Not so fast folks. While a comet can intercept the earth’s orbit it is also most likely to end up impacting Jupiter. However impacting the Earth is a probable event however minor. That a full impact is very unlikely is welcome news that also makes the Pleistocene nonconformity much more anthropogenic. We added another few millions of zeros to the probability measure. It is now about one chance in a billion or so to get hit at all times the one chance in a billion to hit it on the bull’s eye.
The main effect of a comet strike is kinetic energy transfer to the crust but naturally spread out as it will have broken up, and also a killing shock wave that will need an entire continent to properly attenuate. We will also have a major injection of soot and a lot of frozen methane, water and whatever else.
A comet strike is thus an excellent way to eliminate large animals that are simply too fully exposed while deer in a coulee can be amply protected. Decimation of large carnivores may simply have been too much for their recovery if human predation quickly recovered also.
We can make one assertion at least. A comet strike will leave a thin layer of carbon in the fossil record. It may be possible to separate its origins from organic carbon.
What we do know is that a major strike is unlikely even though a small strike like Tunguska is likely very common. We could have one per year over the Pacific and no one would be the wiser. I suspect that we do not even measure atmospheric soot at the moment
Acquitting Comets Of Catastrophes
by Staff Writers
Moffett Field CA (SPX) Aug 05, 2009
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Acquitting_Comets_Of_Catastrophes_999.html
Scientists have long debated the role of asteroid and comet impacts in mass extinctions on Earth. New research may indicate that it is highly unlikely that comets caused any mass extinctions. The findings could have implications in determining the likelihood of globally-damaging impacts in our planet's future.
Scientists have debated how many mass extinction events in Earth's history were triggered by a space body crashing into the planet's surface. Most agree that an asteroid collision 65 million years ago brought an end to the age of dinosaurs, but there is uncertainty about how many other extinctions might have resulted from asteroid or comet collisions with Earth.
The main effect of a comet strike is kinetic energy transfer to the crust but naturally spread out as it will have broken up, and also a killing shock wave that will need an entire continent to properly attenuate. We will also have a major injection of soot and a lot of frozen methane, water and whatever else.
A comet strike is thus an excellent way to eliminate large animals that are simply too fully exposed while deer in a coulee can be amply protected. Decimation of large carnivores may simply have been too much for their recovery if human predation quickly recovered also.
We can make one assertion at least. A comet strike will leave a thin layer of carbon in the fossil record. It may be possible to separate its origins from organic carbon.
What we do know is that a major strike is unlikely even though a small strike like Tunguska is likely very common. We could have one per year over the Pacific and no one would be the wiser. I suspect that we do not even measure atmospheric soot at the moment
Acquitting Comets Of Catastrophes
by Staff Writers
Moffett Field CA (SPX) Aug 05, 2009
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Acquitting_Comets_Of_Catastrophes_999.html
Scientists have long debated the role of asteroid and comet impacts in mass extinctions on Earth. New research may indicate that it is highly unlikely that comets caused any mass extinctions. The findings could have implications in determining the likelihood of globally-damaging impacts in our planet's future.
Scientists have debated how many mass extinction events in Earth's history were triggered by a space body crashing into the planet's surface. Most agree that an asteroid collision 65 million years ago brought an end to the age of dinosaurs, but there is uncertainty about how many other extinctions might have resulted from asteroid or comet collisions with Earth.
In fact, astronomers know the inner solar system has been protected at least to some degree by Saturn and Jupiter, whose gravitational fields can eject comets into interstellar space or sometimes send them crashing into the giant planets. That point was reinforced last week (July 20) when a huge scar appeared on Jupiter's surface, likely evidence of a comet impact.
New University of Washington research indicates it is highly unlikely that comets have caused any mass extinctions or have been responsible for more than one minor extinction event. The work also shows that many long-period comets that end up in Earth-crossing orbits likely originate from a region astronomers have long believed could not produce observable comets. A long-period comet takes from 200 years to tens of millions of years to make a single orbit of the sun.
"It was thought the long-period comets we see just tell us about the outer Oort Cloud, but they really give us a murky picture of the entire Oort Cloud," said Nathan Kaib, a University of Washington doctoral student in astronomy and lead author of a paper on the work being published July 30 in Science Express, the online edition of the journal Science. NASA and the National Science Foundation funded the work.
The Oort Cloud is a remnant of the nebula from which the solar system formed 4.5 billion years ago. It begins about 93 billion miles from the sun (1,000 times Earth's distance from the sun) and stretches to about three light years away (a light year is about 5.9 trillion miles). The Oort Cloud could contain billions of comets, most so small and distant as to never be observed.
There are about 3,200 known long-period comets. Among the best-remembered is Hale-Bopp, which was easily visible to the naked eye for much of 1996 and 1997 and was one of the brightest comets of the 20th century. By comparison, Halley's comet, which reappears about every 75 years, is perhaps the best-known comet, but it is a short-period comet, most of which are believed to originate in a different part of the solar system called the Kuiper Belt.
It has been believed that nearly all long-period comets that move inside Jupiter to Earth-crossing trajectories originated in the outer Oort Cloud. Their orbits can change when they are nudged by the gravity of a neighboring star as it passes close to the solar system, and it was thought such encounters only affect very distant outer Oort Cloud bodies.
It also was believed that inner Oort Cloud bodies could reach Earth-crossing orbits only during the rare close passage of a star, which would cause a comet shower. But it turns out that even without a star encounter, long-period comets from the inner Oort Cloud can slip past the protective barrier posed by the presence of Jupiter and Saturn and travel a path that crosses Earth's orbit.
In the new research, Kaib and co-author Thomas Quinn, a UW astronomy professor and Kaib's doctoral adviser, used computer models to simulate the evolution of comet clouds in the solar system for 1.2 billion years. They found that even outside the periods of comet showers, the inner Oort Cloud was a major source of long-period comets that eventually cross Earth's path.
By assuming the inner Oort Cloud as the only source of long-period comets, they were able to estimate the highest possible number of comets in the inner Oort Cloud. The actual number is not known. But by using the maximum number possible, they determined that no more than two or three comets could have struck Earth during what is believed to be the most powerful comet shower of the last 500 million years.
"For the past 25 years, the inner Oort Cloud has been considered a mysterious, unobserved region of the solar system capable of providing bursts of bodies that occasionally wipe out life on Earth," Quinn said. "We have shown that comets already discovered can actually be used to estimate an upper limit on the number of bodies in this reservoir."
With three major impacts taking place nearly simultaneously, it had been proposed that the minor extinction event about 40 million years ago resulted from a comet shower. Kaib and Quinn's research implies that if that relatively minor extinction event was caused by a comet shower, then that was probably the most-intense comet shower since the fossil record began.
"That tells you that the most powerful comet showers caused minor extinctions and other showers should have been less severe, so comet showers are probably not likely causes of mass extinction events," Kaib said.
He noted that the work assumes the area surrounding the solar system has remained relatively unchanged for the last 500 million years, but it is unclear whether that is really the case. It is clear, though, that Earth has benefitted from having Jupiter and Saturn standing guard like giant catchers mitts, deflecting or absorbing comets that might otherwise strike Earth.
"We show that Jupiter and Saturn are not perfect and some of the comets from the inner Oort Cloud are able to leak through. But most don't," Kaib said. The results of the study shed light on how comet impacts could have affected Earth's biosphere in the past, and also help astrobiologists understand the liklihood of comet impacts affecting the future of life on Earth.
