficult to accept for most but several strands of thought and research
have led us there and it thus needs to be stated.
1
During
the Garden of Eden epoch which roughly went from 200,000 BP through 45000 BP mankind
had the benefit of mind to mind communication with others at hand and with
perhaps a general group mind consciousness as well. It was not the same as our sophisticated
verbal system but allowed images to be shared and warnings to be sent if necessary. This capability allowed humanity to manage
and control interactions with other animals and naturally avoided ever been
prey.
2
The
natural corollary of this is that other sentients have the same capacity. That includes all animals in particular however
physically limited as a group mind naturally overcomes the physical. Because the group mind is just that some
information naturally is shared in this manner down through generations as has
been demonstrated by experiment.
3
It
follows that when this talent was blocked in mankind, we lost our ability to
live safe of carnivore predation and had to adapt to a less congenial
lifeway. Yet there is no reason
whatsoever to presume that this talent was ever lost by sentient animals. This means that this talent remains intact
and in use to this day and become subject to skilled investigation. This is obviously huge and also makes
completely clear the famous prophesy that the lion would lay down with the
lamb.
So far so good. I could now open the discussion on observed
herd and flock behavior in particular but that is simply puts up a wall of
conforming data for science to dispute.
At least we now know that we should be looking. In fact I can go much further than that.
I spoke recently
with a friend and in this case a unique informant. What he had to tell me is extraordinary and
provides us clear direction. At the
moment he is a sample of one and may also have a naturally sensitized mind to
begin with. After his experiences, he
ultimately worked on meditation and made significant breakthroughs there to
experience the light and perhaps the sound.
You do not need to know what all that means but it suggests that you are
becoming sensitized to the inner eye and the pineal gland. I can say that he was an excellent prospect
and had empathy for animals which has led him naturally into vegetarianism.
Thus what I am
about to describe is likely best attempted by those already emphatic with the
animals to be tested. I suspect an
emotional potential must exist. They may
also need to be vegetarian as well just to be free of the odor.
What occurred
happened once and obviously needs to be repeated. My informant was attending at a wildlife refuge
in South Africa. The important aspect is
that it occurred unequivocally once and thus can be repeated.
He was
introduced to a teenage elephant that had been brought to the refuge after been
orphaned by poachers who had killed the parents. He was to simply hand a bunch of hay to the
elephant, nervously of course, as part of an effort to help the young animal to
trust the people in the refuge that would be working with it.
What he did
instead on impulse was to step forward up to the elephant and rest his forehead
directly on the forehead of the young elephant much as has been observed
between two elephants at times.
He formulated in
his thoughts that he was so sorry for what had happened to this young
elephant. He empathized with the
elephant’s experience. Astonishingly he
got a completely clear mental response from the elephant. This was in the form ‘we’ which is important
and stated ‘we’ understand and understand that most humanity is like you and
that it is only a few who cause damage.
It was a direct communication speaking for the apparent group mind. Then over the next few seconds, images were
shared of great beauty of the elephant’s home range until the communion ended.
This was a
unique event for my informant though he has had additional encounters with
other animals that were at least suggestive.
Of course, had we all communicated directly with an elephant mind to
mind, we would then be simply more open to other animals.
What is
demonstrated is clear mind to mind communion and real information sharing
taking the informant from a sense of personal guilt for others to an
understanding that the guilt is with the few.
That was even an unlooked for outcome.
Thus both direct
mind to mind communications is experimentally provable but is also likely range
dependent. We have simply lost the
range. A hundred yards would be
sufficient to protect us in the company of a pride of lions. Recovering that range is also likely to be
something amenable to scientific research.
This will be an exciting avenue of research and a good number of our
members of the animal kingdom should be open to cooperation. Once a link is established, then it should get
much easier. Elephants and dolphins and
whales are certainly at the top of the list as well as horses perhaps. I think a lot depends on the human range and
actual skill. My point is that those
with some hint of skill need to experiment with meditation and head to head
communication to see if a response is inspired.
No comments:
Post a Comment