What is missing in these
discussions is the forgotten fact that communication remained two way. Thus the existence of a new island able to
absorb two thousand new settlers found its way back and this triggered a mass
migration. The success of that migration
then triggered active exploration in all directions from the new island and that
quickly led to the discovery of New
Zealand and others.
The same thing took place and all
these outliers were quickly colonized with sufficient manpower to allow full populations
in three centuries as happened.
My point is that the island discoveries
triggered an inflow of population that abrogated any need to wait fro natural
growth to encourage further expansion.
It could all have happened over one man’s lifetime.
Pacific
colonisation one big 'pulse'
TOM HUNT
Last updated 05:00 29/12/2010
Academics are calling for a rewrite of Pacific history after new
research indicating the immigration wave that colonised islands around New Zealand
is out by about 400 years.
Academics are calling for a rewrite of Pacific history after new
research indicating the immigration wave that colonised islands around New Zealand is
out by about 400 years.
An historian says the peer-reviewed and published findings could call
into question the notion of Maori as indigenous people.
The findings showed that islands such as Easter and Marquesas, as well
as Hawaii , were settled hundreds of years
later than thought, about the same time as New Zealand , researchers said.
The research – led by Janet Wilmshurst from New Zealand's Landcare
Research, and Atholl Anderson, from the Australian National University – showed
a rate of dispersal "unprecedented in oceanic prehistory", Dr
Wilmshurst said. It also showed human impact on the islands – through fire,
introduced predators and hunting – was faster than earlier believed.
"Whereas species declines were thought to have occurred over a
thousand years or more, it now appears that in most cases several hundred years
was all it took."
Published in the Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences in the United States ,
the findings came from analysis of 1400 radiocarbon dates from 47 islands –
more than 10 times the number of radiocarbon dates of previous studies.
They show Polynesians migrated from Samoa to the Society Islands about
AD1050, four centuries later than had been thought.
About two centuries later, they colonised other islands, including New Zealand ,
in one major "pulse". Dr Anderson said possible reasons for leaving
the islands were rapid population growth, technical innovation in sailing
boats, climate change and environmental disaster.
Existing models of human colonisation, ecological change and historical
linguistics for the region now required substantial revision, he said.
The timing of the colonisation of the South Pacific had previously been
poorly understood, with no definite timeline for colonisation in most island
groups, excluding New
Zealand .
Auckland University of Technology history professor Paul Moon said the
findings could have implications for the Waitangi Tribunal because claims,
using oral history, had Maori colonisation out by hundreds of years.
"If Maori reached New
Zealand waters just 300 years before the
first Europeans, some people might also start to reconsider the idea of Maori
being indigenous. It could be interpreted as a different type of `indigenous'
from the sort that applies to peoples who inhabited countries exclusively for
thousands of years."
Professor Anderson dismissed Dr Moon's claim as
"exaggerated", saying the most widely regarded figure for Maori
settlement had already been about 1250.
"Dr Moon's argument that occupation of only hundreds of years
could disqualify Maori from claiming indigeneity is illogical, since they were
the first people here."
Richard Walter, an Otago University expert in the archaeology of New
Zealand colonisation, backed the new findings and also dismissed Dr Moon's
suggestions.
No comments:
Post a Comment