Thursday, January 24, 2013

HIV Vaccine Brakes Disease for Year





 Not a cure of course, but certainly it is a useful tool to apply to the problem. Considering the side effects and costs of all the present protocols, getting a year's relief is great.

It may also lead to something permanent.

The tool kit now available for HIV is now surprisingly large and optimism abounds that a cure is both possible and perhaps sooner than appears obvious. At least victims are all now living out their lives in the developed world with some occasional damage and are actually drifting into old age and succumbing to other causes often not related at all.

Scientists say vaccine temporarily brakes HIV

by Staff Writers

Madrid (AFP) Jan 03, 2013



A team of Spanish researchers say they have developed a therapeutic vaccine that can temporarily brake growth of the HIV virus in infected patients.

The vaccine, based on immune cells exposed to HIV that had been inactivated with heat, was tested on a group of 36 people carrying the virus and the results were the best yet recorded for such a treatment, the team said.

"What we did was give instructions to the immune system so it could learn to destroy the virus, which it does not do naturally," said Felipe Garcia, one of the scientists in the team at Barcelona University's Hospital Clinic.

The therapeutic vaccine, a shot that treats an existing disease rather than preventing it, was safe and led to a dramatic drop in the amount of HIV virus detected in some patients, said the study, published Wednesday in Science Translation Medicine.

After 12 weeks of the trial, the HIV viral load dropped by more than 90 percent among 12 of the 22 patients who received the vaccine. Only one among the 11 patients who received a control injection without the vaccine experienced a similar result.

After 24 weeks, the effectiveness had begun to decline, however, with seven of the 20 remaining patients receiving the vaccine enjoying a similar 90-percent slump in viral load. No-one in the control group of 10 patients experienced such a decline in the virus.

The vaccine lost its effectiveness after a year, when the patients had to return to their regular combination therapy of anti-retroviral drugs.

Researchers said the results were similar to those achieved with a single anti-retroviral drug, used to block the growth of HIV.

"It is the most solid demonstration in the scientific literature that a therapeutic vaccine is possible," they said in a statement.

The vaccine allowed patients temporarily to live without taking multiple medicines on a daily basis, which created hardship for patients, could have toxic side-effects over the long term and had a high financial price, the team said.

"This investigation opens the path to additional studies with the final goal of achieving a functional cure -- the control of HIV replication for long periods or an entire life without anti-retroviral treatment," the researchers said in a statement.

"Although we still have not got a functional cure, the results published today open the possibility of achieving an optimal therapeutic vaccine, or a combination of strategies that includes a therapeutic vaccine, and could help to reach that goal," they said.

The team said it took seven years to get to this point, and the researchers would now work on improving the vaccine and combining it with other therapeutic vaccines over the next three or four years.

According to latest UN figures, the number of people infected by HIV worldwide rose to 34 million in 2011 from 33.5 million in 2010.

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Death Spiral of the Honey Bee Population




 Now it appears that the boots on the ground have reached the obvious consensus. Beekeeping is entering a death spiral and we are about to experience a massive withdrawal of services. There are local solutions but no solution for large pollination dependent crops. In practice, every operator needs to be come a beekeeper and needs to deliberately develop refugia and adjacent fallow crops that do not demand pesticides. It is a great time to go organic.

It continues to be outrageous that the industry continues ignore and obfuscate the situation when their home markets in Europe have shut them down for the past five years.

Sorry chaps, it is not working and yes the class action suit will be an economic tsunami that will not be contained. Particularly since the science used to pass the FDA was cherry picked and gamed in a way any judge and jury can see through.

Beekeepers Expect “Worst Year For Bees”

January 21, 2013

Paul Towers


We’re facing the extinction of a species.” That’s what one Midwest-based large-scale commercial beekeeper told me last week at the annual gathering of the American Honey Producers Association (AHPA). And he meant it.

Bee losses have been dramatic, especially in recent years. And beekeepers are feeling the sting. According to many who manage hives, commercial beekeeping won’t pencil out in the future unless things change, and soon.

Beekeepers from across the country gathered in San Diego to swap stories and share best practices in the trade, as well as to learn more about the latest research on declines in bee populations (often referred to as Colony Collapse Disorder). Independent science continues to point to pesticides as one of the critical co-factors in bee losses — alongside nutrition and disease — and beekeepers continue to see major declines. And these losses parallel the ongoing increase in pesticide products used on seeds and in fields across the country.

As one beekeeper told me, “On average, 40% over-wintering losses across the country. That’s what we’re facing. And my losses are closer to 70% — this is likely gonna be the worst year for bees.”

But it isn’t just this year; USDA reports major bee population declines since 2006. Another beekeeper told me he lost over $250,000 in honey business last year alone, and he’s no longer pollinating melon and cherries. As he reminded me, this not only has direct impacts on him, but his employees, their communities, suppliers, vendors, the food system and agricultural economy.

Pesticide industry, front & center

Workshops on pesticides were more common than ever at this annual AHPA conference, as evidence mounts showing pesticides to be a key catalyst in bee declines. And representatives from chemical giants like Arysta, Bayer and Monsanto made their presence known, even hosting workshops to pacify concerned beekeepers.

These corporations have a lot at stake. With the market becoming increasingly consolidated, just a few companies manufacture many of the same seeds and pesticides implicated in honey bee losses. If history is any guide, these corporations will likely continue to object to finding healthy, sustainable and commonsense solutions to bee declines.

Toward commonsense solutions

By the end of the conference, several themes had emerged. Beekeepers, and the farmers they work with, don’t have the necessary support from state and federal officials to protect pollinators and maintain productive businesses. They feel victim to a handful of powerful pesticide corporations and lax government regulators.

In order to support healthy pollinators, several beekeepers suggested the following:

  • Reduce pesticide use, especially near bees. With the weight of the evidence behind them, beekeepers are encouraging reductions in pesticide use, including the use of products like neonicotinoids and fungicides, and especially near bees.
  • Fix the system that tracks bee incidents. Beekeepers find it burdensome and ineffective to report pesticide-related bee kills, as the onus is often placed on them, and many states have failed to create systems for monitoring bee kills.
  • Create transparent state and federal systems for tracking pesticide use. Beekeepers, like rural and farm worker communities, are best served by knowing what’s being used near them, including amount, type and weather conditions. The federal government and most states — except for California, New York and Oregon— have failed to create a meaningful pesticide use tracking program.
Some beekeepers have taken matters into their own hands, forming the National Pollinator Defense Fund. With a commitment to protecting bees and their livelihood, this new band of beekeepers will “defend managed and native pollinators vital to a sustainable and affordable food supply from the adverse impacts of pesticides.”

No doubt it will take all of us to make sure they are successful, and to ensure we will have healthy bees and beekeepers for years to come.

Massive Gas Supply Around Modern Galaxies





 This is a neat solution to the problem and provides important data. In my cloud cosmology, what is produced is hydrogen and only hydrogen and all else is a product of star formation. It is worthwhile to know that we have a natural and continuing balance of mass between the galaxy and the surrounding envelop which is real is itself as an artifact of the gravitational fields. It is plausible to posit an internal steady state of star creation and star destruction for every individual galaxy with little at play between galaxies.

Not enough though to make an anti galaxy a good idea though.

At least we now have direct insight into the make up of all that gas.

Notre Dame astronomers find massive supply of gas around modern galaxies

by Staff Writers

Notre Dame IN (SPX) Jan 16, 2013



Galaxies have a voracious appetite for fuel - in this case, fresh gas - but astronomers have had difficulty finding the pristine gas that should be falling onto galaxies. Now, scientists have provided direct empirical evidence for these gas flows using new observations from the Hubble Space Telescope.

The team led by Nicolas Lehner, research associate professor at the University of Notre Dame, is presenting its work at the meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Long Beach, Calif.

The team's observations using Hubble's two ultraviolet spectrographs, the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph and the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph, show large quantities of cool gas with very low quantities of heavy elements in the gaseous cocoons surrounding modern galaxies.

The lack of heavy elements indicates this gas in the circumgalactic medium of the galaxies has not been strongly processed through stars. The members' work, "The Bimodal Metallicity Distribution of the Cool Circumgalactic Medium at z<1 astrophysical="astrophysical" been="been" has="has" i="i" journal.="journal." submitted="submitted" the="the" to="to">

Led by Lehner, the team of astronomers identified gaseous streams near galaxies through the absorption they imprint on the spectra of distant, bright background quasars. The atoms in the gas remove small amounts of the light, and as the light from the quasars passes through the gas around galaxies, the chemical elements leave characteristic spectral "fingerprints" that allow astronomers to study the physical and chemical properties of the gas.

Lehner and collaborators searched for the signature of gas within about 100,000-300,000 light-years of galaxies, identifying this gas due to its strong hydrogen absorption, a known signature of circumgalactic gas.

They subsequently determined the amount of "metals" - all elements heavier than hydrogen and helium - in this gas to test whether the circumgalactic matter was being newly accreted from intergalactic space and lacking in metals or being ejected from the galaxies themselves and strong in metals.


"Astronomers have been searching for this infalling gas for a while," notes Lehner. "However, due to observational limitations, they had to search for metal-poor gas using the metals themselves. Since there is a tiny amount of metals in this gas, it was difficult to find in that way."

The new work uses ultraviolet spectroscopy to identify the gas through its hydrogen absorption, which is independent of the metal content. This has allowed the team for the first time to determine how heavy elements are distributed around galaxies in an unbiased manner.

Lehner and colleagues estimated the amount of metals in the circumgalactic medium of galaxies over the last six billion years. They found that the distribution of heavy elements abundances in circumgalactic gas has two different characteristic values, around 2 percent and 40 percent of the heavy element content of the sun. Both branches of the metal abundance distribution have a nearly equal number of gas clouds.

Meanwhile, the circumgalactic gas probed in this study was also found to have a mass comparable to that of all the gas within the galaxies themselves, thus providing a substantial reservoir for fueling continued star formation in modern galaxies.

This study confirms the earlier finding by the same team that metal-enriched gas is widespread even far from the galaxies themselves, likely sent there by strong outflows driven by supernovae. The metal-rich gas likely traces winds and recycled gas from outflows and galaxy interactions.

The metal-poor gas is in quantities of metals too low to trace even in very low-metallicity galaxies that are six billion years old or older. It very likely traces cold streams onto galaxies; its properties are in very good agreement with those seen in the computer simulations of galaxy formation and evolution.

"One of the big questions remaining from our study is what types of galaxies are associated with these gas clouds," remarks Lehner. The luminous components of most of the galaxies in the current study have not yet been identified. This team will use the Large Binocular Telescope, Keck and other ground-based telescopes to reveal the nature of the galaxies.

"Independent of the interpretation, our findings place new constraints on our understanding of how elements are distributed around galaxies," Lehner concludes. "There is not only a large mass of metal-rich gas around galaxies in the modern-day universe, but also a significant mass of metal-poor gas that may become available for star formation." This new work also implies the more diffuse intergalactic medium far from galaxies in the modern universe may be far more metal deficient than previously thought.

This research has been funded by NASA and the National Science Foundation, and has made use of the Hubble, Keck and Magellan telescopes. Co-authors include J. Christopher Howk from Notre Dame; Todd Tripp from the University of Massachusetts; Jason Tumlinson from the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI); J. Xavier Prochaska from the University of California, Santa Cruz; John O'Meara from St. Michael's College; Chris Thom from STScI; Jess Werk from the University of

Giant Squid Poses




Back in the sixties, the existence of the Giant Squid was actively challenged by academe in much the same way that Bigfoot is today. The arrival of a body finally ended that debate. Unsurprisingly, getting a picture is a huge challenge and this item retells just how difficult it was. We can expect as much for any large creature out there, all of whom must be naturally shy.

DNA work is now ending the Bigfoot story and someday soon we will have extensive film work with a Bigfoot family performing on camera. All the signs are there to suggest that this will be possible. I think that they will respond well to seeing themselves on camera.

At least we are \well begun in capturing images from the deep.

Giant Squid Filmed in Ocean Depths for 1st Time


By MALCOLM FOSTER Associated Press

TOKYO January 9, 2013 (AP)



After a hundred dives deep into the Pacific, scientists and broadcasters say they have captured video images of a giant squid in its natural habitat deep in the ocean for the first time.

The three-meter (nine-foot) invertebrate was filmed from a manned submersible during one of 100 dives in the Pacific last summer in a joint expedition by Japanese public broadcaster NHK, Discovery Channel and Japan's National Museum of Nature and Science.

NHK released photographs of the giant squid this week ahead of Sunday's show about the encounter. The Discovery Channel will air its program on Jan. 27.

The squid, which was inexplicably missing its two longest tentacles, was spotted in waters east of Chichi Island about 1,000 kilometers (600 miles) south of Tokyo, NHK said. The crew followed it to a depth of 900 meters (2,950 feet).

Little is known about the creature because its harsh environment makes it difficult for scientists to conduct research. Specimens have washed ashore on beaches but never before have been filmed in their normal habitat deep in the ocean, researchers say.

Japanese zoologist Tsunemi Kubodera, who was on board the submersible at the time of the encounter, was able to lure the giant squid with a one-meter (three-foot) -long diamond squid.

All the lights from the submersible were turned off while they waited. At a depth of 640 meters (2,100 feet), the giant squid appeared and wrapped its arms around the bait, eating it for over 20 minutes before letting go.

"What we were able to gain from this experience was the moment of the giant squid attacking its prey — we were able record that," said Kubodera, who has been researching the giant squid since 2002.

Other scientists involved in the expedition this summer, which logged 400 hours of dives, were American oceanographer and marine biologists Edith Widder and Steve O'Shea from New Zealand.

NHK said a high-definition camera was developed for the project that could operate deep in the ocean and used a special wavelength of light invisible to the giant squid's sensitive eyes.

Kubodera said scientific research, technology and the right lure all came together to make the encounter possible, and that this case will shed more light on deep-sea creatures going forward.

After more than a decade of going out to sea in search of the giant squid, he relished the moment he came face-to-face with it.

"It appeared only once, out of 100 dives. So perhaps, after over 10 years of some kind of relationship I've built with the giant squids, I feel, perhaps, it was the squid that came to see me."

Mondragon





 Here is a glimpse of the world's most successful coop system and the nature of its access to capital. Imagine it also using its own bank to support local government structures as well. That is what I have envisaged to expand the human endeavor across the planet.

Much of what I have understood has already been evolved here and certainly needs to be replicated. Do notice that all this is immune to external financial manipulation as it is based on the credit and good faith of the whole active population. With 100,000 employed today, it is clear that well over 250,000 are participating fully in this enterprise. Besides it is also an engine for local growth and has made it all work.

Also notice just how naturally flexible this setup has to be. It soon has ample internal capital to launch a new enterprise and ample internal human resources to make anything succeed. It is also continuing to grow.

What is key is that it accesses manpower and preserves that access. This is what is fundamentally flawed about industrial agriculture. Manpower unavailability restricts you to a capital model and huge fields while giving up all other prospective opportunities. This is a terrible vulnerability that must fail as this type of regime is established.

Please note that this has grown steadily for seventy years and will continue to grow for thousands of years because it naturally grabs the talent. You are looking at our real future.

A Timely Visit to Mondragon

November 4, 2009 by Phyllis Robinson

The following article was written by Aaron Dawson, Equal Exchange Customer Service Manager and former Worker-Owner Coordinator.



It seems somewhat ironic that exactly a week after I return from my St. Mary’s Master of Management – Cooperatives and Credit Unions study tour of Mondragon, Spain, where the world’s largest formalized network of worker co-ops lives, the United Steelworkers announced their collaboration with Mondragon to develop and grow manufacturing worker co-ops in the U.S. & Canada (click here to visit that announcement from the United Steelworkers Union). Had I known this announcement was coming, maybe I could have just waited a couple years and visited a Mondragon co-op somewhere in the U.S.

But let’s back up a little and ask: Why is the fact that some Spanish company is opening manufacturing plants here in the U.S. so exciting? Well, for one, we could certainly use more manufacturing jobs, but that’s just the beginning. Mondragon is exciting because it is such a large and complex network of worker-owned businesses, ranging from worker-owned auto parts manufacturing plants, worker-owned kitchen appliance manufacturing plants, worker-owned and consumer-owned grocery stores, worker-owned credit unions and even a worker-owned University where professors and university workers own the University.

What is also amazing about Mondragon is its history. The worker co-ops were started by a young priest, Don Jose Maria Arizmendiarrieta, who came to Mondragon in 1941. At that time, Mondragon was one of the most economically depressed areas in the Basque region of Spain. Soon after his arrival, he organized the community to help fund a democratically structured Polytechnic school to teach young people both the skills they needed to get work, as well as teaching them the overall dignity of their labor. Shortly after the opening of the school, a few of his early graduates found that working in a traditionally structured company was not enough. They wanted to work in a company that placed value on their labor above all else, empowered workers to not only share in the profits of the company they worked for, but also share in the decision making as well. Thus, five of the early graduates, with Don Jose Maria’s guidance and again, the financial help of community members, purchased a small factory, hired worker-owners and started manufacturing and selling small ovens. Soon after, again with the guidance of Don Jose Maria, a credit union was formed to help fuel the rest of Mondragon’s growth.

From these humble beginnings, we now have a co-operative network that has a total of $49.5 billion, with over 70,000 worker-owners and 92.3% of the share capital coming from those same worker-owners. Along with the types of organizations listed above, they also have a worker-owned insurance co-op, research and design co-ops and worker-owned distribution co-ops. On top of this, every co-op in Mondragon invests 10% of their profits toward the research and design for new products and services. Two percent of each co-op’s profits goes towards a solidarity fund for individual co-ops who may be struggling and need assistance. When looking at Mondragon 50 years later, we can see not only a powerful co-operative network, but also an area that, through Don Jose Maria’s guidance, went from one of the most economically depressed areas in the Basque region to one the biggest employers in the Basque Region. In the end, one could say that Don Jose Maria Arizmendiarrieta accomplished what most community developers can only imagine in their wildest dreams, all through the vehicle of worker-owned co-ops!

So, when the United Steelworkers Union announced that they would be collaborating with Mondragon to create worker-owned manufacturing jobs in the U.S. and Canada, it is an understatement to say that this is very exciting news for the Worker-Owned Co-operative movement in the North America. My own excitement was furthered when I heard that one of the people in attendance (via phone) for that announcement was the head of Mondragon’s America’s Division, Fernando De Landa – Director of International Operations (America), who had spoken to our group just the week before in Mondragon. And although when we met with him, he did not announce this partnership, he did talk a bit about what Mondragon looks for when going into partnership with organizations overseas: organizations that not only are familiar with the local area and the market, but also organizations that match their values. He likened this type of relationship to a marriage, where the matching of values is as important to anything else in making a successful collaboration. 

In my opinion, not only will Mondragon’s decision to collaborate with the United Steelworkers result in good bit of splash, it will also result in a terrific marriage. Mondragon will be working with an organization that has been fighting since 1942 for the right of workers to have such things as collective bargaining, higher wages and paid vacations, and believes that the true value of a product comes from the labor that goes into it. These beliefs are shared by Mondragon, whose new corporate name is, Mondragon: Humanity at Work, and has been striving to empower the worker-owners in its own organization for over fifty years.

The collaboration of these two organizations is a monumental move for both the U.S./Canada labor movements and the U.S./Canada worker co-op movements. Although no specific plans have been laid out as of yet, it is definitely a step in the right direction. Unions will have a chance to innovate the working world once again by actively working with and encouraging a worker-owned model. This partnership will also help shine new light on the successes and benefits of Mondragon and the benefits of the worker co-op model as the labor union movement continues to look for new ways to advance the working conditions and the empowerment of workers in the U.S. and Canada.

For my second post about Mondragon, I would like to talk about the 6th co-operative principle: cooperation among co-operatives. Mondragon has done amazing work with cooperating amongst the different co-ops within their network, but they’ve also faced challenges.

I was blown away by Mondragon’s network of various co-ops. As noted in my previous post, there were worker-owned home appliance and auto parts factories, worker/consumer-owned credit unions, worker/consumer-owned grocery stores, worker-owned universities, to name a few, and they are all working together. The ways that they work together is just as impressive as the variety and types of worker co-ops themselves.

The first and most basic way in which the Mondragon co-operatives cooperate with each other is through the divvying up of each co-op. Below is a chart of how each co-op puts their profits towards the general Mondragon network:

Gross Profits (general funds):

  • 15-20%: the average that goes to the group reserves (most co-ops choose 20%)
  • 10%: goes to Mondragon investment for new products and co-ops
  • 2%: goes to Mondragon education (a.k.a. – Research & Design, Mondragon University)
  • 2%: goes to a general solidarity fund (to cover individual co-ops’ losses)

So, around 34% of an individual co-op’s profits go straight to the Mondragon network to supporting a variety of activities, from growing the reserves, to investing in new products and co-ops, to support education, and even toward a solidarity fund to help co-ops in financial difficulty. Not only does this profit allocation provide a healthy safety net for all of the co-ops, it also helps fund innovation and future projects that allow the co-ops to continue to be profitable and innovative far into the future. This is one very direct way in which all the co-ops in Mondragon cooperate!

There are other ways that co-ops in Mondragon cooperate. Our group took a shopping trip to the Mondragon worker/consumer hybrid super market: Eroski. The particular store we went to can only be compared to a store like Super Walmart or a Super K – it sold groceries, appliances, luggage, clothing, etc., but all of the workers were also owners! On the shelves of the co-op, you could buy products that were manufactured by other Mondragon worker co-ops, like refrigerators and washing machines. The machines were very likely researched and designed by one of the Research & Design co-ops, and the products were transported from the factory to the store by a worker owned transportation co-op. They also had tons of Eroski private labeled items, which came in handy when I had to find some Spanish deodorant with a name I could trust! The point is, this is just one of many examples of how these co-ops, who are distinctly separate in business, are able to work together to create a vibrant co-operative economy.

So with all this cooperation going on, our group was left with the question: “How is Mondragon co-operating with co-operatives outside their network”? In all truth, Mondragon typically teams up with any company in a given area that can best do what Mondragon is looking to do, regardless of their ownership structure. When we asked Jesus Herrasti, who was the former head of Mondragon’s International Division (and current head of Mondragon’s Innovation Park – Garia), about partnering with any co-ops in the United States, he noted that Mondragon had talked with a few co-ops in America, some of them with quite a lot of resources, but in the end, the American co-ops were not able to come up with any projects for collaboration with Mondragon. Herrasti felt that this was the case because co-ops are thinking about their own time, their own stuff – and that co-ops do not trust each other. He noted that often times, in co-op organizations with social missions, you can find that people are very proud and thus the organizations are hard to manage and hard to work with. The point of bringing this up is that we, as a co-op community, have to do better. We need to work together, we need to work with each other in the U.S., and we need to work with large co-ops such as Mondragon in other countries if we are to accomplish our missions!

It is time to put aside our egos and our pride and just do something, together. If unions and worker co-ops can cooperate to build something new (see my first post: A Timely Visit to Mondragon), then it should not be asking too much to expect consumer co-ops and worker co-ops to cooperate, or worker co-ops cooperating with other worker co-ops, or Credit Unions with housing co-ops, etc. The point is, we in the co-op world recognize that we need an alternative model; that much is obvious.

I, personally, also believe that the co-op world has that alternative model to give to the world. So the question is, are we going to be able to work together to build that alternative? I would like to leave off with a quote from Herrasti that highlights what we need to do in cooperating with each other: “We do not need to be something big and fight with capitalism; we just need to create something different.”

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Snowpocalypse Russia





This is an example of how bad the snow can get, yet it is still a rare occurrence. The real take home is that the potential is there always and it cannot be easily predicted, just as hurricane Sandy was an example of a rare confluence of events that just happened to produce a mega storm.

Yet capability needs to be in place should such an event arise. Again it is distributed capability that can move on target when needed. It is no trick to pretrain crews for mobile operations operating 24/7 in an emergency mode with remaining crew doing double shifts back at home. The need for the planning is now clear and I suspect that it is now well established also.

Russia's crews are now been stress tested and will learn. This is as bad as it gets and one needs to known what is important to keep open. Otherwise, everyone is taking a week off whether they like it or not.

Snowpocalypse Russia: 'Snow tsunami' swallows streets, cars, buildings

18 January, 2013, 22:27



Unrelenting snowfalls have caused unprecedented chaos in Russia. Over the past week, the country has seen scores of traffic accidents, flight delays and, in some cases, the complete isolation of some remote settlements and towns.

On Friday, Moscow was on a verge of traffic collapse as more than 10 inches of snow fell on the city, which is more than half of January’s average.

Thousands of passengers were stranded overnight in the capital’s major airports, as several dozen flights were delayed.

Muscovites woke up and found their cars, driveways and houses buried under a thick layer of snow, with city workers unable to get to smaller streets.

Moscow’s Yandex app showed traffic at level 10, the highest possible, as strong winds created blizzard conditions and built imposing snow drifts.

Falling snow and ice caused many accidents due to poor visibility and bad road conditions. Moscow witnessed a 13-kilometer jam on MKAD, one of the city's main highways, reducing speeds to 10 to 25 kph in the capital.

More than 12,000 snow removal trucks worked around-the-clock to clean up the mess, but their efforts did little, with the city coming to an effective standstill.

The chair of the Duma’s transport committee called for local transport officials to face legal sanctions for failing to cope with the winter weather. “Until local bureaucrats face the wrath of the law, winter will always be a surprise occurrence. They will continue to do nothing, as people suffer,” Mikhail Bryachak told Kommersant FM radio.

However, meteorologists have promised some good news for Moscow: The stormy conditions are expected to recede over the weekend.

While the snowstorms have caused inconvenience for large population centers in western Russia, they have been life-threatening further east in the country. The polar circle city of Norilsk has been buried under 10 feet of snow – entire apartment blocks, markets, stores and offices were buried under snow overnight.

Banks of snow were as high as two people put together, reaching the second-story windows of some apartment buildings. Cars, stores, garages were blocked. Norilsk metropolitan workers were forced to dig passageways through the snow banks to create access between the outside world and the barricaded city.

Meanwhile, icicles up to three feet in length have formed off the ledges of buildings, breaking at random and causing a lethal hazard for pedestrians below.

Elsewhere, the extreme weather continues. In the Altai Republic in Western Siberia, 12 Russian settlements were isolated because of the snowstorm. Seven settlements, with a total population of 1,300 people, remain cut off from the outside world due to the snow drifts. Emergency crews are currently en route to deliver needed supplies to the stranded populations.

Snow accompanied by strong winds has caused flight delays in the airport of Russia’s far eastern town of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. The runway has been cleared, but planes are not risking takeoff due to strong sidewinds. Flights were also delayed in Russia’s easternmost cities of Vladivostok and Khabarovsk.

More snow storms are predicted in Western Siberia and the Western Urals over the weekend.

In the end of 2012, Russia saw extreme winter not witnessed since 1938. The coldest-ever December in Russia led to the evacuation of hundreds of people in Siberia, where temperatures fell below -50 degrees Celsius; Moscow also saw its coldest night ever for the season.

More than 90 Russians died during the cold snap, and more than 600 people were taken to hospital due to the extremely dangerous weather, which is 10 degrees below the December norm.

Nearly 200 people have died throughout Russia as a direct result of weather-related accidents and hypothermia this season, according to official statistics, although the extreme conditions have likely contributed to many more fatalities.

Warp Speed: What Hyperspace Would Really Look Like






 All good fun and likely all nonsense. I suspect that FTL travel is possible only using worm hole concepts and that should be safe enough provided one moves to low curvature points to avoid instantaneous acceleration been applied. I am sure there will be other tricky issues as well once the core technology is mastered.

In that scenario, the view would merely change completely. It is likely also that actual movement will be in short hops to have line of sight of any close by objects and it may be more energy efficient.

Warp drive remains a concept unlikely to be competitive with an effective worm hole strategy in the end which I suspect to be practical as more conforming evidence washes up.

Warp Speed: What Hyperspace Would Really Look Like

by Clara Moskowitz, SPACE.com Assistant Managing Editor

Date: 15 January 2013 Time: 11:54 AM ET



The science fiction vision of stars flashing by as streaks when spaceships travel faster than light isn't what the scene would actually look like, a team of physics students says.

Instead, the view out the windows of a vehicle traveling through hyperspace would be more like a centralized bright glow, calculations show.

The finding contradicts the familiar images of stretched out starlight streaking past the windows of the Millennium Falcon in "Star Wars" and the Starship Enterprise in "Star Trek." In those films and television series, as spaceships engage warp drive or hyperdrive and approach the speed of light, stars morph from points of light to long streaks that stretch out past the ship.

But passengers on the Millennium Falcon or the Enterprise actually wouldn't be able to see stars at all when traveling that fast, found a group of physics Masters students at England's University of Leicester. Rather, a phenomenon called the Doppler Effect, which affects the wavelength of radiation from moving sources, would cause stars' light to shift out of the visible spectrum and into the X-ray range, where human eyes wouldn't be able to see it, the students found.

"The resultant effects we worked out were based on Einstein's theory of Special Relativity, so while we may not be used to them in our daily lives, Han Solo and his crew should certainly understand its implications," Leicester student Joshua Argyle said in a statement.

The Doppler Effect is the reason why an ambulance's siren sounds higher pitched when it's coming at you compared to when it's moving away — the sound's frequency becomes higher, making its wavelength shorter, and changing its pitch.

The same thing would happen to the light of stars when a spaceship began to move toward them at significant speed. And other light, such as the pervasive glow of the universe called the cosmic microwave background radiation, which is left over from the Big Bang, would be shifted out of the microwave range and into the visible spectrum, the students found.

"If the Millennium Falcon existed and really could travel that fast, sunglasses would certainly be advisable," said research team member Riley Connors. "On top of this, the ship would need something to protect the crew from harmful X-ray radiation."

The increased X-ray radiation from shifted starlight would even push back on a spaceship traveling in hyperdrive, the team found, slowing down the vehicle with a pressure similar to the force felt at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean. In fact, such a spacecraft would need to carry extra energy reserves to counter this pressure and press ahead.

Whether the scientific reality of these effects will be taken into consideration on future Star Wars films is still an open question.

"Perhaps Disney should take the physical implications of such high speed travel into account in their forthcoming films," said team member Katie Dexter.

Connors, Dexter, Argyle, and fourth team member Cameron Scoular published their findings in this year's issue of the University of Leicester's Journal of Physics Special Topics.

Editor's Note: This article was updated to correct the following error: As an ambulance moves closer to an observer, its wavelength becomes shorter, not longer.

Largest Structure in Universe Discovered?




Let us try something else. Quasars are way closer to us than we have imagined and may actually be in our own galaxy. I have good reason to think this anyway as the present theory depends on the extreme red shifts exhibited for which present day astronomy accepts only one explanation.
We do that and it is a simple star cluster that is much the same age and has entered the Quasar Stage close together. This obviously changes the whole picture and demands an independent explanation for the spectrum and the red shift. I can actually do this easily but will leave it for the time been. It flows naturally from understanding the implications of the higher order metrics I introduced in 2910 in my paper in AIP's Physics Essays and the derivative Cloud Cosmology unpublished as yet.
The only other large groups out there are in fact local star clusters, so it is completely reasonable to assert that they are the same thing.


Largest Structure in Universe Discovered

By Mike Wall | SPACE.com – Fri, 11 Jan, 2013

Astronomers have discovered the largest known structure in the universe, a clump of active galactic cores that stretches 4 billion light-years from end to end.

The structure is a large quasar group (LQG), a collection of extremely luminous galactic nuclei powered by supermassive central black holes. This particular group is so large that it challenges modern cosmological theory, researchers said.

"While it is difficult to fathom the scale of this LQG, we can say quite definitely it is the largest structure ever seen in the entire universe," lead author Roger Clowes, of the University of Central Lancashire in England, said in a statement. "This is hugely exciting, not least because it runs counter to our current understanding of the scale of the universe."

Quasars are the brightest objects in the universe. For decades, astronomers have known that they tend to assemble in huge groups, some of which are more than 600 million light-years wide.

But the record-breaking quasar group, which Clowes and his team spotted in data gathered by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, is on another scale altogether. The newfound LQC is composed of 73 quasars and spans about 1.6 billion light-years in most directions, though it is 4 billion light-years across at its widest point.

To put that mind-boggling size into perspective, the disk of the Milky Way galaxy — home of Earth's solar system — is about 100,000 light-years wide. And the Milky Way is separated from its nearest galactic neighbor, Andromeda, by about 2.5 million light-years.

The newly discovered LQC is so enormous, in fact, that theory predicts it shouldn't exist, researchers said. The quasar group appears to violate a widely accepted assumption known as the cosmological principle, which holds that the universe is essentially homogeneous when viewed at a sufficiently large scale.

Calculations suggest that structures larger than about 1.2 billion light-years should not exist, researchers said.

"Our team has been looking at similar cases which add further weight to this challenge, and we will be continuing to investigate these fascinating phenomena," Clowes said.

The new study was published today (Jan. 11) in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Capitalism Imbalance and Resolutions




What is destroying capitalism is its penchant for gaming monopolies and stifling competition and innovation. The expedient of setting the tax universe to powerfully over tax the cost of capital for the capital rich is likely able to end this abuse.

Recall that large capital accesses cheaper money than a small dynamic growing business. It is no trick to establish the cost of capital and to then tax away the advantage. It is not particularly onerous, but assembling for the sake of assembling becomes unattractive and will only be driven then by specific business rationalization.

Such a formula would quickly see the too big to fail enterprises unwind in a hurry when their smaller competitors have a few hundred extra basis points to work with.

The real problem of capital has been the simple access to capital which has been rationed by the King to his buddies. Micro banking has shown us that there are alternatives that work and empower.

If the entire population is a natural member of an economic cooperative whose size is not in excess of 200 individuals and has access to sufficient capital to prosper with lending managed by a group of internal peers, then it is reasonable that all these issues will in time resolve simply because we have a working balance.

Is There an Alternative for Capitalist Economics and Politics? Richard Wolff Says Yes

Tuesday, 08 January 2013 09:18


"Imagine a country where the majority of the population reaps the majority of the benefits for their hard work, creative ingenuity and collaborative efforts. Imagine a country where corporate losses aren't socialized, while gains are captured by an exclusive minority. Imagine a country run as a democracy, from the bottom up, not a plutocracy from the top down. Richard Wolff not only imagines it, but in his compelling, captivating and stunningly reasoned new book, Democracy at Work, he details how we get there from here - and why we absolutely must."

-- Nomi Prins, Author of It Takes a Pillage and Black Tuesday

Few are better equipped than economist Richard Wolff, professor emeritus at the University of Massachusetts, to address the massive failings and inequalities of capitalism as he does in his latest book, Democracy at Work: A Cure for Capitalism.

He also describes Workers' Self-Directed Enterprises (WSDEs) as an alternative to the capitalism that broke the US economy and has resulted in massive economic redistribution to the ruling elites.

Mark Karlin: In your book, what is the distinction between capitalism and welfare state capitalism?

Richard Wolff: Capitalism, like all other economic systems, displays a variety of forms. There are, for example, largely private, laissez-faire kinds of capitalism that differ in many ways from forms of capitalism in which the state plays more significant roles, such as market regulator or social welfare guarantor (as in "state welfare capitalism"), or as a close partner of capitalists as in fascism. What remains the same across all such forms - why they all deserve the label "capitalist" - is the exclusion of the mass of workers that produces the output and generates the profits from receiving and distributing that profit, and from generally participating democratically in enterprise decisions. Capitalism excludes workers from deciding what is produced, how it is produced, where it is produced and how profits are to be used and distributed. Democracy at Work is a critique and alternative aimed at changing that exclusion shared by all these forms of capitalism.

Mark Karlin: In that regard, what do you think about the contention that FDR was not at all an opponent of capitalism, but simply saw that some government intervention was necessary in the US economy in order to save capitalism during the depression of the '30s?

Richard Wolff: What FDR saw was the political might of the coalition of unionists (galvanized by the CIO in the middle 1930's), socialist and communist parties demanding that government not only bail out the banks and corporations, but also directly help the mass of people suffering the Great Depression. Elements within that coalition threatened that Washington's failure to respond to do so would turn many millions of US citizens against capitalism. FDR got the message and crafted a deal in response. The government would both tax and borrow from corporations and the rich to fund the new Social Security system, national unemployment insurance, and a vast program of federal hiring. In return, the coalition would downplay its anti-capitalism and celebrate instead the achievement of a welfare state type of capitalism. The coalition mostly accepted this New Deal. FDR went on to win four consecutive presidential elections making him the most popular president in US history. The New Deal saved the capitalist system by changing its form from a relatively more laissez-faire [form]to a welfare-type state.

Mark Karlin: Before the recent crash, what was the capitalist crisis from above and below that you describe in the book?

Richard Wolff: The crisis from above refers to the speculative mania indulged by the small minority of people (major holders of corporate securities, boards of directors, their professional staffs, etc.) who gathered increasing profits into their hands as wages stagnated after the mid-1970s. Financial enterprises competed for the funds accumulating in this minority's hands by taking ever-greater risks with old and new (e.g. asset-backed securities, credit default swaps, etc.) financial instruments. Another in the long history of capitalist speculative manias built a bubble on the back of the rising debt of the US working class. When the latter's debt burden could no longer be serviced, the bubble burst, adding the crisis from above to that built from below by the lethal mixture of stagnant wages and rising debts.

Mark Karlin: How does the distribution of surpluses in revenue (profits) in business enterprises affect the economic structure of a society?

Richard Wolff: The surplus generated by enterprises - the excess of revenue from commodity sales over the direct costs of producing those commodities - is what capitalists receive and control in capitalist economies. They then distribute those surpluses as they see fit to reproduce the system in which they occupy such exalted positions. Thus, for example, they distribute some of the surplus to top corporate officials (shaping the distribution of income and wealth in capitalist societies), some to moving production abroad if, when and where that might generate larger surpluses (producing unemployment at home and growth abroad), some to donations to politicians and parties to shape and control political decisions to serve their needs, and so on. The distribution of the surplus is thus a major shaper of how our society works, how we all live.

Mark Karlin: During the last few years, particularly during and after the Occupy movement, many of the masters of the universe on Wall Street trumpeted their alleged intellectual capital, as if capitalism was equal to being the smartest guys on the block. In this bragging rights boasting, it can be inferred that workers are interchangeable parts of a machine and should be grateful to those with "intellectual capital." How do you respond to that claim?

Richard Wolff: Intellectual capital is just the latest name for an old idea that has long been recognized as a crucial part of production. In the past, other names included "know how" and "technology" and "expertise." The basic idea was that in addition to the tools, equipment, machines and raw materials that go into production, and in addition to the muscles and energy people contribute to production, there is the mental capacity to think, to adjust behavior, to invent new things and new ways of working - that is also crucial to production. To build that "intellectual capital" is one purpose of schooling. Of course, everyone in the production process can bring his or her intellectual capital into the production process if that process is organized to welcome, recognize, reward and stimulate that. When people suggest that only executives or financiers have or apply "intellectual capital," that is one sure way to discourage and reduce the application of workers' intellectual capital to production.

Mark Karlin: Refreshingly, you offer a key alternative to capitalism in decline. You promote Workers' Self-Directed Enterprises (WSDE) in Part III of your book. What would be a succinct description of a WSDE?

Richard Wolff: Quite simply, a WSDE entails the workers who make whatever a corporation sells also functioning - collectively and democratically - as their own board of directors. WSDEs thereby abolish the capitalist differentiation and opposition of surplus producers versus surplus appropriators. Instead, the workers themselves cooperatively run their own enterprise, thereby bringing democracy inside the enterprise where capitalism had long excluded it.

Mark Karlin: In your sixth chapter, you contrast WSDEs with worker-owned enterprises, worker-managed enterprises and cooperatives. What are the primary differences?

Richard Wolff: Workers have a long history of multiple kinds of cooperatives. That is, workers can cooperatively own (e.g. their pension fund holds shares in the company that employs them), buy (e.g. the many food coops around the country), sell (e.g. grape growers who combine to market their outputs), and manage (e.g. workers take turns supervising themselves). All such cooperatives can and often do co-exist with a capitalist organization of production in the precise sense of workers being excluded from the decisions of what, how and where to produce and what to do with the profits. What makes WSDEs unique is precisely that they are about cooperative production, about ending the capitalist division of producers from appropriators of the surplus, and replacing it with democratic cooperative decisions governing production and the social use of its fruits.

Mark Karlin: Where does the much-celebrated (and world's largest) Mondragon cooperative model fit in with your vision of WSDEs?

Richard Wolff: Mondragon is the world's largest and perhaps most successful example of WSDEs' successful growth in competition with conventional capitalist enterprises. Begun in 1956 with six workers organized into a cooperative enterprise by a Spanish priest, the Mondragon Cooperative Corporation (MCC) now employs over 100,000 workers, is the largest corporation in the Basque part of Spain and the tenth largest corporation in all of Spain. It has extensive research and development labs generating new ways to produce new products and maintains its own university to train its workers and interested others in all the ways of running and building democratically cooperative enterprises. MCC is thus a remarkable testimony to the contemporary viability and strength of non-capitalist production systems.

Mark Karlin: I recently asked this question in another interview on labor and economics and received an answer that amounted to a sigh. Although there is definitely a growing cooperative movement in the United States, it is still struggling. What will be the tipping point that will persuade US workers that WSDEs are preferable to the current managerial capitalist system? So many workers in the US have been brainwashed that any alternative to capitalism is satanic and communist. How does an idea like WSDEs change from an intellectual concept to a grassroots labor movement?

Richard Wolff: As has happened often in human history, what provokes change is less any clear vision of where we go next and more the intolerability of where we are. Capitalism is no longer "delivering the goods" for most people. The circle of its beneficiaries grows smaller and richer and more out of touch with the mass of people than ever. In the US, this is particularly problematic because the rationale of US capitalism has long been its creating and sustenance of a vast "middle class." As capitalism's evolution destroys that middle class, it opens the space in minds and hearts to inquire after alternatives to an increasingly unacceptable system. WSDEs offer precisely that. Nothing better illustrates that growing interest than the fact that Democracy at Work is going into a second printing three months after it was first published.

Mark Karlin: Republicans and Democrats both tout the alleged benefits of free trade agreements, despite their lack of adequate support for labor rights and worker remuneration. One thing that free trade advocates claim is that by moving to lower-cost labor, products will be cheaper in the US. While this may be true in some cases, this hardly appears to be the case in name brand products (particularly clothes) and trendy hi-tech products such as Apple. For instance, I went to a retail store and looked at items made by Calvin Klein, Nautica, and IZOD. Not one of the items, not one, was made in the United States. Most were made in China and Southeast Asia. Supposing we assume a worker who gets a few dollars a day produces a Nautica polo shirt for $1. Add the costs of material and equipment and maybe we get to $3. Add management and shipping and maybe we get to $5 per shirt, maybe. But the retail price on upper end brand name polo shirts could be as much as $70. So the shirt is not less expensive; the company is just making a greater profit off of exploited labor overseas. Is that correct?

Richard Wolff: When US corporations producing for the US market move existing (or open new) production facilities overseas, their usual goal is more profits. They relocate to exploit cheaper labor, lax environmental rules, lower taxes, etc. If they lowered their prices, then the cheaper labor, lax rules, and lower taxes would raise their profits less or not at all. So they rarely drop prices much when they move and then only temporarily to gain market share (thereby pressuring competitors to similarly relocate). Of course, relocating corporations could choose to lower their prices, but profit considerations usually render that a last resort. Finally, corporations in lower-cost overseas locations can usually more easily manage competition among themselves than they do in the US (because local rules against monopoly are less effective and relatively low-cost bribes are more effective).