Friday, March 13, 2009

Chicken Manure sorts out Oil Spills

You never know when a good idea will show up. Chicken manure has never been a satisfactory source of fertilizer on its own. This shows us a little of what we already know, but formalizes it as a preferred option where an excess of complex carbon based molecules are choking of natural remediation.

Thus hitting the beach after an oil spill, with chicken manure and mixing the two will possibly do wonders in the clean up. It could even justify the bagging and storage of chicken manure under a remediation contract formula so that the material is available as needed.

Without moisture, the biological activity is easily arrested and safely stored. This can become a viable farm product since actual utilization of this material has been suboptimal. Used as bioremediation agent, it could actually be valuable and superior to simply using chemical fertilizers.

The user gets an effective product that is also light and in the case of oil spills can be mixed with fiber to grab it all together allowing nature the opportunity to clean it all up.

Since it has always been an inconvenience for the factory farm, it is likely that other uses will ever compete significantly.

Chicken manure sorts out oil spills

Bacterial degradation of oil is under investigation as a more environmentally friendly means of cleaning up after spills. Other schemes that use chemicals such as detergents can in turn pollute the area themselves.

Often the bacteria used in such bioremediation require the addition of nitrogen and phosphorus to act as nutrients and promote their growth. Whilst researching the enrichment of microbial cultures at Wuhan University, China, Bello Yakubu found that adding chicken manure as a nutrient source also decreased the content of hydrocarbons in the soil.
"This reminded us that adding animal manure into petroleum-polluted land might be a prospective measure to remediate contaminated soil because it might be a cheaper and a more environmental-friendly way to treat the pollution caused by petroleum and animal manure simultaneously, as described in a Chinese idiom 'killing two birds with one stone'," said Huiwen Ma of Wuhan University, Yakubu's supervisor at the time. "So we decided to study the finding deeply."

After adding chicken manure to soil contaminated with 10% by volume of light crude oil, the team found that around 75% of the oil was broken down after two weeks. Soil without the manure broke down just 50% of the oil.

The researchers believe that Bacillus species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the best at breaking down the hydrocarbons; a total of 12 bacteria species were able to metabolize components of the oil.

As well as adding bacteria and nutrients, the manure raises the acidity of the soil to between 6.3 and 7.4 – an ideal range for growth of the bacteria. Other fertilizers used in bioremediation can be expensive and can lead to soil hardening and a loss of soil quality.

Yakubu has now returned to his native Nigeria and is at Niger State College of Education while Ma has retired and is acting as a scientific advisor to a hi-tech environmental protection company in Shenzhen, China, whose "major business is to provide solutions for treating highly concentrated organic wastewater, malodorant, and municipal solid waste, including fly-ash from incinerators and waste-activated sludge from sewage treatment facilities".

The researchers reported their work in International Journal of Environment and Pollution.

Nelder on Mexico

We all want to see a prosperous middle class Mexico emerging from the country’s long dalliance with third world status. Mexico has never had more friends north of the border.

Yet here we are watching another victim succumbing to the travesty of the failed drug prohibition strategy maintained in the USA. Any form of prohibition merely finances a growing war between authority and a well financed and organized criminal business class.

Ending the war on drugs by converting it into a medical management problem immediately ends the financial support for all of the wars that the USA is engaged in, including those in the Middle East. It even ends the medical problem substantially and decimates internal gang crime in the USA which exists solely to support the drug distribution business.

It also strips a huge amount of the hot money washing through the offshore banking system on a daily basis and speeds the healing of that system.

It is said that the root of all evil is money and today the global currency system is practically backed by an inflated drug trade that continues to wreck economies and reintroduce barbarism. End it now, Mr. Obama.

My readers should consider this as a heads up on a developing crisis that will impact the USA directly and indirectly. A nasty civil war financed by the drug trade is nobody’s idea of good governance and can possibly draw in US troops acting in support of the Mexican government. It will not be pretty, but it will not be a surprise. This column is alarmist, but should we not be alarmed over how the drug economy has trampled its way through our society for over fifty years?

When the history is written a century from now, no credit will accrue to the US government in its handling of the drug problem. In fact huge blame will be attached for the damage induced.

Once again the same method is used repeatedly with the same continuing bad result. We expect the result to ever be different.

Mexico's Troubles Are Our Troubles
By Chris Nelder Wednesday, March 11th, 2009

http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?.rand=6ck0q9fc831ev

A new contender now tops my long list of worries: Mexico.

I have been keenly aware of Mexico's troubles for most of my life. I lived in Mexico City for a short while as a kid, and saw its crushing poverty firsthand. I vividly remember certain formative experiences, like seeing kids my age dressed in rags and panhandling for centavos, or eight full-grown men riding a single motorcycle, or a rural cave dwelling with a TV antenna sticking out of the top, powered by an illegal tap on a nearby power line. I also grew up in Tucson, where shopping excursions to the border town of Nogales 60 miles away was standard fare when we had visitors.

But I have written about Mexico's oil production repeatedly in this column primarily because it is so essential to US supply. Mexico is our #3 source of imports, providing 1.3 million barrels per day (mbpd), or about 6% of our total petroleum supply (EIA, Dec 2008 data).

Yet Mexico's days as a top oil producer, and possibly its days as a democratic nation, are numbered.

Mexico's largest oil field, Cantarell, is one of the four largest "supergiant" oil fields in the world, and was once the world's second-largest producer (after Saudi Arabia's Ghawar field). It peaked in 2003 at 2.1 mbpd, but thanks to a program of nitrogen injection that was pursued to maximize the rate of production (probably at the expense of long-term production), its production is crashing at an accelerating rate, currently about 38% per year. It is now producing about 0.77 mbpd, and will probably fall to 0.5 mbpd before tailing off at a gentler rate (or so Pemex hopes).

Mexico's largest producing region is now the Ku-Maloob-Zaap (KMZ) complex, adjacent to the Cantarell complex. It's a much smaller complex than Cantarell, and at 0.78 mbpd it is near its planned maximum production rate. Nitrogen injection was initiated from the beginning, which we could take as an indication that Mexico would rather maximize its revenue now than worry about tomorrow.

One doesn't have to look too far to see why that might be.

Oil is Mexico's number-one export. With its oil revenues in decline, the state is finding it increasingly difficult to fund operations-including operations against one of its other top exports: illegal drugs.

"A State of Undeclared War"

Drug cartels have grown in power and wealth in Mexico, and have now taken to open war with the authorities, who are finding themselves increasingly outgunned against better funded and supplied adversaries sporting military-grade weaponry.

An estimated 10,000 people have died in the violence since Mexico's president Felipe Calderón took office in 2006 and began a campaign against organized crime. Over 6,000 died last year alone, of which about four-fifths were criminals killing criminals, plus about 800 police, soldiers, prosecutors and other officials who dared to fight organized crime. Another 1000 have already died in 2009.

The atrocities committed are brazen and horrific, including torture, beheadings, and public displays of mutilated corpses. Gangs hang banners in the streets announcing their views, make public threats against officials, and make YouTube videos of their executions. Extortion and protection rackets are proliferating as the federal crackdown has splintered the cartels into warring factions. The nation's framework of 32 independent states, a decrepit judicial process, and an ineffective and disorganized federal police force have left the nation with a corrupt law enforcement system that is ill-equipped to control the cartels.

The violence is primarily concentrated in the Sinaloa region, and along the border with the US, as gangs fight with one another for market share and try to smuggle their goods north, and guns and cash south. Consequently, the border cities of the US are fighting an escalating battle of their own.

Phoenix is now the kidnapping capitol of the US, with 366 abductions last year, mostly conducted by and against cartel members for financial gain and displays of power, but increasingly also against innocent civilians and even against anti-kidnapping authorities. Phoenix is now also the top gateway city where illegal drugs enter the US. Other US cities along Mexican borders of California, Arizona and Texas are contending with increased violence and trade in weapons.

The reach of the cartels now extends to every corner of the US, from distribution of marijuana and cocaine in major cities, to guerilla pot farms in national parks and the mountains of Northern California. Mexican drug cartels are now the major criminal force in America, surpassing the Mafia.

In a congressional hearing with the Department of Homeland Security yesterday, Rep. John Culberson of Texas called the conflict "a state of undeclared war on the southern border."

Strangely, Mexico's troubles have remained mostly off the radar in the US, until the State Department issued a warning on February 20 urging American travelers—particularly students on spring break—to avoid going there for their own safety.

So what does the estimated $20 billion trade in illegal drugs from Mexico have to do with energy, you ask?

Oil Exports Are Crucial

Mexico's exports of oil and gas to the US account for over one-third of the government's revenues, and their decline is expected to widen the country's current-account deficit to an average 3.6% of GDP in 2009-13. Its economy is projected to contract by 2% this year as its exports to the US fall due to the recession, which has weakened the peso badly; around a third of its value relative to the dollar has eroded since last August.

The declining production of Cantarell alone will deprive Mexico's economy of roughly $5 billion, or half a percent of its approximately $1 trillion GDP.

At the same time, a large number of migrant workers in the US are going back home as their work here dries up. (On a trip to Oregon a few weeks ago, I visited a commercial farmer who put a sign up at the end of his driveway saying "No Trabajo" after being hounded by up to five worker gangs per day looking for field work.) The loss of that income to the workers' families back home will be keenly felt.

Add to that declining tourism revenues—my family doesn't take shopping trips to Mexico anymore, due to poor security and other problems—and a loss of income due to the falling price of oil, and you have an economy that is truly on the ropes.

It will be very difficult for the Mexican government to maintain order, keep its people fed and sheltered, and fight the drug cartels under such severe pressures. Some experienced analysts of Mexico have even speculated that the country will not survive as a nation-state for more than another few years.

It will also make it very difficult for Pemex, under whose sole domain the Mexican petroleum industry operates, to raise the necessary capital to expand its oil and gas production. Mexican law prohibits foreign companies from owning its petroleum resources, so it relies heavily on debt backed by foreign issuers to fund its operations.

Given the increasing uncertainty of Mexico's future, the inability of its law enforcement to maintain security, the crippling of its currency, declining tourism, and a possible downgrading of its investment grade on the horizon, I find it hard to imagine how Pemex will continue to invest at the necessary levels—$20 billion in capital expenditures are planned for this year—to keep its oil and gas flowing to US markets.

On current trends, Mexico's oil and gas exports to the US will cease entirely within seven years.

How will the US adjust to a 6% loss in its oil supply from Mexico alone, when all of its other major suppliers are also in decline, and foreign competitors are able and willing to pay hefty sums for the last, marginal barrel of exported oil?

It won't be easy, but our remaining reserves right here at home will become an increasingly important answer to that challenge, and those barrels will sell for much higher prices than they do today. Not only is Mexico my number-one worry, it's also my number-one reason to invest in domestic oil and gas producers with significant reserves.

Much of our unconventional oil reserves are too expensive to produce at a profit while oil is still in the $40s. But that might turn out to be a good thing. If we were to leave them in the ground for another three years, they could be worth three times as much when we do produce them, and make a crucial contribution to our national security.

Until next time,

Chris

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Al Gore on Civil Rights Movement

There comes a time when the unrelenting propaganda is so over the top that one becomes offended.

Tying in the civil rights movement as a comparable is saddening. That was the ending in the USA of an imposed human condition that lasted for thousands of years in which one tribe enslaved those of another tribe as a matter of course. That behavior is still extant around the globe but modern economic development is slowly eroding it away. Most ethnic victims will have a far easier time to escape the trap because of the US achievement.

In the end it was all made possible by the modern economy and nothing else. The political war was the necessary effort needed to remove the last holdouts. Billions today have already escaped informal slavery systems such as peonage. The rest will escape in the next two generations. That is how important the civil rights movement was as a global symbol. No one can do less and join the modern world.

The CO2 issue will be solved also by a few economic tweaks and the best tweak is to simply subsidize biochar in the third world of subsistence farming. It will solve more problems than ever created, and Mr. Gore needs to get on the solutions bandwagon rather than the turn off the economy bandwagon which will merely prolong the so called disease.

March 06, 2009

Al Gore: Global Warming Struggle Akin to Civil Rights

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/03/al_gore_global_warming_struggl.html
Deborah Hallberg

We've seen it before: Al Gore portraying global warming as a moral issue. Now he's gone one step further. He's
compared the global warming crisis to the civil rights struggles of the 1950s and ‘60s.

The former vice president spoke at the recent Wall Street Journal's ECO:nomics summit, where he described his 10-year plan to get the country off carbon-based fuels as a "generational investment" and chastised the country for failing to take action.

But where he showed his desperation was where he compared global warming alarmists to civil rights activists, and global warming skeptics to southern segregationists.

"When Bull Connor turned those hoses on the demonstrators - peaceful, nonviolent demonstrators - a lot of kids asked their parents, hey, tell me again why that's not wrong? When their parents couldn't really give them good answers, that's when the tipping point came there. And I think we're close to a similar situation now, where enough people are saying, in all sincerity, tell me again why we shouldn't be solving this?"

He even made a reference to Bob Dylan's civil rights anthem, "Blowin' in the Wind," though he stumbles over the lyrics:

"How long will it take? Bob Dylan wrote the song, How many ... I can't remember the words, but you know, How many times will we have to go through this before people realize that civil rights are a birthright in this country, and shouldn't be denied on the basis on skin color?"

But Gore's effort to demonize the skeptics did completely escape scrutiny. Bjorn Lomborg, the Danish environmentalist and author of "Cool It: The skeptical Environmentalist's Guide ot Global Warming," was in the audience and challenged Gore to a debate on the issue.

"I want to be polite to you," Gore said, in turning him down. "The scientific community has gone through this chapter and verse. We have long since passed the time when we should pretend this is a ‘on the one hand, on the other hand' issue," he said. "It's not a matter of theory or conjecture, for goodness sake," he added.

Graphene Hydride

Do take a look at this image. I almost got excited until I realized that no one had actually made this yet. The only improvement over speculations that I made on exactly this type of carbon structure thirty years ago is that they have shown that it is theoretically stable and possibly workable.

Carbon wonderfully lends itself to this type of theoretical construction. It is your atom of choice if you have an active imagination. It is also proving to be magical when we can actually make something like a very small sheet of graphene.

Research is in full swing and I look forward to someone been able to actually fabricate a three dimensional graphene structure just to store hydrogen. Recall that a serious effort went into the development of metal hydrides thirty years ago for the same reason and that they were a lot easier to fabricate.

Obviously a container holding small pellets would sponge huge amounts of hydrogen into the structure eliminating gas pressure, or at least managing it. This promises to be a light weight method of storing a large amount of hydrogen and well worth the effort.

Designing novel carbon nanostructures for hydrogen storage

George Dimitrakakis, George Froudakis, and Emmanuel Tylianakis

Pillared graphene provides a stable architecture for enhanced fuel storage.

9 March 2009, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1200902.1451

Energy consumption has reached record levels, and global demand is expected to grow by more than half over the next quarter of a century. The greenhouse effect and global warming are only two of the issues we face. In addition, fossil fuel reserves are gradually being depleted. To address these problems, we need a new, clean energy source. Hydrogen is an ideal environmentally friendly energy carrier, since the only product from its combustion is water. The main drawback limiting its wide use is the lack of an efficient storage device.

The United States Department of Energy (DOE) has established targets
1 to be met by 2010 in order to use hydrogen as a fuel for mobile applications. Nanoporous carbon materials, like carbon nanotubes (CNTs),2 were initially considered ideal candidates for hydrogen storage.3–5 However, later work showed that pristine CNTs cannot store sufficient amounts of hydrogen under ambient conditions.6–8 On the other hand, doping CNTs with lithium atoms can considerably increase their capacity.9–11 Efficient storage also requires a material with high surface area and suitable pores.12,13 To fulfill these requirements, we designed pillared graphene.14
As shown in Figure 1, pillared graphene14 is the combination of two allotropes of carbon, CNTs and graphene sheets. The entire structure looks like a building in the early stages of construction, with CNTs forming the pillars and graphene sheets forming the floors. The combined 3D material has tunable pores, in which the length, width, and intertube distance of the CNTs can be changed at will. Tunable porosity is crucial for efficient hydrogen storage.

Binary Black Hole

I sort of liked the accompanying bit of art work. I cannot imagine it having any semblance of an image of the real thing but what the heck. That such binaries should exist is a given. Their closeness must provide the most amazing effects on galactic material surrounding them.

Not that any observation device is likely to survive close enough to see anything.

Elusive Binary Black Hole System Identified

http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Elusive_Binary_Black_Hole_System_Identified_999.html

http://www.spacedaily.com/images/art-binary-supermassive-black-hole-system-bg.jpg





by Staff Writers

Tucson AZ (SPX) Mar 09, 2009

Finding a needle in a haystack might be easy compared to finding two very similar black holes closely orbiting each other in a distant galaxy.

Astronomers from the National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO) in Tucson, Arizona, have found what looks like two massive black holes orbiting each other in the center of one galaxy. It has been postulated that twin black holes might exist, but it took an innovative, systematic search to find such a rare pair.

The newly identified black holes appear to be separated by only 1/10 of a parsec (1/3 of a light-year) - a tenth of the distance from Earth to the nearest star (other than the Sun).

This discovery of the most plausible binary black hole candidate ever found may lead to a greater understanding of how massive black holes form and evolve at the centers of galaxies. The NOAO astronomers' results are published in this week's edition of the journal Nature.

After a galaxy forms it is likely that a massive black hole can also form at its center. Since many galaxies are found in clusters of galaxies, individual galaxies can collide with each other as they orbit in the cluster.

The mystery is what happens to these central black holes when galaxies collide and ultimately merge together. Theory predicts that they will orbit each other and eventually merge into an even larger black hole.

The signature of a black hole in a galaxy has been known for many years. The material falling into a black hole emits light in narrow wavelength regions forming emission lines which can be seen when the light is dispersed into a spectrum.

These emission lines carry the information about the speed and direction of the black hole and the material falling into it. If two black holes are present, they would orbit each other before merging and would have a characteristic dual signature in their emission lines. This signature has now been found.

Former NOAO Director Todd Boroson and NOAO Astronomer Tod Lauer used data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, made with a 2.5-meter diameter telescope at Apache Point in southern New Mexico, to look for this characteristic dual black hole signature among 17,500 quasars discovered by the survey.

More than 100,000 quasars are known, with most being found in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and at distances of billions of light-years.

Quasars are the most luminous versions of the general class of objects known as active galaxies, which can be a hundred times brighter than our Milky Wave Galaxy, and powered by the accretion of material into supermassive black holes in their nuclei.

The matter falling into the black hole doesn't go directly in, but orbits around the black hole forming a flat accretion disc, much like the soap scum on water circling an open drain.
It has long been thought that all large galaxies must have a massive black hole in their center and that some galaxies must have two or more black holes, at least until the black holes merge.

The black holes would be so close together that it would be nearly impossible to see them or their accretion disks separately. However, the light emitted from the accretion disks, and the galaxy containing the black hole, ought to be identifiable.

Boroson and Lauer had to especially careful to eliminate the possibility that they were seeing two galaxies, each with its own black hole, superimposed on each other. To try to eliminate this superposition possibility, they determined that the quasars were at the same redshift-determined distance and that there was a signature of only one host galaxy.
If the two quasars were independent objects at different distances, the spectral signatures of both host galaxies should have been seen, and each would have a different redshift and thus a different distance, even though they would be in the same line of sight. Determining the spectral signature was critical, as it would be impossible to see the host galaxies directly against the glare of the quasar.

"The double set of broad emission lines is pretty conclusive evidence of two black holes," Boroson argues.

"If in fact this were a chance superposition, one of the objects must be quite peculiar. One nice thing about this binary black hole system is that we predict that we will see observable velocity changes within a few years at most. We can test our explanation that the binary black hole system is embedded in a galaxy that is itself the result of a merger of two smaller galaxies, each of which contained one of the two black holes."

The smaller black hole has a mass 20 million times that of the Sun; the larger one is 50 times bigger, as determined by the their orbital velocities.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Global Warming Trends

When I commenced this blog two years ago, global warming had been with us for at least a decade and perhaps realistically for twenty years. It was indisputably warmer but is had also stabilized near the top end of the natural range as demonstrated in the historical record.

Also it was a matter of creditable measurement that the CO2 content of the atmosphere was very slowly increasing over the past century or two and this was clearly linked to our combustion of the fossil fuel inventory. No one could reasonably dispute the direct correlation and no one has. Very clearly, Mother Nature is slow at sponging up the surplus and it may also be true that higher levels are welcome. Theory has suggested that absorption will increase more rapidly as the percentage increases, so it is not linear.

Theorists then connected the dots and proclaimed the hypothesis that CO2 increase was forcing the climate change. The press was sold on the veracity of the theory and it became part of popular scientific belief. This belief system has since struggled to hold its own in the face of an unfortunate and sharp reversal in apparent climate ending the very nice twenty year trend line.

We have had two classic cold winters in a row and there is little reason to expect a reversal. In fact the present trend is negative and could possibly stay on the cold side of the historic range. Quite simply, facts in the field have demolished the trend line that supported the received fact of ongoing global warming. It simply ceased to be a fact.

In the meantime the sunspot theorists have been largely on the right side of the global warming curve and recent comments suggest that cycle 23 may have bottomed late last fall and we are about to enter an upswing there with concomitant rise in the global temperature. Again, we must wait and see.

Were I have taken issue is that the best projected impact of any CO2 forcing is totally within the real temperature range of the Holocene climate norm and we cannot properly predict and account for all the variables that contribute to that. This means that accepting any conclusion regarding CO2 forcing is both premature and most probably wrong to boot, while we cannot prove otherwise. This is true for both the pro and con position, but the balance of probabilities weigh against the pro position, now so popularized.

Importantly, CO2 forcing is not linear and is increasingly resisted by Mother Nature. All that means though is that the proper public policy is to ignore the weather and concentrate on the step by step removal of fossil fuels from the energy regime.

And that returns me to my original objective. The removal of CO2 must be done in conjunction with an ongoing reform and redesign of the operation of global agriculture. We have come a long way in understanding how that might be done.

Denatured Plutonium

This is a pleasant piece of rather good news. This innovation allows us to effectively take bomb grade plutonium out of the market forever. At least we hope so.

Inspection and vigilance has been largely successful but still allows for a rogue state to pursue a bomb agenda. Not very well, it must be observed and the rogue arsenals are small but still dangerous and unacceptable. This will outright remove the temptation.

It will still take time to implement but we have the time, and I believe the will to bring this beast under control once and for all. The ideological wars have subsided and strangely enough, the Islamic dream is slowly fading and will be fatally impacted by the end of the oil age and the establishment of modern economies, however long it takes. In the meantime the rest of the world has learned how to confront and contain the treat.

In time, perhaps the atomic bomb can and will become a museum exhibit without ever seeing another one set of in anger.

Scientists learn to 'declaw' plutonium

http://www.nuclearpowerdaily.com/reports/Scientists_learn_to_declaw_plutonium_999.html

by Staff Writers
Beer-Sheva, Israel (UPI) Mar 9, 2009

Engineers at the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Israel say they have developed a way to "declaw" nuclear fuel, ensuring only peaceful plutonium use.

The engineers said their technique "denatures" plutonium created in large nuclear reactors, making it unsuitable for use in nuclear arms. They said that by adding Americium, a form of the basic synthetic element found in commercial smoke detectors and industrial gauges, plutonium can only be used for peaceful purposes.

Professor Yigal Ronen, who led the research, said if the United States, Russia, Germany, France and Japan agreed to add the denaturing additive into all plutonium, it would affect other nations now developing nuclear power.

"When you purchase a nuclear reactor from one of the five countries, it also provides the nuclear fuel for the reactor," said Ronen. "Thus, if the five agree to insert the additive into fuel for countries now developing nuclear power -- such as Bahrain, Egypt, Kuwait, Libya, Malaysia, Namibia, Qatar, Oman, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Yemen -- they will have to use it for peaceful purposes rather than warfare."

The research is to be reported in next month's issue of the journal Science and Global Security.

Slavery Epidemic

Reading a book on the cultural development of Brazil, I came away with a disquieting train of thought. The first aspect that became clear was that the native population was healthy and robust and remained so for most of the first century of contact in the contact coastal zone. It was reported on by many witnesses from all aspects. It is apparent that epidemic type depopulation would have been remarked upon. Yet these reports are missing.

That throws into question the whole idea of Indian depopulation by epidemic decimation. Particularly so as it mimics the experience shortly afterwards on the North American coast. There again we get reports of disease losses but nothing quite so catastrophic as endured by the remote tribes of the north west in the nineteenth century.

In Canada, the native cultures acquired a valuable trapping lifeway that secured their living in a way that was clearly superior to that abandoned and it is fair to say that the population actually thrived. In the USA this lifeway was quickly displaced and conflict reduced the viability of the original agrarian lifeway.

The point to all this was that the real epidemic was slave taking by the technically superior Europeans rather than disease in general.

While disease will usually kill off the very young and the very old with the exception of influenza allowing easy replenishment, slave trading preferentially takes the young adults with a full working life ahead of them. Rather obviously, if you constantly remove the breeding population to the coastal plantations, there will be no replenishment.

Population replenishment after a pass by an epidemic is surprisingly swift.
Recall that a mother is able to produce several offspring if there are plenty of resources available. The early reports from Brazil emphasize the richness of the indigenous food supply and the obvious excess of population that supported a culture of ritual cannibalism. This obviously acted to stabilize an expansive semi agrarian tribal system. It was not occasional and once slave taking began, almost certainly led to an acceleration of the population collapse.

This is also a disease that works well upcountry to supply manpower to the coast. Thus the Indians themselves did the bulk of the slave acquisition work.

Once a person was brought into slavery, their fecundity also collapsed because it cost the slave owner money to have children around and cared for when the value of a slave was cheap. It seems unlikely that slaves in Brazil maintained natural replacement. What replacement took place also likely took place at the hands of the slave owners producing hybrids even less susceptible to disease.

Thus the economic pressure of the cost of children and a low resale value would have passed the Indian population through a managed population collapse in which most of the survivors after several generations would be hybrids. In the end, slave trading replaced cannibalism.

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Fiat Scores 25% Engine Improvement

This is one of those unexpected tidbits that come along once in a while.
That a technology as mature as the internal combustion engine can achieve an incremental improvement of twenty five percent is unheard of, but here we are.

It noticeably applies to diesel engines also, since they will be with us long into the electric automotive age.

This is an innovation that will allow the present engines in use to meet the next wave of government mandated mile per gallon regulation for automobiles quite handily and buy a little time for the tooling up of the alternatives that no one fails to believe are in our automotive future.

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitm3QdDeNG2gWvrQhNNzn1Y1P2UBDArvs9AQH-UmqUsAvR9zLTDFyxeW1WnV8drZivuLVNX7eHBtSe3Ee5uWHyzaUmQz8zSgiOa0dM92uyZALlvsfta1shUBv4ZJgooRiXX1WUcmKpKPNN/s1600-h/multiair1.jpg





MultiAir turbocharged and downsized engines can achieve up to 25 per cent fuel economy improvement over conventional naturally aspirated engines with the same level of performance. Maximum power is increased by up to 10 per cent thanks to the adoption of a power-orientated mechanical camshaft profile. Low RPM torque is improved by up to 15 per cent through early intake valve closing strategies that maximise the air mass trapped in the cylinders. Elimination of pumping losses brings a 10 per cent reduction in fuel consumption and CO2 emissions, both in naturally aspirated and turbocharged engines with the same displacement. Optimum valve control strategies during engine warm-up and internal exhaust gas recirculation, realised by reopening the intake valves during the exhaust stroke, result in emissions reductions ranging from 40 per cent for unburnt hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide (HC/CO), and up to a 60 per cent cut in oxides of nitrogen, (NOx). Constant upstream air pressure, atmospheric for naturally aspirated and higher for turbocharged engines, together with extremely fast air mass control, cylinder-by-cylinder and stroke-by-stroke, result in a superior dynamic engine response, and enhanced driving pleasure. MultiAir is applicable to all internal combustion engines, regardless of the fuel used. It can be adapted for diesel engines to reduce their NOx emissions and make particulate filters significantly more effective.

In short, an engine equipped with Fiat MultiAir technology is more powerful, more responsive across the entire engine speed range, uses considerably less fuel, and reduces all types of exhaust emissions by a substantial amount. It will also assist in enabling Fiat to maintain its lead in low emissions and low fuel consumption technology, which has seen Fiat crowned for the past two years as the number one car maker for the lowest range-wide CO2 emissions.

The first new engine to be equipped with MultiAir will be the 16-valve 1.4 litre family of naturally aspirated and turbocharged engines, and the first car to go on sale with MultiAir installed will be the Alfa MiTo at the end of 2009. Its second application will be as an integral part of a new two cylinder engine family.

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiX2rghtjVjb6Vm93knU9Zoia9QDeQhXGeCT_ZCK3fl2n6IAqcksnV9hs8lfW_idog0Pxsgz1FVO2Mp7uxAeQ_TuSovia2LCpVVwCZ_iA_3q1Pj3aKRek8XXEotYPDVCefsPtxuMwc3EwIR/s1600-h/multiair2.jpg

The operating principle of the system, applied to intake valves, is the following: a piston, moved by a mechanical intake camshaft, is connected to the intake valve through a hydraulic chamber, which is controlled by a normally open on/off solenoid valve.

When the solenoid valve is closed, the oil in the hydraulic chamber behaves like a solid body and transmits to the intake valves the lift schedule imposed by the mechanical intake camshaft.

When the solenoid valve is open, the hydraulic chamber and the intake valves are de-coupled; the intake valves do not follow the intake camshaft anymore and close under the valve spring action.

The final part of the valve closing stroke is controlled by a dedicated hydraulic brake, to ensure a soft and regular landing phase in any engine operating conditions.

Through solenoid valve opening and closing time control, a wide range of optimum intake valve opening schedules can be easily obtained.

For maximum power, the solenoid valve is always closed and full valve opening is achieved following completely the mechanical camshaft, which is specifically designed to maximise power at high engine speed (long opening time).

A Close Shave

This is a few days old but it is a reminder of just how busy space is. That the odds for a seriously damaging impact are low means nothing if you are at ground zero.

We are fortunate that geological events are proving to have a history of repetition and preliminary activity. It has become possible to establish warning systems and rapid reaction response systems. That we have not done enough yet is a given, but the cost is dropping and the expertise is rising. At some point, I expect that a satellite will pick up all the preliminary noise and trigger warnings based on excellent modeling.

We are a long way from doing the same for incoming asteroids and comets. Certainly what we know of their history and energy, we ultimately will. Just not with our current level of knowledge and expertise.

What just blew by would have been a very big atomic bomb in terms of energy release. It is still quite smallish. Anyway, the bad ones can be expected to scour a region at least fifty miles across through shock.

Seriously bigger than that, and we start hammering the entire globe. The blast that hit us almost thirteen thousand years ago in the northern ice cap released energy that appears to have been fully felt throughout the rest of North America and must have been also felt more survivably everywhere else.

The only way we can protect ourselves from these events will be to disturb their orbits at aphelion, likely way out in the Kuiper belt. We are a long ways away from that.

Space rock gives Earth a close shave

by Staff Writers

Paris (AFP) March 3, 2009

An asteroid of a similar size to a rock that exploded above Siberia in 1908 with the force of a thousand atomic bombs whizzed close past Earth on Monday, astronomers said on Tuesday.

2009 DD45, estimated to be between 21 and 47 meters (68 and 152 feet) across, raced by at 1344 GMT on Monday, the Planetary Society (http://planetary.org/news/2009/0302_Space_Rock_Swoops_by_Earth.html) and astronomers' blogs reported.

The gap was just 72,000 kilometers (44,750 miles), or a fifth of the distance between Earth and the Moon and only twice the height of satellites in geosynchronous orbit, the website space.com said.

The estimated size is similar to that of an asteroid or comet that exploded above Tunguska, Siberia, on June 30 2008, flattening 80 million trees in a swathe of more than 2,000 square kilometres (800 square miles).2009 DD45 was spotted last Saturday by astronomers at the Siding Spring Survey in Australia, and was verified by the International Astronomical Union's Minor Planet Centre (MPC), which catalogues Solar System rocks

Outlaw the Shadow Banking System

I am hesitant to discuss this subject because I know that only a very few people have a sophisticated understanding of the background and history of the global banking system that is now so broken.

In fact, in the absence of a proper popular history we have instead a slew of alternate badly flawed explanations supported by enthusiastic adherents.

We get here though that the two major political forces that are cast in the center of this maelstrom are now working toward clawing back some semblance of control over this bloated monster.

Let us get it right. The offshore monster did not create the subprime disaster, but their hunger for product created a ready market for poorly engineered financial garbage. If they were not feeding, Wall Street would never have had a market for securitized crap and everyone would have continued to make an honest living doing what they do best.

The money was so free and easy, that they went out and financed the fence posts. Yes, they all knew better, and they knew that they were damaging their countries’ credit system like they were some South American dictator, and most took early retirement just as fast as they could get away and left the pending train wreck to the rookies. And yes, it is appropriate to charge them with treason.

The result is that each country has to restructure their banking system to bail themselves out. What are going to be saved are the domestic banking systems. The rest is hanging and very likely massive offshore failures are going to sweep away billions in private wealth. Perhaps as it should.

The two major financial powers are now getting ready to clean up the offshore banking game with all the power of the state at their control.

Imagine you are a personal banker in the Bahamas or say Switzerland with a largish portfolio of private investors who have placed money with you for decades for shady reasons.

Imagine you are invited for coffee with a fine gentleman who informs you that he is a CIA operative and that he has some instructions for you and he really does not care what laws you think are protecting you. After all your clients believe in the law of the jungle, so why should not you?

Suppose those instructions include a complete disgorgement of client data. What recourse do you have? Or your clients for that matter.

This game has been protected because the clients could influence the game in their home countries to prevent any form of pursuit. That may have just ended.

We are going to now get a global financial regulatory system that will generally work and the USA will not be standing aloof as has been their want for all the usual reasons. The complete failure of the system is a direct result of American political folly, and as mentioned before, the blame is shared. In fact it is offensive to see politicians stand up and point fingers across the aisle when a simple read of their record can easily make them the greater culprit. Few today look good.

"Outlaw the Shadow Banking System!"

Guess Who Said It?

By Matthias Chang

URL of this article:
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12584

Global Research, March 7, 2009
FutureFastForward.com

When I read the remarks of President Obama and Prime Minister Gordon Brown after their meeting at the Oval Office on March 3, 2009 and the speech of the latter to the Joint Session of Congress on March 4, 2009, I realized that a growing antagonism has emerged between certain factions of the ruling elites in the City of London and in Washington DC.

The first warning of the acute differences was sounded by President Obama himself and it was most surprising that the mass media paid hardly attention to it. In his weekly address on February 28, 2009, President Obama said:

“I realize that passing this budget won't be easy. Because it represents real and dramatic change, it also represents a threat to the status quo in Washington. I know that the insurance industry won't like the idea that they'll have to bid competitively to continue offering Medicare coverage, but that's how we'll help preserve and protect Medicare and lower health care costs for American families. I know that banks and big student lenders won't like the idea that we're ending their huge taxpayer subsidies, but that's how we'll save taxpayers nearly $50 billion and make college more affordable. I know that oil and gas companies won't like us ending nearly $30 billion in tax breaks, but that's how we'll help fund a renewable energy economy that will create new jobs and new industries. In other words, I know these steps won't sit well with the special interests and lobbyists who are invested in the old way of doing business, and I know they're gearing up for a fight as we speak. My message to them is this:

“So am I.”

Read the underlined words again.

It is clear something is definitely amiss within the ruling elites and President Obama has thrown the gauntlet to his adversaries. The skeptics may say that we should not read too much into this above quoted paragraph, as it could be mere spin to rally the troops in times of crisis. Time will tell.

I take the view that it is inevitable that the members of the ruling elites would go for each other's throats because those who were given the charge to ensure that the money-machine keeps running have screwed up big time. Someone must answer for the fiasco.

The Blame Game
It would be naïve to assume that the status quo would remain, when the Global Trillion Dollar Casino is for all intents and purposes broken down beyond repair.

Confirmation that the blame game has started in earnest can be found in the aforesaid remarks of President Obama and Prime Minister Gordon Brown on March 3, 2009 given after their meeting at the Oval Office and Brown's speech to Congress on March 4, 2009.

Let us come back to the issue of the money-lenders. For some strange reason, many people are put off by the term “money-lenders” but are ever so comfortable with bankers.

But are not bankers, money-lenders?

In fact I would say that money-lenders are more honourable than your high street bankers, as they can only rob you in the millions. The global bankers, they rape and plunder in the trillions!

Is it any wonder that Gordon Brown and President Obama, the political representatives of the Power Elites have decided that it is about time that these financial harlots are to be brought under control before they wreck the entire global power structure?

Let us have no illusions about Obama and Gordon Brown. They are going after these financial harlots not because they want to protect us from these criminals, but because for too long the political faction had to play second fiddle to the financial faction in the overall scheme of global one world government.

Until lately, money power triumphed over political power. However, when the entire financial system broke into pieces, it was time to settle scores!
Read for yourself:

Prime Minister Gordon Brown's remarks at the White House, March 3, 2009

“Well, there's got to be deep regulatory change. We've just been talking, Barack and I, about the need for proper supervision of shadow banking systems, of areas where there was bank practices that were unacceptable, where remuneration policies got out of hand and weren't based on long-term success, but on short-term deals. And these are the changes that we've already announced that we are going to make.”
“We've had a global banking failure, and it's happened in every part of the world. It's almost like a power cut that went right across the financial system. And we have got to rebuild that financial system. We've got to isolate the bad assets.”

“You don't want shadow banking systems. You don't want regulatory tax havens. So we've got to act as a world together to deal with that. And that's one of the things we'll be talking about in April in London.”

President Obama's response at the White House, March 3, 2009

“Now, having said that, the banking system has been dealt a heavy blow. It has to do with many of the things that Prime Minister Brown alluded to: lax regulation, massive over-leverage, huge systemic risks taken by unregulated institutions, as well as regulated institutions. And so there are a lot of losses that are working their way through the system. And it's not surprising that the market is hurting as a consequence. In fact, I think what we're seeing is that as people absorb the depths of the problem that existed in the banking system, as well as the international ramifications of it, that there's going to be a natural reaction.”

“We are cleaning up that mess. It's going to be sort of full of fits and starts in terms of getting the mess cleaned up, but it's going to get cleaned up.”

Prime Minister Gordon Brown's Speech to Congress, March 4, 2009

“And we need to understand what went wrong in this crisis, that the very financial instruments that were designed to diversify risk across the banking system instead spread contagion across the globe. And today's financial institutions are so interwoven that a bad bank anywhere is a threat to good banks everywhere.”

“And you are also restructuring your banks. So are we. But how much safer would everybody's savings be if the whole world finally came together to outlaw shadow banking systems and offshore tax havens?”

Blink and read again the underlined words. You have just read that Prime Minister Gordon Brown has made the call to “outlaw the shadow banking system and offshore tax havens!”

Wow!

Even if you are a skeptic and holds the view that the quotes are mere spin to delude the people, you cannot deny that Prime Minister Brown has let the genie out of the bottle!

Whether there are any follow through actions by President Obama and Prime Minister Brown, the global citizens must take action independently, if they want to save their children, and their children's children from decades of impoverishment and extreme hardship.

The most powerful leader of the Western world and his side-kick has openly and unreservedly acknowledged that we are having a global financial melt-down. And that the cause for this catastrophe is the shadow banking system!

There is now an open warfare between the political factions and the financial factions of the global power elites. This will be ugly. And as President Obama warned, “they are gearing for a fight ” He has also responded to the challenge: “So am I.”

Given the above scenario, we must first take out the financial elites, and thereafter the political faction, failing which we will all plunge into the black hole of financial Armageddon!Matthias Chang is a prominent barrister, author and analyst of the New World Order based in Malaysia.
His website:
www.FutureFastForward.com

Monday, March 9, 2009

Frost Protection Innovation

This bit of radio energy application work comes under the file of ‘why not before?’ We always knew radio waves heated whatever it reacted with and it is a simple leap to do what Raytheon has just done. A bit of attention to positioning and a likely modest amount of energy and you can counter the threat of frost. Some additional attention to antenna design is likely an ongoing challenge.

Integrate this with field sensors and a little bit of built-in flexibility and it could be bullet proof.

This also suggests that it will be possible to expand the range on certain very vulnerable crops into additional growing regimes. After all, the frost problem has always been a brief event either early or late in the growing season.

Anyway, the success of this research is very good news. It will not save a crop from a once a century sleet storm but it will allow the last couple of week of harvest to be brought under control.

Raytheon Technology Protects Crops From Frost

by Staff WritersTewksbury MA (SPX) Mar 06, 2009

Raytheon Company is taking the fight to the frost with a new system using radio frequency technology. Raytheon's Tempwave radiant heating system offers a more efficient way to warm crops and avoid the adverse effects of frost on the growing season.

The Tempwave system delivers energy directly to a crop without heating the intervening air. It works to prevent freeze damage in both radiation and advection frost events.

The system is silent in operation, uses no water, emits no smoke, and unlike a wind machine, it does not rely on environmental conditions for its effectiveness.

"Our expertise in radio frequency has enabled a disruptive product that frees growers from the limits and variations inherent in existing frost protection methods," said Lee Silvestre, vice president Mission Innovation for Raytheon's Integrated Defense Systems.

"Tempwave autonomously and precisely delivers energy directly where it's needed to prevent freezing."

In successful concept testing on citrus crops in California, Tempwave radiators on towers were arrayed in an orchard, powered by grid electricity, and provided the needed coverage and intensity to protect orange groves from frost damage.

Lula on DOHA

Lula has become an influential voice on the world stage and he needs to be listened to.

Most Americans, unless they are directly affected, leave the niceties of international agreements and international behavior to whoever has the job and ignore it totally with the belief that it does not affect them in any way.

Yet as USA direct economic interest as a percentage of the global economy wanes and that is not a bad thing because the global economy is not a zero sum game, it has a residual influence far in excess of its direct hitting power.

Yet it also has a political culture that horse trades on every little issue that permits nationally and internationally damaging policy to be imposed as capriciously as any despotic royal lunatic.

The sheer size of the USA economy has massively shielded the USA from unintentional blowback. We have now entered a period were there is serious risk of blowback mistakes been made. Is our present government up to not letting it happen?

More importantly, is Hillary up to the challenge? I think so and certainly hope so. There is no area of the present regime more in need of an overhaul than the area of trade liberalization and rationalization. There are hundreds of stakeholders all grasping for petty advantage, yet not effectively trading them off.

My personal pet peeve is the outrageous agricultural market distortion that has been imposed by all developed countries of their own economies. That everyone is massively subsidizing this situation in a perverted race to the bottom is gross folly that is in fact inducing poverty world wide.

It is easily solved by a ten year withdrawal program as was established on the implementation of NAFTA. All that has to happen is for NAFTA and the EU to sit down and decide unilaterally to set a start day and establish a dispute mechanism to strong arm anyone trying to game the system inside and out.

Today, twenty years on, NAFTA has almost completely faded as a source of conflict, because it works and everyone’s pie is hugely bigger.



SAO PAULO (Reuters) - Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva urged leading economies to complete stalled global trade talks, warning on Monday that protectionism could tip the economic crisis into chaos.

"If the United States, Europe, Brazil close themselves, the crisis could become much bigger and produce chaos instead of a solution," Lula told industry leaders in Sao Paulo during a visit by Jan Peter Balkenende, the prime minister of the Netherlands.

Brazil said last month it may challenge the legality of a "Buy American" clause in the U.S. economic stimulus package at the World Trade Organization, or WTO.

Lula also intends to speak against global protectionism and for the completion of the WTO's Doha round at the Group of 20 meeting of leading economies in London next month.

"The Doha round was almost finished but we had elections in the United States and then India and politics dominated. Now, nothing stands in the way," said Lula. "The Doha round is more of a political than a financial decision."

The seven-year-old talks intended to further global free trade collapsed in July over differences between India and the United States on safeguards to protect farmers from a flood of food imports.

As a major commodities exporter, Brazil has been a key player in the Doha round and had hoped the G20 would honor a November pledge in Washington to avoid protectionism.

The United States Trade Representative warned on Monday there would be no agreement on the Doha round until other countries made stronger commitments to open their markets to U.S. goods.

Lula frequently urges other countries to pour cash into anti-cyclical measures to help keep their economies afloat amid the global crisis but has himself refrained from massive public spending plans at home that would increase government debt.

"The solution to this crisis is more (free) market, more free trade and more competition -- like the developed world always said over the past 30 years," Lula said.

(Reporting by Carmen Munari; Writing by Raymond Colitt; Editing by John O'Callaghan)

Economic Floor and Rick Cook

We are in what should be and actually needs to be the floor of this economic down swing. Most commentators have now bought into the trend line and are all making the classic mistake of projecting its continuance. It is correct to say that it is very ugly and that everyone has had to reevaluate their financial position.

I am calling it a floor for a very simple reason. Asset pricing is now such that it is impossible for the lender to take possession and realize significant recovery. Instead he realizes both a loss and a hit on capital. The hit on capital impacts his lending ability by at least ten times the loss. At best he is unable to replace the asset.

If the only possible solution is a work out that somehow limits the immediate effects of the capital loss, then willy-nilly that is the way it will go. That means that entire inventory is not really in the market. So it is possible to slowly rebuild our way up out of this from the current floor using the programs now going into place.

This article catches the flavor of the times and certainly encourages a massive lowering of expectations. That is now happening a little more directly in the US auto industry. Today it is reported that the auditors saw that they must stick in the chapter 11 warning into the GM financials.

Again no one is getting it. Yes, the banking system needs a massive influx of cash to make up the reduction in their lending multiple and to replace money never to be recovered. That prevents fire sale liquidation of their assets and the total destruction of the economy.

What is also needed is a replacement of credit card debt with cheap term debt, perhaps with a government guarantee and the IRS as enforcer. That begins to free up the individual. After that we need to implement a government sponsored mortgage restructuring program so that the homeowner can ultimately pay off the property and that there is some chance of the government recapturing its investment.

It can be done that simply and that smoothly. Do you hear anyone else saying this?

[“The Last Picture Show” was a 1971 film depicting the decay of small town America . It took place in the fictitious town of Anarene , Texas .]

We hear a distant tune reminiscent of America ’s high and lonely places and the sound of a dry wind blowing. It’s March 2010 in the tiny West Texas town of Anarene . Nothing much happens here any more. The last business shut down a couple of years ago. It was a cement plant that went broke after the housing bubble burst and the banks stopped lending. The kids out of high school drive their jalopies from one end of Main Street to the other past boarded-up storefronts.

Some of the grown-ups carpool to low-wage jobs in a city 50 miles down the road. The elderly have had their Social Security eaten up by the high price of food but still get by on Spam and Kool-Aid. There used to be a movie theater, but it too closed a few months ago. Not a single person went to the “Last Picture Show.”

But there is change in the air! President Barack Obama, who was elected president a couple of years ago, is in the middle of his fiscal year 2010 budget. The 2009 budget had a deficit of $1.75 trillion, a number no fool could even have imagined before the crash of 2008. The projection for 2010 is $1.17 trillion, due to the government’s hopes for an economic recovery. But the jury is out on whether a recovery will ever happen.

Some say the banks are starting to lend again, though no one at the Anarene State Bank knows anything about it. Some say the city down the road is getting a plant to make blades for those new wind turbines. The Anarene high school got funding for an adult training course on writing resumes. The Nightly News says, “ America is coming back.”
I wish!

So what is really going on here?

Well, President Obama’s 2010 budget has attracted a lot of attention. $1.75 trillion? That’s not federal spending. That’s new federal debt!

A good measure of fiscal policy is federal government tax revenues. Revenues for 2010 are projected at $2.19 trillion, off 13 percent from a year ago, due to the recession. With the huge bank bailouts and Obama’s $787 billion economic recovery program, 2010 expenditures are estimated at $3.94 trillion, an increase of 33 percent over 2008.
Then there’s the interest taxpayers must pay on the national debt, which will likely reach $600 billion in 2010. Of course almost 100 percent of all new federal debt is financed by foreigners, mainly China .

But don’t worry, the recovery program will succeed, and the economy will start growing again. THE GOVERNMENT PROMISES! Obama’s budget forecasts such a strong upsurge in economic activity by the end of 2009 that the net for the year will be GDP growth of 1 percent. (Yes, that’s what it says.)

Is it a contradiction that the government is conducting “stress tests” on the nation’s banks in which it is predicting that the recession will last at least until 2011 to see if those banks are strong enough to weather the storm? Yes, it is a contradiction. Even the Federal Reserve does not see recovery coming as quickly as Obama’s budget. Neither do any economists. The budget is not an honest document.

It gets worse. The budget says growth will then continue as far as the eye can see—the projections go out to 2019, when we’ll have a GDP of $22.86 trillion, 61 percent higher than 2008. Happy days will be here again!

So go back to sleep, America . It’s official. The recession we are in right now will end soon and is the last one ever.

This means that the financial industry will soon be fixed, plenty of good jobs will be available, climate change and drought will be overcome, the government budget will be right-sized, and America and the world will be content and at peace. All because of the decisions being made by the Obama administration and approved by Congress during these few critical weeks we’re in the middle of right now.

But there are a whole swarm of flies in the ointment. I’ll mention just two.
One is that according to University of Massachusetts economist Thomas Ferguson, who spoke at last weekend’s Eastern Economic Conference national conference in New York , the Bush/Obama bank bailouts alone will cause a permanent addition of interest payments on the national debt of $100 billion a year forever. That means every American will pay, during the course of his or her lifetime, over $20,000 to rescue the banks from their bad loans. To put that number in perspective, it equates to 2-1/2 years of tuition at a state university that instead will be paid to the government of China or a similar foreign investor.

Yes, America , that is what your elected government just decided you will do.

Another is that the U.S. has had virtually no real economic growth since the early 1970s, because since then we’ve lived in a bubble economy. Look it up. Most of our industrial output has been flat or has declined. Whole industries, such as steel, are shadows of their former greatness. The automobile industry is on life support. We’ve imported huge amounts of foreign capital by selling them our real estate and businesses. As stated on the Economy in Crisis website:

“The United States now no longer controls many of its domestic industries. Over the last 10 years alone foreigners have spent $1.2 trillion to acquire more than 8,000 key US companies. Already as of 2002, foreigners owned fully 20 percent of American manufacturing. In many high-tech and defense-related industries, the proportion is far higher. Such US industries as mining, cement, publishing, engine and power transmission equipment, rubber and plastics, and sound recording and motion pictures are now largely foreign owned. Even in industries like pharmaceuticals, chemicals, industrial machinery, transportation equipment, electronics, metal industries, and coal and petroleum industries, foreign ownership has recently become very high.”
Until the last year, the biggest growth industry within the U.S. had been the financial sector, producing profits of over $500 billion as late as 2006. In other words, the U.S. has replaced working for a living with the manipulation of money and the extraction of interest, either by lending it or by brokering the lending and investment by foreigners. In order to enrich themselves, the financiers, with a lot of help from the government, created the merger/buyout bubble of the 1980s, the dot.com bubble of the 1990s, and the housing/equity/hedge fund/derivative bubble of the 2000s.
All this time, the federal, state, and local governments have tried to keep up by taxing every financial transaction they can get their hands on, including by raising property taxes on the inflated value of family homes. But now, with the last of the bubbles deflating, the tax base is vanishing. So governments, along with the private sector economy, which has been living on capital gains in the absence of job income for all but the very rich, have gone into the tank as well.

President Barack Obama’s economic recovery program, along with the budget just released, is an attempt to substitute a federal government bubble for the failed private sector ones. Like the private sector bubbles, this one is also based on debt. This is because debt is the only way anyone in the U.S. can any longer think of when it comes to creating a national money supply. It includes the president’s proposed $5 billion federal infrastructure bank for lending to state and local governments. This bank will probably offer better interest rates than the bond markets, but it’s still debt.

There was a time in U.S. history when other ways were known to create money; for instance, during the Civil War, when Congress authorized the Lincoln administration to spend Greenbacks directly into existence. The banks hated the Greenbacks, of course, so they got Congress to pass the National Banking Acts of 1863-64, which were the prelude to the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. Today, Greenback-type funding for the federal government is one of the chief provisions of the American Monetary Act drafted by the American Monetary Institute (
www.monetary.org).

Another way to introduce debt-free money into the economy is through a dividend, such as the Alaska Permanent Fund, which in 2008 paid every resident $3,269 tax-free out of the state’s resource revenues. There is no good reason why such a dividend could not be paid by every state or by the federal government.

Greenbacks and programs like the Alaska Permanent Fund are part of what I call Dividend Economics. It’s why I’ve proposed the “Cook Plan,” which would be a system of vouchers for the necessities of life in the amount of $1,000 a month for any adult citizen who applied. A smaller amount would be provided as an allowance for children. The vouchers would be taxed like any other income and would supplement other entitlements such as unemployment compensation, Social Security, etc. But taxes would be low for those who would use the vouchers as a main source of income. Under the plan, the vouchers would then be accepted as deposits at a new network of community savings banks that would lend at one percent interest to consumers, students, small businesses, local manufacturing establishments, and family farms.
This would introduce over $2.5 trillion of debt-free money into the economy over the next year, because under the “Cook Plan,” the dividend would be paid directly by the U.S. Treasury without borrowing or taxation. It would not be inflationary, because it would replace money from public bank lending and would result in new goods and services being created within the U.S. producing economy. In fact, we would see a renaissance of local and regional economic activity that would eventually transform the national economy as well.

You may ask, should we just be “giving away money?” My answer is that if the banks can create trillions of dollars in credit out of thin air for lending, why can’t the government create it for the people? The same goes with the trillions the government is borrowing to pay to the banks to reinflate the bubble economy. Give it to the people instead. Look at Obama’s economic recovery program that equates to $225,000 for each new job it hopes to create and probably won’t. Give that to the people too. Let them use the money as a dividend to live on during this emergency and create new jobs as well. Right now there is nothing further from the minds of President Obama and his advisers than such ideas. That’s why his new bubble budget is America ’s “Last Picture Show.”

Richard C. Cook is a former U.S. federal government analyst. His book on monetary reform, We Hold These Truths: The Hope of Monetary Reform, is now available at
http://www.amazon.com. He is also the author of Challenger Revealed: An Insider’s Account of How the Reagan Administration Caused the Greatest Tragedy of the Space Age. He can be contacted through his website at http://www.richardccook.com.

Richard C. Cook is a frequent contributor to Global Research. Global Research Articles by Richard C. Cook

Friday, March 6, 2009

Exploiting Polar Bears

Declaring the polar bear as endangered never made any sense whatsoever. Now we discover that it provides a convenient straw man to promote the anti development agendas everywhere else of the radical left.

I do not understand why we even bother to provide these marginalized ideologues such a blanket label as if there ever were a underlying rational for their intellectual position. Like the radical right they represent that portion of the body politic whose real ideology is driven by a hatred of the status quo and their own marginalization in it. They really are the tail end of the third standard deviation. This is not a good thing. Once upon a time it found and promoted Hitler.

The situation with the polar bears is just plain silly. Not as bad as having congress declaring that the earths is flat, but close enough.

The polar bear faces two possible threats. The most serious is been hunted to extinction by man. It was not feasible in the nineteenth century and now we simply do not care anymore. That leaves us with a loss of their food supply. Again, we are not competing for their seal diet, nor are anything else and it looks very secure.

Even if the temperature of the Arctic rose dramatically, the Arctic winter does not go away. There will be a huge area of viable habitat always. The bear is able to function successfully deep into Hudson Bay, which tells us that the only thing that matters is at least six months of pack ice.

By the by, if the 110,000 year cycle through the Sirius hot zone holds up, then they have survived worse at least ten times.

March 2, 2009

Global Warming: Using the Polar Bear to Impose Costly Measures

by
Ben Lieberman

http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/wm2319.cfm

WebMemo #2319

In 2008, the Bush Administration, responding to litigation from an environmental group, listed the polar bear under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Bush Secretary of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne also made some changes to the implementation of the ESA in order to limit the adverse consequences. But now, the omnibus appropriations bill, first passed by the House and now being debated in the Senate, seeks to reverse these common sense limitations.

If successful, this revised polar bear policy would greatly threaten economic growth and serve as a powerful anti-stimulus measure, not just in the polar bears' Alaskan habitat but throughout the United States. These rule changes are a costly and unnecessary form of backdoor global warming policy and have no business in a massive spending bill that is headed for quick passage with limited debate. With such drastic implications for the nation, the Senate should, at a minimum, fully debate the pros and cons of such a policy.

History of the ESA: More Economic Harm Than Environmental Good

Enacted in 1973, the ESA authorizes the Department of the Interior (DOI) to create a list of species considered endangered or threatened. Once a new species is listed, the statute requires DOI, working with other federal agencies, to formulate a recovery plan that includes any and all actions deemed necessary to protect the species and its habitat. Broad citizen suit provisions allow environmental activist groups to force DOI to enjoin any activity alleged to be in violation of the provisions of the ESA, to list additional species, or to expand provisions for already-listed species.

Notwithstanding its laudable goal of protecting species, the ESA has proven to be a flawed approach that has only gotten worse after three decades of judicial interpretation. Some 1,300 species are listed, but very few have actually recovered to the point of being de-listed, and only 5 percent are more than 50 percent recovered.
[1]

While doing little to protect species, the ESA's provisions have been highly successful in curtailing economic activity in the vicinity of the designated habitat for the 1,300 species.

The ESA, Global Warming, and Polar Bears

Such ulterior motives are clearly a part of the push to list the polar bear. Its global numbers have actually doubled, from an estimated 8,000–10,000 in 1965–1970 to 20,000–25,000 today.
[2] Unfortunately, the requirements for listing have never been rigorous. In the case of polar bears, listing was based on speculation that, according to computer models, continued global warming will reduce the future amount of Arctic summer ice upon which the bears rely.[3] In this way, the ESA is being used to implement global warming policy.

Among its many requirements, the ESA states that "each federal agency shall, in consultation with and with the assistance of the Secretary, insure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out by such agency is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species or threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of habitat."
[4] These so-called Section 7 consultations routinely add delays to economic activities near endangered species and sometimes block them entirely.

Most directly, the polar bear listing could curtail energy production in Alaska. This would be unfortunate, as Alaskan oil and natural gas potential is tremendous. A 2008 U.S. Geological Survey study estimated there are 40 billion barrels of undiscovered oil above the Arctic circle—which would nearly double America's proven reserves—as well as tremendous volumes of natural gas.
[5]

The impacts of the polar bear listing stretch well beyond Alaska, though locking up Alaskan energy would be bad enough. Carbon dioxide, the ubiquitous byproduct of fossil fuel combustion, is the agent DOI blames for the warming that supposedly shrinks the ice and thus harms the bears. Consequently, any activity producing or using energy—building a new bridge in Alabama, opening a factory or power plant in Arizona, expanding a dairy operation in New York, constructing a school in Idaho—could invoke the Section 7 consultation process. Bottom line: Environmental activists could use the ESA to hold up any of thousands of projects across the U.S. This would include many if not all of the "shovel ready" projects that are funded in the stimulus package.

Anticipating these adverse economic impacts, Secretary Kempthorne took several steps to address them. This included a rule to limit the Section 7 consultations to those where the cause and effect between the activity in question and the harm to species is not tenuous (thus excluding carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions from any individual source) and a rule specifically exempting new global warming considerations with regard to the polar bear listing.

Congressional Attempts to Undo These Regulations

Now, Section 429 of the House-passed Omnibus Appropriations Act would allow DOI to reverse these rules for the polar bear listing and, worse, to do so without the customary notice and comment rulemaking. In other words, the provisions here would allow DOI to make the change and do so with even less transparency and accountability than usual.

If this is done, then every activity that involves energy—from expanding a power plant to starting a farm—could get caught up in ESA red tape. The long-term economic impacts would be severe, and ironically the shorter-term effects would undercut the thrust of the stimulus package to spur an economic recovery.

Consider all new construction projects as well as efforts to create or expand all but the very smallest of businesses—the very kinds of things that are both a part of the stimulus package and that in any event are necessary for economic growth. Assuming the proposed changes are enacted, then all of the federal agencies involved in one way or another in such projects—for example, the Environmental Protection Agency for the many things that require EPA permits—will have to engage in Section 7 consultations with the Department of the Interior over the global warming implications. At the very least, such projects will be held up by bureaucratic delays, thereby creating opportunities for environmental groups and others to initiate litigation against them. Aside from delays, which could stretch into years in some cases, some projects could end up being scaled back in an effort to mitigate the supposed adverse impact, and others could be stopped entirely.

Beyond being bad policy in itself, the very fact that this complicated and far-reaching change is being done in an omnibus bill with precious little opportunity for debate strongly urges that these provisions should not be rushed into law.

Backdoor Extremism

The American people do not need a costly backdoor global warming policy implemented through the misuse of preexisting ESA authority never intended for that purpose. But at no time is such a policy more harmful than in the midst of a severe recession. The adverse economic impacts of ill-advised global warming measures are clear and are a big part of the reason why Congress has yet to directly enact any such measures. Doing it indirectly via the ESA and quietly tucking it into the massive omnibus appropriations bill now moving through the Senate would be just as damaging. The Senate should allow and encourage a full debate on this pernicious policy rather than cramming this legislation through with little to no discussion of the economic perils it would bring to the nation's future.
Ben Lieberman is Senior Policy Analyst in Energy and the Environment in the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation.

Quantum Dots In Solar Cells

This is another interesting advance in the solar cell story. We are able to sculpt the active layer and use that geometry to control the behavior of the nanodots that are a promising alteration to solar cell design.

It promises an improvement in the theoretical efficiency of silicon based solar cells.

Again, this is an indication of how we are advancing in terms of fabricating devices to the tolerances needed for nano technology. It is not quite like laying down the structure one atomic layer at a time, but we are beginning to see the next best thing.

There are many research groups focused on the area now and they are all attempting different protocols and all seem to be seeing some semblance of success. Yet this is surely only the beginning. I have already described the type of atomic layering preferred for a magnetic exclusion device. We are close enough to see the mountain tops.

Feb 27, 2009

Quantum dots boost solar cell efficiencies

Scientists in the UK and US have shown how to increase photovoltaic efficiencies by attaching nanocrystal quantum dots to patterned semiconductor layers. The approach exploits the phenomenon of non-radiative energy transfer and could, say the researchers, lead to a new generation of more efficient solar cells.

Semiconductor solar cells work by using the energy of incoming photons to raise electrons from the semiconductor’s valence band to its conduction band. A potential barrier formed at the junction between p-type and n-type regions of the semiconductor forces the pairs to split up, thereby producing a current.

A solar cell’s performance is measured by its efficiency; in other words how much electrical power it generates for a given incident solar power. Cells consisting of a single p–n junction that are made from bulk semiconductor have a maximum theoretical efficiency of 31% — and the best performing affordable commercial devices are about 18% efficient.

Carrier multiplication

One way in which scientists are trying to overcome this limit is to make cells from billions of tiny pieces of semiconductor known as quantum dots, rather than one large piece of semiconductor, because these can harness light more effectively and can also create multiple carriers from each incoming photon — a process known as “carrier multiplication”.

Unfortunately, carriers in quantum dots are not as mobile as in bulk semiconductors and are usually trapped in crystal impurities. In addition, immobile carriers are attracted by neighbouring carriers of opposite charge and by coupling together they annihilate and emit a photon in exactly the reverse process that created the carriers in the first place.

Pavlos Lagoudakis of Southampton University and colleagues say that they can overcome these problems by combining the light-absorption ability of quantum dots with the current-generating capacity of a bulk semiconductor.

To demonstrate this they etched an array of rectangular channels some 500 nm wide into a layered semiconductor
structure. The structure comprised a multiple-quantum-well (MQW) layer sandwiched between a p-type layer and an n-type layer. The MQW itself comprised 20 layers of gallium arsenide, each about 7.5 nm thick.

They then deposited a solution of cadmium-selenium quantum dots, each just a few nanometres across, onto the structure.

Inspired by photosynthesis

The idea, says Lagoudakis, is to take advantage of the “non-radiative energy transfer” used in photosynthesis. The photo-generated carriers within the quantum dots, which are confined within the etched channels, are close enough to the quantum wells that they can exchange energy via a dipole–dipole interaction. “Appropriate engineering of the hybrid device allows for the coupling of the electronic properties of the different components in a way that we get the best properties from each system,” he adds.

To prove that their device was enhancing current output via non-radiative transfer, the researchers also deposited quantum dots onto a substrate without channels. They reasoned that this unpatterned device would not support non-radiative transfer because the photo-generated carriers would be too far apart to interact via dipole–dipole interaction, and that it would therefore produce a much smaller current for a given light input than the patterned device. This is what they found: the patterned device, they report, was six times more efficient than the unpatterned one.

Lagoudakis and colleagues are now designing devices that can combine this feature of non-radiative energy transfer with carrier multiplication by appropriate engineering of the p–n junction and choice of materials for the quantum dots. Such devices, he believes, will exceed the 31% efficiency limit. He admits that these devices would cost more than existing silicon solar cells because the “molecular beam epitaxy” technique used to make the layered structure is expensive. However, he maintains that because the biggest cost in manufacturing solar cells is in fact associated with housing the device, an improvement in efficiency, which would reduce the “active area” of the device, could lead to cheaper solar cells overall.

Thinner and cheaper?

Solar cell developer Martin Green of the University of New South Wales in Australia believes that the research by Lagoudakis’ team is interesting because cells made from quantum dots may prove to be thinner and cheaper than traditional cells. But he cautions that the group may not have chosen the ideal reference device to demonstrate increased photocurrent. He says it would have been better to have used as a reference an identical device but with no quantum dots attached as this should also be more efficient than the unpatterned device.

About the author
Edwin Cartlidge is a science writer based in Rome