It is a compelling coincidence
that human agriculture emerged approximately 9000 years ago in six separate
centers around the globe including those of North America . There may be some debate in terms of this
assertion, but I observe that I am seeing continuing convergence to what is at
best the same time frame.
I have argued that this ‘impulse’
was initiated by the insertion of specially prepared human stock (us) at
appropriate locations around the globe with at initial stock of seeds and
perhaps additional kit. The best known
such event was the establishment of the Noah colony at Ararat. At least we retain a record of it.
Now we have tidied up the
appropriate time frame for the Chinese colony and also shown that natural expansion
did not necessitate contact with India for the first five thousand
years. Again this makes good sense as India had its
own colony(s) with its own emergent agricultural tool kit. We discover that the advent of Chinese rice
induced hybridization with indigenous wild rice varieties and this helped localize
Indian strains about 4000 years ago or just as the seaborne Bronze Age emerged.
I have posted extensively on this
topic and it is worth the effort to wade through related posts on this
site. My conjecture is that
approximately 9000 to 10,000 years ago, once the climate of the Holocene had
fully established itself after the Pleistocene Nonconformity around 13,000
years ago had ended the Ice Age, our space brethren who are of Terran descent,
jump started agriculture on Earth by establishing modern human colonies at a number
of locations sufficiently removed from each other to avoid early conflict.
This conjecture is obviously
controversial and it is also possible that the agricultural idea simply became
practical at much the same time which may also be true. Whatever happened, the succeeding four
thousand years saw a huge population rise occur as mankind exploited his
options through agriculture.
The other compelling argument in
favor of the deliberate insertion conjecture is that the grains we use are
almost all produced by an unusual and generally unnatural application of a
certain type of forced hybridization we have only even understood in the last
century or so.
by Staff Writers
Genome researchers tracking the evolutionary history of rice say domesticated rice may have appeared as far back as around 9,000 years ago in
Previous studies had suggested domesticated rice may have had two
points of origin, Indiaand
China , but genetic evidence
points to China as the older
source of the crop species, a release from New York University
said Monday.
The study supports archaeological evidence gathered in the last decade
pointing to rice domestication in the Yangtze
Valley beginning approximately 8,000
to 9,000 years ago, while domestication of rice in the India 's Ganges region began
around about 4,000 years ago.
The researchers examined the history of domesticated rice by
re-sequencing 630 gene fragments on selected chromosomes from a diverse set of
wild and domesticated rice varieties.
Their results showed that the gene sequence data was consistent with a
single origin of rice.
"As rice was brought in from China
to India
by traders and migrant farmers, it likely hybridized extensively with
local wild
rice," NYU biologist Michael Purugganan, one of the study's
co-authors, said. "So domesticated rice that we may have once thought
originated in India actually
has its beginnings in China ."
Asian rice, Oryza sativa, is one of world's oldest crop species.
No comments:
Post a Comment