This item addresses the rich trove on machined stone that is present in
Egypt partially associated with major works using less skillful methods. A cultural claim is made that this work arose
as part of a pre dynastic culture that used clearly superior tools. Their application may well have been rather brief
though. The development of the required
tools is evolutionary and we have certainly created their equivalent and can
thus recognize the tool marks.
I am hesitant to speculate on eras here because this expertise was
plausibly imported to complete a task. The
rich Atlantean world comes to mind. They
had at least two thousand years to get it right before it showed up in Egypt.
As well all this tool work can be done using bronze and Emory dust, which
was well within their limits. Again do
not underestimate their talent. More
telling is the appearance of a circular saw.
That means a source of rotary energy.
Hand work could do this also with a simple crank.
The Hidden History Of Egypt: Khemitology
Egypt is currently in
the news, and not for the most pleasant of reasons. Political disturbances are
being felt in isolated pockets of the country, yet are clearly overblown by
western media, and some foreign governments. But this land, and especially the
fertile areas that border the Nile River has been a vital part of human history
for thousands of years. From the rise of Islam in the 7th century AD, and back through the Coptic
Christians, Jews, Romans, Greeks, Persians and finally the so called dynastic
Egyptians, each successive dominant culture has left their mark.
The clearest evidence
of this is in the stone constructions they left behind. And it is through the
study of these works that we can see the level of technology each culture had,
through what tools they used. Limestone is and has been in great abundance in
the country, especially near Cairo, due to the laying down of sedimentary
deposits millions of years ago. In fact, the famous Giza plateau is more or less
a massive outcrop of limestone.
Both the Romans and
Greeks had the use of steel, and thus could shape limestone with ease, as well
as marble. However, the archaeological record shows us that the dynastic
Egyptians worked with mainly bronze tools, such as chisels, as well as stone
hammers. These would have been fine for the shaping of limestone, as in the
columns and flat surfaces which make up many of the palaces and temples that we
think of as dynastic achievements.
Limestone averages 3
to 4 on the Mohs scale, which is an indication of the ability of harder
minerals and materials to scratch softer ones. And bronze has a similar
hardness, depending on what has been added to the copper base. The first bronze
in any appreciable quantities was in use in Egypt starting in the 4th dynasty (2613 to 2494 B.C.) and this
coincided, as most Egyptologists would have it, with the building of the three
pyramids at Giza.
###
The stone often used
for hammers and other tools was usually diorite, which has a hardness of 7, on
average, on the Mohs scale. It was mainly in the form of ball shaped pounders
which were used to strike the limestone as a way of removing material. And,
flat stones could be employed, along with silica sand slurry to act as an early
sanding process.
It is commonly
believed that iron, let alone steel did not appear in appreciable quantities
until at least the 8th century BC in Egypt,
brought in by traders from lands farther to the east. So how was the harder
stone shaped?
In order to shape
stone, or wood, or practically any solid material, there is one simple
principle; the tool material has to be as hard or harder than the material
being worked. Also, a power tool, that which is energized by electricity, water
or some other force tends to remove material faster and more efficiently than a
tool operated solely by hand. As well, powered instruments tend to be more
accurate in their execution than those which are solely human operated and
energized.
This then leads to a
true conundrum when we look, for example, at some of the shaped surfaces on the
Giza plateau, because here, and many engineers can attest to this, we find
evidence of the use of machine powered saws in deep antiquity. In order to get
into any real depth about this, I will refer to the research of two great
contemporary men, Stephen Mehler and Christopher Dunn, both of whom I traveled
with in Egypt in April 2013.
Stephen Mehler is an
oral tradition specialist and author of ancient Egyptian knowledge; much of his
tutelage came from his relationship with Abd’El Hakim Awyan. The latter was an
Egyptian tour guide and indigenous wisdom keeper. Christopher Dunn is a master
machinist, born and raised in England who moved to the United States and worked
in high technology establishments which make, for example, specialized parts
for jet engines.
Conventional
Egyptology has a tendency to either ignore, or insufficiently try to explain
the machined saw marks I witnessed, as well as obvious examples of high speed
core drills having been at work at such sites as Abu Sir, Abu Ghurob, and the
Giza plateau. The important point is that the saw marks and drill holes that I
and others have seen, in profusion in these and other areas were not so much in
soft limestone, but in far harder rock like basalt, granite and diorite.
All three of the above
mentioned types of rock are at least 6 to 7 on the Moh’s scale of hardness, and
thus could not have been shaped using the copper or bronze chisels of the
dynastic Egyptians, though many Egyptologists insist this is the case. As well,
in many instances we can see the grooves that the saw blades and core drills
left behind as they penetrated the stone. These marks tend to be very even in
nature, with each succeeding one representing one revolution of the saw or
drill bit; something which is very difficult to do if done with hand tools, due
to muscle strain over time.
###
According to some
engineers that I have interviewed, the 2 to 3 mm distance between each
successive rotation of the tools mentioned above matches, if not exceeds modern
day diamond tipped equipment. So if the dynastic Egyptians, as well as the
succeeding cultures did not have access to what we in the 21st century would call “high tech” tools, who
did?
To explain this, we
use the knowledge of Christopher Dunn to explain the “how and why,” and Stephen
Mehler for the “who and when.” Dunn has published two very revolutionary
books; The Giza Power Plant: Technologies Of
Ancient Egypt, and Lost
Technologies Of Ancient Egypt: Advanced Engineering In The Temples Of The
Pharaohs.
###
In the Giza Power Plant he
explores his theory that the Great Pyramid, and perhaps others were harmonic
resonance devices, used to actually generate and distribute vibratory power.
And in Lost Technologies Of Ancient
Egypt he shows that ancient artisans left their marks all over that
land, unique marks that reveal craftsmanship we would be hard pressed to
duplicate today. Drawing together the results of more than 30 years of research
and at least 9 field study journeys to Egypt, he presents a stunning stone by
stone analysis of key Egyptian monuments, including the statue of Ramses II at
Luxor and the fallen crowns that lay at its feet. His modern-day engineering
expertise provides a unique view into the sophisticated technology used to
create these famous monuments in prehistoric times.
Stephen Mehler has
also written two books pertaining to ancient Egypt. The first, The Land Of Osiris basically
rewrites the history of the area thanks in large part to his decades long
relationship with indigenous wisdom keeper Abd’El Hakim Awyan. In it, he
explores the existence of a pre-pharaohnic civilization, called the Khemetians
who were responsible for the creation of the Sphinx, pyramids of the Giza
Plateau, as well as other monuments to the north and south. The name given to
this area was Bu Wizzer, translated as meaning the Land Of Osiris.
In his second
book, From Light Into Darkness: The Evolution
Of Religion In Ancient Egypt he explores the idea that the three
great western religions, Judaism, Christianity and Islam all evolved out of
Egypt.
The work of both of
these authors flies in the face of entrenched Egyptology dogma which insists
that no defined culture preceded the dynastic Egyptians. However, by combining
the works of Dunn and Mehler, a logical picture of ancient history arises which
explains the hard stone artifacts found in the area displaying machine cutting
marks.
To those that have not
visited Egypt, you probably would be quite shocked at the amount of damage to
the monuments which has occurred over the course of thousands of years. Casing
stones of pyramids and other monumental refined works have been strewn about,
shattered and harvested as building materials by later cultures. It is the
remains of the hard stone artifacts which are of particular importance, as in
basalt, granite and diorite because, again, these are stones which the dynastic
Egyptians could not have shaped with the tools found in the archaeological
record.
Outside the Great
Pyramid, within the first half hour of our being there in April 2013,
Christopher Dunn and Stephen Mehler both pointed out clear examples of black
basalt that had been cut with a circular saw of some kind. And the best
evidence, as far as I am concerned is at a site called Abu Sir, to the south of
Giza. Here we saw many examples of core drilling in red Aswan granite, as well
as saw cut marks in black granite and basalt.
###
And the most
stupefying of all locations was the Serapeum, which is a subterranean
passageway containing more than 20 large niches, and inside of each is an
enormous granite box, with lid. The boxes are made of one piece of hollowed
out granite, and the lid was originally part of that same stone. The surfaces
are flat within a few ten thousandths of an inch of laser perfection, yet
the inscriptions, commonly called hieroglyphs were of much inferior quality.
What this suggests is that the inscriptions were made later, and by people of a
lower technological prowess.
It seems apparent that
the conventional historical accounts and interpretations of Egypt are woefully
lacking. We have all been taught, and some would say indoctrinated from
childhood that prior to the dynastic Egyptians, who arrived in the area at
about 3100 BC that relatively primitive people inhabited the area. We have also
been told that the dynastic people erected all of the pyramids, carved the
Sphinx, and cut, shaped and transported multi-ton blocks from the Aswan quarry,
some 500 miles from Giza.
Yet the presence of
traces of advanced machining, such as core drill holes, high speed circular saw
marks, and mortar free joinery of megalithic stones tells us that someone was
present before the Pharaohs. These people, according to Stephen Mehler and
others, especially those of the Khemit School of Ancient Mysticism, www.khemitology.com were
called the Khemitians; a civilization of advanced capabilities whose existence
is largely ignored, dismissed, or ridiculed by most academics.
However, evidence of
their presence can still be seen at many sites, especially those on and near
the Giza Plateau, and a tour of these locations will happen between March 30
and April 12, 2014, hosted by Yousef Awyan (son of the wisdom keeper Abd’El
Hakim Awyan), his wife Patricia, Stephen Mehler, Gary Evans, Mohamed Ibrahim,
and the author. View details here.
No comments:
Post a Comment