Biological Gravity Plausibly Observed

I took the trouble to catch up on my backlog on unread material one weekend and came across this article by Grebenniko describing the Cavity Structural Effect. It is very important and is to date totally misunderstood. I then forgot to post it, but we will remedy this now.

APPLICATION OF A POLARIZATION MODEL OF HETEROGENEOUS PHYSICAL VACUUM TO BIOLOGY

http://www.keelynet.com/greb/greb.htm

NATURAL PHENOMENA OF BIOLOGICAL ANTIGRAVITATION ASSOCIATED WITH INVISIBILITY IN INSECTS & GREBENNIKOV'S CAVITY STRUCTURAL EFFECT

The article is very long but is a very empirical description of the process of discovery and his sharing of the evidence and his successful experiments. I needed to work through it twice to come to a proper understanding of what it was that I had just read.

I advise readers to jump past the introduction and go straight into the first part of the text. You need to trust his approach before you move on to the wilder stuff. Then go back and read the rest.

Centuries of scholarship has given us electro magnetic force, clearly associated with the interplay of electrons and protons, it has given us gravity associated with the total particle count and so far nothing else, and forces internal to atomic structure.

Suddenly we are confronted with an effect associated with the cellular structure of material that we are able to biologically sense. Yet no other measuring device is able to detect any such effect. Also, the zone of influence appears related to the apparent geometry. This is actually good news, because it tells me we do not have to go looking for a new force of nature. We are biologically detecting the fine structure of gravitational force. In fact my own readings regarding curious phenomena inform me that we have seen and misunderstood this forever. Regrettably it is a weak sensation and is easily just confounding, as the author came close to been in this case. How easy to just walk away.

My recently submitted paper on a new metric to Physics Essays makes this interpretation obvious and actually implies geometric structure of this nature. We just had no way to measure it and still do not.

For clarity gravity is directly proportional to the particle count contributing to the sum force and must be affected by macroscopic geometry. We have always ignored the possibility and inevitability of fine structure gravity because we could not measure it. That never meant that it failed to exist or that one day we might measure it. It actually makes great sense that a single cell animal be able to sense local gravity variation while suspended in a fluid. Ask a simple question. Does such a cell understand up and down in a test tube? We get disoriented in a neutral gravity situation but that is likely because other cues are overriding our senses.

In fact we still have no great way to measure gravity to this day. That is why Grebenniko was unable to measure any effects even when everyone could pass his hand about an active object and sense changes.

He goes on to discuss additional experiments with manipulating gravity directly taking his lead from his observations alone. That this was possible is more than I could predict safely from my theoretical work but was open to speculation. He claims in his paper that he has made it work and for now we do not need to go there at all.

It is enough that he has identified repeatable phenomena and shared it with all and sundry. This is good science that must be cheered.

This is the first convincing report of biological management of gravity that I have come across and it puts the topic into testable status that can be repeated by anyone, once we get access to the underlying protocols and perhaps a hint at what insects to chase with our butterfly nets.

He reports that he went on to produce a device that manipulated gravity and allowed him to travel above the ground. This is obviously very promising.

Gravity

Gravity is a topic taught in physics and largely apologized for. We are given the formulation of Newton and perhaps a quick pass on the subject of General Relativity in which gravity disappears into mystery. This is unfortunate, but is caused by a simple remarkable fact. We are barely able to sense it at all if at all or so we believe. Its existence was deduced by its apparent action as an attractor at a distance in the planetary system, with a lot of clever mathematics.

For the other apparent forces of nature the opposite is true. They are detectable and measurable because they are generated by complexes of those components that originate gravity. Gravity is far deeper in the structure of our universe.

You may or may not know that I have constructed a metric that is able to describe gravity at the particle level and have submitted a paper describing that metric and its mathematica. Constructing the particle universe with this metric is a larger task requiring substantial computer resources. We are not about to go there, but there is a few things that I can say.

Gravity is better described as impressed curvature. Just as a planet creates a gravity well, so too does a particle at the sub atomic level. It is not however a Pythagorean metric. It is quite different except that it also satisfies a Pythagorean metric of order greater than two. More importantly all matter is structured as we know already and homogeneous for the scaling we care about today.

If you feel that you slightly understood what I just said and wish to discuss it further, feel free to contact me.

What this is all saying is that this impressed curvature which at the macro level is simply positive though whose magnitude is very small is also geometrically cumulative. This is also common sense. If you have a stick, then the impressed positive curvature will be larger at the ends than along the sides. We are not dealing with any cancelling effects and the curvature itself is not shielded at all. The gross geometry of the structure guides the impressed curvature.

Now from my perspective this was all obvious and could be dismissed because we could not sense or measure these differences. Then along came the late Grebennikov who not only was able to sense these effects but then learned to work with them. It turns out that insects, that have a lot to gain through such mastery had developed ways to use this curvature. This also made plenty of sense since their aerodynamic strength profile is responsive to such mastery whereas we certainly are not.

Check out the described experiments posted a couple of days ago and try them out. I have not done so yet but some are dead simple and no fuss at all. If we can all make the pyramid frame spin we will all be on his page knowing that fine geometric curvature actually exists. It is also better to have a lot of folks doing these experiments because it will allow us to report to each other through this blog. Also a hundred people demonstrating gravity effects and perhaps even gravity shielding as opposed to antigravity is vastly more convincing than looking over the shoulders of a lone individual and kibitzing. In other words, I am damned if I am going to do this all by myself because I know better.