Dale
has provided us here with an overview of previous work on the sea
creature phenomenon particularly as done by Paul Leblond.
What
I am comfortable with is that there are outright sea serpents out
there with external gills on their heads. These have been seen up
close and personal all over the world. I am unconvinced that we have
pleiosaurs out there though. The argument that we are mistaking
other creatures for this is well taken and nicely shown by some of
this material.
On
the west coast, there were 300 individual reports of cadosaurus and
one I read and posted here some years back could hardly be closer and
better.
Dale
suggests that we may also have a large mammal out there although I
find that to be a stretch simply because it would be surely confined
to the surface making discovery inevitable. The sea serpent lives
mostly in the deep well away from then surface.
THURSDAY, 22 NOVEMBER
2012
I found this on a photo search yesterday and I found it EXTREMELY interesting.
IDENTIFYING THE
UNIDENTIFIABLE
July 27, 2012
The three types of
unidentified sea creatures described by Dr. Paul LeBlond. (Linda
Godfrey)
Ancient myths paint
unknown sea creatures as true monsters, or beings that combine
characteristics of different species and that may possess
supernatural powers. But the modern view of sea“monsters” is
usually that they are unknown, natural animals. But what kind of
animal are they? Reptile? Amphibian? Mammal? Some researchers have
analyzed as many eyewitness accounts as possible and created models
that most closely match all these descriptions.
The task itself is
monstrous, given the many stories reported over the years by hundreds
of people in all types of weather and light conditions, from varied
distances and points of view. Creatures that resemble giant whales,
squid, or other known ocean dwellers demand separate categories. And
those that most closely fit the public’s mental image of sea
monsters have been described with many combinations of long necks,
“humps,” flippers, headsranging from turtle-like to horse-like,
lengths from 20 to over 100 feet, and skin both scaled and smooth.
Yet most classifiers have managed to boil them down into some basic
subtypes.
In 1963 French
zoologist Bernard Heuvelmans wrote a classic book, In the Wake of the
Sea Serpents, that attempted to place sightings from around the world
into nine categories: long-necked, merhorse, many humped,
super-otters, many-finned, super-eels, marine saurians, yellow-
bellies, and fathers-of-all-the-turtles. While it is now alleged that
Heuvelmans skewed data to fit his own ideas in some cases, he is
still known as the “father of cryptozoology” for his pioneering
work on unknown species.
Inspired partly by
Heuvelman’s work, scientists Dr. Paul H. LeBlond of the University
of British Columbia’s Institute of Oceanography and Dr. John Sibert
looked at reports of large, unknown creatures inhabiting the waters
of British Columbia and found three subtypes that sound much like sea
monsters reported around the world. These were repeated in a 1980
book by biologist and author Roy P. Mackal, who cautioned that the
three categories may not represent separate species and in fact might
simply show differences between male and female:
1. A creature with
large eyes set laterally on a horse- or camel-shaped head mounted at
the end of a long neck. This animal is a fast swimmer, has short,
dark-brown fur and no mane. It is probably a mammal and may be
related to seals.
2. An animal similar
to the first type but with small eyes, sometimes described with horns
or mane. Both types are not only fast, but also smooth swimmers,
submerging vertically as if pulled under.
3. A long, serpentine
animal, showing loops of its body above water and swimming fast, with
much thrashing. Its head is described as sheeplike with small
eyes, and it has a dorsal fin running along part of its back.
I can identify each
of these creatures quite easily but they do not ordinarily come so
assorted. Usually the more normal animal-shaped creatures 1 or 2 are
also trailing a length of tail or wake which gives the appearance of
number 3. In fact the sheeplike head of number 3 is comparable to
number 1 or 2. In assorting these categories out, 1 and 2 are fairly
small animals although they can be reported as being larger (again,
according to how long of a "Tail" they are trailing.) 1 and
2 are obviously the same sort of creature and they can be
characterised as "Plain" #1 and "Fancy"#2, with
the latter embellished by mane or beard, horns or floppy ears.(DD)
But here is another
view for clarification:
HUNTING SEA BEASTS
How to spot a
sea monster
2012-06-23T07:00:00Z2012-06-26T08:26:41ZHunting
sea beastsDaniel Simmons-Ritchie, The WorldThe World
June 23, 2012 7:00
am • Daniel Simmons-Ritchie, The World
Sighted a sea beast?
Contact the British Columbia Cryptozoology Club:
Too much silliness? Read a British paleontologist’s article debunking the Cadboro-saurus:
blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/2012/04/16/the-cadborosaurus-wars/
COOS BAY — My editor
called me insane.
“I need money,” I said. “I need a boat.”
My editor, as a broad rule, does not believe in sea monsters. Even those, like the Cadborosaurus, that have been seen by over 300 seafarers.
If I’m insane, I argued to my editor on a Friday afternoon in The World office, then I must be in good company.
No more than 60 years ago, a fishing crew watched an unknown creature approach their ship off Cape Arago.
If those men were insane, so too perhaps were the fishermen who recorded a humped beast in Alaskan waters in 2009. Footage later appeared on the Discovery Channel.
If we are insane, then our ringleader must be Paul LeBlond, an emeritus professor from the University of British Columbia. For 50 years, LeBlond has collated hundreds of monster sightings.
Commonly described as a “horse-headed megaserpent,” the creature has all the hallmarks of the Loch Ness Monster. In the Pacific Northwest, experts know the beast by a different name: The Cadborosaurus.
Skeptical? LeBlond asks doubters to read about the Cadborosaurus before brushing it aside.
“This isn’t like UFOs that are a stretch of the imagination,” LeBlond said. “This is a zoological possibility. There are still animals being discovered in the ocean.”
In the interest of pushing the zoological frontier, I wanted to charter a boat in search of the Cadborosaurus. My dream was to be the first man to lay claim to the brute.
It was the hunt for the leviathan.
Expedition
I set sail from Charleston Marina on the 14th of June with a five-man crew, pressed between 15-knot winds and the allure of the unknown.
The odds were against us. While the Cadborosaurus is sighted from California to Alaska, it has been more than 50 years since one was spied off Cape Arago.
Among experts, British Columbia is known as ground zero for Cadborosaurus sightings. In the 1930s, the beast was named after its frequent sightings in Cadboro Bay, Vancouver Island.
But even in the heart of “Caddie” country, the serpent is elusive. Despite several expeditions, LeBlond has never seen one in real life. In late May, a National Geographic film crew at his side, the Canadian made another unsuccessful search.
LeBlond didn’t rate the chances of my own expedition.
“You would basically keep your eyes open and go to sea without a strong expectation of seeing anything, because the creature is rarely seen,” he said.
But he offered some advice: Keep your camera ready. Too many photo opportunities have been missed by distracted observers.
“They stand there ogling the creature and forget about their camera,” he said. “One good photo is worth a lot of eyewitness observations.”
My crew was up for the challenge. Although my editor was absent, I had a World photographer at my side.
I also had Mel Campbell of the Wild Women of Charleston. When Campbell heard of The World’s expedition, she insisted on joining.
“I just have this feeling, a good feeling that today is the day. Don’t you?” said Campbell, as our boat churned through the brackish water of the Charleston channel.
And, unlike LeBlond, I had the eagle eyes of Margie Whitmer, the owner of Betty Kay Charters.
Fate had brought me to Whitmer, a red-haired woman with a warm, motherly charm. When I first called, she not only agreed to reserve me her 47-foot boat; she also told me, unexpectedly, that her father had sighted a Cadborosaurus off the coast of Washington.
Margie recounted the story: It was 1956. Whitmer’s father was salmon fishing with four friends on a foggy day in Neah Bay. A creature appeared, which he described as “long, dark, bigger than a boat.”
“He said, ‘I’m never going out again in an open boat, a small boat, for salmon,’” Whitmer said. “It scared him that much.”
I asked whether her father might have been joking.
Whitmer shook her head.
“He was just very serious, to the point that you know he was rattled,” she said. “And he was a big strong man and nothing could disturb him. But that sure did.”
Sea
After 30 minutes, we reached open water. We were alone now, two miles from land, a crouton in a teal soup.
Our boat churned toward Cape Arago lighthouse, our eyes probing the horizon.
An hour passed and our hopes began to fray. No necks. No humps. No fins.
Compounding matters, seasickness began to take hold of me. I could barely hold my harpoon.
We charted a course homeward.
Return
As our boat pulled into the marina, a sea lion lazed on the pier. In a search built on hearsay and dreams, its flesh, so blubbery and tangible, taunted me.
Be it Cadboro Bay or Loch Ness, few monsters appear to those who search for them. Most witnesses, like Whitmer’s father, stumble on the beast by accident.
Sadly, those sightings are never enough for the insatiable appetite of the scientific record.
Jan Hodder, a Charleston-based marine biologist from Oregon State University, says while little is known about many deep sea creatures, those closer to shore are well-documented.
“Just think of how many people are on the ocean all the time,” she said.
A British paleontologist, Darren Naish, is less polite. He says Cadborosaurus mavens, like Paul LeBlond, have created a composite creature based on body parts from different sightings.
“Accounts used to support the reality of ‘Cadborosaurus’ likely represent a hodge-podge of seal and deer sightings, as well as sightings of other animals and phenomena,” Naish wrote in his blog for Scientific American.
These comments are fuel to the fire of unbelief. While I remain empty-handed today, I am cheered by a 1933 editorial in the Victoria Daily Times by Archie Willis, an editor more imaginative than my own.
“Any fool can disbelieve in sea serpents,” he wrote.
Reporter Daniel Simmons-Ritchie can be reached at 541-269-1222, ext. 249, or at dritchie@theworldlink.com.
Basically you have a situation with sightings assumed to be in the shape of the newspaper article's sketch. Creatures with necks 3-6 feet long need to be separated out from the more definitely Longnecked category of creatures reported with necks 6-12 feet long (and perhaps twice that actually.) and a body length of 10-20 feet long to go with the shorter-necked category but 20-40 feet to go along with the longer necks 12 feet long or so. (That is, the LongNecked creatures are up to 30-50 feet long total, length of neck assumed about 1/3 to 1/4 of total length, and shoter-necked creatures in the range of 10-20 feet long total with a head like that of a horse or camel reported on both categories, only a neck reported as half as long in the smaller category. The larger sized longer necked category now matches with Tim Dinsdale's Reconstruction of the Loch Ness Monster in its basic measurements and proportions.)
We can now return to LeBlonde's creatures listed above.
His long bodied creature is clearly the same as "THE GREAT SEA SERPENT" Otherwise reported World-wide in all bodies of water, freshwater and saltwater, and described in similar terms all over. It is also illustrated as the tail section of the newspaper article's monster sketch (DD)
No comments:
Post a Comment