A great deal of conventional or accepted knowledge about the Solar System is all derived from inferances based on Newtonian physics. Unfortunately, when it really does not work well, we have explanation by hand waving which goes unresolved while drifting into the canon.
Altertnatively we have my evolving Cloud Cosmology which posits all planets and all stars are created by an ignition source consuming Dark Matter and perhaps producing it as well. This produces an inner star body. Matter production then produces an outer shell like an egg shell consisting of higher elements.
We posit that life evolves on the inner surface where water accumulates in a benign environment. This holds true for all planets in particular! The outer surface has to be Terraformed in order to be ultimately used.
So just how did the asteroid belt form up and why did it not accumulate into a Newtonian planet? Why does Venus show little geological evolution and really looks far younger than other planets. what are we getting wrong? Are gas giants really gas giants?
Cloud Cosmology gives us an entirely different pathway for planetary evolution that is driven by the ongoing creation of matter as an an underlying given from the consumption of so called Dark Matter, likely neutron neutron pairs. These decay into hydrogen mostly.
My unusual inferance today is that a large planet existed inside Jupiters orbit that was provided the mass for both the belt and Venus. This was not a dynamic spin off from jupiter which is plausible using Newtonian ideas. Instead we had a planet that was massively impacted which shattered the planetary shell. When this happened ,the shell distributed into the circum Solar astertoid belt, which the inner Star fell into a lower orbit which is likely that of venus. It then began to form a new shell which is what we see along with ample gas production likely communicating with the inner shell.
We also need to rethink our gas giants as well. does the gas ultimately combine to form larger molecules and evolve into a material component of the shell? Is the gas also internal to the shell? Or is it consumed there? Is life possible?
No comments:
Post a Comment