Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Obama's First Blunder

The US government cannot hire everyone with a minimum wage job and expect any success. Russia tried it for seventy years and it did not work. The first round of stimulus prevented a total implosion of the banking system. This second round is merely a flushing of cash into government programs and fixes little. It does not restore the collapsed credit system.

Firstly, the US government must intervene to rewrite all outstanding mortgage contracts to properly release and restore credit to the credit users. Left to themselves, everyone will sooner or later be forced to walk away from their own mortgage. There is just too big an overhang to possibly be absorbed by normal market turnover. The current contract structure will simply grind the market down to levels were the underlying land value will be zero and the house value will be the cost of construction, depreciated and deflated to meet current construction costs. And no one, including you will have any credit whatsoever.

I have explained that a fifty percent take back formula will immediately put a floor under all this real estate and generate a land rush that drives prices back up while restoring credit to millions. It will be also the cheapest solution and possibly the most profitable if anyone wishes to listen. It will end the USA part of this global crisis.

In the meantime, we also have to try to help the Europeans to fix their disaster. Their problem is a surfeit of fraudulent US investments manufactured in New York. First, it must be disclosed and quantified. Then a work out has to be put in place that allows the banks to stay in business. A huge amount of depositor’s capital is now frozen because they financed funny paper unbeknownst to themselves.

I also do not know if the insurance industry is still solvent. Their silence is astounding and a lot of their stuff will take a long time to sort out because they have to rematch their books. You simply do not wake up in the morning and find that the world’s largest banks have disappeared and not be badly damaged. The problem is that it takes a long time to for these folks to determine the losses as many assets are illiquid to begin with and the globe is in the middle of an asset repricing binge.

Right now, it is desperately necessary to rewrite the mortgage contracts and underwrite the program. Otherwise, inaction will bring on the second great depression as everyone loses all credit. That is why stocks are in persistent decline.

The stimulus package is a frothy distraction driven by a sudden enthusiasm to throw money at the problem instead of moving to end the whole problem. The Japanese tried it for ten years until they finally did the right thing. Already two months of this is enough.


February 20, 2009

The Market Is Shorting Obama's 'Stimulus'
By George Bittlingmayer & Thomas W. Hazlett

President Barack Obama’s “stimulus” plan invokes the 1930s fiscal strategy put forward by British economist John Maynard Keynes, who saw capitalism as pretty much spent. Having exhausted their store of innovative ideas, investors curled up. Workers lost jobs, spent less, and sent still other workers walking. Budget deficits – government spending without taxes to “pay as you go” - would pull unemployed workers off the street and arrest the downward spiral. Investors’ “animal spirits” would be calmed, new capital risked, and economic vitality restored.

So the Obama theory – government spending is stimulus. If so, financial markets should feel the love. The U.S. budget is awash in red ink, and $800 billion more of it should easily move the needle on our economic prospects. Indeed it has – in the wrong direction. Financial markets don’t want more government debt or a scramble for “shovel-ready” spending projects. They want the skeletons in the banking sector’s closet exposed and expunged.

The Bush Economy went up in smoke in September-October 2008. The financial meltdown hit Wall Street, devastating bank equities and laying waste to America’s 401-Ks. The Republican ticket, McCain-Palin, was a 50-50 bet on Sept. 15; by Oct. 15 it was a 5-1 long-shot. Voters saw the carnage: the Dow Jones Index lost 17% of its value from Sept. 2 through Nov. 3. In a flash, Americans lost years of toil, and Republicans the election. Decisively.

The election marked a turning point. Investors looked forward to the economic policies crafted by Democrats in Congress and the White House. More pointedly, they wanted decisive, well-crafted action on the banking crisis. Hence the Dow soared 6.5% Nov. 21 on news that Timothy Geithner, the highly-respected head of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, was Obama’s pick for Treasury Secretary.

Yet, from Nov. 4, 2008 through Feb. 12, 2009, the DJI overall fell 18% -- a larger drop than during the Sept-Oct plunge. In January, when the Obama plan, promising far greater deficits than the two much smaller “emergency stimulus” plans signed by Pres. George W. Bush in 2008, was unveiled, the market tanked – the worst January performance in 113 years.

More pointedly, key political victories for the Team Obama spending plan have not been viewed as buying opportunities on Wall Street. A string of negative market reactions began with the December 18 announcement of a stimulus bill of $700 billion (Dow down 2.5%), continued with the January 7 announcement that the actual plan would be “on the high side” (-2.7%) and continued with last week’s 61-36 Senate vote supporting the Administration’s fiscal plan. The White House victory and the new bank bail-out plan announced the following day by Treasury Secretary Geithner were met with a 5% wipe-out in the DJI, and a decline in Treasury bond yields, indicating a “flight to quality.”

There are many problems with Keynes’ “stagnationist thesis,” as Joseph Schumpeter called it, not the least of which is that it didn’t test so well when applied by New Dealers. U.S. unemployment was perniciously high throughout the 1930s, peaking at 25% in 1933 but still over 17% in 1939.

Many claim that World War II brought us out of the Great Depression, but the lesson to be learned is still being debated. Federal budget deficits soared (reaching 26.5 % of GDP in 1942 as calculated by Harvard economist Robert Barro), providing Keynesians an argument for spending as stimulus. But WWII also brought a profound shift in the New Deal’s regulatory policies. Attorney General Thurman Arnold’s vigorous campaign to break-up “the bottlenecks of business” in major industries like steel, chemicals and electrical equipment was shuttered, and America’s largest corporations enjoyed a respite from threats of dismemberment (Arnold was kicked upstairs to a judgeship). As Thomas K. McCraw writes in his superlative Schumpeter biography, “Under the life-and-death pressure of war mobilization… the Roosevelt Administration, which had been hostile toward alleged monopolies, now decided that big business must lead in the job that had to be done.”

The only thing guaranteed by the spending stimulus is more national debt. One stroke of the presidential pen has now increased it by $800 billion. Democrats recently screamed about W-era profligacy. On July 28, 2008, Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND), Chair of the Senate Budget Committee declared, "If they gave out Olympic medals for fiscal irresponsibility, President Bush would take the gold, silver and bronze. With his eight years in office, he will have had the five highest deficits ever recorded. And the highest of those deficits is now projected to come in 2009, as he leaves office."

Kent Conrad was right. The projected 2009 deficit then stood at $482 billion. In January it was forecast by the Congressional Budget Office at $1.2 trillion. Pres. Obama’s new plan now ups that to $1.7 trillion. If W got the gold, the new Administration has landed the Platinum in just its qualifying heat.

If historic U.S. budget deficits are any indication, the economy is already “stimulated.” The predicted 2009 federal deficit stood at 8.3% of GDP before Obama’s package sent it to about 12%. This is a stunning level of debt, double the previous post WWII high when Reagan’s 1983 budget deficit amounted to 6% of GDP. That time around, the 10.8% unemployment rate, the worst since the Great Depression, was soon reversed.

Keynesians claim that the Reagan boom was an outcome of just this deficit strategy; for sake of argument, let us assume the Keynesian position. Reagan’s budget deficit, half the size of Obama’s as a fraction of GDP, was able to pull the economy out of an unemployment trough deeper than the 7.6% hole we’re in today.

How do economists know that, while a deficit amounting to 6% of GDP budget was sufficient to spur the economy back to health in 1983, it will take more than twice that federal borrowing to do the same now? They don’t. Economic models are all over the place in their projections. Indeed, Prof. Barro’s cutting edge analysis of fiscal policy finds no historical stimulus from peacetime deficits. Of course, we’ve never seen so massive a deficit – one that would bar the U.S. from membership in the European Union, on grounds that our government finances are a mess -- and so we lack empirical evidence to inform the precise experiment we’re running today.

We do, however, know the accounting trends: our government faces massive new spending increases as Baby Boomers retire and their Social Security and Medicare bills come due. Market investors are wary of new spending, guaranteeing either future tax increases or inflation, as a run-up to the demographically guaranteed spending spiral. The quest for “shovel-ready” projects makes one think, Where’s Senator Ted Stevens when we need him? In any event, this fiscal bridge to nowhere is not spurring markets.

Government deficits are nonetheless being sold as doctor’s orders, an elixir that – while it looks ugly and tastes bitter – will propel us back to economic health. Yet the best forecast currently on the table is the one made by investors risking their own money. They are shorting the “stimulus.”

George Bittlingmayer is the Wagnon Professor of Finance at the University of Kansas. Thomas Hazlett is Professor of Law & Economics at George Mason University.

Comet Lulin Shines Tonight

My chances of spotting comet Lulin went to zero tonight with the advent of a rainstorm eliminating any possible viewing conditions. However, we have this picture from the Swift satellite and the related story to make up for it.

I also noticed from the map log of my readers that there was a lot of interest and that google found my site helping folks locate Lulin from the story I posted some weeks back. By the way this blog is clocking around 400 readers every day which is not bad at all from a blog whose subject matter palette is eccentric to say the least. Anyway it is nice to see a response passing through the readership for an event like this.

I need to pay more attention to events like this and do welcome tips. I am not planning to become a day log of news traffic since there is plenty of that, but I like to catch stuff that I care about sooner than later.

NASA's Swift Spies Comet Lulin

http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/NASA_Swift_Spies_Comet_Lulin_999.html

by Francis Reddy
Pasadena CA (SPX) Feb 24, 2009

http://www.spacedaily.com/images/comet-lulin-libra-swift-dss-bg.jpg











Comet Lulin was passing through the constellation Libra when Swift imaged it. This view merges the Swift data with a Digital Sky Survey image of the star field. Credit: NASA/Swift/Univ. of Leicester/DSS (STScI, AURUA)/Bodewits et al. For a larger version of this image please go
here.

********

While waiting for high-energy outbursts and cosmic explosions, NASA's Swift Gamma-ray Explorer satellite is monitoring Comet Lulin as it closes on Earth. For the first time, astronomers are seeing simultaneous ultraviolet and X-ray images of a comet.

"We won't be able to send a space probe to Comet Lulin, but Swift is giving us some of the information we would get from just such a mission," said Jenny Carter, at the University of Leicester, U.K., who is leading the study.
"The comet is releasing a great amount of gas, which makes it an ideal target for X-ray observations," said Andrew Read, also at Leicester.

A comet is a clump of frozen gases mixed with dust. These "dirty snowballs" cast off gas and dust whenever they venture near the sun. Comet Lulin, which is formally known as C/2007 N3, was discovered last year by astronomers at Taiwan's Lulin Observatory. The comet is now faintly visible from a dark site. Lulin will pass closest to Earth - 38 million miles, or about 160 times farther than the
moon - late on the evening of Feb. 23 for North America.

On Jan. 28, Swift trained its Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) and X-Ray Telescope (XRT) on Comet Lulin. "The comet is quite active," said team member Dennis Bodewits, a NASA Postdoctoral Fellow at the Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. "The UVOT data show that Lulin was shedding nearly 800 gallons of water each second." That's enough to fill an Olympic-size swimming pool in less than 15 minutes.

Swift can't see water directly. But ultraviolet light from the sun quickly breaks apart water molecules into
hydrogen atoms and hydroxyl (OH) molecules. Swift's UVOT detects the hydroxyl molecules, and its images of Lulin reveal a hydroxyl cloud spanning nearly 250,000 miles, or slightly greater than the distance between Earth and the moon.

The UVOT includes a prism-like device called a grism, which separates incoming light by wavelength. The grism's range includes wavelengths in which the hydroxyl molecule is most active.

"This gives us a unique view into the types and quantities of gas a comet produces, which gives us clues about the origin of comets and the solar system," Bodewits explains. Swift is currently the only space observatory covering this wavelength range.

In the Swift images, the comet's tail extends off to the right. Solar
radiation

pushes icy grains away from the comet. As the grains gradually evaporate, they create a thin hydroxyl tail.

Farther from the comet, even the hydroxyl molecule succumbs to solar ultraviolet radiation. It breaks into its constituent oxygen and hydrogen atoms. "The solar wind - a fast-moving stream of particles from the sun - interacts with the comet's broader cloud of atoms. This causes the solar wind to light up with X rays, and that's what Swift's XRT sees," said Stefan Immler, also at Goddard.

This interaction, called charge exchange, results in X-rays from most comets when they pass within about three times Earth's distance from the sun. Because Lulin is so active, its atomic cloud is especially dense. As a result, the X-ray-emitting region extends far sunward of the comet.

"We are looking forward to future observations of Comet Lulin, when we hope to get better X-ray data to help us determine its makeup," noted Carter. "They will allow us to build up a more complete 3-D picture of the comet during its flight through the
solar system."

Other members of the team include Michael Mumma and Geronimo Villanueva at Goddard.

NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., manages the Swift satellite. It is being operated in collaboration with partners in the U.S., the United Kingdom, Italy, Germany and Japan. NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope is an astrophysics and particle physics observatory developed in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Energy and with important contributions from academic institutions and partners in France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Sweden, and the U.S.

Monday, February 23, 2009

Capitalism and Crisis

This article deserves a thoughtful response and perhaps even a call to action. At the present all eyes are on Obama as he struggles with the prescribed remedies hoping that it will do some good somewhere. Then he will try to preach a wait and see approach while we all pray that the economic ship can turn around. In the meantime he has the coin to run around playing Peter at the dyke.

The sharp lowering of mortgage interest rates will allow the housing industry to refinance over the next four years but it will still leave a lot of damaged credit that will take the four years to restore. It should work itself out. I have suggested a way to make it faster and more furious with an excellent chance to be very profitable to the government. It is too radical to be tried for now.

This still leaves massive amounts of stranded money all over the globe as everyone retrenches their economies. Europe has not finished their nightmare and the institutional systems are likely not sufficient to fix Eastern Europe let alone Europe in general. They barely understand how bad the financial system is.

There is wreckage elsewhere but most were a lot better insulated than recognized. What is happening though is every country is first internalizing fresh demand to get their own system back on the tracks.

In a way there was a massive balloon of funny money created by our wall street idiots that was never able to land anywhere for the past several years into real goods and was used to support an ever enlarging credit Ponzi scheme. Had any of it actually so landed we would have had massive inflation to contend with. Instead it was kept up in the air until the music stopped.

Since the bubble has burst, all this credit and coin has abruptly disappeared, and we are now living through a very painful readjustment where we reinstate the cost structures of 2000.

A result of this scheme is that governments actually thought that they had tax money to spend over the past several years. Now they have to print money to replace that money that was lost and spent in the past several years sinking the banks. Again the bail out money is merely replacing capital lost and already in circulation. You got the benefit of all that money. You are been taxed to pay it back.

That is where we are at. So what about the question that this article poses? It is obvious that something is wrong. It was not wrong in terms of its thirty years of expansion. No one wants to end that part of the movie.
In fact Reagan bequeathed a much superior system to what went before and it is easy to locate the diddling that finally took it of the tracks.

The fundamental problem with our economic system is that while it harnesses greed properly and allows it to naturally enrich us all and that is good, our institutions are open to been gamed. More clearly, we are all at the poker table, and the game works because there are fifty two cards, four suites and thirteen separate card types. This is immutable.

In our current financial system, we have never settled on a final design for the deck of cards and this has led to every market enthusiasm converted into fraud.

Let me put it another way. How many lawyers do you need to run a poker table?

They tried to lock the cards down in the thirties but did not really appreciate what they were doing. That rule book was thrashed by the end of Clinton’s presidency and we had a B.Com type minding the store since who could not be expected to grasp the gravity of what was transpiring. We can not even blame him because the subtlety of what was happening was beyond only a few.

If the will exists to produce a superior financial system, and I question that, then we begin by constructing a lawyer free rule book. I think Napoleon made a good stab at it and other comparables might help.

Obviously I have plenty more to say about all this but we will leave this for now. I am beginning to appreciate that I actually had an economic research lab at my beck and call for ten years of my life. It is possible for me to actually propose valid changes and understand the underlying foundations.

I will leave you with this thought. Greed is uncontrollable. It can only be regulated through immutable rules. Regulation and greed cannot be combined. A lawyer is paid to combine them. Uncontrolled regulation and greed is treason.

And how in hell can Obama be up to any of this?

The Economic Crisis Isn't All Bad; It's a Chance for Us and Obama to Reimagine How We Live Our Lives

By
Benjamin R. Barber, The Nation. Posted January 28, 2009.

Capitalism is on its knees and now we have a chance to create higher ideals beyond career climbing and mindless consumerism.

As America, recession mired, enters the hope-inspired age of Barack Obama, a silent but fateful struggle for the soul of capitalism is being waged. Can the market system finally be made to serve us? Or will we continue to serve it? George W. Bush argued that the crisis is "not a failure of the free-market system, and the answer is not to try to reinvent that system." But while it is going too far to declare that capitalism is dead, George Soros is right when he says that "there is something fundamentally wrong" with the market theory that stands behind the global economy, a "defect" that is "inherent in the system."

The issue is not the death of capitalism but what kind of capitalism -- standing in which relationship to culture, to democracy and to life? President Obama's Rubinite economic team seems designed to reassure rather than innovate, its members set to fix what they broke. But even if they succeed, will they do more than merely restore capitalism to the status quo ante, resurrecting all the defects that led to the current debacle?
Being economists, even the progressive critics missing from the Obama economic team continue to think inside the economic box. Yes, bankers and politicians agree that there must be more regulatory oversight, a greater government equity stake in bailouts and some considerable warming of the frozen credit pump. A very large stimulus package with a welcome focus on the environment, alternative energy, infrastructure and job creation is in the offing -- a good thing indeed.

But it is hard to discern any movement toward a wholesale rethinking of the dominant role of the market in our society. No one is questioning the impulse to rehabilitate the consumer market as the driver of American commerce. Or to keep commerce as the foundation of American public and private life, even at the cost of rendering other cherished American values -- like pluralism, the life of the spirit and the pursuit of (nonmaterial) happiness -- subordinate to it.

Economists and politicians across the spectrum continue to insist that the challenge lies in revving up inert demand. For in an economy that has become dependent on consumerism to the tune of 70 percent of GDP, shoppers who won't shop and consumers who don't consume spell disaster. Yet it is precisely in confronting the paradox of consumerism that the struggle for capitalism's soul needs to be waged.

The crisis in global capitalism demands a revolution in spirit -- fundamental change in attitudes and behavior. Reform cannot merely rush parents and kids back into the mall; it must encourage them to shop less, to save rather than spend. If there's to be a federal lottery, the Obama administration should use it as an incentive for saving, a free ticket, say, for every ten bucks banked. Penalize carbon use by taxing gas so that it's $4 a gallon regardless of market price, curbing gas guzzlers and promoting efficient public transportation. And how about policies that give producers incentives to target real needs, even where the needy are short of cash, rather than to manufacture faux needs for the wealthy just because they've got the cash?

Or better yet, take in earnest that insincere MasterCard ad, and consider all the things money can't buy (most things!). Change some habits and restore the balance between body and spirit. Refashion the cultural ethos by taking culture seriously. The arts play a large role in fostering the noncommercial aspects of society. It's time, finally, for a cabinet-level arts and humanities post to foster creative thinking within government as well as throughout the country. Time for serious federal arts education money to teach the young the joys and powers of imagination, creativity and culture, as doers and spectators rather than consumers.

Recreation and physical activity are also public goods not dependent on private purchase. They call for parks and biking paths rather than multiplexes and malls. Speaking of the multiplex, why has the new communications technology been left almost entirely to commerce? Its architecture is democratic, and its networking potential is deeply social. Yet for the most part, it has been put to private and commercial rather than educational and cultural uses. Its democratic and artistic possibilities need to be elaborated, even subsidized.

Of course, much of what is required cannot be leveraged by government policy alone, or by a stimulus package and new regulations over the securities and banking markets. A cultural ethos is at stake. For far too long our primary institutions -- from education and advertising to politics and entertainment -- have prized consumerism above everything else, even at the price of infantilizing society. If spirit is to have a chance, they must join the revolution.

The costs of such a transformation will undoubtedly be steep, since they are likely to prolong the recession. Capitalists may be required to take risks they prefer to socialize (i.e., make taxpayers shoulder them). They will be asked to create new markets rather than exploit and abuse old ones; to simultaneously jump-start investments and inventions that create jobs and help generate those new consumers who will buy the useful and necessary things capitalists make once they start addressing real needs (try purifying tainted water in the Third World rather than bottling tap water in the First!)

The good news is, people are already spending less, earning before buying (using those old-fashioned layaway plans) and feeling relieved at the shopping quasi-moratorium. Suddenly debit cards are the preferred plastic. Parental "gatekeepers" are rebelling against marketers who treat their 4-year-olds as consumers-to-be. Adults are questioning brand identities and the infantilization of their tastes. They are out in front of the politicians, who still seem addicted to credit as a cure-all for the economic crisis.

And Barack Obama? We elected a president committed in principle to deep change. Rather than try to back out of the mess we are in, why not find a way forward? What if Obama committed the United States to reducing consumer spending from 70 percent of GDP to 50 percent over the next ten years, bringing it to roughly where Germany's GDP is today? The Germans have a commensurate standard of living and considerably greater equality. Imagine all the things we could do without having to shop: play and pray, create and relate, read and walk, listen and procreate -- make art, make friends, make homes, make love.

Sound too soft? Too idealistic? If we are to survive the collapse of the unsustainable consumer capitalism that has possessed our body politic over the past three decades, idealism must become the new realism. For if the contest is between the material body defined by solipsistic acquisitiveness and the human spirit defined by imagination and compassion, then a purely technical economic response is what will be too soft, promising little more than a restoration of that shopaholic hell of hyper-consumerism that occasioned the current disaster.

There are epic moments in history, often catalyzed by catastrophe, that permit fundamental cultural change. The Civil War not only brought an end to slavery but knit together a wounded country, opened the West and spurred capitalist investment in ways that created the modern American nation. The Great Depression legitimized a radical expansion of democratic interventionism; but more important, it made Americans aware of how crucial equality and social justice (buried in capitalism's first century) were to America's survival as a democracy.

Today we find ourselves in another such seminal moment. Will we use it to rethink the meaning of capitalism and the relationship between our material bodies and the spirited psyches they are meant to serve? Between the commodity fetishism and single-minded commercialism that we have allowed to dominate us, and the pluralism, heterogeneity and spiritedness that constitute our professed national character?

President Obama certainly inspired many young people to think beyond themselves -- beyond careerism and mindless consumerism. But our tendency is to leave the "higher" things to high-minded rhetoric and devote policy to the material. Getting people to understand that happiness cannot be bought, and that consumerism wears out not only the sole and the wallet but the will and the soul -- that capitalism cannot survive long-term on credit and consumerism -- demands programs and people, not just talk.

The convergence of Obama's election and the collapse of the global credit economy marks a moment when radical change is possible. But we will need the new president's leadership to turn the economic disaster into a cultural and democratic opportunity: to make service as important as selfishness (what about a national service program, universal and mandatory, linked to education?); to render community no less valid than individualism (lost social capital can be re-created through support for civil society); to make the needs of the spirit as worthy of respect as those of the body (assist the arts and don't chase religion out of the public square just because we want it out of City Hall); to make equality as important as individual opportunity ("equal opportunity" talk has become a way to avoid confronting deep structural inequality); to make prudence and modesty values no less commendable than speculation and hubris (saving is not just good economic policy; it's a beneficent frame of mind). Such values are neither conservative nor liberal but are at once cosmopolitan and deeply American. Their restoration could inaugurate a quiet revolution.

The struggle for the soul of capitalism is, then, a struggle between the nation's economic body and its civic soul: a struggle to put capitalism in its proper place, where it serves our nature and needs rather than manipulating and fabricating whims and wants. Saving capitalism means bringing it into harmony with spirit -- with prudence, pluralism and those "things of the public" (res publica) that define our civic souls. A revolution of the spirit.

Is the new president up to it? Are we?

Biological Gravity Plausibly Observed

I took the trouble to catch up on my backlog on unread material one weekend and came across this article by Grebenniko describing the Cavity Structural Effect. It is very important and is to date totally misunderstood. I then forgot to post it, but we will remedy this now.

APPLICATION OF A POLARIZATION MODEL OF HETEROGENEOUS PHYSICAL VACUUM TO BIOLOGY

NATURAL PHENOMENA OF BIOLOGICAL ANTIGRAVITATION ASSOCIATED WITH INVISIBILITY IN INSECTS & GREBENNIKOV'S CAVITY STRUCTURAL EFFECT

The article is very long but is a very empirical description of the process of discovery and his sharing of the evidence and his successful experiments. I needed to work through it twice to come to a proper understanding of what it was that I had just read.

I advise readers to jump past the introduction and go straight into the first part of the text. You need to trust his approach before you move on to the wilder stuff. Then go back and read the rest.

Centuries of scholarship has given us electro magnetic force, clearly associated with the interplay of electrons and protons, it has given us gravity associated with the total particle count and so far nothing else, and forces internal to atomic structure.

Suddenly we are confronted with an effect associated with the cellular structure of material that we are able to biologically sense. Yet no other measuring device is able to detect any such effect. Also, the zone of influence appears related to the apparent geometry. This is actually good news, because it tells me we do not have to go looking for a new force of nature. We are biologically detecting the fine structure of gravitational force. In fact my own readings regarding curious phenomena inform me that we have seen and misunderstood this forever. Regrettably it is a weak sensation and is easily just confounding, as the author came close to been in this case. How easy to just walk away.

My recently submitted paper on a new metric to Physics Essays makes this interpretation obvious and actually implies geometric structure of this nature. We just had no way to measure it and still do not.

For clarity gravity is directly proportional to the particle count contributing to the sum force and must be affected by macroscopic geometry. We have always ignored the possibility and inevitability of fine structure gravity because we could not measure it. That never meant that it failed to exist or that one day we might measure it. It actually makes great sense that a single cell animal be able to sense local gravity variation while suspended in a fluid. Ask a simple question. Does such a cell understand up and down in a test tube? We get disoriented in a neutral gravity situation but that is likely because other cues are overriding our senses.

In fact we still have no great way to measure gravity to this day. That is why Grebenniko was unable to measure any effects even when everyone could pass his hand about an active object and sense changes.

He goes on to discuss additional experiments with manipulating gravity directly taking his lead from his observations alone. That this was possible is more than I could predict safely from my theoretical work but was open to speculation. He claims in his paper that he has made it work and for now we do not need to go there at all.

It is enough that he has identified repeatable phenomena and shared it with all and sundry. This is good science that must be cheered.

This is the first convincing report of biological management of gravity that I have come across and it puts the topic into testable status that can be repeated by anyone, once we get access to the underlying protocols and perhaps a hint at what insects to chase with our butterfly nets.

He reports that he went on to produce a device that manipulated gravity and allowed him to travel above the ground. This is obviously very promising.

Accidental Woodland Habitat Restoration

This is a bit of positive news on inadvertent habitat restoration. There is ample evidence that woodlands are all naturally designed around the presence of periodic fires that clean out the surplus fuel and undegraded organic material. We certainly know this to be true in the West and now this note shows the same for the South East.

It would be quite easy to establish a woodland maintenance program consisting of operating a proscribed burn on designated refugia combined with some soil disturbance. This was formerly called slash and burn. It can be designed to be labor efficient and the recovery will be supported by increased productivity.

And while we are at it establish a buffalo herd to do what the forest needs naturally. The recycling of green surplus into manure is surely able to prolong the burn cycle time period. In fact it may make such burns largely unnecessary if we also collect the waste wood from time to time.

Such buffalo herds will still need access to winter fodder but they will open up the forests and trample waste wood while rough browsing the vegetation. This will surely lead to much more productive woodlands needing far less human input.

Such terrain will also support large herds of deer as they are already. They all need to be simply owned and well managed unless we want to leave it in the hands of the wolves.

The original eastern forests were lightly burned every year by the original occupiers and this was abandoned as populations collapsed and its importance never understood.

Gone But Not Forgotten?

posted Wednesday, February 2, 2009 by
lynda mills\

http://www.fs.fed.us/r9/ssrs/story?id=4304

http://www.fs.fed.us/r9/ssrs/attachments/4304.jpg

First-year running buffalo clover seedlings emerge following prescribed burn on MTNF.

Endangered plants re-appear on Mark Twain National Forest following prescribed burn
It is said that for people to thrive in their environment, sometimes all they need is a little stimulation and encouragement. The Mark Twain National Forest has found that the same could be said for running buffalo clover.
Running buffalo clover (Trifolium stoloniferum) is a federally endangered plant that was listed in 1987. It looks a lot like the clover in your backyard, but unlike cultivated clovers, it is native to North America. It derives its name from the theory that historically, it was dependent upon bison or other large ungulates to scarify and spread its seed, and to provide the moderate soil disturbance necessary for its proliferation and spreading.

In 1994-95, the Mark Twain National Forest entered into a Challenge Cost Share Agreement with Missouri Botanical Garden and Northeast Missouri University to introduce populations of running buffalo clover to eleven sites on the National Forest. At each site, seedlings were planted and monitored. Within a few years, the plants at seven of the sites had disappeared, and by 2000, none of the sites had evidence of any running buffalo clover survival. Soon after, monitoring of the sites was discontinued.

However, before the plants disappeared at the introduction sites, some of them had done quite well and not only flowered, but produced seed. There were many theories regarding why the plants had disappeared at the sites, but the most prevalent theory was that the conditions at the introduction sites had deteriorated due to a lack of management.

Most of the research on running buffalo clover indicated that, for long-term survival, the plants require filtered sunlight and periodic moderate soil disturbance. However, the introduction sites on the Mark Twain National Forest had not been disturbed and most were heavily shaded.

Acting on a suspicion that seeds at one of the introduction sites may still be viable, the Potosi District of the Mark Twain National Forest decided to conduct a burn at one of the introduction sites. It had been over 8 years since running buffalo clover had been observed at the site, but it was hoped that a prescribed burn may stimulate dormant seeds still in the soil and encourage them to germinate.

In March 2008, a small five-acre burn was conducted on the site. Prior to this burn, no active management (e.g. burning, thinning, etc.) had occurred at the site. Then, biologists waited. Finally, after the spring burn followed by a growing season of record rainfall, it was time to go check the site.

On September 17, 2008, biologists returned to the site, and to their pleasant surprise, were greeted by healthy, vibrant and growing running buffalo clover seedlings. The prescribed burn had worked! Biologists counted several seedlings growing in many of the introduction plots in the burned area.

Although this was a very small burn on the Mark Twain National Forest, in had a very large impact upon the biodiversity of the National Forest and Missouri. With the re-appearance of running buffalo clover at this site, the number of populations of this endangered plant on the Mark Twain National Forest now equals one, and it represents one-eighth of the statewide population.

Managers of the Mark Twain National Forest are now discussing options regarding how to best manage this site, and are considering burns at some of the other historic introduction sites to see if this good luck can be repeated. Stay tuned!

Friday, February 20, 2009

Wind Power Bull

In a way this is important. Putting up a wind turbine has become as common place as buying a car and the permitting process has also become noncontroversial. It helps to recall that this has taken twenty years of build out around the world after twenty years of perfecting the technology.

Rather importantly, these wind turbines are obviously working financially for their owners and for the power companies also. That means in a world with a paucity of safe investments, these investments are gold.

We can expect the build out of these turbines to continue booming until the installed base is maximized at an order of magnitude higher. I cannot think of a better industrial stimulus program to replace the failed housing stimulus plan that foundered in the morass of sub prime lending.

Other technologies are rising but are still in the maturation stage. This is important to understand. We cannot buy time to make a technology bullet proof. Wind technology is presently bullet proof and it has cost forty years to achieve this.

It therefore make great sense to load our grid with as much wind power as can be properly handled, say 20% to 30% of grid load. It has certainly succeeded in Europe and is obviously working everywhere else.

It is not the final answer, but it is a great stimulating solution for the next five years while we get over the subprime hangover.
What is wonderful, is that individual investors can easily participate in this build out, by simply identifying location and working through the permitting and acquisition process.


US Officially Leads World in Wind

http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/2543/86/

Written by Jack Moins

Friday, 06 February 2009

The Global Wind Energy Council (
GWEC), a consortium of wind power supporters, based out of Brussels has announced some news that will have a lot of us pretty geeked. Last year, they revealed, showed tremendous gains in the wind market, growing 28.8 percent, to reach 120 GW of installed capacity.
Steve Sawyer, Secretary General of GWEC adds, "The 120 GW of global wind capacity in place at the end of 2008 will produce 260 TWh and save 158 million tons of CO2 every year."
In the race fight climate change, and move away from geopolitically volatile, deletable fossil fuels, wind offers the promise of oodles of largely untapped power. As Bob Dylan would say, "The answer my friends, is blowing in the wind."
Last year the U.S. started to exploit this resource in earnest, with
50 percent growth, to reach 25 GW of capacity. The big news is that for the first time the U.S. seized the world lead in wind power production, wresting it from former champion Germany.
This year, Germany came in a close second at 24 MW, while alternative-energy-friendly-Spain filled in at third. China, though, perhaps earns the biggest pat on the back for
taking fourth place after managing to double its growth for the fourth year in a row. If it continues on this pace, it may soon seize the wind power lead, and help get the coal power monkey off its back.

Cost wise, wind is relatively affordable, almost as cheap as coal and nuclear, and significantly cheaper than solar. However, the unprecedented wind power growth also brings challenges. The young industry has yet to figure out a good scheme to store power to offset its variable nature, much like solar. However, with money and projects flowing in like, well... the wind, the industry seems ready to tackle such a challenge.


Gravity

Gravity is a topic taught in physics and largely apologized for. We are given the formulation of Newton and perhaps a quick pass on the subject of General Relativity in which gravity disappears into mystery. This is unfortunate, but is caused by a simple remarkable fact. We are barely able to sense it at all if at all or so we believe. Its existence was deduced by its apparent action as an attractor at a distance in the planetary system, with a lot of clever mathematics.

For the other apparent forces of nature the opposite is true. They are detectable and measurable because they are generated by complexes of those components that originate gravity. Gravity is far deeper in the structure of our universe.

You may or may not know that I have constructed a metric that is able to describe gravity at the particle level and have submitted a paper describing that metric and its mathematica. Constructing the particle universe with this metric is a larger task requiring substantial computer resources. We are not about to go there, but there is a few things that I can say.

Gravity is better described as impressed curvature. Just as a planet creates a gravity well, so too does a particle at the sub atomic level. It is not however a Pythagorean metric. It is quite different except that it also satisfies a Pythagorean metric of order greater than two. More importantly all matter is structured as we know already and homogeneous for the scaling we care about today.

If you feel that you slightly understood what I just said and wish to discuss it further, feel free to contact me.

What this is all saying is that this impressed curvature which at the macro level is simply positive though whose magnitude is very small is also geometrically cumulative. This is also common sense. If you have a stick, then the impressed positive curvature will be larger at the ends than along the sides. We are not dealing with any cancelling effects and the curvature itself is not shielded at all. The gross geometry of the structure guides the impressed curvature.

Now from my perspective this was all obvious and could be dismissed because we could not sense or measure these differences. Then along came the late Grebennikov who not only was able to sense these effects but then learned to work with them. It turns out that insects, that have a lot to gain through such mastery had developed ways to use this curvature. This also made plenty of sense since their aerodynamic strength profile is responsive to such mastery whereas we certainly are not.

Check out the described experiments posted a couple of days ago and try them out. I have not done so yet but some are dead simple and no fuss at all. If we can all make the pyramid frame spin we will all be on his page knowing that fine geometric curvature actually exists. It is also better to have a lot of folks doing these experiments because it will allow us to report to each other through this blog. Also a hundred people demonstrating gravity effects and perhaps even gravity shielding as opposed to antigravity is vastly more convincing than looking over the shoulders of a lone individual and kibitzing. In other words, I am damned if I am going to do this all by myself because I know better.

Crossing the Continent 1527

A book is out this past year titled Crossing the Continent 1527 – 1540 by Robert Goodwin and is reconstruction of the experiences of the four survivors of an ill fated Spanish expedition to land and penetrate Florida, just a couple of generations after first contact and in the first generation of the conquest of Mexico.

This is one of the first results of the placing of the contents of the Archivo General De Indias (AGI) on the internet at www.pares.mcu.es. We will undoubtedly see many more reports emerge which is very welcome. Fresh informed eyes see new things and there never seem to be enough eyes.

For whatever reason, I am an informed eyeball regarding mining and its related artifacts. I can at least begin the process of discovery when confronted with new evidence. Here we have another fresh report of a band producing copper to sell to others. The unit of sale is in the form of a very small bell, containing an amount of copper similar to what is in a penny.

Once again, I had checked the four corners region for Bronze Age copper mining activity and had found it. Here again we learn that just after contact, that a local copper economy still existed before populations were decimated and destroyed by disease. The copper trade clearly did not completely disappear and clans continue to own and exploit copper resources.

Before the survivors made it to the upper reaches of the Rio Grande they had traveled from Florida along the coast to the environs of Galveston by small water craft. They then spent five years among local Indians. We get a glimpse of life ways that still relied on harvesting the natural bounty, rather than any form of agriculture. It is not obvious why this is so except that particular tribal groups adhered to historical life ways and their associated territories more than we want to accept.

Perhaps we need to recall that crop agriculture is a recent development in northern Europe. We assume some form of slash and burn preceded the steel plow, but that was surely small scale and used as a supplement to the diet provided by cattle herding. So slash and burn agriculture needs large tribal acreages to supply the ongoing large tracts of fallow land as well as ample hunting ground for deer to supply meat.

We also know that large villages did exist throughout the Mississippi valley. However this report was simply outside that world and missed any evidence of it totally. So while I was looking for a hint of a more settled corn culture similar to the Pueblo Indians extant and discovered in this report, I did get an independent confirmation of the existence of an indigenous copper trade.

The sources are not as rich as I would have wished, but I recommend this book as a good glimpse of the conditions on the ground during this era. We have all forgotten or mostly never knew just how hard it is for a family to feed itself year round without the application of agriculture. These peoples spent far too much of their time hungry in a very good climate.

We also learn just what a staple the prickly pear really was in these areas. Other tree nuts are also mentioned as are pine nuts, now been brought into our own cuisine.

Most importantly this is a tale of bare survival by four men out of well over two hundred men. Most were lost to drowning, the rest to disease mostly and a very few to conflict. Their benefactors struggled as much to stay alive. I have read many similar tales were the struggle for bare survival overwhelmed everyone.

Thursday, February 19, 2009

Depolymerization Tries Again


This is recent material from a company called EcoKat that has opened a test facility and is now operational. They are using catalytic depolymerization to produce lightweight oil whose makeup is not described. The temperature is sufficient to produce pyrolysis fluids which though like a diesel oil is still not much use so we are clearly relying on the catalyst to reform the fluids into a fuel grade product.

It also obviously must be tuned to the feedstock and that means selectivity.
Another company was doing something similar has suspended its operations and is expected out with a new information soon. The main difference was that they brought the temperature up to 600 degrees and applied high pressure in a pressure chamber. The promise was again fuel grade diesel. Thus if the same result can be achieved at half the temperature with the use of a catalyst it will surely be much cheaper.

We will keep a watch of this project to see how it turns out. This stuff was plucked out of its web site and is disorganized but still gets the message across.

Our ongoing interest is derived from the promise of converting any organic feedstock into a shippable fluid feedstock while leaving no organic residual behind. This allows difficult feedstocks like municipal waste to be processed cleanly.

KDV 500 Catalytic Pressure-Free Fuel Conversion Plant

A new recycling formulation was necessary that would convert existing hydrocarbons (CH2), not into methane (CH4), and coke crystals (C), but into hydrocarbons (CH2) and only then in molecular lengths that reduce and bind in a manner which separates out unusable pollutants. In essence, the new formulation returns to the natural processes used for hundreds of millions of years where fossilized by-products from the seas settled into suspended clay minerals and ultimately formed fossil fuels, such as oil hydrocarbons.

We have patented a process that is modeled on this fuel creation, Mother Nature's behavior without the hundreds of millions of years it took to create fossil fuels through natural processes. KDV, our patented process, also avoids the creation of unusable, environmentally unfriendly materials, such as PCBs and Teflon , which when mixed together at high temperatures, can easily form Dioxins and Furan.
The key elements of our patented process, therefore, are as follows:

• A temperature from 270°C to 350°C in place of 40° C.• Ion exchange catalysts. • Up to 100% conversion of the extremely active crystallized y-catalysts.

These elements result in a final product of high-quality synthetic lightweight combustible fuel oil very similar to Diesel or Jet Fuel.

Our patented process uses catalyzing reduction to produce a lightweight oil, similar to Diesel Fuel. The production costs are at a fraction of those associated with existing recycling processes.

In order to produce a low cost, high quality fuel product, development of a reliable, low maintenance engineering plant was necessary. The KDV Plant is a self-sustaining energy production platform. It uses up to 10% of its own energy formation to run itself through a 230kW diesel-powered generator, or can run from a municipal power grid or similar supply, using its generator as a back-up system.
In our plant's closed-process cycle, the input waste materials are mixed with the catalyst as it is heated simultaneously by means of viscous pressure via our patented turbine. At a threshold temperature, the normally inert catalyst reacts, driving the reaction characterized by the following results:

• Molecular depolymenzation at low temperatures (279°C - 350°C) • System pressure-free (indeed, a negative atmoshpheric pressure of .5 bar, via a viscous friction turbine, which also creates the flameless trigger heat source and chemical / material mixing process). • Previously unachievable Hydrocarbon conversion rates of more than 80% with liquid feedstocks and plastics, without the possibility of the formation of dangerous residuals• Decontamination of dangerous residual by-products (halogens, etc.) in a liquefied process that yields salt. • High-quality Diesel Fuel or Jet-Fuel suitable for use in today's engines.• Better yield performance with lowering quality crude inputs over standard refinery methods by roughly 20%• Better yield over traditional biodiesel feedstock and methodology. This is not biodiesel in the traditional sense. It is made as a straight, high cetane clean fuel, with operating temperature envelope equal or better to standard fuel. It is intended to meet or exceed ASTM 975 standards for highway use in California


As we hurtle into the next century with the ever growing demand for limited fossil / mineral oil reserves and rapidly growing competition in the global economy, it becomes vitally important for any viable company to be vigilant about its economical success, while implementing effective methods of environmental protection and resource conservation. A clean, unencumbered environment, while powering commerce and society, free of foreign dependencies, are of no small concern.

To combine these requirements becomes essential in present day economic planning and progress. As economies such as China and India surge forward with huge growth, so this issue is further exacerbated. It also becomes apparent that carbon dioxide emissions, a by-product of combusted resources, is rapidly changing our climate, the ramifications of which we have still to fully comprehend and realize.

Therefore, we have developed and are working on a variety of technologies which will help us by reducing carbon dioxide emissions and various other toxins produced or emitted by plants, factories and other combustion sources as well as creating high quality fuel oil from organic waste and other materials at a high degree of efficiency and low cost.

• KDV. We are also able to produce a light weight synthetic fuel oil, similar to diesel, kerosene, or jet fuel, with low or no sulfur content, from nearly any organic material, with emphasis on waste products as feedstock. This process is carbon neutral, highly efficient, and pollution less. It is a decentralized (modular) concept and economically viable. The fuel produced is a straight fuel, not a mere additive, with equal or better operating temperature ranges and power produced than ASTM 975 requirements (US highway diesel fuel). However, KDV derived fuels can be mixed with conventional or existing fuel supplies. The cost to produce this fuel is well under current pump prices. This small plant (30’x30’x30’) can produce nearly a million gallons of fuel per year from 1.2 million gallons of fats, oils, greases, shredded plastics. All manner of solid agricultural, municipal and industrial organic waste has been successfully tested in the lab, with production scale techniques presently being developed.

ECOKAT Applied Technologies is proud to offer these technologies while continually striving to improve upon them. Responsible, intelligent waste management, the economical creation of clean, high efficiency fuels from low value materials or waste, as well as creating methods in which to conserve that fuel, all in a decentralized method, is what we are all about.

***

The standard KDV 500 plant is designed to produce 500 litres or 132 gallons of fuel per hour and is economically optimized for the most diverse biological and mineral materials to be used as plant inputs.

Presently the scope of feedstock that can be guaranteed to work smoothly in the system is limited to all organic liquids, including fats of any kind, oils of any kind, greases of any kind, and because plastics can be melted into a liquid at relatively low temperatures, plastics are on the list of good, high yield feedstock.

Brown Grease collected from septic and commercial diverters is excellent feedstock.

Tallow and rendering plant product as well as prepared input is excellent feedstock.

Any plastic is an excellent feedstock. Shopping bags are a problem to recyclers, but they melt readily in a KDV heat exchanger and become excellent input.

Waste oils of all kinds, contaminated fuels, bitumen, and standard refinery waste, are high in hydrocarbons and flow easily through the system.

Successful testing of solid organics has been accomplished in the lab. Getting solids to flow through the system reliably over extended periods has proved a challenge which we happily engage, given the potential applications and rewards in municipal, agricultural and certain industrial waste management / fuel production.

KDV Production Scale Input Materials include:

• Plastics of all kinds (including PVCs and hospital waste materials)• Fats, Waste oils, and greases, waxes and fats (FOGs) of all types (including hydraulic oils and Trafooele)• All refinery by-products (bitumen, tars, etc.)
Under development:

• Agricultural wastes (including animal waste products, spoiled food, etc.)• Biologically regenerating raw materials (wood, vegetables, meat wastes, etc.)• Municipal Solid Waste

The small size of the plant makes decentralized, on-site processing possible. This eliminates considerable transportation related costs, both on the input and product distribution end.

Evolution of Intelligent Design

This short item is extremely important because it identifies a mechanism by which a single cell organism can rewire its own DNA and thereby the information that it passes on to its offspring. I had come to this conclusion in my manuscript and had said exactly this must be possible. It is always nice to land confirmation this handily and this directed.

The idea that directed design managed the evolutionary process was never a bad one. What was a bad idea was to go looking outside the cell itself for the decision making process. This is slowly clarifying the process and ending the debate.

I came to the conclusion that some form of decision making process was involved in the evolutionary process a long time ago. The support for it was always in your face, and the survival of the fittest concept really fails to hold up well and is obviously far too wasteful. It made sense that such a process be internal to the organism and as our appreciation of biological complexity has improved, the biological markers and answers are now showing up.

The only negative was the misplaced enthusiasm of the intelligent design crowd who fail to realize that any solution short of divine intervention was counter productive to their cause.

Study finds new way for disease to evolve

http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Study_finds_new_way_for_disease_to_evolve_999.html

by Staff Writers
Hamilton, Ontario (UPI) Feb 17, 2009
A Canadian-led study has discovered a new mode of disease evolution, giving scientists another way to identify and assign risk to emerging diseases.
Scientists at McMaster University, the University of Melbourne and the University of Illinois found bacteria can develop into illness-causing pathogens by rewiring regulatory DNA, the genetic material that controls disease-causing genes in a body. Previously, disease evolution was thought to occur mainly through the addition or deletion of genes.
"Bacterial cells contain about 5,000 different genes, but only a fraction of them are used at any given time," said McMaster University Assistant Professor Brian Coombes, who led the research. "The difference between being able to cause disease, or not cause disease, lies in where, when and what genes in this collection are turned on. We've discovered how bacteria evolve to turn on just the right combination of genes in order to cause disease in a host."
With infectious diseases on the rise, the finding has implications on how new pathogens are identified in the environment, he said.
"This opens up significant new challenges for us as we move forward with this idea of assigning risk to new pathogens," Coombes said. "Because now, we know it's not just gene content -- it is gene content plus regulation of those genes."

China's Response to Global Crisis

This is an excellent report on the actions been taken by China in the wake of the global credit contraction. I do not entirely concur with the conclusions been drawn by the author but then he has his own agenda and is an enthusiast for gold as currency.

The Chinese are doing everything and then some that I had hoped that they would do. This is more than I can say for the USA. They are taking this global economic interlude to shift purchasing power internally to maximize internal economic growth at a time they have surplus manufacturing capacity.

We are going to see a Chinese housing boom with credit constraints. This will fuel a broad consumption boom as the Chinese consumer society emerges to ultimately rival that of the USA.

Eric’s fears of hyperinflation are misplaced. Real shortages can be handled by short term rationing and there is no end of other places to put money.
Expect agriculture to be fully refinanced now that farming rights may be dealt.

There is a present fear of agricultural shortfalls because of the present drought conditions in Northern China. That is very real and is worrisome, but is likely a result of the cold shift that has taken place. Remember, it is still February. Ample spring rains would end all concerns and possibly even save the winter wheat. Otherwise we get a later crop laid in and yes, if you grow winter wheat, you must lose the odd year.

China is letting loose a major internal expansion that will last five years and hugely upgrade Chinese productivity. It does not intend to contract at all because of the global shakeout and it should be able to invest hugely all over the world to secure resources for it modernizing economy. I anticipate that China will have a fully modernized economy on a par with Japan of 1990 by no later that 2020 and more likely now by 2015.

The only concern is to determine what method will be used to replace fossil fuels, but they have huge maneuver room compared to the USA. The USA must exit that merry go round while China can postpone it for some time as others solve the problems.

Sunday, January 18, 2009

The conventional wisdom on China is dead wrong. Specifically, there is a widespread belief, as expressed by Goldman Sachs, that "China will keep the yuan trading within a narrow range in 2009 due concerns about exporters." Worse still, others are even predicting that China will devalue its currency! The sheer wishful thinking is astounding! The idea that "China will keep the dollar peg to help its exporters" ranks all the way up there with "Housing prices always go up" and "You can spend your way to prosperity".

THERE ARE NO FREE LUNCHES

If you have learned nothing else in the last year and a half, you should have learned that if something sounds too good to be true, that is because it IS too good to be true. The media overwhelmingly presents China's dollar peg as a win-win situation: Americans get cheap imports and low interest rates while China gets a strong manufacturing sector. While commentators do sometimes debates whether China will keep lending us money forever, they never talk about the REAL problem with the dollar peg.

Below is a chart which shows how China's dollar peg works. See if you can spot the downside that the media never seems to mention.

The US's trade deficit requires China to print money!

The little discussed downside of the dollar peg is all the money China has to print to maintain it. China's Central Bank puts the extra dollars it receives from its trade surplus into its growing foreign reserves and then prints yuan to pay Chinese exporters. This results in an increase in China's base money supply by an amount equal to the increase in its foreign exchange reserves. While China's ability to keep accumulating US reserves is endless, its ability to keep its money supply under control is not.

The true threat to the dollar peg

If there is one development which could force China to drop its dollar peg, it is out of control inflation. Rampant inflation would result in millions of citizens starving and would create widespread social unrest. Keeping food prices low is a matter of political survival for Chinese authorities. So, facing the choice between losing their grip on power and losing the dollar peg, they will not hesitate for a second to sacrifice the dollar to save their own skin.

So far China been able to contain inflation, but…

In recent years, China has been able to contain the inflationary effects of its trade surplus by soaking up or "sterilizing" all the extra liquidity (printed yuan). These sterilization efforts mostly involved:

A) Raising the reserve requirements of commercial banks. In essence, the PBOC (People's Bank of China) prints money to fund its trade surplus and then increases the amount of yuan banks have to keep as reserves at the Central bank, preventing the printed cash from reaching the economy. As of May of last year, commercial banks' reserve requirements were at 16.5 percent

B) Selling RMB-denominated sterilization bills. The state owned and controlled banking system has been forced to absorb the majority of these bills. As of May of last year, the value of sterilization bills reached 10 percent of bank deposits.
Taken together, these two steps have immobilized roughly 26.5 percent of Chinese commercial banks' deposits. This shows the magnitude China has had to intervene so far, as the value of sterilization instruments outstanding has been increasing at roughly the same rate as its foreign reserves.

PBC Foreign Reserves and Sterilization Instruments (US$ Billions)

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhAfk8_vVsDbJjJR4wAjZUbjbKuSRihdhlHPnp3dkmwR8LkxHqrwad2Y-8VwEmmF48rgz2wWXCE75yiU5V-n96ZtQLb75LbO3H5W1zXXyrLPiKvs52kzq6pMyNhZ2fv29cDW9M0uDORGVFJ/s1600-h/Reserves+Sterilization+Bills-788327.bmp

While China has been able to contain inflation to single digits for the last decade, that is about to change. All economic forces are aligning in China for a surge in inflation.

1) China has abandoned its sterilization operations

Currently, the PBOC has abandoned its sterilization efforts all together:

A) The PBOC has lowered reserve requirements by 2 percentage point for China's big banks and by 4 percentage point for all other banks.

B) The PBOC has scaled back sterilization efforts by reducing liquidity-draining three-month and 52-week bill sales from once a week to once every two weeks. As a result of these decreasing sales, the clearing house for China's interbank bond market expects
PBOC's 2009 bill issues to be down over 70%, which will increase the Chinese base money supply by 2 trillion yuan.

These actions signify that the PBOC has ceased sterilizing its currency interventions and is focusing on (imaginary) deflation risks. A flood of cash has been unleashed, and a tsunami of pent-up inflation will soon hit China.

2) China is running record trade surpluses

China's imports are crashing much faster than its exports. In December, Chinese imports fell 21.3% while exports fell only 2.8%. As a result, China has been running record trade surpluses these last three months: $35 billion, $40 billion, and 39 billion.

The
reason for China's surplus is obvious when you think about it. Consider the following list of goods a country can exports and ask yourself what would hold up best during a severe global economic downturn.

*** Commodities (Oil, gas, steel, etc)
Capital goods (Airplanes, Caterpillars, Machinery for new factories, Machinery for new mining/oil exploration projects, etc)

*** Durable goods (SUVs, CARs, appliances, business equipment, electronic equipment, home furnishings, etc)

*** Luxury goods (brand name products, designer clothing, artwork, etc...)

*** Cheap consumer goods (everything you buy at Wal-Mart)

The answer is that the demand for cheap consumer goods will hold up better than anything else. This can easily be seen in the
retail sales this holiday shopping season. Wal-Mart, which imports 70% of its products from China, was the only retail to post a year-on-year increase in sales. So while the world economy might be imploding spectacularly, demand for Wal-Mart's cheap Chinese goods is holding up quite well. The implications of this is that while China's exports will fall, they will fall less than those of any other country.

The current trade surplus is still completely unsustainable. If China's continues running a 40 billion dollar trade surplus all year, its base money supply will double by the end of 2009. Also, since China has halted the appreciation of the yuan, its trade surplus is unlikely to shrink as demand for cheap consumer goods is set to remain strong.

3) The Chinese economy will shrink in 2009

Consistently amazing economic growth is the biggest factor which has helped China contain inflation. Inflation happens when the money supply is growing faster than the economy, and china's economy has been growing fast. This economic growth has helped absorb the enormous quantities of yuan that have been printed to support the dollar. However, this will change in 2009. Due to falling global demand, China's economy is set for zero, if not negative, growth which will remove a significant mitigating force against inflation and amplify the inflationary impact of China's printing press.

Side note: China's economic strength is underestimated

It is important to note that, while economic growth will go probably go negative, China's economy will not crash. The strength of the Chinese economy is widely underestimate in the media today. In addition to the resilient worldwide demand for its cheap consumer goods, China is also benefiting for import substitution at home. This is why imports to China are falling so fast: Chinese are switching to cheap domestic product instead of expensive foreign imports. So while there has been a sharp drop in Chinese demand for big-ticket brands (Dior, Chanel, Hermes, etc…) and others luxury items, knock-offs and other cheap goods are still flying off the shelves. Chinese consumers are downshifting, but they are still spending strong, as reflected by the 21% year-over-year growth in 2008.

However, despite China's strong fundamentals, the current worldwide downturn is too strong for it to escape. The worldwide financial carnage is so severe that even the demand for cheap consumer goods will decrease. As a result, while China may outperform every country on Earth, its economy will still suffer in 2009.

4) Deflation in China would be too good to be true

China has been in a constant war with the inflation caused by the dollar peg. Economic growth and sterilization operations alone have not been enough to absorb the growing liquidity, and China has been forced to turn to ever more drastic steps in its efforts to contain inflation. These stifling policy measures together with its sterilization efforts have enormously suppressed domestic demand and have distracting the government from developing key services enjoyed by other developed nations. This suppressed domestic demand has also distorted China's economy, as reflected by the undersized service sector, and has lowered the quality of life for Chinese citizens.

Chinese financial repression and market socialism

In its losing battle with inflation, China has adopted stifling policy measures to suppress domestic demand and keep prices down:

(these are only a few of the anti-inflation measures China has adopted)

A) Strict price controls. (ie: Large wholesalers must seek central government approval if they want to raise prices by 6 percent within the space of 10 days or by 10 percent within a month.)

B) Credit ceilings. (limits on how much commercial banks can lend)

C) Floors on lending rates and ceilings on deposit rates

D) Strict rules governing lending decisions

E) Tight land purchase and lending requirements

F) Direct government intervention to limited expansion in certain industries (ie: aluminum, steel, autos and textiles sectors in 2004)

G) Penalty taxes on anyone buying and selling real estate in a short period of time.

H) Forcing local government to cut back spending by delaying approval of their investment projects

I) High sales taxes.

J) Etc...

Suppressed domestic demand has distorted China's economy

The distortions caused by sterilization operations and stifling policy measures are best seen when comparing China's and the US's economy:

A) US home buyers get tax incentives VS Chinese home buyers get tax penalties

B) US gets artificially low interest rates VS China's artificially high interest rates

C) US's "service economy" VS China's "service-less economy"

D) Etc…

In the US, the overvalued dollar and easy credit environment have caused the service sector to become oversized, artificially raising America's standard of living. In contrast, China's suppressed domestic demand has led its service sector to become undersized, artificially decreasing its standard of living.

Focus on inflation has lead to a lack of key government services

With Chinese authorities sidetracked by their export oriented focus and battle with overheating, the development of key government services enjoyed by other developed nations has been neglected. As a result, Chinese citizens' lack of social security, free education, and available consumer credit, which has forced them to save far more than their Western counterparts, leaving them with less disposable income.

Deflation would be a godsend to China

Chinese authorities must be thrilled about the prospect of fighting deflation instead of inflation. Fighting deflation would allow China to:

A) Scale back its increasingly costly sterilization efforts.

B) Lower interest rates.

C) Get rid of all the controls which are distorting domestic property markets.

D) Promote consumer spending without worrying about the inflationary impact.

E) Develop a comprehensive social security net.

F) Increase funding of public education.

E) Accelerate the development of a system to rate people's credit.

F) Encourage growth in underdeveloped domestic sectors (housing, health care, education, entertainment, etc)

G) Etc…

Most of the steps above are already being taken by Chinese authorities. Unfortunately, there are no free lunches. The possibility that China can maintain a highly inflationary currency peg, reverse years of anti-inflation policies, release a flood of sterilized yuan back into circulation, and go on a Western-style stimulus/bailout binge without experiencing double digit inflation is zero.

5) No deleveraging

There is no chance of real deflation happening in China. None.
The Strength of China's Banking System makes it impossible.

A) Apart from Bank of China, Chinese banks have little exposure to overseas debt. So, although toxic US securities were sold to banks around the world, China's capital controls protected its banking system from America's bad debt

B) As a side effect of the country's sterilization operations, 26.5 percent of Chinese commercial banks' deposits were placed with the central bank last year (reserve requirements and forced underwriting of PBOC bills).

C) Unlike Western banks, who have been enjoying a credit bonanza for decades, Chinese banks have only recently gotten into the credit game, after years of being ridiculed for being overly cash-centric. Because of this late entry, Chinese banks completely missed the subprime party.

D) China is also in the enviable position of being one of the few countries which doesn't need to deleverage. While Western banks were going insane with high leverage and off-balance sheet financial vehicles, Chinese banks were doing the opposite, as can be seen on the chart below (from Tao Wang of UBS).

E) China has been waging a war against NPLs (non-performing loans) in the last few years. For example, with heavy penalties having been imposed on bank managers responsible for new NPLs, Chinese banks have become much more concerned about the loan safety than profitability. This battle again NPLs has paid off. As of September 30, 2008, nonperforming loans totaled only 2 percent for Chinese banks, compared to the 2.3 percent for FDIC-insured banks in the US. Loan loss provisions have also improved substantially, with provisions of Chinese banks amounting to an impressive 123 percent of their NPLs.

F) Finally, China's money supply itself is underleveraged when compared to the rest of the world. For example, the US's M2 to M1 ratio is 65% higher than China's. The Chinese M2 to GDP ratio is also more 160 percent, perhaps, the highest in the world.

When considering the strength of Chinese Banks and underlying strength of China's economy, no debt deflation is possible.

If there is no chance of deflation, then why is China's cpi slowing down?
There are three main reasons for the slowdown in China's cpi:

A) The bursting of the commodity bubble. Because of
speculator dominated futures markets in the US, commodity prices were boosted to artificial level going into the summer of 2008. As these inflated commodity prices fell back down to Earth, they caused a temporary worldwide slowdown in inflation.

B) In the second half of the year, deleveraging and hedge fund redemption caused the outflow of a large amount of hot money from China. This outflow temporary depressed asset prices.

C) The unwinding of the commodity bubble spread deflation fears worldwide and caused the velocity of money to drop.

6) Deflation fears are paralyzing China's money supply

"deflation fears" have slowed the Chinese money supply to a crawl. While they are still spending, Chinese consumers are delaying big purchases and downshifting to discount stores. Businesses are strapped for cash, and scared Chinese banks are dumping riskier borrowers, like credit-card holders. China is experiencing one of
the brief deflationary periods which typically precede hyperinflation.

Deflation fears in China also provide the perfect example of how a slowdown in the "velocity of money" and makes prices fall. Right now,
Chinese banks are hoarding cash and delaying payments on personal credit cards. Only a year ago, most banks paid credit-card transactions in 14 days, but now merchants are having to have to wait 20, 40 or even 90 days to get paid. With lenders making credit-card transactions as unattractive as possible, many merchants are refusing to take credit cards from Chinese consumers. Think about that for a second, all that purchasing power from Chinese credit cards wiped out due to nothing but fear itself.

The important point to note about the price deflation caused by the deflation fears is that it will reverse sharply once inflation picks up. Banks will begin paying credit cards normally, and merchants will start accepting them again. The enormous amount of purchasing power which disappeared will reappear just as suddenly, causing a wild jump in inflation.

7) Sterilization operations have become a loss generating ventures

Until last year, China's sterilization operations had been profitable, since the rate of interest that Beijing earned on foreign exchange reserves (mainly US Treasuries) had been higher than the rates it was paying on its yuan-denominated sterilization bills at home. However, now that the fed has lowered US interest rates to zero for the foreseeable future, China's dollar peg has become a loss-making policy. When inflation hits china and interest rates rise again, China's losses from its currency sterilization will become staggering.8) China likely to attract a flood of hot money in 2009
China has had a problem with hot money inflows in the past, and those problems are likely to get worse this year. Hot money refers to the money that flows regularly between financial markets in search for the highest short term interest rates possible. This hot money has found ways around China's capital controls and flows freely in and out of China to the authorities great frustration.

When hot money flows into china, it forces the PBOC to print money the same way as the trade surplus does. At the beginning of last year, these hot money inflows were one of China's biggest problems, bringing inflation up to 8.6 despite the authorities best efforts. The country's hot money problem ended temporarily with the bursting of the commodity bubble.In the second half of last year, deflation fears and hedge fund deleveraging cause much of this hot money to leave China and seek the "safety" of US treasuries. This small exodus is what is responsible for the brief fall in China's foreign reserves. However, the outflow of hot money from China has ended, and it now looks set to reverse.

In the next month or so, rising inflation will start pushing up Chinese interest rates at a time when central banks around the world have set their rates at or near zero. Since the entire world knows that the yuan is undervalued, these higher rates will make China the most attractive destination on Earth for those seeking safe high yielding interest rates, and the hot money problem will return with a vengeance.

9) Chinese authorities are pulling out all the stops

Chinese authorities are pulling out all the stops to get the country back on track. In order to prop up economic growth, Chinese authorities have:

A) Raised tax rebates for exporters of everything from high-tech and electronic products (motorcycles, sewing machines and robots, etc) to some rubber and wood products.

B) scraped export taxes for some steel products, aluminum, rice, wheat, flour and fertilizers

C) Cut the lock-up period beyond which people can resell their property without paying a business tax from five years to two years.

D) scraped the urban property tax for foreign firms and individuals

E) Allowed people to buy second homes on the same preferential terms normally reserved for first time buyers.

F) Announced plan to spend 900 billion yuan over three years to build affordable housing

G) Cut the deed tax payable by first-time buyers of homes smaller than 90 sq m is to 1 percent.

H) Announced measures such as cash subsidies and tax cuts to encourage home purchases

I) Announced plans for a 4 trillion yuan (586 billion) stimulus package to boost domestic demand through 2010.

J) Announced plans to invest 5 trillion yuan roads, waterways and ports in the next three to five years (over 2 trillion yuan more than originally planned).

K) Approved 2 trillion yuan for railway investment

M) Announced a tax break for public infrastructure projects.

N) Abolished the 5 percent withholding tax on interest income.

O) Scraped the 0.1 percent tax on purchases of equities.

P) Instructed Central Huijin (a government investment arm) to buy shares of listed Chinese firms.

Q) Encouraged state-owned firms to buy back shares.

R) Raised minimum grain purchase prices by 15 percent

S) Approved landmark reforms that give peasants the right to lease or transfer their land-use rights

T) Issued a stimulus package for its auto sector, including a tax cut

U) Set a price floor for air tickets

V) Handed out cash gifts to brighten the mood before the Chinese New Year

W) Etc...

10) Banks are flooding the economy with new loans

Chinese authorities are pushing banks to extend credit and help fight "deflation". To encourage this money supply growth and new lending, the PBOC (the People's Bank Of China) has halted sterilization operations and has cut the benchmark one-year lending rate by 2.16 percent and the deposit rate by 1.89 percent. Also, as part of these efforts, Chinese officials are reversing decades of financial repression and freeing up their banking system.

As China lifts restrictions on lending, banks are flooding the economy with new loans. Credit ceilings under which commercial banks have been operating have now been removed, and credit controls have been relaxed to give banks more leeway in making lending decisions. Chinese lenders will now be able to restructure loans and adjust the types and maturities of debt. Banks are being pressured to use this new financial freedom to "promote and consolidate the expansion of consumer credit".

In addition to stimulating consumption, credit constraints are being relaxed to give loan access to small and medium privately owned businesses, which have until now been mostly shut out of credit by the state-owned financial system. As part of this effort and in order to help banks overcome their deflation fears,
China has said it will tolerate more bad debt. This step is particularly significant, as the heavy penalties imposed for the creation of new non-performing loans has been a big restraint on credit expansion.

Finally, the commitment of Chinese authorities to fight deflation is so great that regulators have stated they will support the sale and securitization of loans. I repeat,
China is moving towards securitization of loans! The adoption of securitization holds the potential to enormously accelerate money supply growth.

China's efforts to boost lending are working. In December,
China's M2 money and loan growth soared. Just look at the graph of Chinese money supply growth below.

Does it look like China is headed towards deflation to you? (this chart will become much scarier once January's numbers are added in)

ConclusionI view hyperinflation in China as absolutely guaranteed. Zero doubt. China is dismantling all the measures it has put in place over the years to fight inflation. It is dropping restrictions on purchasing property, eliminating price controls, getting rid of loan quotas, lowering interest rates, ceasing its sterilization efforts, etc… It is also pulling out all the stops to boost government spending and new loan creation.

Meanwhile, China's 40 billion dollar trade surplus means that its base money supply looks set to double in 2009. There is also the fact that China's money supply is frozen due to cash hoarding and will cause inflation to increase when it accelerates. Finally, the commodity bubble has finished bursting, and China's economy looks set to shrink.

Every economic factor in China suggests an enormous wave of hyperinflation will begin early this year. While I have written about
the threats facing the dollar, this will be the event that finally ends the US's borrowing binge and destroys our currency.

Hyperinflation in China will be a monumental event

Because China makes most of the world cheap consumer goods, it will export its hyperinflation around the world. This means that no fiat/paper currencies will survive this with its purchasing power intact. Some will lose all value (dollar) while others will survive while experiencing a loss of purchasing power (yuan, euro, yen, etc...). The only money that will retain its full value in the face of Chinese hyperinflation is gold.

China will sink the dollar to save the yuan

Once hyperinflation kicks into gear, Chinese authorities will find it impossible to bring it under control without sacrificing the dollar. Since hyperinflation would hurt Chinese exporters as much as losing their US exports, China will face a clear cut decision. By dumping the dollar peg and selling its USD holdings, China will help contain domestic inflation in many ways:

1) China will no longer be printing massive quantities of yuan to support the dollar.

2) By selling dollars in exchange for yuan, China will be able to take those yuan out of circulation, shrinking its monetary base.

3) Since the yuan will strengthen enormously again foreign currencies, Chinese exports will fall and that means there will be a lot more goods available for domestic consumption.

4) Since the yuan will be stronger against foreign currencies like the dollar, Chinese imports will rise. That means cheaper commodity prices across the board.

5) Dropping the dollar peg will make the yuan a major reserve currency. That means lower interests rates in China as foreign central banks build up yuan reserves.

Those expecting deflation are in for a surprise

Western nations who are lowering interest rate very sharply, without fearing inflation, are mainly concentrating on the domestic dynamics of their economies and the value of their currency. My bet is that no one is even considering the possibility that inflation could be imported from China, and, when cheap Chinese imports stop being cheap anymore, it will catch everybody completely by surprise